Redmond City Council Special Meeting: August 3, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Redmond City Council Special Meeting: August 3, 2026
The Redmond City Council held a special meeting on Monday, August 3, 2026, beginning at 7:00 PM. Mayor Pro Tem presided in the absence of Mayor Birney. The meeting featured public comments, unanimous approval of a consent agenda, ombudsperson reports, and committee reports. The council will be in recess until September 1, 2026. An executive session for potential litigation (20 minutes) concluded the meeting, which adjourned at 7:56 PM.
Consent Calendar
- Minutes Approval: Minutes of the July 21, 2026 Regular and Special Meetings were approved.
- Payroll and Claims: Payroll registers for July 24 and July 31, 2026, and the check approval register for August 3, 2026, were approved.
- Appointments: Austin Ashenbrenner was appointed as a new Human Services Commission member and sworn in.
- Budgets and Ground Rules: Adoption of Council Ground Rules for the 2027-2028 Preliminary Budget Deliberations.
- Grants and Contracts: Approval of the 4Culture Art Grant, the Lake Washington School District 2026-2027 School Community Resource Officer Contract Agreement, and pre-membership in the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) with an interlocal agreement.
- Ordinances:
- Ordinance No. 3266: Amending RMC Chapter 3.38 to implement a 12-year Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Extension Program.
- Ordinance No. 3267: Setting the framework for the 2026-27 Annual Comprehensive Plan Docket, including concurrent review of amendments.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Dr. David Morton: Presented two budget requests for the 2027-2028 biennial budget. First, requested funding for soil and groundwater PFAS testing at a 4.7-acre parcel (8504-192nd Ave NE) that was the site of a 2013 fire; he argued the site is a confirmed cleanup site but has never been tested for PFAS, and noted its location upgradient from city drinking water wells. Second, requested funding for a city-employed arborist to independently verify tree assessments made by qualified tree professionals hired by applicants. He acknowledged formal budget hearings begin September 15 and will provide written follow-up.
- Davisha Aurora: A high school student and founder of Know Your Ride, a youth-led bike/e-bike/e-moto safety initiative, requested support for youth-friendly educational resources. She noted that confusion about rules is the problem, not e-bikes themselves, and asked to connect with city staff, schools, or community programs to promote safer riding. Council members noted she had already connected with city communications staff about sharing resources.
Discussion Items
No separate discussion items were held; all items were handled on the consent agenda or during reports.
Ombudsperson Reports
- Councilmember Parsi (July): Received requests to expand CPR education, concerns about Blue Angels noise, questions about a teen center project (progressive design-build, leadership, stakeholder engagement, 2031 completion), and a safety intersection issue (Redmond Way and Eastline Central Parking Driveway) that was referred to staff.
- Councilmember Prakriya (August): Received emails requesting PFAS testing, a city arborist, a budget proviso for a legislative policy analyst, pavement quality concerns on NE Union Hill Road, and a funding request from an organization.
- Councilmember Forsyth: Conversations about emergency management emails (phishing look), support for permanent supportive housing, traffic calming at Bell Red Road and NE 46th Street, and a query about Flock cameras for an HOA (clarified city does not own them).
- Councilmember Kritzer: Discussions on road conditions, tenant protections, police technology (including Flock camera vote follow-up), e-moto helmet safety, and safety procedures for public events after the Seattle Center tragedy.
- Councilmember Soni: Attended a cancer research 5K walk and Derby Days, answered questions on tenant protections and general safety concerns after Seattle Center.
- Council President Stewart: Derby Days included conversations on Flock cameras, Recology service transition, criterion bike race return, and meetings with One Redmond and Indian Cultural Community Center. Also noted office hours will not be held on August 13; next council conversation on September 10 in Spirit Brook Park.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Agenda Approved Unanimously: A roll call vote (8 ayes) passed all consent items, including two ordinances and the appointment of a human services commissioner.
- Executive Session: A 20-minute closed session for potential litigation (RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)) was held; no action followed.
- Next Steps: The council will recess until September 1, 2026. The next council conversation is September 10 in Spirit Brook Park. The formal budget hearings begin September 15. Ballots for an unspecified election are due August 4, 2026 (Redmond had the highest return rate in King County).
Meeting Transcript
The Redmond City Council held on Monday, August 3rd, 2026, commencing at 7 p.m. I'll be chairing this meeting as Mayor Pro Tem. This is the one and only meeting of the Council for the month of August. Following tonight's meeting, the council will be in recess until September 1st. I will call the roll starting with Council Vice President Nueva Camina. Here let the record reflect that all council members are in attendance. I do not yet see Mayor Bernie online. She may choose to join us later in the evening. Additionally, as you may have already witnessed, we are having a little different technical setup tonight, so we do apologize and thank you for your patience. Additionally, this meeting is not being live streamed as was announced to the public, but will be uh posted on the following day. Uh the first item on our agenda tonight is items from the audience. I have the sign-in sheet for members of the public to speak. When I read your name, you'll come up to the podium and have three minutes to address the council. Council members generally won't respond to comments or questions directly. Umbers of the public are welcome to email the council any time at MayorCouncil at Redmond.gov. The views stated by members of the public do not represent the opinions of the city of Redmond. As a reminder, RCW 29B.45.010 prohibits any public comment during the council meeting in support or opposition of ballot propositions, measures, or candidates. All comments must pertain to the city of Redmond business as indicated on the sign-in sheet. There are two people signed up to speak tonight. The first is Dr. David Morton, followed by Davisha. Good evening, Council members and Mayor Pro Tem. I'm David Morton. I'd like to offer two funding requests for your consideration as you begin the 2027 to 2028 biennial budget process. First, soil and groundwater PFAS testing at 8504-192nd Avenue Northeast. This 4.7 acre parcel, currently owned by United Ventures Inc. and previously operated as All Wood Recycling and later DTG Recycle was the site of a three-day fire in August 2013 that required six fire jurisdictions to extinguish. The Department of Ecology tracks this property as an active model toxic toxics control act cleanup site, awaiting cleanup, with 12 confirmed or suspected can contaminant categories on record, including metals, solvents, and petroleum. PFAS is not among them, not because it's been ruled out, but because the site has never been tested for PFAS. Given the scale of that fire, given the likely use of PFOS-based firefighting foam, and given the site's location within a critical aquifer recharge area and upgradient from city drinking water wells one and two. I'm asking council to budget for soil and groundwater PFAS testing at this specific parcel. This builds on the testimony I've already provided on the PFAS contamination in wells one and two. The fire history at this address gives that contamination concern a testable source. This testing will close a real documented gap before the nearby Evans Creek Relocation Project moves forward, not after. Second, a city employed arborist. As council knows, the tree code update currently underway relies heavily on qualified tree professionals or QTPs to assess trees proposed for removal. These QTPs are hired and paid by the applicants seeking removal of trees. Many of these same applicants also have a financial interest in the outcome. I'm asking council to budget for a city employed arborist position who can independently verify or where warranted, dispute the findings of applicant hired QTPs. This isn't a criticism of any individual professional's judgment. It's a structural fix. Right now, the city has no in-house technical capacity to check the work informing its own tree retention decisions, and that gap will only grow as canopy goals tighten under the tree code update. And that gap will only grow as canopy goals tighten under the tree code update. I recognize that the formal budget hearings begin September 15th, and I'll follow up with written material on both items before then. I appreciate council's time and consideration. Thank you. Thank you. The next speaker is Devisha. Welcome. Good evening, Council members and city staff.
openpublica.com