The Land Use & Environment Committee of the Olympia City Council met on June 26, 2026 (note: the minutes indicate June 25, 2026; the date used here follows the provided timestamp). The meeting included a briefing on the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP), a preliminary discussion of 2027 work plans for the Planning Commission and other advisory bodies, and public comments urging immediate protection for large trees.
Sure. All right. Welcome to a meeting of the land use and environment uh committee of a city council. I'm Robert Vanerpole, your chair. Um I have my folks want to introduce themselves, we'll just go that way. Sure. Clark Gilman, committee member. Paul Barron, um City Council member uh committee member. Cool. All right. Can I uh get an approval of tonight's agenda? I I move to approve the agenda for the um June 25th meeting. Second. All right, all favor say aye. Aye. All right, we have public comment. A few folks signed up. Yeah, um online. We have a person, potential person. All right. Would you like to start us off with your you can come up here if you want or even it's up to you? A little less awkward. Yes. Um for the record, Lynn Fitzhugh, um, executive director of restoring earth connection. And I've had the pleasure in the last few months of talking to uh Robert Clark and Paul about all my interests and concerns about trees, and also have talked to Leanne and Kim. Um on many occasions about this. Um so after eight years of asking the city to please, please update the tree code. We're thrilled that things are underway and that a contract is signed. Uh, we do wish that it would not take two years. Um a lot of our concerns center around what is historically happened over that period of time. So for example, um when both Lacey and Tumwater have looked at LIDAR data that shows some look back period, um, they will see significant tree loss that has happened. And even if you get like two percent a year, um that means that in five years you've got 10% loss, right? So it can it can look like oh, we're not getting that much loss, and then really it's adding up to quite a bit of loss. Um, and Tumwater has just um looked at the LIDAR data that they had for 2023 to identify their 10 largest trees. And then when they went out to look for the 10 largest trees, they discovered that two of them had already been cut down, two of them are slated to be cut down any day now. Um, and that includes the largest tree they had in Tumwater, it's about to be cut down. Um and part of the sadness of that is Tumwater had started on uh a tree ordinance in 2023 that if completed would have protected that largest tree. They got interrupted from the process, and so while waiting, now the tree is gone. Um five more of the trees are on Port of Olympia land, so who knows what will happen to those, and so there's one that they can potentially protect. Um when we did our tree ambassador program and we went door to door and we looked at trees in the city of Olympia and we identified the largest that you had of each species. One of the things that we found, which was sort of a surprise finding to us, was that um all of those largest trees with maybe one exception, uh, are on lands that are highly susceptible to redevelopment, uh, either either an elderly owner or a slum lowered sort of rental situation. So um they're very likely to wind up getting cut down. So our concern about the two-year period is that you know, will those significant trees get lost in the meantime? And I think in general, when people think about tree policies, there's sort of this feeling of almost like the trees are static, and then we'll just well, when we get to the tree policy, we get to the tree policy. Well, the trees are not static, they're they're being lost in the meantime. So um I have you know spoken to council people and really want to encourage a um resolution that would put a moratorium um in place on the cutting of the largest size trees while this tree policy gets worked on. I I hope that by the end of the time when we get to the end of the tree policy, it'll have its own protections in place, but I think we have to do something in the interim um to make sure that they don't get cut down. And you know, at this point, the county based on landscome water intended to adopt has created tree designations of heritage trees for the largest size and landmark for the next largest size. So I think those are categories that can be made use of in order to try to identify trees that we would protect. And having looked at plans for places like Spring Creek and other places where development is happening in the city.