OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Pleasantville, New York/Village Board of Trustees & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Pleasantville Village Board of Trustees Work Session – July 28, 2026

Village Board of Trustees & Boards — Tuesday, July 28, 2026
BodyPleasantville, New York
SessionVillage Board of Trustees & Boards
DateTuesday, July 28, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 57:28

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:02

All right.

0:03

Uh welcome all.

0:04

Sorry to be starting a little bit late.

0:05

We had an executive session that ran a little bit long.

0:08

Uh, but we are beginning the work session for the village of Pleasantville Board of Trustees.

0:12

Today is Monday, July 27.

0:15

Uh, first item on our list here in the work session is a conversation about the draft speed hump policy that has been uh impressively assembled by village engineer Anthony Carr, who is present here in the room.

0:32

Um I could share my screen, and maybe Anthony, you could give us the thumbnail sketch, the executive summary of what you have.

0:47

Good evening, mayor,

Speaker 2

0:48

board, Eric and Alyssa and audience, especially a big shout out to the pedestrian committee.

0:55

Uh figure out as well independently, but uh to keep it uh focused, yeah, the speed hump policy.

1:01

Uh

Unassigned speaker

1:01

you

Speaker 2

1:01

know, just give some background since 2017 to present day, between 2017 to 2025, excuse me, eight years, we've had six speed hump requests, at least on record, that I've that I was able to go back and fit through from email prior from my predecessor, and thus all from since I joined the village since 2022, September 2022.

1:22

So I'm coming up on four years,

Unassigned speaker

1:23

which

Speaker 2

1:23

has flew by.

1:25

Um, the request won Ashland and Nanny Hagen, and those were in 2025.

1:28

Uh Grand Street was 2023, Orchard Street was 2023.

1:31

So those those were with me.

1:33

Um, and then suddenly side was 2021 and Ron Row was 2017.

1:36

So not saying there wasn't more, but between between the last eight years or from that period of 72 to 2025, there was eight requests.

1:44

So they're not coming in uh in leaps and bounds, but

Unassigned speaker

1:47

um

Speaker 2

1:48

I would say that they're coming in enough when I say they the the speed hump request to at least rather than just say, no, no, it's not gonna

Unassigned speaker

1:55

work.

Speaker 2

1:56

There should be, and at the request I know the board administrator giving the firing order, say, hey, come up with a policy, or at least let's look into developing policy.

2:05

We've talked about it as we're doing it tonight, um, what we're gonna do, um, and determine if the the village wants to move forward with such a policy or revise this as proposed or or change it completely.

2:17

So I use the village of Tyree Townshump policy, which we're developed in 2021, and City of Yonkers, which was developed in 2017, and looked at that, said okay, well, we have to make it towards village of pleasantville, right?

2:29

Because we're not city of Yonkers, and we're also not Tyre Town either.

2:32

We have every every misbalance on identity, right?

2:35

So me being here now four years, I know what that identity is, at least I think I do for the most part, still learning every day.

2:41

Uh, but the policy gives an outlet to an interested party to say, hey, we notice some problems down our street.

2:48

We'd like to request speed hump.

2:51

And rather it be just an email, you know, then I have to respond back with the with a cut and paste template.

2:57

It would be a formalized policy, right?

2:59

So not not codify or code, but it'd be a policy, a departmental policy, where we look at it, we would we get the request, and basically there is uh several steps, but just to condense the steps would be individual or parties see, okay.

3:14

Let's just say make it results.

Unassigned speaker

3:16

Or

Speaker 2

3:16

just read comes back.

3:17

So now I want to speed up.

Unassigned speaker

3:18

Well, they have to submit the request and write it, right?

Speaker 2

3:20

So the initial request comes to the DPW, and if you go through, there's there's a number of steps, but just to kind of I want to figure out any number.

3:27

The interested party submits an initial request.

3:30

We look at the we being DPW evaluates the initial eligibility, right?

3:33

So there's criteria in this policy from letters A to uh J, K.

3:38

There's a number of, I'd say about 20, maybe a little bit less, where you know, no dead ends, no cold attacks.

3:46

Um they can't be placed, speed hump's proposed before intersections at or near intersections, uh, road grades steeper than five percent, and that's measured along the the gutter, right?

3:56

So it's not it's not the cross slope as you walking from left to right on a row, right?

4:00

Of course, the the short distance, it's that running slope kind of parallel to the per that can't be more than five percent.

4:05

Five percent is a five-foot rise over 100 feet with a little bit.

4:09

Five percent is also uh an ADA minimum compliance or maximum compliance for a lot of pitches and other things on the municipalities.

4:17

So that's why five percent was used.

4:19

John Cruise and Tyre Town six percent.

4:21

Um they submit the request, DVW looks at it, and if it meets the initial eligibility request or not, the request still gets notified from Dirty A, basically saying, hey, it's denied because of these reasons.

4:34

It failed the initial test, or hey, it's gonna move forward.

4:37

And what that looks like is from the following step, DPW then says, okay, it's past the initial criteria test.

4:45

Please come back with a petition signed by 67% of the neighborhood that'll be impacted with two-thirds

Unassigned speaker

4:51

of

Speaker 2

4:51

the neighborhood, and that's consistent with Tyree Town and Yonkers as well.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████66%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████18%
Public Engagement█████████13%
Technology and Innovation██3%
Summary of Proceedings

Pleasantville Village Board of Trustees Work Session – July 28, 2026

The Pleasantville Village Board of Trustees held a work session on July 28, 2026, to discuss a draft Speed Hump Policy prepared by Village Engineer Anthony Carr. The conversation examined the effectiveness of speed humps, reviewed historical requests, and considered alternative traffic calming measures. The board decided to defer adoption of the policy until the results of the ongoing Complete Streets study (expected in fall 2026) could inform a more comprehensive traffic calming framework.

Discussion Items

  • Draft Speed Hump Policy Overview: Anthony Carr presented a policy modeled on those from the Village of Tarrytown and City of Yonkers, tailored to Pleasantville. Key elements included: initial eligibility criteria (e.g., no dead ends, road grades under 5%, placement away from intersections), a petition requiring 67% support from affected residents, a traffic study costing $2,500–$5,000, a temporary rubber speed hump trial period of up to one year, and a final petition requiring 75% support for permanent installation. Carr noted that from 2017 to 2025, the village received only seven speed hump requests (including Hopper Street), with speeds recorded between 26 and 31 mph on roads like Nanny Hagen and Ashland Avenue—above the 15–25 mph range recommended by the Federal Highway Administration for effective speed humps.
  • Debate on Effectiveness and Alternatives: Several board members and the pedestrian committee representative expressed concerns that speed humps may not be the best traffic calming tool. Carr and others noted that professional traffic engineers (including the firm conducting the Complete Streets study) generally favor raised crosswalks, curb bump-outs, chicanes, road diets, and painted edge lines over speed humps, especially on roads with higher operating speeds. The board discussed that the existing speed humps on Romer Road are perceived as successful, while those on Sunnyside have received mixed reviews. A board member pointed out that data often contradicts residents’ perceptions of speeding, and that the village’s identity as a walkable community might be better served by a broader traffic calming policy rather than a standalone speed hump policy.
  • Connection to Complete Streets Study: The board noted that a $160,000 grant-funded Complete Streets study is underway, focusing on 10–12 corridors and intersections, with a draft report expected in August 2026 and a final report in October 2026. Over 600 public comments were submitted via an interactive map. Several trustees argued that waiting for this study would provide a more data-driven and comprehensive approach to traffic calming, including recommendations for raised crosswalks, curb bump-outs, and other measures. The pedestrian committee representative supported the speed hump policy as a way to create a formal process, but agreed that aligning with the broader study would be beneficial.
  • Resident Input: A board member who lives on Pleasantville Road shared that residents on Ashland Avenue and other streets near the school have long requested speed humps, but also emphasized the value of quick, low-cost measures like painted edge lines (as done on Pleasantville Road) and the need for a clear path to effective traffic calming. The member urged the board to decide what they are willing to do (e.g., raised crosswalks) rather than focus on what they are not.

Key Outcomes

  • No vote was taken on the draft Speed Hump Policy.
  • The board agreed to table the policy until the Complete Streets study is completed in fall 2026, at which point they will develop a broader traffic calming policy that incorporates speed humps as one option among many.
  • The initial eligibility criteria from the draft policy will be retained as a potential tool for evaluating future requests, but no formal process will be adopted immediately.
  • The village will continue to use other traffic calming measures (e.g., painted lines, radar speed signs, stop signs) on a case-by-case basis, with input from the pedestrian committee and engineering staff.

Meeting Transcript

All right. Uh welcome all. Sorry to be starting a little bit late. We had an executive session that ran a little bit long. Uh, but we are beginning the work session for the village of Pleasantville Board of Trustees. Today is Monday, July 27. Uh, first item on our list here in the work session is a conversation about the draft speed hump policy that has been uh impressively assembled by village engineer Anthony Carr, who is present here in the room. Um I could share my screen, and maybe Anthony, you could give us the thumbnail sketch, the executive summary of what you have. Good evening, mayor, board, Eric and Alyssa and audience, especially a big shout out to the pedestrian committee. Uh figure out as well independently, but uh to keep it uh focused, yeah, the speed hump policy. Uh you know, just give some background since 2017 to present day, between 2017 to 2025, excuse me, eight years, we've had six speed hump requests, at least on record, that I've that I was able to go back and fit through from email prior from my predecessor, and thus all from since I joined the village since 2022, September 2022. So I'm coming up on four years, which has flew by. Um, the request won Ashland and Nanny Hagen, and those were in 2025. Uh Grand Street was 2023, Orchard Street was 2023. So those those were with me. Um, and then suddenly side was 2021 and Ron Row was 2017. So not saying there wasn't more, but between between the last eight years or from that period of 72 to 2025, there was eight requests. So they're not coming in uh in leaps and bounds, but um I would say that they're coming in enough when I say they the the speed hump request to at least rather than just say, no, no, it's not gonna work. There should be, and at the request I know the board administrator giving the firing order, say, hey, come up with a policy, or at least let's look into developing policy. We've talked about it as we're doing it tonight, um, what we're gonna do, um, and determine if the the village wants to move forward with such a policy or revise this as proposed or or change it completely. So I use the village of Tyree Townshump policy, which we're developed in 2021, and City of Yonkers, which was developed in 2017, and looked at that, said okay, well, we have to make it towards village of pleasantville, right? Because we're not city of Yonkers, and we're also not Tyre Town either. We have every every misbalance on identity, right? So me being here now four years, I know what that identity is, at least I think I do for the most part, still learning every day. Uh, but the policy gives an outlet to an interested party to say, hey, we notice some problems down our street. We'd like to request speed hump. And rather it be just an email, you know, then I have to respond back with the with a cut and paste template. It would be a formalized policy, right? So not not codify or code, but it'd be a policy, a departmental policy, where we look at it, we would we get the request, and basically there is uh several steps, but just to condense the steps would be individual or parties see, okay. Let's just say make it results. Or just read comes back. So now I want to speed up. Well, they have to submit the request and write it, right? So the initial request comes to the DPW, and if you go through, there's there's a number of steps, but just to kind of I want to figure out any number. The interested party submits an initial request. We look at the we being DPW evaluates the initial eligibility, right? So there's criteria in this policy from letters A to uh J, K. There's a number of, I'd say about 20, maybe a little bit less, where you know, no dead ends, no cold attacks. Um they can't be placed, speed hump's proposed before intersections at or near intersections, uh, road grades steeper than five percent, and that's measured along the the gutter, right? So it's not it's not the cross slope as you walking from left to right on a row, right? Of course, the the short distance, it's that running slope kind of parallel to the per that can't be more than five percent.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com