OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Oswego Committee of the Whole Meeting – November 4, 2025

Village Board & CommissionsTuesday, November 4, 2025
BodyOswego, Illinois
SessionVillage Board & Commissions
DateTuesday, November 4, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 53:31

Transcript — Verbatim
0:01

President Kaufman?

0:02

Here.

0:03

Trustee Cooper.

0:04

Here.

0:04

Trustee Hughes.

0:05

Here.

0:05

Trustee Koenig.

0:06

Here.

0:07

Trusted McCarthy and Lane.

0:08

Here.

0:09

Trustee Novi.

0:10

Here.

0:10

Trustee Torres.

0:12

Here.

0:13

All right.

0:13

First up, we're going to open the public forum, and I have two green slips.

0:17

I'm going to answer, or I'm going to call you forward in the end the order in which I receive these.

0:22

So first up, we have uh Mr.

0:24

Sam Fagola.

0:25

If you'd like to come forward now.

0:36

Welcome, sir.

0:37

Good evening, everyone.

0:38

Uh, first of all, thank you for letting me speak tonight, and thank you for addressing the issue of uh e-bikes and e-scooters, not only for the safety of pedestrians, but for the young people that are operating these vehicles.

0:54

So uh we're delighted to see that uh take place.

0:59

Uh I live in Southbury.

1:01

I'm also on the HOA board, and I'll be very brief tonight.

1:06

I only have two suggestions and then one question.

1:09

Uh the first suggestion is reading through the ordinance.

1:13

I see that uh it talks about 30 mile an hour streets.

1:21

Well, I believe every residential area and also Southbury Boulevard, uh, the village reduced all those speed limits to 25.

1:33

So I'd like you to consider maybe changing that because if it's 30 and above, then uh we're still gonna have some of the issues that we're dealing with now.

1:44

Uh the second suggestion is uh it says that e-bikes and e-scooters may be operated on any sidewalks and is limited to bike paths and roadways.

2:00

Well, as you know, we maintain our own walking paths like we do or ponds.

2:07

I know a lot of communities don't.

2:09

The park district takes care of that.

2:12

So maybe I'd like to see something in there that uh stresses either like Oswego bike paths or park district bike paths, because that's still gonna create a problem for us because in our declarations, which I know you guys don't enforce, uh we state no motor vehicles of any type are permitted on walkways.

2:35

So I could see a parent uh when this ordinance goes through of looking at distances.

2:41

Oh, it's okay for them to ride on bike paths.

2:44

So maybe I'd like to see you call that out a little bit differently.

2:49

And uh the last question is I think I'm reading this right, but uh many bikes uh motorized vehicles are prohibited from all of this.

3:03

Is that correct?

3:07

That would probably be something the chief presents, he can address that.

3:10

Oh, okay tonight.

3:12

Okay, because I'm thinking maybe motor bikes are more addressed by rules of the road than probably gas operated vehicles shouldn't be on sidewalks and walking past.

3:24

I'll just be sure.

3:25

Chief, you're able to address that during your comments.

3:27

Yeah, we will.

3:28

So once again, thank you for letting me speak.

3:31

Unfortunately, I can't stay for the meeting tonight, but uh once again I really appreciate the opportunity and thank you all for looking at this uh concern.

3:40

We appreciate it.

3:42

Thank you, sir.

3:44

Up next is David Rood.

3:47

Come on down, sir.

3:51

Uh good evening, everyone.

3:52

Uh I uh I plan to be brief.

3:54

I'm usually a little longer speaking, but I just wanted to back up what Sam says because everybody likes a second.

4:01

Um this is an issue that's going around our entire region.

4:06

It is also an issue I'm sure that is incredibly difficult to enforce.

4:10

Those things are fast.

4:11

By the time you call, they're not gonna get it.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████████████████████████37%
Water And Wastewater Management█████████████████████████████████33%
Budget Equity Analysis████████████████████████24%
Transportation Safety████4%
Public Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Oswego Committee of the Whole Meeting – November 4, 2025

The Oswego Village Board Committee of the Whole met at 6:00 PM on November 4, 2025, at Oswego Village Hall, 100 Parkers Mill. The meeting focused on FY2026 budget decisions and public comments on a proposed e-bike/e-scooter ordinance. The committee gave direction on the property tax levy, senior center funding, and a grocery-tax rebate on water bills; the e-bike/e-scooter discussion was deferred to the 7:00 PM regular board meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Sam Fagola, a Southbury HOA board member, expressed support for the village addressing e-bikes and e-scooters for the safety of pedestrians and young riders. He recommended lowering the ordinance threshold from 30 mph to 25 mph because residential streets and Southbury Boulevard are already 25 mph, and asked the village to specifically reference Oswego or park district bike paths because HOA declarations prohibit motorized vehicles on its walkways. He also asked whether motorized bikes would be prohibited; the village president said the police chief could address that during his comments.
  • David Rood supported Fagola’s comments. He questioned the phrase “only three crashes” involving e-bikes since 2021, saying there is no acceptable number of e-bike crashes. He also noted that if the speed threshold were 25 mph, riders under 16 would be prohibited on neighborhood streets, which would apply to most residential areas.

Discussion Items

FY2026 Budget Review

  • Finance staff (Andrea) reported several cleanup changes to the proposed FY2026 budget: removal of the Project Development Report; reduction of the Main Street water main budget after a 5% portion was found double-budgeted in both the TIF and water fund; reduction of the Wolf’s Crossing water main budget after an MFT-funded portion was double-budgeted; and a $100,000 reduction in police dispatch services from $465,000 to $365,000 based on the updated Kencom amount.
  • The updated EAV estimate from Kendall County was lower than the projection used at the October 25 budget workshop, requiring an additional $22,075 from the general fund to achieve a 2% levy rate decrease.
  • The 2024 EAV was $1,400,840,731; the 2025 estimated EAV is $1,541,185,255, a 10.02% increase, although the latest estimate was slightly lower than the projection used at the workshop.
  • With these changes, the projected FY2026 general fund surplus increased from $1,053,193 to $1,131,118. If the board takes no further action, the surplus remains in the general fund and the levy rate decreases by 2.0%.
  • The new fueling station will reuse the existing two 2,000-gallon fuel tanks; the originally planned tank capacity increase was not needed.
  • Debt call dates were reviewed: a small portion of the Series 2016 bonds is callable December 15, but those bonds carry 3% coupons and current rates are higher, so refinancing would not occur. Other call dates are in 2027 and later.
  • The parking credit card fee line item that appeared as $0 was corrected; staff said it was a formula error.

Board members discussed the three outstanding budget items:

  • Several trustees supported the 2% levy rate decrease and the proposed $10,000 increase to the senior center contribution, from $50,000 to $60,000.
  • The grocery tax rebate proposal drew extended debate. Supporters said water rates are certain to rise because of the Lake Michigan connection project, residents are already feeling cost pressure, and the credit could be adjusted later. Trustees who preferred waiting argued the $600,000 could be used in the spring water-rate calculation to reduce the long-term rate path or pay down project principal, providing larger savings over time.
  • Staff noted that a one-time $50 check to each resident would be administratively difficult, but a line-item credit on the bill could be applied easily.

The e-bike/e-scooter ordinance item was not substantively discussed; the board said it would be taken up during staff reports at the 7:00 PM regular board meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal board vote was taken; the committee provided direction by consensus and straw poll.
  • Committee consensus: keep the FY2026 property tax levy rate decrease of 2.0% in the budget.
  • Committee consensus: increase the annual senior center contribution by $10,000, to $60,000.
  • Committee consensus by straw poll (five in favor, one trustee opposed) to transfer $600,000 from the general fund to the water and sewer fund for a grocery tax rebate on residential water bills. The rebate would be $50 per account per year, shown as an $8 credit per bill, with the first credit appearing on the March 2026 bill for January–February 2026 water service.
  • Staff was directed to prepare the final budget ordinance for the November 18, 2025 vote with these items included, leaving an estimated general fund surplus of roughly $500,000.

Meeting Transcript

President Kaufman? Here. Trustee Cooper. Here. Trustee Hughes. Here. Trustee Koenig. Here. Trusted McCarthy and Lane. Here. Trustee Novi. Here. Trustee Torres. Here. All right. First up, we're going to open the public forum, and I have two green slips. I'm going to answer, or I'm going to call you forward in the end the order in which I receive these. So first up, we have uh Mr. Sam Fagola. If you'd like to come forward now. Welcome, sir. Good evening, everyone. Uh, first of all, thank you for letting me speak tonight, and thank you for addressing the issue of uh e-bikes and e-scooters, not only for the safety of pedestrians, but for the young people that are operating these vehicles. So uh we're delighted to see that uh take place. Uh I live in Southbury. I'm also on the HOA board, and I'll be very brief tonight. I only have two suggestions and then one question. Uh the first suggestion is reading through the ordinance. I see that uh it talks about 30 mile an hour streets. Well, I believe every residential area and also Southbury Boulevard, uh, the village reduced all those speed limits to 25. So I'd like you to consider maybe changing that because if it's 30 and above, then uh we're still gonna have some of the issues that we're dealing with now. Uh the second suggestion is uh it says that e-bikes and e-scooters may be operated on any sidewalks and is limited to bike paths and roadways. Well, as you know, we maintain our own walking paths like we do or ponds. I know a lot of communities don't. The park district takes care of that. So maybe I'd like to see something in there that uh stresses either like Oswego bike paths or park district bike paths, because that's still gonna create a problem for us because in our declarations, which I know you guys don't enforce, uh we state no motor vehicles of any type are permitted on walkways. So I could see a parent uh when this ordinance goes through of looking at distances. Oh, it's okay for them to ride on bike paths. So maybe I'd like to see you call that out a little bit differently. And uh the last question is I think I'm reading this right, but uh many bikes uh motorized vehicles are prohibited from all of this. Is that correct? That would probably be something the chief presents, he can address that. Oh, okay tonight. Okay, because I'm thinking maybe motor bikes are more addressed by rules of the road than probably gas operated vehicles shouldn't be on sidewalks and walking past. I'll just be sure. Chief, you're able to address that during your comments. Yeah, we will. So once again, thank you for letting me speak. Unfortunately, I can't stay for the meeting tonight, but uh once again I really appreciate the opportunity and thank you all for looking at this uh concern. We appreciate it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com