Racine Common Council Meeting - January 31, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Racine Common Council Meeting - January 31, 2025
The Racine Common Council met on January 31, 2025, at 2:15 PM. The meeting covered approval of past minutes, a public comment on property taxes, a detailed discussion of a $2 million home fund allocation for property redevelopment, and a deferral of two garage-related items for further review. The consent agenda was approved, and council members made announcements recognizing community members and city staff.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of the December 3, 2024, council proceedings and the previously deferred November 19, 2024, minutes. (Moved by President McCarthy, seconded, approved unanimously.)
- Items from the Public Services and Licensing committee report were placed on the consent agenda without objection.
- After separate consideration and deferral of two items, the remaining CDBG advisory board item was placed on the consent agenda and approved.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Jerry Hueyman (3608 Wilshire, Racine) spoke about high property taxes in Racine compared to Appleton. He cited a Patch.com article ranking Racine ninth highest in the state for property taxes, while Appleton ranked 272nd. He noted his home is similar in size to his relative's in Appleton, but he pays over $4,000 in taxes versus $2,700, and his neighborhood experiences blasting from Pen and Dolan. He urged council members to contact their counterparts in Appleton to learn how to do more with less.
Discussion Items
- Item 0760-24: Communication from Mayor Mason requesting up to $2 million in HOME funds for property redevelopment at 2509 16th Street and 1624 Homes Avenue. Alder Weidner requested separate consideration. Director of City Development George Williams provided details: $100,000–$150,000 for demolition of the church, approximately $1.4 million to build four homes (two-story, three- to four-bedroom, similar to homes built on 12th Street), total cost $2 million. The HOME fund has a balance of $4.2 million; the project would clear 2018–2020 allocations to avoid losing funds. An environmental assessment for asbestos is underway. Alder Escada raised concerns about code violations and whether standalone garages (items 1091-24 and 1092-24) are eligible under HUD rules. Alder Caprillion requested specifications and noted insufficient detail in the minutes. Discussion led to a motion to defer the two garage items to the next meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Deferral of items 1091-24 and 1092-24: A motion to defer these two garage standalone projects to the next council meeting was made by Alder Caprillion, seconded by Alder Mack, and passed unanimously (12–0). The deferral allows time for additional HUD eligibility review.
- Remaining CDBG item (0760-24): After the deferral, the item was placed on the consent agenda and approved without further discussion.
- Consent agenda: Approved unanimously.
- Announcements: Alder Mack wished his wife a happy 54th birthday and congratulated Joe Mooney's Jean's Jazz Series and the Racine Theater Guild on their 25th season. Alder Weidner commended Public Works drivers for snow plowing and Chief Electrical Inspector Charles Ward for saving a resident $16,000. Alder Press thanked Public Works for snow response. Alder Harman wished happy birthday to family members.
- Adjournment: Motion carried with aye vote.
Meeting Transcript
Yes, Mr. Mayor, Alders Coe and Jones have requested to be excused this evening. Duly noted. Next item is the approval of the council proceedings, uh December 3rd minutes, and people may recall at the last meeting we deferred the November 19th minutes. Uh President McCarthy, would you like to make a motion to approve said minutes? Yes, I've approved both sets, or excuse me. I have reviewed both sets of minutes and I move for their approval. Aye. Opposed. That motion carries. There are no proclamations this evening, so we will go on to public comments. If the clerk could please read the rules before we begin. The public comment segment is an opportunity for citizens to speak directly to the common council. Speakers will limit their remarks to three minutes. There shall be no dialogue or interaction between the speaker and elected officials or staff. This time is not intended to be a debate or discussion. The common council shall not hear personal complaints or attacks against any city employee or elected official or any matter related to an individual claim, citation, appeal, or lawsuit. Profane, disruptive, threatening, or conduct that otherwise impedes the safe, orderly, and effective conduct of the common council meeting is equally unacceptable during the public comment period as it is during all portion of sitting meetings. When a group of people representing one viewpoint wishes to address the council, one person shall be appointed the designated speaker for the group. Candidates for public office may not use this opportunity to campaign for office. Speakers during the public comment period shall follow all rules of the common council and rulings of the chair, including a decision to terminate the remarks if the speaker does not adhere to these rules. Public comments shall be limited to ideas or concerns regarding the city of Racine. There will be one speaker this evening. Jerry Hueyman, 3608 Wilshire Racine. You didn't pronounce the name right, but I'm gonna present it anyway. The reason I came, each of you probably remembered me when I gave a presentation on November 19th. Uh regarding the Racine was based on a patch.com article, uh ranking 596 villages, towns, and cities and so forth in the state of Racine. Uh not Racine, Wisconsin. Uh Racine came in ninth number ninth highest in the state. And I've got relatives in Apple and Wisconsin. They came in at 272. And the reason that I even looked it up was the person was complaining about her taxes up there. Uh so Appleton has a population on 2023. I looked up a little better than uh 74,000. Racine has a population of 76,000. So it's you know, comparing it's not a small village, whatever, it's the same size about city. And uh their home is assessed at uh eight at 8,000 more than mine. Their property taxes are 36 percent less than mine. They have the same square footage as mine, basically 12 to 1,300 square feet across from their home are mansions and the Fox River. And mine is you know, her neighborhood behind her and so forth, and the side of her is the same as my size, but it like I say mansions. In fact, one was recently torn down. Uh it was 10,000 square feet, and they built about a 25,000 square foot mansion. I assume their property taxes are higher. Uh in my neighborhood, all the houses are about 12 to 1,300 square foot. Uh she lives in a quiet neighborhood. I live where Pen and Dolan, which the city did nothing about their expansion, they were going to live for about another five years. Now they're gonna live for about I think another 30 or 40. But I live where two blocks away, and there's blasts four or five times a week and causes dust, noise, and shaking. Uh my relative, their property taxes are just a little better than 2700. And I pay over $4,000.
openpublica.com