OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Redmond, Washington/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Redmond City Council Study Session – September 22, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, September 22, 2026
BodyRedmond, Washington
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 22, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:52:45

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:01

Good evening.

0:02

I am calling this meeting to order.

0:04

This is a Redmond City Council study session held on Tuesday, September 22nd, 2026, commencing at 7 p.m.

0:12

All council members are in attendance.

0:14

Councilmember Prakria is online.

0:16

Mayor Burney will not be in attendance tonight.

0:19

There are five items on the agenda.

0:21

The Municipal Operations Center Project Update Validation Summary and Recommendation.

0:40

From our last study session, the Housing and Human Services Action Plan and Council Talk Time.

0:47

So the first item is the Municipal Operations Center project update, and Chris Stanger, interim public works director will kick us off.

0:54

Thank you, Chris.

0:55

Thank you, Council President, and good evening, Council members.

0:59

As uh introduced Chris Stinger Public Works side, uh joining me tonight is uh Parks Director Lorreen Hamilton.

1:08

Project manager Amy Kim from Capital Projects team.

1:11

We're also joined by our progressive design build team from Lee Skrutter Lewis and Miller Hall, Duncan Howard from the Lewis side, and Claire Rennick from the Miller Hull side.

1:22

And then online, if there's any permitting type of questions, we have the acting development service director, Jason Lynch.

1:30

So joined by a cast uh tonight to present the validation maintenance and operations center or MOC campus redevelopment project.

1:41

And tonight's presentation follows the completion of the validation phase and provides an overview of where we are headed as the project transitions into phase one design.

1:53

Next slide, please.

1:56

The purpose of tonight's presentation is to provide a summary of the validation phase, share the outcomes of that work, and outline the path forward as the project moves into design.

2:06

The validation phase provided an opportunity for the city and progressive design build team to further define the project requirements, confirm the project approach, and make sure we remain aligned with the project goals, budget, and overall schedule.

2:21

Tonight is also an opportunity to provide council with visibility into where we are in the process and upcoming decision points as the project advances.

2:30

Next slide, please.

2:32

So these are the primary goals that are guiding the MOC project.

2:37

Oh, one slide back, thank you.

2:40

First, we want to create a multi-general generational facility for our current and future public servants.

2:47

That means a facility that is durable, adaptable, easy to maintain, and designed to evolve as the city's needs change.

2:56

Second, we want to create a sustainable and functional workplace that supports staff well-being, collaboration, and changing workflows.

3:05

The MOC will bring a uh multiple divisions together, so the layout and adjacencies are important.

3:12

We want to reduce physical and operational barriers between the teams and create opportunities for staff to work together more efficiently and ultimately serve the public more effectively.

3:23

Then finally, we're looking at the project through a long-term lens in the context of Redmond 2050.

3:29

The goal is to create a forward-looking campus that maximizes sustainability, capacity, capacity, and infrastructure readiness, and provides a facility that can serve the generation uh city for generations.

3:41

These goals have guided the validation phase and will continue to guide the design as we move forward.

3:47

And finally, uh slide four for me.

3:52

Slide here shows the overall project schedule and where we are today.

3:56

So, as stated, we have completed the validation phase, which is the initial phase of the progressive design build process.

4:03

So during the validation, the city and the design build team work together to confirm the project requirements, scope, schedule, risk and cost assumptions before advancing into the next phase.

4:16

So now we are transitioning into phase one design and pre-construction.

4:21

As part of phase one, the design build team will advance the design, continue to refine the project scope and cost, coordinate permitting, and develop the work necessary to prepare for construction.

4:33

You'll see phase one and TP on the schedule.

4:36

NTP stands for notice to proceed.

4:40

This is an authorization for the design build team to begin the work associated with phase one.

4:46

Project will then move through permitting and early works while the design and construction approach continue to be developed.

4:54

You'll also see GMP, which stands for guaranteed maximum price.

5:00

This is a major milestone associated with establishing the construction price before moving into primary construction phase.

5:06

Following that pro that the project moves into phase two construction, followed by project closeout.

5:12

So the current schedule anticipates substantial completion by May 2030, right around the corner.

5:18

So at a high level, validation is complete.

5:20

We are bringing uh beginning phase one design and pre-construction and folks now is advancing the design, refining the scope and cost, completing permitting and early work and preparing for construction.

5:34

And with that, I'm handing it over to Director Hamilton.

5:38

Thank you, Chris.

5:39

So I'm gonna start talking a little bit about scope.

5:42

As we talked about earlier today in committee, um, validation does three things for us in the progressive design build process.

5:49

It uh validates our scope, our schedule, and our budget.

5:52

So Chris just talked about our schedule.

5:54

Uh as you'll notice that's that timeline did move up from previous touch points by how long?

6:03

We we were previously in 2031, correct?

6:08

Six months.

6:09

So we we um were able to move the completion up approximately six months as we went through the validation, and this is simply because information becomes more clear, it helps us understand the project a little bit better.

6:19

The next piece that we're gonna talk about is scope, and that's gonna be over the next four slides or so.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Water And Wastewater Management████████████████16%
Public Works██████████████14%
Budget Equity Analysis███████████11%
Environmental Protection████████8%
Human Services███████7%
Public Engagement██████6%
Housing And Homelessness████4%
Procedural███3%
Budget███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Redmond City Council Study Session – September 22, 2026

The Redmond City Council met in study session on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, beginning at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. All councilmembers were present, with Councilmember Prakriya attending online. The agenda listed Mayor Angela Birney, though the transcript referred to her as Mayor Burney; she was not in attendance. The agenda included five items: the Municipal Operations Center (MOC) project update, the 2027–2028 biennial financial forecast, the 2027–2032 Capital Investment Program (CIP) review, the Housing and Human Services Action Plan, and council talk time. The meeting was extended twice by unanimous consent and adjourned after council talk time.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No formal public comment period was held.
  • During the housing discussion, staff referenced public input from earlier community engagement, including a Let's Connect survey with mixed views on homelessness services—about half of respondents said the city should do more in the homeless space, while some residents opposed additional permanent supportive housing in their community.
  • Staff also noted a prior public commenter who requested inclusive early learning and child care strategies in the housing and human services plan.

Municipal Operations Center (MOC) Project Update

  • Interim Public Works Director Chris Stanger, Parks Director Lorreen Hamilton, project staff, and the progressive design-build team presented the completed validation phase for the MOC campus redevelopment.
  • The project will replace outdated facilities with a resilient, multi-generational campus. The new site was purchased from Heidelberg. The existing site will continue to host decant, fuel island, mineral bins, and salt storage; staff are studying whether fuel, mineral, and salt facilities can later be consolidated to allow surplus of part of the existing property.
  • The new campus will include a two-story mass timber operations/office building, a one-story operations building with shops, labs, warehouse, and storage, and a one-story fleet maintenance building with two pull-through heavy-duty bays and eight tandem pull-through medium-duty bays. Public works, parks, citywide fleet maintenance, and fire fleet maintenance staff will be consolidated at the new site.
  • Sustainability targets include LEED v5 Gold for the administrative building, with equivalent certifications such as Envision or zero-carbon certifications under study for maintenance and site facilities.
  • Schedule: validation is complete; phase one design and pre-construction is beginning; substantial completion is expected by May 2030, about six months earlier than previously forecast. Future council approval points include the guaranteed maximum price and phase two contract, expected around Q1–Q2 2028.
  • Budget: the project target is $268.5 million, including an additional $18.5 million covered within the project budget for the new site purchase and full site outfitting.
  • Several councilmembers, including Councilmembers Soni, Parsi, and Vice President Nuevacamina, said they had previously understood that the existing site would be sold and that the decant facility could relocate. Staff acknowledged a shift from prior understanding and committed to more transparent communication. Staff explained that relocating all remaining functions would require an underground stormwater vault and parking garage costing roughly $40–50 million, so that option was not selected.
  • Councilmember Forsythe emphasized the MOC's connection to community values and the opportunity to advance the city's emission-reduction goals.

2027–2028 Biennial Financial Forecast

  • Finance Director Kelly Cochrane and Deputy Director Nara presented the general fund and utility revenue forecasts for the 2027–2028 biennium.
  • Sales tax: Redmond receives 32% of sales tax collected in the city. Ongoing sales tax is sensitive to economic conditions and policy decisions; one-time sales tax has been largely driven by Sound Transit and Microsoft Refresh projects. Revenue from Senate Bill 5814, which expanded taxable services, is being treated as one-time and is set to sunset in 2029. Construction sales tax is expected to normalize by 2027–28. Retail trade has grown following light rail opening, and wholesale revenue spikes in 2024 and early 2025 were partly attributed to tariff-driven purchases and treated as one-time.
  • Property tax: the city receives 11% of property taxes paid on Redmond property. Property tax growth is forecast at just over 3%, using conservative assumptions for new construction and no annexations. The first official 2027 assessment notification is expected in early October.
  • Business license revenue: an audit found that 30–40% of businesses in the city may be non-compliant, though staff later said that estimate may be high and that not all non-compliant businesses will become compliant immediately. Compliance revenue is projected gradually over several years, and a business license fee study is proposed after 2025–26.
  • Development revenue: fees are set on a full cost-of-service basis and adjusted annually with CPI. The city saw a 2025 surge from mixed-use and multifamily development. The forecast assumes about 1% growth in 2027–28 and more moderate growth later; a development fee study is scheduled next year.
  • Utility rates: staff updated the preliminary July utility rate forecast, reducing most recommended increases by roughly 2–5%. City water, wastewater, stormwater, and Novelty Hill utility rates were discussed. Multifamily growth helped lower projected rate increases; medical cost increases were phased in; King County and Cascade Water Alliance pass-through costs and depreciation are expenditure pressures. Novelty Hill rates remain higher because of a small customer base and new infrastructure.
  • Budget schedule: the preliminary budget will be delivered October 6; the first council discussion is scheduled for October 22; House Bill 2015 is scheduled for October 27 with a possible continuation on October 29.
  • Councilmembers asked for clear public communication on utility rate drivers, confirmed the return of the budget executive summary, and asked about how 2025–26 savings were used to balance the preliminary 2027–28 budget.

2027–2032 Capital Investment Program (CIP) Review

  • Staff reviewed the utility portions of the 2027–2032 CIP across water, wastewater, and stormwater.
  • Financial highlights: combined utility beginning fund balance is forecast at $124 million; capital facility charges assume 5% annual growth, plus $500,000 per year from Southeast Marrymore beginning in 2029 and $917,000 per year from Redmond Town Center development beginning in 2027; depreciation transfers total $55.2 million; grants total just under $9 million, including EPA and Washington Department of Commerce grants; and placeholder debt proceeds of $35.5 million begin in 2029. Utility CIP expenditures for the 2027–28 biennium are about $72.5 million, with a large spending increase in 2029–30 driven by MOC construction.
  • Water portfolio: the system includes five supply wells, about 333 miles of water pipe, 33 million gallons of storage, about 7 million gallons of average daily use, and about 4,328 fire hydrants. Projects include the 51st Street water main replacement, roughly 6,200 feet of asbestos-cement water main replacement at Viewpoint, booster pump station assessment, telemetry and control system upgrades, a regional storage tank partnership with Bellevue and Kirkland, pressure-reducing valve replacement, the Willows Road water main extension, and well No. 3 rehabilitation.
  • Wastewater portfolio: the system includes about 233 miles of pipe, 22 lift stations, about 7,200 manholes, and about 16,000 sanitary sewer connections. Projects include the Avondale Road connection to King County, lift station equipment upgrades, about 7,585 feet of cured-in-place pipe rehabilitation, NE 51st Street sewer upgrades of about 1,800 feet, Redmond Town Center sewer upgrades, and West Lake Sammamish Parkway and Education Hill pipe rehabilitation.
  • Stormwater portfolio: the system includes about 202 miles of stormwater pipe, 400 stormwater treatment facilities, about 50 miles of streams, and manages about 11 billion gallons of rainfall annually. Projects include the Evans Creek relocation of about 4,500 feet, the 9200 ravine stormwater bypass, Willows Road culvert replacement, a landslide-area outfall repair, detention improvements, and NE 95th and 98th Street stormwater trunk lines.
  • In Q&A, staff said the King County operations and maintenance agreement for Evans Creek is anticipated for review in October, with construction possibly starting in the 2028 season. Staff confirmed that one project's '2033 and beyond' cost extends to 2036. Councilmember Parsi asked that Bear Creek habitat restoration also consider extending the East Redmond Corridor; staff agreed to take it into consideration. Councilmember Prakriya raised sewer issues on NE 148th Street, and staff said they would follow up. Council Vice President Nuevacamina asked about well capacity and PFAS; staff said well No. 4 is being researched and well No. 3 rehabilitation is scheduled outside peak production season to minimize impact.

Housing and Human Services Action Plan

  • Staff presented the proposed five-year Housing and Human Services Action Plan, which combines the expiring Housing Action Plan and Human Services Strategic Plan. The plan centers on serving residents at 0–50% of area median income.
  • Prior plan results highlighted by staff: mandatory inclusionary zoning was recalibrated to 50% AMI; $1 million was invested in Overlook Village Station TOD to buy down family-sized units; human services funding increased from $1.3 million to $2.6 million; 31 new programs were funded; about 66% of prior plan actions were accomplished; about one-fifth are partially underway or perpetual.
  • Engagement included outreach to 50 community partners, responses from community partner organizations, 33 responses to the Let's Connect questionnaire, and input from the Human Services Commission, Planning Commission, and city departments. Most community partners agreed the draft was on the right track.
  • The plan is organized around three focus areas: get and keep people housed; build more housing faster; and connect and strengthen communities. It intentionally does not add new metrics for every action and instead relies on existing budget performance measures, King County countywide planning policies, and annual reporting to council.
  • Councilmembers raised several areas for strengthened or new language: tenant protections and renter stability, immigrant and refugee community callouts, early learning and child care accessibility, healthy communities including food access and youth mental health, healthy aging, and domestic violence legal support.
  • Staff committed to drafting revised language and circulating it before the planned consent adoption, working directly with councilmembers on specific wording. The action plan was not adopted at this meeting; it had been planned for the October 6 business meeting consent calendar, but staff agreed to adjust the path if council needs more time.

Council Talk Time

  • Councilmember Forsythe reported on a council-funded housing study tour in Vancouver, BC, with the Housing Development Consortium. She highlighted TransLink's land-use and housing mandate, station-area planning, Vancouver's strong transit ridership, the strata property act that allows pre-buying into condo properties, and potential 2029 legislative ideas. Four work groups were formed on topics including condos, off-site building, and transit-oriented development.
  • Council leadership announced that the new legislative coordinator is expected to start October 7, with candidate materials to be shared in council inboxes.
  • Councilmembers were reminded to send questions on the Office of Airspace Management proposal to Chief Lowe by October 1; a study session is scheduled for November.
  • Council leadership reported that Mayor Birney proposed keeping the HR and payroll assessments separate but using the same RFP committee for both. Councilmembers commented on timing and on involving the future HR director in consultant selection.
  • A development services reorganization issue matrix is expected midweek; the council study session on that topic is scheduled for October 13. Councilmembers were asked to send examples of permitting delays.
  • There will be no council meeting next week because it is a fifth Tuesday.
  • Councilmember Soni announced housing tours on September 30 and October 17.

Key Outcomes

  • No ordinances, resolutions, or formal policy adoptions were approved; the meeting was a study session.
  • Motions to extend the meeting by 15 minutes and then by 10 minutes both passed unanimously.
  • MOC project: council received the validation summary; staff will proceed into phase one design and pre-construction, with guaranteed maximum price and phase two contract approvals expected around Q1–Q2 2028.
  • Financial forecast and CIP: received as informational. Staff will incorporate council questions; the preliminary budget will be delivered October 6, budget deliberations begin October 22, and House Bill 2015 will be discussed October 27 with possible continuation October 29.
  • Housing and Human Services Action Plan: staff will prepare revised language on tenant protections, immigrant and refugee community needs, early learning and child care, healthy communities, food access, youth mental health, and healthy aging, then return to committee before the consent adoption. No adoption occurred tonight.
  • Council talk time included updates on the legislative coordinator, the Office of Airspace Management study session, the development services reorganization, and upcoming housing tours.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. I am calling this meeting to order. This is a Redmond City Council study session held on Tuesday, September 22nd, 2026, commencing at 7 p.m. All council members are in attendance. Councilmember Prakria is online. Mayor Burney will not be in attendance tonight. There are five items on the agenda. The Municipal Operations Center Project Update Validation Summary and Recommendation. From our last study session, the Housing and Human Services Action Plan and Council Talk Time. So the first item is the Municipal Operations Center project update, and Chris Stanger, interim public works director will kick us off. Thank you, Chris. Thank you, Council President, and good evening, Council members. As uh introduced Chris Stinger Public Works side, uh joining me tonight is uh Parks Director Lorreen Hamilton. Project manager Amy Kim from Capital Projects team. We're also joined by our progressive design build team from Lee Skrutter Lewis and Miller Hall, Duncan Howard from the Lewis side, and Claire Rennick from the Miller Hull side. And then online, if there's any permitting type of questions, we have the acting development service director, Jason Lynch. So joined by a cast uh tonight to present the validation maintenance and operations center or MOC campus redevelopment project. And tonight's presentation follows the completion of the validation phase and provides an overview of where we are headed as the project transitions into phase one design. Next slide, please. The purpose of tonight's presentation is to provide a summary of the validation phase, share the outcomes of that work, and outline the path forward as the project moves into design. The validation phase provided an opportunity for the city and progressive design build team to further define the project requirements, confirm the project approach, and make sure we remain aligned with the project goals, budget, and overall schedule. Tonight is also an opportunity to provide council with visibility into where we are in the process and upcoming decision points as the project advances. Next slide, please. So these are the primary goals that are guiding the MOC project. Oh, one slide back, thank you. First, we want to create a multi-general generational facility for our current and future public servants. That means a facility that is durable, adaptable, easy to maintain, and designed to evolve as the city's needs change. Second, we want to create a sustainable and functional workplace that supports staff well-being, collaboration, and changing workflows. The MOC will bring a uh multiple divisions together, so the layout and adjacencies are important. We want to reduce physical and operational barriers between the teams and create opportunities for staff to work together more efficiently and ultimately serve the public more effectively. Then finally, we're looking at the project through a long-term lens in the context of Redmond 2050. The goal is to create a forward-looking campus that maximizes sustainability, capacity, capacity, and infrastructure readiness, and provides a facility that can serve the generation uh city for generations. These goals have guided the validation phase and will continue to guide the design as we move forward. And finally, uh slide four for me. Slide here shows the overall project schedule and where we are today. So, as stated, we have completed the validation phase, which is the initial phase of the progressive design build process. So during the validation, the city and the design build team work together to confirm the project requirements, scope, schedule, risk and cost assumptions before advancing into the next phase. So now we are transitioning into phase one design and pre-construction. As part of phase one, the design build team will advance the design, continue to refine the project scope and cost, coordinate permitting, and develop the work necessary to prepare for construction. You'll see phase one and TP on the schedule. NTP stands for notice to proceed. This is an authorization for the design build team to begin the work associated with phase one. Project will then move through permitting and early works while the design and construction approach continue to be developed. You'll also see GMP, which stands for guaranteed maximum price. This is a major milestone associated with establishing the construction price before moving into primary construction phase. Following that pro that the project moves into phase two construction, followed by project closeout. So the current schedule anticipates substantial completion by May 2030, right around the corner. So at a high level, validation is complete. We are bringing uh beginning phase one design and pre-construction and folks now is advancing the design, refining the scope and cost, completing permitting and early work and preparing for construction. And with that, I'm handing it over to Director Hamilton.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com