The Redmond Planning Commission met on May 14, 2026, holding a study session on temporary non-commercial sign regulations, hearing public comment on water management, and voting on a staff recommendation. The raw transcript and agenda identify the meeting date as May 13, 2026, which conflicts with the official timestamp of May 14, 2026. All commissioners were present except Commissioner Copley (excused). The commission approved the agenda and prior meeting minutes, then voted to direct staff to prepare a revised sign code recommendation.
All right. Welcome to the May 13th, 2026 meeting of the Redmond Planning Commission. Like to call this meeting to order. We'll start with a roll call. Commissioner Parna. Present. Commissioner Coleman. Present. Commissioner Gagnier. Present. Commissioner Van Dyman. Present. Vice Chair Whittier. Present. And I am Chair Weston. Commissioner Copley is excused tonight. I'd like to thank the following staff for being present. Lauren Albert, Jeff Churchill, and Chris Wyatt. Look for a motion to approve the agenda. So moved. Second. All in favor? Aye. Great. And then any corrections to the meeting summary and meeting minutes from last time. All right. In that case, I look for a motion to approve the meeting minutes from April 22nd, 2026. And the workshop summary from April 29th, 2026. So moved. Second. All in favor? All right. Also approved. Yep, we sorted it out. All right. Now it's time for us to hear a public comment and items from the audience. Who do we have tonight? We have David M. Great. And as always, um, keep your comments to three minutes and start with your name and address, please. Good evening, Commissioners. I'm David Morton, Redmond 98053. I want to talk about the gaps between Redmond's current water management programs and the goals and vision of Redmond 2050. Redmond has genuine strengths to build on. Your critical aquifer recharge area protections are among the most rigorous in the state, backed by decades of groundwater monitoring. Will reflect a commitment to healthier streams and lakes for the entire community. But a review of Redmond's plans across five water domains, potable water, wastewater, stormwater, groundwater, and surface water, reveals nine significant gaps that deserve attention. Five of these are critical. First, Redmond has no water reuse or recycled water program, no framework to distribute reclaimed water for non-potable uses like irrigation or industrial cooling. Second, there is a limited graywater reuse policy, limited ways for dense new development in downtown or overlake to reuse sink and shower water on site.