OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Olympia Hearing Examiner Approves Bank Shoreline Permits - April 14, 2026

City Council & CommissionsTuesday, April 14, 2026
BodyOlympia, Washington
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateTuesday, April 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 37:38

Transcript — Verbatim
0:17

All right.

0:18

Well, thanks everyone for being here.

0:20

We are waiting for the hearing examiner, Mark Scheidemeyer.

0:24

And once he gets here, he will kick it off and lead the show.

0:30

And we only have one person in the audience.

0:33

So we'll see if others show up, but maybe not.

1:48

Good evening.

1:53

Are we set to go?

1:56

Yep.

1:56

All good to go.

1:58

Okay.

2:01

So I see a number of people on the screen.

2:04

Are they all associated with the applicants or perhaps a city?

2:09

Are there any uh members of the public that you recognize?

2:15

No, not as a panelist.

2:17

There is one member of the public who's in the attendee field.

2:22

Okay.

2:22

All right.

2:23

Thank you.

2:24

And by the way, alert me if I break up.

2:28

We've been having a little trouble with our uh reception recently on our Wi-Fi.

2:35

And if it becomes problematic, I may have to switch to a phone.

2:39

I certainly hope that's not the situation.

2:42

But if you're having trouble uh receiving me, uh let me know.

2:46

And are we being recorded?

2:51

Yes, we are.

2:53

All right.

2:53

I think as the clerk, this is Nicole Floyd, and I'm also in the room, the city room, and there's no one here.

3:01

Okay.

3:02

So uh good evening, Mark Scheifmeyer, the city hearing uh examiner.

3:08

Um I've been asked to convene uh hearing at the request of representatives of Washington Federal Bank seeking a shoreline substantial development permit and a shoreline conditional use permit in order to demolish an existing office building and replace it with a new bank facility, including uh drive-through and parking located at 406 Water Street Southwest at the intersection of Water Street and Fourth Avenue in downtown Olympia.

3:40

Uh, in advance of tonight's hearing, I've received the staff report and all associated materials prepared by Ms.

3:45

Mock, who is present tonight.

3:47

I have reviewed all of those materials in their entirety in advance of tonight's hearing.

3:53

The uh applicant appears to be represented by uh a few individuals.

3:57

Uh Carlana Eguan, is that close, Ms.

4:01

Agwan?

4:02

Again, it's close enough.

4:05

Okay.

4:06

Michael Winnick and Mr.

4:08

Winnick.

4:09

Good evening.

4:10

There may be other representatives of the applicant as well.

4:14

And again, the city appears uh through Casey Mock, assistant uh planner, with Nicole Floyd also being present uh to assist with any in-person uh proceedings.

4:26

So, like all matters of this nature, it has uh three components to tonight's hearing.

4:32

Uh the first is an opportunity for the city uh to more fully explain uh the applic uh the review of this application and its recommendations, followed then by an opportunity for the applicant to respond to the city's uh suggestions, uh followed then by an opportunity for members of the public to be heard.

4:54

All those who do testify tonight will do so under oath, including city staff.

5:00

There does not appear to be many members of the public present.

5:04

So I'm not imposing any time limits on public uh presentations tonight.

5:10

Let's get us underway with the testimony of city staff.

5:14

So, Ms.

5:14

Boc, let's have you sworn.

5:15

Do you swear or for them to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

5:20

I do.

5:21

Go ahead.

5:23

All right.

5:24

Good evening, everyone.

5:26

I will be giving a brief presentation on the project before we turn it over to the applicant and get into public testimony and questions.

5:37

Okay.

5:39

Let me make sure.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural██████████████████████████████30%
Historic Preservation██████████████████████22%
Land Use Planning███████████████████19%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████14%
Parking Management██████████10%
Public Safety█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Olympia Hearing Examiner Approves Bank Shoreline Permits - April 14, 2026

On the evening of April 14, 2026, City Hearing Examiner Mark Scheidemeyer convened a public hearing to consider a shoreline substantial development permit and a shoreline conditional use permit for Washington Federal Bank. The project proposes demolishing an existing 5,500 sq ft vacant office building at 406 Water Street SW (corner of Water and Fourth Avenue) and constructing a 2,400 sq ft bank with a drive‑through lane and parking. The site lies within shoreline jurisdiction due to its proximity to West Bay/Percival Landing, though separated by a street. The hearing included testimony from city staff, the applicant, and one member of the public.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Luke Viscusey (public attendee) – Asked about the proposed building height and whether it complies with shoreline height restrictions. City staff confirmed the one‑story building is 23 ft tall, well below the 35‑ft or 90‑ft limits applicable in the area. No other public comments or opposition were presented.

Discussion Items

  • City Staff Presentation (Casey Mock, Planner) – Reviewed the project’s compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Shoreline Master Program, historic preservation requirements, engineering standards, and other city codes. Key points:
    • The non‑water‑oriented bank use is appropriate because the site is functionally separated from the shoreline by a street and will not harm the shoreline environment.
    • A cultural resources assessment identified the site as a potential archaeological area; the applicant must obtain a permit from the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) prior to engineering permits, and coordinate with tribes for monitoring/trenching.
    • Traffic analysis showed only a net increase of one daily trip compared to the prior office use (39 vs. 40 trips), so no additional traffic mitigation was required.
    • Additional lighting was recommended by a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) review in response to a neighboring property owner’s concerns about alley safety; the lighting is shielded from the shoreline by the building.
    • Parking is not required for a branch under 3,000 sq ft; the applicant chose to provide a few spaces, with on‑street parking available nearby.
  • Applicant Representatives (Michael Winnick and Joe Beretta) – Expressed appreciation for the city’s assistance and confirmed they will work with DAHP on the cultural permit. Emphasized eagerness to build a “beautiful building” on the corner.
  • Hearing Examiner Questions – Explored traffic impacts, lighting, archaeological findings, and parking balance. Staff responses confirmed no significant impacts and that conditions address potential issues.

Key Outcomes

  • Decision – Hearing Examiner Mark Scheidemeyer approved both the shoreline substantial development permit and the shoreline conditional use permit, finding the project consistent with all applicable regulations and complementary to the downtown and shoreline environment.
  • Conditions of Approval – Recommended by staff and adopted: comply with DAHP permit (including tribal consultation), implement lighting per CPTED recommendations, replace damaged sidewalks/ramps, provide bike parking, install a tree in each parking lot island, meet tree density or pay in‑lieu fee, submit bonds for vegetation and maintenance, pay impact fees, and follow allowed construction hours.
  • Next Steps – The shoreline conditional use permit requires final approval from the Washington State Department of Ecology. The applicant must also obtain engineering permits before construction.

Meeting Transcript

All right. Well, thanks everyone for being here. We are waiting for the hearing examiner, Mark Scheidemeyer. And once he gets here, he will kick it off and lead the show. And we only have one person in the audience. So we'll see if others show up, but maybe not. Good evening. Are we set to go? Yep. All good to go. Okay. So I see a number of people on the screen. Are they all associated with the applicants or perhaps a city? Are there any uh members of the public that you recognize? No, not as a panelist. There is one member of the public who's in the attendee field. Okay. All right. Thank you. And by the way, alert me if I break up. We've been having a little trouble with our uh reception recently on our Wi-Fi. And if it becomes problematic, I may have to switch to a phone. I certainly hope that's not the situation. But if you're having trouble uh receiving me, uh let me know. And are we being recorded? Yes, we are. All right. I think as the clerk, this is Nicole Floyd, and I'm also in the room, the city room, and there's no one here. Okay. So uh good evening, Mark Scheifmeyer, the city hearing uh examiner. Um I've been asked to convene uh hearing at the request of representatives of Washington Federal Bank seeking a shoreline substantial development permit and a shoreline conditional use permit in order to demolish an existing office building and replace it with a new bank facility, including uh drive-through and parking located at 406 Water Street Southwest at the intersection of Water Street and Fourth Avenue in downtown Olympia. Uh, in advance of tonight's hearing, I've received the staff report and all associated materials prepared by Ms. Mock, who is present tonight. I have reviewed all of those materials in their entirety in advance of tonight's hearing. The uh applicant appears to be represented by uh a few individuals. Uh Carlana Eguan, is that close, Ms. Agwan? Again, it's close enough. Okay. Michael Winnick and Mr. Winnick. Good evening. There may be other representatives of the applicant as well. And again, the city appears uh through Casey Mock, assistant uh planner, with Nicole Floyd also being present uh to assist with any in-person uh proceedings. So, like all matters of this nature, it has uh three components to tonight's hearing. Uh the first is an opportunity for the city uh to more fully explain uh the applic uh the review of this application and its recommendations, followed then by an opportunity for the applicant to respond to the city's uh suggestions, uh followed then by an opportunity for members of the public to be heard. All those who do testify tonight will do so under oath, including city staff. There does not appear to be many members of the public present. So I'm not imposing any time limits on public uh presentations tonight. Let's get us underway with the testimony of city staff.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com