Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Pleasantville Village Board of Trustees held a work session from approximately 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Village Hall, 80 Wheeler Ave, 2nd Floor, Pleasantville, NY. This summary uses the meeting date of January 20, 2026 (2026-01-20) as supplied; the agenda and raw transcript identify the session as Monday, January 12, 2026. The agenda covered A1 zoning/daycare use, FY 2026-27 recreation fees and pay rates, and continued Master Fee Schedule discussion. No formal public comment period was held.
Here. All right. Welcome all to the work session for the Village of Pleasantville Board of Trustees. Today is Monday, January 12th. As of the moment, three of us here. Nicole asked with David Vignamori. Trustee Paul Alvarez is on board via Zoom at home because of a health issue. Welcome, Paul. He waves. Oh. All right. First item on our agenda is a discussion regarding the A1 zoning district and some redefinitions regarding daycare use. Robert, do you want to give the uh the summary here? Uh yeah. Uh hello everyone. Um basically, you know, daily we go through different inquiries into properties and zoning districts. And in review recently, and um two to time was going through some issues with gas um down at their building. Um we happen to be looking up the use as a private school in daycare. And I was noticing in our zoning that it actually wasn't listed as a permitted use in the A1. And I mentioned two to time because they're clearly a daycare use in the A1 district. I think it was an oversight back some years ago, and I brought it to uh Eric's attention, just so we should look at this to confirm that it should be a permitted use, and uh council did a good job of uh uh writing up new uh definitions on each to clarify it. Um so I think it's a matter of just getting this back into the code, well, into the code as it probably should have always been. Um and that's why it's on the docket tonight. Okay, thank you for that. So the the issue is we know uh in a revised definitions have uh a distinction between private schools K through 12 and private schools pre-K. Because there are circumstances where you would permit a pre-K uh daycare use, for example, in the A1 district, where a K through 12 school might not be appropriate. That makes sense. All right. Judd, you want to add anything to that? Have we misrepresented anything? No. Um, and what the uh code revisions have have done is to draw a distinction but between um K-12 and pre-school. Um there will be no change with regard to those districts within which both private um types of schools are allowed, and the A1 uh has been changed to um allow the uh the the pre-K, uh you know, as Robert has talked about. Uh it's very straightforward. Okay. Uh is there any issue with, for example, a school that might be proposed at K through 8. Um that fall into the K obviously it won't it it ought to fall into the same category as K-12, right? No, no, because you've you've drawn the distinction between um K-12 and pre-K. Right, but what about K 8, for example?