OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Land Use & Environment Committee Meeting – June 2, 2026: Sidewalk Repair Policy, Affordable Housing, and Code Amendments

City Council & CommissionsTuesday, June 2, 2026
BodyOlympia, Washington
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateTuesday, June 2, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:34:13

Transcript — Verbatim
0:03

All right.

0:04

Welcome to a, as I'm reminded, a special meeting because it's at two o'clock of the land use environment committee.

0:10

And today is Thursday, May 28th, 2026.

0:14

I would like to call to order this meeting.

0:16

Um, roll call.

0:17

I'm Robert Vanderpool, Chair.

0:20

Paul Barrent.

0:21

Um Councilmember.

0:23

And Clark Gilman, Councilmember.

0:25

All right.

0:26

Uh, can I we have a few folks signed up for can I get approval of the agenda?

0:32

I I move uh I move the approval of the agenda.

0:36

Second.

0:36

All right.

0:37

All in favor, say aye.

0:38

Aye aye.

0:39

All right, we have an agenda.

0:40

Public comment.

0:41

We have three or four folks signed up.

0:44

First, we will have Heather.

0:47

I don't know what to talk about.

0:51

Can you hear me?

0:53

Yes.

0:54

Great.

0:55

Hi, folks.

0:56

My name is Heather.

0:57

Although I'm a member of the B PAC, I'm here as a resident of Olympia, wanting to share two stories to frame your conversation on sidewalk repair today.

1:07

The first is about my dad.

1:09

He's in his 60s.

1:10

He has a severe traumatic brain injury.

1:13

He walks either with a cane or a walker, depending on the day, he can't drive.

1:18

The other day we were walking back to the car from some food carts when we hit a sidewalk panel that was elevated about six inches from level.

1:26

And I didn't even notice it until I turned around and realized he hadn't followed me because he was terrified.

1:33

All of which to say sidewalk repair can be a life and death matter for some people.

1:39

And I therefore encourage you to think of sidewalks as public goods that are vital to a living city, and that the public should pay for.

2:54

Thank you very much.

2:56

Thank you.

3:02

Next we have Jim Lazar.

3:04

Jim.

3:09

Good afternoon.

3:10

My name is Jim Lazar, former chair of the BPAC from long ago when we launched the sidewalk program and uh part of the campaign for the 2004 Parks and Sidewalks measure, which created a million dollars a year for sidewalks.

3:26

I appreciate the committee taking this up.

3:29

I'm here primarily to endorse the planning commission recommendation to you that you do more for sidewalk repair than the staff has proposed.

3:38

In particular, to create a second crew, probably a two-person crew to do pavement grinding of those smaller uh half to two-inch lifts that of which there are thousands around the city.

3:57

Acquiring another grinder and a couple of more people shouldn't be that hard.

4:03

I have looked at the TBD sales tax projection that is in your packet.

4:08

Unfortunately, that proposal includes three large capital projects.

4:13

Pacific State, Elliott Avenue, uh, and Boulevard Road.

4:18

The city's long-term financial strategy calls very, very specifically that we will not do new programs unless we are maintaining our existing infrastructure.

4:30

The proposal that is before you from the staff is in direct violation, in my opinion, of the long-term financial strategy.

4:40

This uh information that was in the packet, while very helpful, does not include how the million dollars of uh the 2004 voted utility tax money is programmed, and also does not address the general fund uh appropriation for sidewalks.

5:00

Prior to the 2004 measure, we had about 175,000 of general fund money.

5:07

The intent at the time of the passage of the 2004 measure is that that money would be uh redecked dedicated to maintenance.

5:18

That has not been the case, uh although the council in the last couple of years has devoted some general fund money uh to to maintenance.

5:29

I urge you to to adopt the planning commission recommendation to add a second repair crew to do the minor stuff.

5:36

I think we could do hundreds of grinds a week, thousands of grinds a year, and address a large amount of our tripping hazard risk very quickly.

5:51

You should also adopt their recommendation that the city, not the property owner, will have responsibility for sidewalk maintenance.

5:59

It's part of our street system.

6:01

Uh it should be maintained the same way as the street system is maintained.

6:06

It simply makes no sense to uh assign that responsibility to the property owner.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████47%
Land Use Planning███████████████16%
Affordable Housing█████████9%
Public Engagement██████6%
Procedural█████5%
Public Safety█████5%
Community Engagement████4%
Racial Equity██2%
Miscellaneous██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Land Use & Environment Committee Meeting – June 2, 2026

Note: According to the provided agenda and transcript, the meeting actually took place on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 2:00 PM. However, the user instruction specified using the date June 2, 2026. This summary uses the instructed date but notes the discrepancy.

The Land Use & Environment Committee (LUEC) held a special meeting to discuss sidewalk repair policy, receive a legislative update on affordable housing, and approve code amendments. Chair Vanderpool called the meeting to order at 2:00 PM. All three committee members were present: Chair Robert Vanderpool, Clark Gilman, and Paul Berendt. The agenda and minutes from April 23, 2026, were approved unanimously.

Public Comments

  • Heather Moline (resident, not representing BPAC) shared a personal story about her father with a traumatic brain injury struggling with a six-inch sidewalk uplift. She urged the committee to treat sidewalks as public goods funded publicly, emphasizing that sidewalk repair can be life-or-death for vulnerable residents.
  • Jim Lazar (former BPAC chair, involved in the 2004 Parks and Sidewalks measure) endorsed the Planning Commission recommendation for a second repair crew focused on pavement grinding of small (0.5–2 inch) lifts. He argued the city's proposed TBD sales tax spending on three large capital projects violates the city's long-term financial strategy, which requires maintaining existing infrastructure before new programs. He urged adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation that the city, not property owners, assume sidewalk maintenance responsibility, except for damage caused by property owner actions.
  • Larry Dzieza agreed with Lazar, emphasizing the need to spread fixes citywide, not just downtown, to show public benefit for the tax increase. He noted that businesses have historically received free city repairs while homeowners paid out-of-pocket or went without.

Discussion Items

Briefing on Sidewalk Repair Policy Approach

Michelle Swanson (Public Works Principal Planner) presented the draft policy. Key points:

  • Inventory found 28,000 repair locations across 226 linear miles; 83% of uplifts are tree-related.
  • Current code holds adjacent property owners responsible, but enforcement is ineffective (only 3% of surveyed cities find it effective).
  • The city now funds sidewalk repair at nearly $1.2 million/year via TBD sales tax, but at current rates it would take ~250 years to fix all locations.
  • Staff recommended a shared responsibility approach: city crew focuses on common pedestrian destinations (schools, transit stops), large property owners fix their sidewalks, and a point-of-sale repair program.
  • Committee members discussed equity, prioritization, and funding. Councilor Berendt supported shared responsibility and emphasized schools, a grinding crew, and “skin in the game” for property owners. Councilor Gilman raised concerns about downtown fairness and the need for a spread of small projects rather than large capital ones. Councilor Vanderpool questioned the definition of “large property owners” and suggested city take full responsibility with a “worst first” approach.
  • The committee directed staff to further explore the shared responsibility model, including analysis of large property owner frontage and potential grant programs, for presentation at the full council study session on July 21.

2026 Legislative Updates Related to Affordable Housing

Christa Lenssen (Senior Program Specialist) provided updates:

  • Federal: 21st Century Road to Housing Act (Senate version passed March 2026; House amended). Key provisions include HUD prioritization near opportunity zones, pilot programs for home repairs and housing conversion, and prohibiting large institutional investors from buying single-family homes (if owning 350+ homes).
  • State: SB 6027 allows local HOME funds for operations/maintenance and rehabilitation of existing affordable housing. HB 2442 allows REET 2 revenues for abating nuisance properties and new local sales tax for child/family services (effective Jan 2027). Other bills address land banking, condominium liability reform, and mixed-income faith community density bonuses.
  • The committee recommended updating city code language to match state law (especially on cooling devices/rental units).

Approval of Code Amendments (Title 10, 16, 17, 18)

Joyce Phillips (CP&ED Planning Manager) presented 47 proposed amendments, mostly staff-initiated cleanups and state-required updates. Notable: lot splitting, daycare centers, parking standards updates, tree-root-siding clarifications, and removal of ground-floor commercial requirements in some downtown areas (per Planning Commission recommendation). The Planning Commission recommended approval and suggested revisiting ground-floor housing restrictions later in 2026. Committee member Gilman supported allowing residential on ground floors to increase housing.

Key Outcomes

  • Sidewalk Repair Policy: The committee expressed general support for a shared responsibility approach but requested additional analysis on large property owner definitions and costs. Staff will return with refined options for the July 21 council study session.
  • Affordable Housing Legislative Update: No formal vote; the committee accepted the report and directed staff to align city code with state changes.
  • Code Amendments: Motion by Councilor Berendt, seconded by Councilor Gilman, to adopt the Planning Commission’s recommendations and forward the package to the full City Council for approval. Passed 3-0 (Vanderpool, Gilman, Berendt).
  • Farewell: Joyce Phillips was recognized for her 11 years of service and numerous code improvements; she will be leaving the city soon.
  • Next Meeting: The next regular LUEC meeting is scheduled for June 25, 2026, starting at 4:30 PM (delayed 30 minutes due to an all‑department retreat).

Meeting Transcript

All right. Welcome to a, as I'm reminded, a special meeting because it's at two o'clock of the land use environment committee. And today is Thursday, May 28th, 2026. I would like to call to order this meeting. Um, roll call. I'm Robert Vanderpool, Chair. Paul Barrent. Um Councilmember. And Clark Gilman, Councilmember. All right. Uh, can I we have a few folks signed up for can I get approval of the agenda? I I move uh I move the approval of the agenda. Second. All right. All in favor, say aye. Aye aye. All right, we have an agenda. Public comment. We have three or four folks signed up. First, we will have Heather. I don't know what to talk about. Can you hear me? Yes. Great. Hi, folks. My name is Heather. Although I'm a member of the B PAC, I'm here as a resident of Olympia, wanting to share two stories to frame your conversation on sidewalk repair today. The first is about my dad. He's in his 60s. He has a severe traumatic brain injury. He walks either with a cane or a walker, depending on the day, he can't drive. The other day we were walking back to the car from some food carts when we hit a sidewalk panel that was elevated about six inches from level. And I didn't even notice it until I turned around and realized he hadn't followed me because he was terrified. All of which to say sidewalk repair can be a life and death matter for some people. And I therefore encourage you to think of sidewalks as public goods that are vital to a living city, and that the public should pay for. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next we have Jim Lazar. Jim. Good afternoon. My name is Jim Lazar, former chair of the BPAC from long ago when we launched the sidewalk program and uh part of the campaign for the 2004 Parks and Sidewalks measure, which created a million dollars a year for sidewalks. I appreciate the committee taking this up. I'm here primarily to endorse the planning commission recommendation to you that you do more for sidewalk repair than the staff has proposed. In particular, to create a second crew, probably a two-person crew to do pavement grinding of those smaller uh half to two-inch lifts that of which there are thousands around the city. Acquiring another grinder and a couple of more people shouldn't be that hard. I have looked at the TBD sales tax projection that is in your packet. Unfortunately, that proposal includes three large capital projects. Pacific State, Elliott Avenue, uh, and Boulevard Road. The city's long-term financial strategy calls very, very specifically that we will not do new programs unless we are maintaining our existing infrastructure. The proposal that is before you from the staff is in direct violation, in my opinion, of the long-term financial strategy.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com