OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Prince Georges County, Maryland/County Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting - September 24, 2026

County Council & Boards — Thursday, September 24, 2026
BodyPrince Georges County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Boards
DateThursday, September 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:58:58

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:01

Good afternoon, everyone.

0:04

Welcome to the September 24th, 2026 GFP meeting.

0:10

We have a very full agenda today with 20 pieces of legislation.

0:14

The agenda is uh we will um yep.

0:19

Please call the roll.

0:22

Mr.

0:23

Burroughs, present council member Oriata, Councilmember Dernoga.

0:31

Oh, Councilmember Gay.

0:33

My apologies.

0:34

Present Councilmember Ivy.

0:36

Here and Councilmember Adams is on the zoom.

0:40

Uh council member Adams.

0:43

Present.

0:44

Five present.

0:45

Thank you.

0:46

We'll start with CB 112 and that concerning fair election fund, post-election retention, and distributions, uncontested elections.

0:54

We'll have an overview from A Tut.

0:59

Thank you, Mr.

1:00

Chair.

1:01

On page 95 of your virtual binders.

1:04

CB 112026 is in that concerning the fair election fair election fund post-election fund retention and distributions in uncontested elections.

1:15

This uh legislation is for permit will permit a candidate to retain a limited amount of unspent funds after a general election to pay for post-election expenses.

1:25

Uh this also will require the return of retained funds if the candidate does not continue in the public campaign financing system for the next election cycle.

1:36

And would authorize a partial distribution of public contributions to a certified candidate who is unopposed in a primary election.

1:45

Thank you, Mr.

1:46

Benegis.

1:47

Thank you, Mr.

1:48

Tudd, and good afternoon, Mr.

1:50

Chair, Mr.

1:51

Vice Chair, members of the committee.

1:52

Uh CB 112026 aims to fill the gaps and conditions of the fair election fund that were previously enacted by CB 99 2018 and amended through CB 76 2023.

2:05

The proposed bill clarifies the disposition of unspent funds as it relates to participating candidates under the fair election fund in uncontested elections.

2:15

The proposed bill would amend subtitle 10 finance and taxation division 26 fair election fund to add additional language to multiple subsections for bear better clarity and transparency.

2:29

The enactment of CB 112026 may have a direct adverse fiscal impact on the county as it could increase uh expenditures from the fair election fund by authorizing partial distributions to otherwise unopposed primary candidates that would not have been permitted under the existing uh contested election rule.

2:49

The bill could temper temporarily reduce the amount of cash available to the fund following a general election because uh because eligible candidates may retain up to five thousand dollars each amount sub sec subsequently returned would restore the fund balance.

3:05

Thank you.

3:08

Thank you very much.

3:09

CB112.

3:10

Uh, we'll turn to the office of law.

3:15

Good afternoon, Mr.

3:16

Chair, and good afternoon, all committee members.

3:19

Just want to point out on page two line four.

3:24

There's a technical error there.

3:26

There's a reference to subsection K, and this section does not have a subsection K.

3:32

So that needs to be all met it or corrected.

3:35

We'll take that as you know that's we'll take care of that.

3:41

Uh County Exec.

3:45

Thank you.

3:46

Um, the county, the administration is not in opposition of the bill.

3:50

Councilmember Denoga.

3:53

Uh staff really covered this, but basically, other counties that have uh had the fair election fund before before Prince George's have seen that it's difficult for candidates after the election when they had to give back all the money, and they uh I think have changed their law to allow for modest uh retention and this this just does that, so it's uh maximum of five thousand for a candidate who will continue on as a uh uh publicly funded candidate uh fill out a notice of intent to continue in that role in that status by I think December 31st.

4:24

So basically it's it should have very limited impact on who who's eligible for it.

4:29

Thank you.

4:30

Is there a motion from the committee?

4:32

Motion to move favorable, second by council gay, second by council member ivy.

4:38

Clerk, please call the roll council member Burroughs, aye, council member ivy, aye, council member Oriata, Councilmember Blagay, aye, council member Adams, motion carries five zero.

4:57

Uh thank you very much.

5:01

We're going to go to CR96, then 99, and then CB 126.

5:08

If I can have the uh state's attorney and her team come forward.

5:25

Not 99.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Government Operations█████████████████████████25%
Budget Equity Analysis████████████████16%
Public Engagement██████████████14%
Cannabis Regulation███████████11%
Procedural███████7%
Tax Policy██████6%
Affordable Housing████4%
Data Management███3%
Personnel Matters███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting - September 24, 2026

The Government Operations and Fiscal Policy (GOFP) Committee of the Prince George's County Council met on Thursday, September 24, 2026, at 1:55 PM in Committee Room 2027. Chair Edward Burroughs presided with five members present (Burroughs, Blegay, Ivey, Oriadha, Adams). The committee considered 20 pieces of legislation, including amendments to the Cannabis Reinvestment and Restoration Board, a package of property tax relief bills for elderly and disabled residents, resolutions on council transparency and public participation, contract approvals, and a proposal to establish an independent Office of the Inspector General.

Consent Calendar (Unanimous Actions)

  • CB-112-2026 (Fair Election Fund – Post-Election Retention and Distributions in Uncontested Elections): Favorably recommended (5-0) with a technical correction noted by the Office of Law.
  • CR-099-2026 (Contract Approval – State’s Attorney’s Office Discovery Management System): Favorably recommended (5-0). Fiscal impact: approximately $365,000 in FY2027, $2 million over five years.
  • CB-126-2026 (Classification Plan – amended titles, new/abolished classes): Favorably recommended (5-0). No salary ranges provided; potential increase for Executive Director class.
  • CB-094-2026 (Property Tax Credit for Elderly Individuals of Limited Income): Favorably recommended with amendments (5-0). Estimated first-year cost: $846,000; five-year cost: $4.616 million.
  • CB-098-2026 (Property Tax Credit – Reduced Rent for Elderly/Disabled Tenants): Favorably recommended with amendments (5-0). Maximum annual impact: $250,000; five-year cap: $1.25 million.
  • CB-095-2026 (Real Property Tax Deferral for Elderly/Disabled Homeowners): Favorably recommended with amendments (5-0). Amended to require 20 years of homeownership and an assessed value cap of $750,000. Estimated first-year deferral: $520,000; five-year cumulative: $2.824 million (based on 20-year ownership).
  • CB-117-2026 (Property Tax Cap for Elderly Individuals): Reported out with no recommendation (5-0) to allow further discussion between sponsor and administration. Estimated first-year cost: $2.034 million; five-year: $32.354 million as drafted.
  • CR-086-2026 (Government Transparency, Performance, and Accountability Workgroup): Favorably recommended (5-0).
  • CR-091-2026 (Local Impact Grant Funds Multiyear Plan): Favorably recommended (4-0-1, Ivey abstained).
  • CB-122-2026 (Orphans’ Court Judges Compensation): Favorably recommended (5-0). Sets associate judge salary at $80,000 and chief judge at $85,000; fiscal impact $117,100 included in FY2027 budget.
  • CR-092-2026 (Council Rules – Monthly Evening Meeting): Favorably recommended (3-0-2, Burroughs and Ivey abstained).
  • CR-093-2026 (Council Rules – Annual Countywide Listening Tours): Favorably recommended (4-0-1, Ivey abstained).
  • CR-096-2026 (Contract Approval – Emergency Communication Equipment & Public Safety Vehicles): Favorably recommended (5-0). Authorizes up to $120 million in debt for 911 radio system replacement ($70M) and annual public safety equipment lease ($30M).
  • CB-125-2026 (Homestead Property Tax Credit – 104% for FY2028): Favorably recommended (5-0).
  • CB-127-2026 (Capital Budget Transfers – District VI Police Station, Public Safety Infrastructure): Favorably recommended (5-0). No net fiscal impact; supplementary appropriation increases debt by approximately $62 million.
  • CB-129-2026 (Supplementary Appropriations – FY2026 Close-out): Favorably recommended (5-0). Reallocates $28.7 million between agencies.
  • CB-061-2026 (Surplus Property – Removing Redevelopment Authority, Adding Office of Central Services): Favorably recommended (5-0).
  • CB-001-2026 (County Equity Participation Authority Act): Postponed indefinitely.
  • CB-103-2026 (Qualified Data Centers Personal Property Tax Exemption): Held indefinitely (5-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • CB-093-2026 (Cannabis Board): Several speakers opposed the original bill, arguing it would weaken the board’s authority and community voice. Crystal Carpenter (board chair) supported some amendments but raised concerns about unfilled vacancies and a 90-day deadline. Belinda Queen Cunningham (Coalition of Prince George’s County Community Organizations), Taylor Fraser McCullum, Beverly John, and others urged rejection, stating the bill was a “power grab” that would shift control from the community to the council. Council Member Oriadha responded, defending the need for deadlines and consistent staffing to ensure funds are spent, and noted an email sent by board members threatening to withhold a vote unless administrative fees were approved.
  • CB-119-2026 (Inspector General): Patricia Fenn (Legislative Committee Chair, M-NCPPC Retirement Association) testified in favor, citing similar offices in other jurisdictions. Chairman Hardy (Citizens for Accountability and Governance) supported with suggested amendments on independence, mandatory funding, and qualifications. Dr. Takisha Brown (resident and attorney) urged favorable recommendation, citing recent controversies. The County Executive’s Office raised concerns about overlapping responsibilities with the existing Office of Ethics and Accountability and the charter-mandated Office of Audits and Investigation.

Discussion Items

  • CB-093-2026 – Cannabis Reinvestment and Restoration Board Amendments: The committee debated four amendments. Amendment 1 (Ivey) added a flat $5,000 annual administrative fund for the board (carried 5-0). Amendment 2 (Burroughs) extended the deadline for board recommendations from 90 to 180 days after the start of the fiscal year (carried 5-0). Amendment 3 (Burroughs) struck language allowing the council’s grants office to bypass the board if recommendations are late (carried 4-0-1, Oriadha abstained). Amendment 4 (Oriadha) changed the board’s name to “Community Reinvestment and Repair Board” (carried 5-0). The bill was favorably recommended as amended (5-0).
  • CB-094/095/098/117 – Elderly/Disabled Tax Credit Package: The committee discussed each bill. For CB-095, the administration requested amendments to add a 40-year ownership requirement and an assessed value cap; the committee adopted a 20-year ownership plus $750,000 cap (favorable). For CB-117, the sponsor (Oriadha) requested more time to work with the administration on fiscal impact; the bill was reported without recommendation. The Office of Finance estimated that limiting eligibility to those already in queue and using a fixed dollar amount could reduce cost, but no consensus was reached.
  • CR-083-2026 (Virtual Public Participation): Held in committee (2-0-3, Blegay and Oriadha aye; Burroughs, Ivey, Adams abstained). No motion to move forward.
  • CB-119-2026 – Independent Office of the Inspector General: Extensive discussion. Council Member Ivey proposed moving the bill without recommendation to allow further negotiations; no second was offered. Council Members Blegay and Adams expressed support for the concept but raised concerns about redundancy with existing offices and potential conflicts with the county charter. The Office of Ethics and Accountability director noted a planned legislative package for 2027 that could address some issues. The motion died for lack of a second, and the meeting was adjourned without further action on CB-119.

Key Outcomes

  • CB-093-2026: Favorably recommended with amendments (5-0).
  • CB-094-2026, CB-095-2026, CB-098-2026, CB-125-2026, CB-126-2026, CB-127-2026, CB-129-2026, CB-061-2026, CR-086-2026, CR-096-2026, CR-099-2026, CB-112-2026, CB-122-2026, CR-092-2026, CR-093-2026: All favorably recommended (votes ranged from 5-0 to 4-0-1).
  • CB-117-2026: Reported without recommendation (5-0).
  • CR-083-2026: Held in committee (no motion passed).
  • CB-001-2026: Postponed indefinitely.
  • CB-103-2026: Held indefinitely (5-0).
  • CB-119-2026: No action; motion to move without recommendation failed for lack of a second. Meeting adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to the September 24th, 2026 GFP meeting. We have a very full agenda today with 20 pieces of legislation. The agenda is uh we will um yep. Please call the roll. Mr. Burroughs, present council member Oriata, Councilmember Dernoga. Oh, Councilmember Gay. My apologies. Present Councilmember Ivy. Here and Councilmember Adams is on the zoom. Uh council member Adams. Present. Five present. Thank you. We'll start with CB 112 and that concerning fair election fund, post-election retention, and distributions, uncontested elections. We'll have an overview from A Tut. Thank you, Mr. Chair. On page 95 of your virtual binders. CB 112026 is in that concerning the fair election fair election fund post-election fund retention and distributions in uncontested elections. This uh legislation is for permit will permit a candidate to retain a limited amount of unspent funds after a general election to pay for post-election expenses. Uh this also will require the return of retained funds if the candidate does not continue in the public campaign financing system for the next election cycle. And would authorize a partial distribution of public contributions to a certified candidate who is unopposed in a primary election. Thank you, Mr. Benegis. Thank you, Mr. Tudd, and good afternoon, Mr. Chair, Mr. Vice Chair, members of the committee. Uh CB 112026 aims to fill the gaps and conditions of the fair election fund that were previously enacted by CB 99 2018 and amended through CB 76 2023. The proposed bill clarifies the disposition of unspent funds as it relates to participating candidates under the fair election fund in uncontested elections. The proposed bill would amend subtitle 10 finance and taxation division 26 fair election fund to add additional language to multiple subsections for bear better clarity and transparency. The enactment of CB 112026 may have a direct adverse fiscal impact on the county as it could increase uh expenditures from the fair election fund by authorizing partial distributions to otherwise unopposed primary candidates that would not have been permitted under the existing uh contested election rule. The bill could temper temporarily reduce the amount of cash available to the fund following a general election because uh because eligible candidates may retain up to five thousand dollars each amount sub sec subsequently returned would restore the fund balance. Thank you. Thank you very much. CB112. Uh, we'll turn to the office of law. Good afternoon, Mr. Chair, and good afternoon, all committee members. Just want to point out on page two line four. There's a technical error there. There's a reference to subsection K, and this section does not have a subsection K. So that needs to be all met it or corrected. We'll take that as you know that's we'll take care of that. Uh County Exec. Thank you. Um, the county, the administration is not in opposition of the bill. Councilmember Denoga.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com