OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Prince Georges County, Maryland/County Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Education and Workforce Development Committee Meeting - September 14, 2026

County Council & Boards — Monday, September 14, 2026
BodyPrince Georges County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Boards
DateMonday, September 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:22:15

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:04

Adam Stafford and I serve as chair.

0:06

Today is Monday, September 14th, 2026, and we'll start with a roll call.

0:12

Chair Adam Stafford.

0:14

President.

0:15

Councilmember Olson?

0:16

Here.

0:17

Councilmember Harrison.

0:20

Three members present at roll call.

0:22

Thank you.

0:23

For today's agenda, we have one piece of legislation and three briefings.

0:27

To all of our presenters, we're so appreciative of your time.

0:30

Thank you for being here today, and we truly look forward to a robust discussion and the opportunity to collaborate.

0:35

Our first agenda item will be CB 105 2026, an act concerning high-wage employer fast track program.

0:42

I will now turn it over to our EWD staff for an overview.

0:47

Thank you, Madam Chair, and good afternoon, Council members.

0:50

Dr.

0:50

Run Parakin, Director of the Education and Workforce Development Committee.

0:54

The first agenda item is CB 105 2026 and that concerning high-wage employer fast track program for the purpose of creating an expedited coordinated development review pathways for employers that meet defined wage investments and job quality standards, establishing a dedicated project management structure and integrating inspections for workforce recruitment and providing incentives into a six into a single accelerated approval process regarding workforce uh development.

1:24

I'll now turn it over to Mr.

1:25

Caleb Callender for the policy analysis and fiscal impact overview.

1:31

Thank you, Dr.

1:32

Braggan.

1:33

Enactment of CB 105 2026 will likely have an immediate, slightly adverse fiscal impact on the county.

1:40

Uh implement implementation of the proposed program as currently drafted is expected to result in additional administrative costs to the Department of Permitting Inspections and Environment.

1:49

DePI stated that if the bill were to move forward, the department would need permit project managers funded for each qualified high wage employer company.

1:58

The department also expressed concerns regarding the current budget and staffing constraints, but did highlight the programs conducted by the department that currently expedite permits.

2:07

However, the suggested amendments through draft two may mitigate some of the potential costs by distribution distributing responsibilities among the agencies whose existing roles and functions most closely align with the requirements of the program.

2:20

Also, to the extent that the program successfully attracts qualifying high wage employers to the county, the resulting increase in business activity, employment and related economic activity could expand the county's tax base and generate additional tax revenues.

2:33

Thank you.

2:33

This concludes my report.

2:36

Thank you.

2:37

Um at this time I will turn it over to the county executive's office for any comments.

2:44

Thank you, Madam Chair.

2:45

I'm looking over uh draft two, and so we're we're still uh unsure about some of the changes.

2:55

As noted by our agencies, however, though, current implementation of this does have a negative fiscal impact.

3:02

And while we are in line with the with the goal and purpose of the bill, I do not believe there's budget for it currently, and so there is some hesitation as well as um some questions about exactly some of the qualifications that are included in the bill that some of the agencies have.

3:26

Okay, thank you.

3:28

Um I appreciate your feedback.

3:30

Now we will hear from the office of law.

3:36

Thank you, madam chair.

3:37

The office of law has reviewed this um legislation for legal sufficiency, and we find it to be in proper legislative form.

3:44

Thank you so much.

3:45

Um, before turning it over to my colleagues for discussion, I have a few comments.

3:50

I agree with the goal of this bill.

3:52

I think we do need to attract high-wage employers to our county.

3:55

With that being said, we hear the feedback from DPI and our policy team and in coordination with Chair Oriada's office.

4:01

I propose draft two in lieu of draft one for CB 105 2026.

4:06

Draft two states that the Prince George's County Economic Development Corporation shall administer the program in coordination with the Department of Permitting Inspections and Enforcement, DPI, employee Prince George's and the Office of Procurement and other agencies as appropriate.

4:21

Additionally, draft two states that accelerated approval processes are for employers that are participating in the high-wage employer fast track program.

4:29

The language for participation in the program was added for clarity.

4:33

So with that being said, I would like to propose an amendment to strike apprenticeship on page two line four and establish apprenticeship on page two line 17 as the county has already adopted a similar fast tracking mechanism for through CB 37 2026.

4:53

Second okay, it's been moved and seconded.

4:57

Um ahead.

5:03

Councilmember Harrison.

5:06

Thank you, Madam Chair.

5:08

Um my question is for the executive branch.

5:15

Just wanted to know earnestly if this was able to move forward out of committee.

5:23

Um do you believe in the next couple of weeks that we could find out some more information how we could kind of implement this?

5:35

You said it wasn't budgeted, but do we know a cost associated in order to get it budgeted uh so it can it can be efficient?

5:49

I believe we can I think DeepI identified the workers that they would need.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Education And Workforce Development█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Technology and Innovation██████████████████████████████30%
Education Policy███████████11%
Procedural██████6%
Data Management██████6%
Public Health████4%
Budget Equity Analysis█1%
Transportation Safety█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Education and Workforce Development Committee Meeting - September 14, 2026

The Education and Workforce Development Committee of the Prince George's County Council met on Monday, September 14, 2026, at 1:30 PM in Committee Room 2027. Chair Shayla Adams-Stafford called the meeting to order with three members present; Council Member Dernoga arrived at 1:32 PM. The committee considered one piece of legislation, CB-105-2026, and received three briefings on apprenticeship best practices, artificial intelligence (AI) platforms in schools, and AI pathways at Bowie State University. The meeting adjourned at 3:02 PM.

Legislation: CB-105-2026 High-Wage Employer Fast Track Program

  • Overview: Dr. Arun Puracken, Committee Director, introduced the bill, which aims to create an expedited development review pathway for employers meeting defined wage, investment, and job-quality standards. Fiscal analyst Caleb Callender reported that enactment would likely have an immediate, slightly adverse fiscal impact due to additional administrative costs at the Department of Permitting, Inspections and Environment (DPIE), but draft two amendments may mitigate costs by distributing responsibilities across agencies including the Economic Development Corporation (EDC).
  • Agency Comments: The County Executive's office expressed alignment with the bill's goals but noted current budget constraints and requested more information on costs. The Office of Law found the legislation legally sufficient.
  • Committee Discussion: Chair Adams-Stafford proposed draft two, which shifts program administration to the EDC in coordination with DPIE, Employ Prince George's, and the Office of Procurement. Council Member Dernoga asked for a definition of "high wage" and noted none was provided; staff indicated experts would develop criteria. Council Member Harrison requested a cost analysis from agencies within weeks. The committee clarified that the bill is enabling, not a mandate.
  • Votes: A motion to amend the bill (striking apprenticeship language to avoid duplication with CB-37-2026) passed 4-0. A motion to favorably recommend CB-105-2026 (draft two) with amendments passed 4-0. Vice Chair Burroughs was absent.

Briefing: Best Practices in Apprenticeship Programs - CityWorks DC

  • Presenter: Lateefah Durant, Vice President of Innovation, CityWorks DC. She highlighted the county's existing assets (PGCPS, Employ Prince George's, community college) and urged a unified system. She emphasized that incentives under CB-37-2026 (effective September 13, 2026) should reward apprenticeship but meet employers where they are on a continuum of work-based learning. Durant shared lessons from DC's youth apprenticeship program, which served 90+ apprentices with 20+ business partners, and recommended barrier-based incentive design, wraparound supports, and measuring net new activity rather than just participation counts.
  • Discussion: Council Members asked about transportation and coaching supports; Durant noted one-on-one career coaching and community school infrastructure as key assets.

Briefing: AI Platforms Available to Students, Families, and Educators - PGCPS

  • Presenters: Dr. Andrew Zuckerman, Chief Information Officer; Dr. Sandra Rose, Innovation Officer; Ms. Monica Jenkins, Assistant Director, Technology Integration & Support; Ms. Meghen Ehrich, Data Privacy Administrator. They outlined the district's AI literacy plan, noting that generative AI tools are not yet enabled for students, but Gemini will be enabled for high school students in 2027. Staff have access to Gemini, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and productivity tools like Brisk (for lesson design) and Canva. Student use is limited to teacher-directed activities. The district is aligning with MSDE guidance and has partnerships with AI EDU and a $1 million NSF grant (SCALES initiative) with Bowie State and George Mason.
  • Discussion: Council Members asked about student voice (Technology Advisory Committee includes students), pilot school selection (geographically and champion-based), data privacy protections (enterprise agreements, no PII allowed, vendor questionnaires), and ethical training (ethics embedded in foundational AI courses, librarian-led lessons at 9th grade). Chair Adams-Stafford emphasized the need for human-in-the-loop oversight, especially for automated feedback.

Briefing: AI Pathways at Local Higher Education Institutions - Bowie State University

  • Presenter: Dr. Kamruzzaman Sarker, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science. He described Bowie State's AI and technology programs, including a new BS in AI starting spring 2027, and highlighted Bureau of Labor Statistics projections: 35% growth for data scientists, 21% for information security analysts, and 1.9 million healthcare openings annually. He noted a $1 million NSF grant that pays students for internships (nine students placed in Prince George's County IT Department). He proposed stronger pathways from K-12 to community college to university, and adult upskilling credentials. He also raised ethical concerns about AI misuse in health insurance pre-screening.
  • Discussion: Council Member Harrison noted the projected 130,000 healthcare worker shortage by 2030 and asked about AI's role in efficiency; Dr. Sarker agreed AI can assist but stressed trust issues. Council Member Olson asked about job displacement; Dr. Sarker predicted new jobs will emerge (e.g., robot maintenance) but emphasized the need for flexibility. Chair Adams-Stafford expressed interest in capstone projects at the council.

Key Outcomes

  • CB-105-2026 was amended and favorably recommended (4-0) to the full County Council with draft two amendments shifting administration to the EDC.
  • The committee received three briefings with no formal votes required.
  • The committee requested a cost analysis from agencies on implementing the fast track program within the coming weeks.
  • The committee plans to hold a future roundtable on workforce development, with invitations extended to Ms. Durant and Dr. Sarker.

Meeting Transcript

Adam Stafford and I serve as chair. Today is Monday, September 14th, 2026, and we'll start with a roll call. Chair Adam Stafford. President. Councilmember Olson? Here. Councilmember Harrison. Three members present at roll call. Thank you. For today's agenda, we have one piece of legislation and three briefings. To all of our presenters, we're so appreciative of your time. Thank you for being here today, and we truly look forward to a robust discussion and the opportunity to collaborate. Our first agenda item will be CB 105 2026, an act concerning high-wage employer fast track program. I will now turn it over to our EWD staff for an overview. Thank you, Madam Chair, and good afternoon, Council members. Dr. Run Parakin, Director of the Education and Workforce Development Committee. The first agenda item is CB 105 2026 and that concerning high-wage employer fast track program for the purpose of creating an expedited coordinated development review pathways for employers that meet defined wage investments and job quality standards, establishing a dedicated project management structure and integrating inspections for workforce recruitment and providing incentives into a six into a single accelerated approval process regarding workforce uh development. I'll now turn it over to Mr. Caleb Callender for the policy analysis and fiscal impact overview. Thank you, Dr. Braggan. Enactment of CB 105 2026 will likely have an immediate, slightly adverse fiscal impact on the county. Uh implement implementation of the proposed program as currently drafted is expected to result in additional administrative costs to the Department of Permitting Inspections and Environment. DePI stated that if the bill were to move forward, the department would need permit project managers funded for each qualified high wage employer company. The department also expressed concerns regarding the current budget and staffing constraints, but did highlight the programs conducted by the department that currently expedite permits. However, the suggested amendments through draft two may mitigate some of the potential costs by distribution distributing responsibilities among the agencies whose existing roles and functions most closely align with the requirements of the program. Also, to the extent that the program successfully attracts qualifying high wage employers to the county, the resulting increase in business activity, employment and related economic activity could expand the county's tax base and generate additional tax revenues. Thank you. This concludes my report. Thank you. Um at this time I will turn it over to the county executive's office for any comments. Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm looking over uh draft two, and so we're we're still uh unsure about some of the changes. As noted by our agencies, however, though, current implementation of this does have a negative fiscal impact. And while we are in line with the with the goal and purpose of the bill, I do not believe there's budget for it currently, and so there is some hesitation as well as um some questions about exactly some of the qualifications that are included in the bill that some of the agencies have. Okay, thank you. Um I appreciate your feedback. Now we will hear from the office of law. Thank you, madam chair. The office of law has reviewed this um legislation for legal sufficiency, and we find it to be in proper legislative form. Thank you so much. Um, before turning it over to my colleagues for discussion, I have a few comments. I agree with the goal of this bill. I think we do need to attract high-wage employers to our county. With that being said, we hear the feedback from DPI and our policy team and in coordination with Chair Oriada's office. I propose draft two in lieu of draft one for CB 105 2026. Draft two states that the Prince George's County Economic Development Corporation shall administer the program in coordination with the Department of Permitting Inspections and Enforcement, DPI, employee Prince George's and the Office of Procurement and other agencies as appropriate. Additionally, draft two states that accelerated approval processes are for employers that are participating in the high-wage employer fast track program. The language for participation in the program was added for clarity.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com