OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Prince Georges County, Maryland/County Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Prince George's County Board of Appeals Hearing - October 21, 2026

County Council & Boards — Wednesday, October 21, 2026
BodyPrince Georges County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Boards
DateWednesday, October 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:07:22

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:30

Mr.

0:31

Chair, we have an uh technical difficulty, so I'll let you know when they're cleared.

0:36

Okay, sir.

Speaker 2

0:38

Recording in progress.

Speaker 3

0:41

Okay, all right, great.

0:43

Uh good evening, everyone.

0:44

The Board of Appeals hearings for Wednesday, October the 21st, 2026, or hit by a being called to order at 601 p.m.

Unassigned speaker

0:52

I'll

Speaker 3

0:52

ask our board administrator to please call the roll.

0:55

Chair Bulware.

0:57

Present.

Speaker 1

0:58

Vice Chair Johnston.

Speaker 4

1:00

Present.

Unassigned speaker

1:01

Or

Speaker 1

1:01

member Stan.

1:02

Present.

1:03

Three members present and roll call.

1:06

Thank

Unassigned speaker

1:06

you.

Speaker 1

1:06

Are there any announcements?

1:08

No announcements, Mr.

1:10

Chair.

Speaker 3

1:10

Alright, great.

Unassigned speaker

1:12

Uh

Speaker 3

1:12

the Board of Appeals in-person meetings and our hearings continue to operate virtually using alternative public participation options, including utilization of digital technology or telecoms.

1:23

Our virtual hearings are recorded and transcribed during the meeting.

1:26

So please state your name for the record each time you speak.

1:29

For clarity and transcription, please do not speak over another person.

Unassigned speaker

1:33

If

Speaker 3

1:33

you wish to speak, please raise your hand.

2:30

Such variants can be granted without substantial impairment to the intent, purpose, and integrity of the general plan or any area of master plan, sector plan,

Unassigned speaker

2:38

or

Speaker 3

2:38

transit dictionary development plan affecting the subject property, and such variants will not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties.

2:46

Notwithstanding any other provision of the section, a variance may not be granted if the practical difficulty is self-inflicted by the owner of the property.

2:54

All of these criteria must apply.

Unassigned speaker

2:57

If

Speaker 3

2:57

the board determines that it needs to seek technical assistance from any other government agency, we shall do so.

Unassigned speaker

3:03

The

Speaker 3

3:03

approval of a variance is not a guarantee that further review will not be necessary by any other government authorities.

3:09

Following the approval of a variance, a building permit must be obtained before any building permits will be processed by the county permits office.

Unassigned speaker

3:16

A

Speaker 3

3:16

copy of the board's written order must be presented.

3:19

Approval of any variance is contingent upon development of the property in compliance with the board's approved site and elevation plans.

Speaker 5

4:03

Good evening.

4:03

This is Abdullah Hija, the council for the applicant effect Inc.

4:07

Um, my video was on, but it was disabled.

4:10

I'm just trying to start it again.

4:13

Okay.

Speaker 3

4:16

Absolutely.

4:16

Great.

Speaker 5

4:17

With me today are also uh members, other members of the applicant team.

4:21

I know Mr.

4:22

Carballo, Adam Carbolo, the applicant's architect is on here.

4:25

Mr.

4:25

Eddie Diaz Campbell also our senior land planner is on here.

4:30

Um and uh I believe that's pretty much everybody at here for the application so far.

4:36

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

4:37

So

Speaker 3

4:37

Mr.

4:38

Jazee, we won't need to swear you in, but we'll need to swear in anyone else who will be providing testimony.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████81%
Procedural████████14%
Public Works███5%
Summary of Proceedings

Prince George's County Board of Appeals Hearing - October 21, 2026

The Board of Appeals held a virtual hearing on October 21, 2026, beginning at 6:01 PM and adjourning at 7:07 PM, to consider four variance applications and approve the minutes from the October 7, 2026 meeting. Three board members (Chair Bulware, Vice Chair Johnston, and Member Stan/Stanton) were present. All variances were approved unanimously 3-0.

V-46-26: Effect Inc. (5908 Burgundy Street, Capitol Heights)

  • Applicant representative: Abdullah Hijazi (counsel), with architect Adam Carbalo and land planner Eddie Diaz Campbell.
  • Request: Variances of 2,500 sq ft net lot area (from 6,500 to 4,000 sq ft), 25 ft lot width (from 65 to 45 ft), and 5 ft lot frontage at the front street line (from 45 to 40 ft) to construct a single-family dwelling with two-story additions, porch, basement, garage, and second-floor cantilever.
  • Key points: The lot consists of two original 20 ft x 100 ft parcels from a 1930s subdivision, predating current RSF-65 zoning. A previous home on the lot was demolished around 2015-2016. The property has steep topographical differences from adjacent lots. The proposed home footprint is ~1,100 sq ft, compatible with the neighborhood.
  • Vote: Motion by Vice Chair Johnston, seconded by Member Stan. Approved 3-0.

V-45-26: Trung Huynh (9306 Croom Road, Upper Marlboro)

  • Applicant representative: Abdullah Hijazi; interpreter Thanh Vo provided Vietnamese translation. Applicant Trung Huynh present.
  • Request: Variances of 1.39 acres net lot area (from 5 acres to 3.61 acres), 15.14 ft lot frontage (from 240 ft to 224.86 ft), and 8.4% lot coverage (from 5% to 13.4%), plus a waiver for front yard parking, to validate existing conditions after unauthorized driveway construction (paving a dirt driveway and adding a circular driveway).
  • Key points: The property has steep slopes and a stream along the frontage, forcing the home and garage deep into the lot. The lot was subdivided in 1978. The driveway work was done without permits; the applicant applied for corrective permits once flagged. Board focused on criterion six (self-inflicted); it was noted that similar variances would have been required even if permits were sought before construction.
  • Vote: Motion by Member Stan, seconded by Vice Chair Johnston. Approved 3-0 (including the parking waiver).

V-9-26: JAV General Service, LLC (3001 Taylor Street, Mount Rainier)

  • Applicant representative: Diana Klein; property owner Reina Morales present.
  • Request: Variances of 2,375 sq ft net lot area (from 6,500 to 4,125 sq ft), 10 ft lot width, 7.1 ft front yard depth, 0.6 ft side yard width, 11 ft side street yard width, 3.9 ft rear yard depth, and 3.6% lot coverage to validate existing conditions and permit unauthorized construction of a two-story addition and a proposed 7 ft x 29.5 ft covered porch.
  • Key points: The lot was platted in 1904; the dwelling was originally built in 1925. The property is in the RSF-65 zone and Mount Rainier neighborhood conservation overlay. The Mount Rainier Design Review Board and city recommended approval. The proposed second story does not exceed the original footprint.
  • Vote: Motion by Vice Chair Johnston, seconded by Member Stan. Approved 3-0.

V-44-26: Deanna Slaughter (10607 Mullikin Drive, Clinton)

  • Applicant: Deanna Slaughter present; contractor James Garner (Patio Enclosures) also testified.
  • Request: Variances of 0.8% lot coverage and 3 ft side yard width to construct a 10 ft x 15 ft sunroom.
  • Key points: The lot is narrow and has topographical constraints. The sunroom will be at grade and will not hinder adjacent properties. The project cannot be made smaller while remaining functional.
  • Vote: Motion by Member Stan, seconded by Vice Chair Johnston. Approved 3-0.

Key Outcomes

  • All four variances (V-46-26, V-45-26, V-9-26, V-44-26) were approved by a 3-0 vote.
  • The minutes from the October 7, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously.
  • The next meeting is scheduled for November 4, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Mr. Chair, we have an uh technical difficulty, so I'll let you know when they're cleared. Okay, sir. Recording in progress. Okay, all right, great. Uh good evening, everyone. The Board of Appeals hearings for Wednesday, October the 21st, 2026, or hit by a being called to order at 601 p.m. I'll ask our board administrator to please call the roll. Chair Bulware. Present. Vice Chair Johnston. Present. Or member Stan. Present. Three members present and roll call. Thank you. Are there any announcements? No announcements, Mr. Chair. Alright, great. Uh the Board of Appeals in-person meetings and our hearings continue to operate virtually using alternative public participation options, including utilization of digital technology or telecoms. Our virtual hearings are recorded and transcribed during the meeting. So please state your name for the record each time you speak. For clarity and transcription, please do not speak over another person. If you wish to speak, please raise your hand. Such variants can be granted without substantial impairment to the intent, purpose, and integrity of the general plan or any area of master plan, sector plan, or transit dictionary development plan affecting the subject property, and such variants will not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. Notwithstanding any other provision of the section, a variance may not be granted if the practical difficulty is self-inflicted by the owner of the property. All of these criteria must apply. If the board determines that it needs to seek technical assistance from any other government agency, we shall do so. The approval of a variance is not a guarantee that further review will not be necessary by any other government authorities. Following the approval of a variance, a building permit must be obtained before any building permits will be processed by the county permits office. A copy of the board's written order must be presented. Approval of any variance is contingent upon development of the property in compliance with the board's approved site and elevation plans. Good evening. This is Abdullah Hija, the council for the applicant effect Inc. Um, my video was on, but it was disabled. I'm just trying to start it again. Okay. Absolutely. Great.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com