Raleigh City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting - August 19, 2025
Raleigh City Council Meeting - August 19, 2025
This summary is based on the provided transcript, which covers only the 11:30 AM work session on the Street Infrastructure Assessment Program. The regular session, scheduled for 1:00 PM, included numerous consent agenda items, public hearings, and reports, but no transcript was available. The work session was called to order by Mayor Janet Cowell and attended by Council members Forte, Branch, Harrison, Jones, Lambert-Melton, Patton, and Silver.
Work Session: Street Infrastructure Assessment Program
-
Presentation by Bradley Kimbrell (Transportation): The program dates back to the 1950s. Assessments are used to recover costs of street improvements from property owners based on linear frontage, with rates last updated in 2001, recovering less than 2% of actual construction costs. There are 17 pending projects (12 completed, 5 in progress) that have not had assessment rolls adopted. These projects are not new; they were authorized as early as 1999. Staff presented three options for resolving the pending assessments.
-
Council Discussion:
- Councilor Branch asked about potential legal challenges from property owners who paid assessments on earlier projects not on the list. The City Attorney's office indicated that the council has purview to rescind assessments.
- Councilor Harrison noted that all 12 completed projects are in black text (completed work) and asked about refunds; staff confirmed refunds would go to the current property owner, not the original payer.
- Councilor Patton expressed concern about refunding to current owners rather than original payers, but acknowledged the administrative burden and low cost recovery.
- Councilor Lambert-Melton supported staff's recommendation (Option 3) to eliminate all assessments and refund approximately $200,000, stating that when staff recommends refunding charges, the council should do so.
- Councilor Silver emphasized the need to prioritize walkability and increase sidewalk funding, noting that the city should communicate to the public that walkability is a priority.
- Councilor Jones inquired about budget allocation for sidewalks and was informed that the Active Mobility Plan update would include funding recommendations.
- Councilor Branch requested that staff document community pushback on sidewalk projects to avoid future complaints.
-
Staff Recommendation: Option 3: Eliminate assessments on all 17 pending projects, rescind the resolutions, authorize refunds of approximately $200,000 in advanced payments, and no longer assess for future street improvement projects. Staff also recommended eliminating the petition process for project selection, with a future evaluation of criteria.
Key Outcomes
- Council directed staff to bring back Option 3 as a formal agenda item for a vote at the September 2, 2025 regular meeting.
- Council expressed general support for eliminating assessments on future street improvement projects and for moving toward a more equitable, city-funded approach to infrastructure improvements.
- The work session concluded at approximately 11:55 AM, and the regular session proceeded as scheduled, but no transcript of that portion is available.
Note on Other Agenda Items
The agenda for the 1:00 PM regular session included a consent calendar (general items, petition annexations, public hearing requests, grants, contracts, bids, traffic changes), public comment, reports from committees, public hearings on nuisance abatement and annexations, rezoning cases, nominations to boards and commissions, and a closed session. Without a transcript, it is not possible to confirm which items were discussed or voted on. The council likely approved the consent agenda and other routine items as recommended, but this summary cannot verify those actions.
Meeting Transcript
I think they're asking us to just let him get through all the information because there may be a lot of data that you know, and then we can ask the questions, knowing how detail-oriented and eager all of us are. Um with that, uh I will uh hand it over to Mr. Kimbrell. Good morning. Yes, uh, it is a pleasure to have your first item back. Uh you know, a lot of history here, of course, uh as mentioned. Um I can say with some level of confidence. I hope the rest of your agenda items uh get better from here from this one. Uh just kind of set the stage with assessments program in Raleigh, it dates back to the 50s. Um and yes, a tremendous amount of history to unpack, and I just do ask for uh a little bit of grace as uh we we did our best to focus on the key details. Um to give you some indication of that, one of the projects that'll show up uh has is origin uh originally uh authorized when I was in high school. Um just a couple years ago, to be clear. Uh so as we go through this, uh we'll start with kind of high level what is an assessment, what are project types uh that have been hit assessed historically, uh the options for pending projects. So, and and you'll hear me say this a couple of times. When we say pending, these are not new projects. These are not projects that are uh still early in design. These are really pending in the sense that uh they have not been adopted for assessments to be applied to those properties. And we'll cover this a couple of times, but just really wanted to to emphasize that pending doesn't mean new. Um in that spec. So um and then the last thing uh uh if uh time permits uh is a consideration for the future of these programs. So uh what is an assessment? Assessment is a mechanism for cost recovery. Uh recovery for construction of street infrastructure to be more specific. Uh these are applied to the property, not the property owner, and they show up as a lien. Uh the value of the assessments are based around a linear foot of the frontage along the scope of the project. And they are calculated with rates that were last updated over 20 years ago. Uh and you'll see this on the next slide, but ultimately these get applied to the properties through adoption of an assessment role. Um that is the last step before it's uh while it's pending. So here's our our lovely timeline. Thank you to comms for the help on this slide. Um as you as you might have noticed, uh, a lot of the similarities to a normal project, uh, authorization, design, construction. Uh what makes an assessment project unique is that the very beginning, council would authorize that these would be eligible for assessments, uh collection of the assessments. Uh and then around uh preliminary design, uh staff would generate a an estimate of costs for each property. And then around uh preliminary design, uh staff would generate a an estimate of costs for each property, uh and those properties then would be notified that uh based off of your frontage, based off of the rates, this is what you'd be looking as uh as your assessment on your property. Um at that point, we would consider this uh that pending state, and then therefore uh property owners may start to send in payments to the city, advanced payments. Um there's more information that we'll talk about uh in a later slide on that. Uh obviously construction, um, but then after construction and adoption, then at that point, staff would bring back to council through public hearing the final uh calculations of assessments uh for for you to review and ultimately decide to confirm the resolution, which again is that term assessment role. Okay. So here is an example of a capital improvement project that was done uh through an assessment means. Uh picture on the left shows the before conditions, uh unimproved, and then after, uh, where uh median was put in, bike lane, sidewalk, um, and again uh recoup the cost through assessments of properties. So just an example. So to be fair, there are a number of accessible project types. Um the rest of this presentation is really focused on these three here. And so I'll I'll dive a little deeper on those three. Uh petition sidewalks, and uh that is where someone from the public requests the city to build sidewalks. Um that's a city initiated city, um, I'm sorry, a public initiated public requested project type. Uh around 20 uh in 2011, council ultimately decided to no longer take assessments on petition sidewalk projects. So after 2011, no new projects would be eligible for assessments for petition sidewalks. Similarly, in 2018, capital improvement projects, which are city initiated, uh, those no new projects beyond 2018 would be an assessment projects. So that brings us to petition street improvements.
openpublica.com