Prince George's County Streamlining Development Review Work Group Meeting - May 7, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Prince George's County Streamlining Development Review Work Group Meeting - May 7, 2026
Note: The transcript of the meeting indicates the chair stated the date as Wednesday, May 6, 2026, but the meeting date provided for this summary is May 7, 2026. This discrepancy is noted.
The second meeting of the Streamlining Development Review Work Group focused on the subdivision review process, efficiency improvements, concurrency, and an update on a regional analysis of development review processes. The chair reiterated the goal of streamlining development without sacrificing community voice. Presentations and discussion covered the subdivision process, challenges, opportunities, and comparisons with neighboring jurisdictions.
Discussion Items
-
Presentation on Subdivision Review Process: Sherry Connors, Division Chief of the Prince George's County Planning Department, presented an overview of the subdivision process under Subtitle 24. She explained the steps: pre-application conference, pre-application neighborhood meeting, application submittal, completeness check, staff review, and planning board hearing. She highlighted statutory timelines (e.g., 70-day review period, extendable to 140 days) and noted that applicant responsiveness significantly impacts overall duration. Case studies showed timelines ranging from 6-8 months for responsive applicants to over two years for those with delays. She discussed challenges such as conflicting agency comments, inexperienced applicants, and the trade-offs of requiring more detailed upfront information. Opportunities included concurrent review, applicant assist tools, and expanding minor subdivision applicability.
-
Discussion on Efficiency and Timing: Work group members raised several points. Malik Jordan noted the high cost (up to $100,000) for small developers to prepare plans and the problem of conflicting comments from different agencies. He suggested better inter-agency coordination. Greg Smith emphasized the importance of meaningful community input, noting that community members are volunteers and often face steep learning curves. He cautioned against sacrificing community engagement for speed and suggested restoring conceptual site plans for certain cases. He also questioned whether the review process itself is the primary cause of delays. Mr. Copeland proposed a designated liaison within the planning department to serve as a single point of contact for developers, reducing the burden of wrangling multiple agencies. Victoria Bostall asked about the trade-offs of concurrent review for stormwater management plans and confirmed that prior to the new subtitle, stormwater concept approval was not always required upfront.
-
Update on Regional Development Review Processes: Jim Campbell provided an update on his analysis of neighboring jurisdictions. He reported that Arlington County’s process is approximately 9 months, Fairfax County targets 90 days for first cycle review, Montgomery County around 11 months, and Howard County between 8 to 14 months. He noted difficulty in obtaining precise timeframes due to variables. He is continuing to gather data on the number of agencies involved, community engagement practices, and public access to information. Victoria Bostall clarified that these timelines are for entitlements, not permitting, and that engineering and permitting are separate processes that can run concurrently.
Key Outcomes
- The work group identified several priority areas for recommendations: early engagement of agencies and community, a designated liaison at the planning department to coordinate across agencies, and a guidebook to bridge knowledge gaps between developers and community members.
- The chair summarized these priorities and asked members to submit additional recommendations via an Excel spreadsheet or survey.
- The next meeting is scheduled for May 13, 2026, at the same time, to discuss detailed site plan review.
- No formal votes were taken; the meeting was a discussion and information-gathering session.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining our streamlining development work group. This is our second meeting. Today's Wednesday, May 6th. Um, just so that everyone knows as all of our work groups for the council, these meetings are open to the public. They are recorded. They'll also be posted and shared on our website, similar to any presentations or information that we get as a work group is also open for the community to have access to. As always, I'm just thankful that everyone is willing to participate in this work group. As we say in our first meeting, the goal is really just to try to find a way to look at our development process to see if there's things we could be doing more efficiently to look at what neighboring jurisdictions or even best practices around the country. Um, but holding what's important to me is that we want to make sure that we have the best process, but not at the expense of the community and the community having a voice in the type of development uh that comes into the community. So that's my goal and my hope for uh this task force. For today's discussion, we'll have planning department presentation on subdivision review process, a discussion on improvement for the efficiency and timing of the subdivision review process, discussion on consolidation and things running concurrent, uh, and then update on uh analysis of the regional development review process that we had from our first meeting. Um now I'll pass it to uh I guess staff who's gonna um orient for for the presentation. Good afternoon, uh Madam Chair and members of the streamlining development review work group. I'd like to uh introduce you to uh Miss Sherry Connors, who is the division chief with the Prince George's County Planning Department. She will be providing a presentation to us today. Ms. Connor, if you will please thank you. Yes, good afternoon. Can you hear me okay? Yes. Okay, excellent. Um good afternoon, Madam Chair and members of the committee. Um thank you for having me today. I'm gonna share my screen here. All right. Can everyone see that? Okay, excellent. Um, I'm gonna go over the subdivision uh process, uh, what subdivision is, when it is required, what the process looks like, um, some examples of um real projects that have gone through the process, and um some an example also of a concurrent review that was done with site plan. So you can kind of see what the timeline looks like, what all is involved in the process, and then offer some food for thought as you go into your discussions on recommendations for streamlining. Um the subdivision regulations are housed under subtitle 24 of the county code. Um the subdivision process really entails the the division consolidation or establishments of lots or tracks or parcels of land. Um it's where we review uh the proposed development or uses and their impacts on public facilities. And um, if applicable, imposed exactions for roads, pedestrian bicycle park improvements, and or the payment of fees for schools, police, fire and rescue services where inadequacies may exist. Um it's uh a preliminary plan drawing as a one-dimensional drawing prepared by a surveyor or landscape architect. It shows proposed lot lines, it shows the locations of streets, um, open space areas or areas for parks. Um, it depicts uh non-disturbance, maybe tree conservation areas, locations for utilities, um, but it is it does not depict the proposed buildings and structures and other site details. Um, those are detailed further at a subsequent development review stage. Um really the purpose of subdivision is to ensure the orderly planned development of land, um providing for safety of uh health and welfare. Um, as I said, it organizes the layout of the land where your open spaces will go, um, where environmental protections should be placed and determines the location where infrastructure will be placed in order to develop the property, including roads and utilities. Subdivision is sort of the third step in the development process, but it's often the first step in obtaining development approvals. And that's because master planning is already done and in place. That is done through our master planning process and master master plans, sector plans, general plan are already in place. So unless the development application involves a rezoning, subdivision will be the first place a development application will typically start. And on this slide, I do have the approval authority for each of these steps. Subdivision is under the sole review authority of the planning board. So when does subdivision apply? Any land proposed to be subdivided, proposed to be developed, or proposed for converting from residential to non-residential or vice versa, is subject to subdivision. There are certain limited exemptions to that. If an existing property is only proposing one single family detached dwelling, less than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area and/or is generating less than 50 trips, it's exempt from subdivision or may meet an exemption. Also development that is existing on the property prior to 1990 is also exempt.
openpublica.com