OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Redmond, Washington/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Redmond Committee of the Whole – Parks & Environmental Sustainability Meeting – October 27, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodyRedmond, Washington
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
Meeting Thumbnail
⇩ GET FROM SOURCE

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Original source
Transcript — Verbatim

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

0:01

Good

Speaker 1

0:01

afternoon.

0:02

I'm calling to order the October 2020 27th, 2026 at 4 30 p.m., Committee of the Whole for Parks and Environment Sustainability.

0:11

In attendance, we have all the council members here.

0:14

So we'll not spend time on that.

0:16

There are seven items on the agenda that has been already shared with all the council members in their agenda packet.

0:23

There are two consent items to be submitted for November 2 business meeting, three informational and two items from the other committee.

0:31

Let's go to the first agenda item.

0:33

The first item is park impact fee schedule update.

0:37

We have parks director Law Lauren Hamilton, Lindsay Falkenberg box planning manager Cameron Sapeta, our senior box planner.

Speaker 2

0:46

Good afternoon, City Council.

0:48

We are back to discuss the park impact fees, which we discussed with you at the last committee of the whole.

0:54

At that point, it was requested to bring a little more detail around where we've been, where we're going, and the changes that we are making, as well as decision points that council has already been engaged in.

1:06

And so Cameron is here to share that overarching information.

1:10

Our hope is that this will move towards the consent agenda with other impact fees for the

Unassigned speaker

1:18

for

Speaker 2

1:18

the omnibus.

1:19

What's the meeting?

Unassigned speaker

1:21

November 17th.

Speaker 2

1:22

November 17th consent.

Speaker 3

1:27

Good afternoon.

1:28

Today we are here returning for our final update to city council on the park impact fee updates.

1:34

And the purpose of today's update is to refresh the council's memory on the work that Park has under Parks has undertaken over the last seven months, provide materials and answers to questions that were requested by council, and then share out the next steps.

1:49

The goal of the park impact fee project is to update the outdated park impact fees, which were last updated in 2017.

1:57

And typically these fees are updated along with the park plan, meaning that they should have been updated in 2023.

Speaker 4

2:06

So before we dig in,

Speaker 3

2:08

um, we want to recognize that there are several terms that do sound pretty familiar, familiar and um can be or similar, sorry, and can be a little confusing.

2:17

So the full definitions, they are included in your packet under attachment B, and I'll briefly summarize them here.

2:25

So first we have the impact fee, which is the total amount developers pay during the development of their projects.

3:02

Taking the CIP and the CIS into account.

3:06

And the methodology is what we had shared with council in the past study session and updates.

3:14

And this is uh included in the report, the impact fee report.

Unassigned speaker

3:20

Uh

Speaker 3

3:20

then we have the impact fee schedule, and this is the official list of the impact fee rates by unit organized by land use and to be updated in the Redmond Municipal Code or RMC.

Unassigned speaker

3:33

And

Speaker 3

3:33

then we have the impact fee calculation, and this is the calculation used to determine the fees owed by this for the specific project.

3:41

And this remains unchanged in the RMC.

Unassigned speaker

3:45

So

Speaker 3

3:45

now that we've clarified some of those terms, I'd like to share an overview of why we're here, uh, where we've been,

Unassigned speaker

3:51

uh,

Speaker 3

3:51

where we are, and then where we're

Unassigned speaker

3:53

going.

Speaker 3

3:55

Um, so to provide the project purpose and some context, uh, we undertook this project starting in November of 2025, where we worked with our consultants, FCS, to begin the impact fee update work.

4:08

This update was comprehensive because instead of just updating the impact fee rate based on our based on our updated CIP and CIS, it introduces a new method.

4:18

Uh, this is the standards-based 20-year method, and it's used to determine the park impact fee rates.

4:26

The proposed standards-based 20-year method aligns with our park plan level of service metrics, where it's based on uh acres per resident and walkability.

4:36

Once adopted, this methodology will remain consistent over time and then will be used during future park plan updates and will adjust the fee rates uh as the CIP and the CIS lists evolved.

4:53

This ensures that the park system can grow in alignment with our community growth and needs.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

So now I want to go over the timeline and where we've been.

Speaker 3

5:02

So in October 25th or October of 2025, staff brought forward the contract with FCS, where council approved it on November 3rd of 2025.

Unassigned speaker

5:12

In

Speaker 3

5:13

late April of 26, staff presented the status update to council.

5:18

And then in July of 2026, during a study session, staff shared several impact fee methods that were explored by the consultant and then presented what the impact fee rates could look like under each approach.

5:32

Staff was or council seemed generally supportive and requested that additional community engagement be conducted.

Unassigned speaker

5:39

In

Speaker 3

5:40

late July of 2026, staff returned to council with an additional update where we shared results of positive engagement with the community development, the development community, and then recommended the standard-based 20-year approach, which is the method that you see before you today.

5:57

Council supported this method and then requested the draft RMC language, including the updated impact fee rates and language.

Unassigned speaker

6:07

At

Speaker 3

6:07

the September 22nd committee of the whole meeting, staff presented the draft RMC language and then updated with the updated rates based on that updated methodology.

6:19

And council requested a side-by-side comparison of the existing versus the proposed rates, as well as answers to additional questions which are in your packet today.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Parks and Recreation██████████████████████████████████████38%
Budget████████████████████████████████32%
Community Engagement██████████10%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Arts And Culture████4%
Historic Preservation███3%
Youth Programs██2%
World Cup Planning█1%
Public Safety█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Redmond Committee of the Whole – Parks & Environmental Sustainability Meeting – October 27, 2026

On Tuesday, October 27, 2026, at 4:30 PM, the City of Redmond Committee of the Whole for Parks and Environmental Sustainability met at City Hall and remotely. Presiding Officer Menka Soni chaired the meeting; all council members were present. The agenda included two action items intended for future consent, three informational reports, and two pay-related items referred from other committees. The committee did not take final legislative votes, but gave direction on advancing several items.

Action Item: Park Impact Fee Schedule Update (CM 26-466)

  • Parks staff presented the final update on park impact fees, noting the fees were last updated in 2017 and should have been updated with the 2023 park plan. The proposed standards-based 20-year methodology aligns with the park plan level-of-service metrics, using acres per resident and walkability.
  • Staff recapped the project timeline: consultant FCS contract approved in November 2025, council updates and community engagement through spring and summer 2026, and draft Redmond Municipal Code language presented on September 22, 2026. The packet included a side-by-side comparison of current and proposed rates.
  • Councilmember Stuart noted a scrivener error on the informal one-pager referencing a future 2028 contract date. Another council member confirmed that single-family residential would be the only fee category increasing and voiced support for the approach as consistent with density and middle-housing goals. One council member also asked for earlier council review of methodologies when approving future consultant fee studies.
  • Staff warned that if the fee update is not approved now, updating it later would require reopening the consultant contract and likely delay the update to the next biennium.
  • Outcome: The committee agreed to include the park impact fee ordinance in the impact fee omnibus being prepared by long-range planning staff. Although the agenda listed a November 2 consent date, staff clarified the item will return through the Committee of the Whole and then go to consent on November 17.

Action Item: Old Fire House Teen Center Demolition – Final Contract and Acceptance (CM 26-614)

  • Eric Dawson presented the request to accept the completed demolition and finalize the contract with the contractor. The project finished about $50,000 under budget.
  • Staff displayed a 1948 newspaper recovered from the building. Salvaged materials include newspapers, part of the hose-tower ladder, and original window hardware. The Redmond Historical Society visited before demolition and recommended salvaging the window hardware; items are being held for possible integration into the rebuilt teen center, with future handoff to preservation organizations for items not reused.
  • Councilmembers asked about unexpected site conditions; staff reported no real surprises or hindrances to the next phase.
  • Outcome: The committee agreed to forward the item to the November 2 consent agenda. The agenda names the contractor as Dickson Company, while the transcript refers to Dixon Contracting; that discrepancy is noted.

Informational Item: Teen Center Project Update (CM 26-652)

  • Parks Director Lauren Hamilton reported that the city received nine statements of qualifications for the design-build team, shortlisted three, held informational interviews on September 16, received proposals on October 13, and selected Miller Hull with Lise Crutcher Lewis after staff evaluation. The evaluation emphasized community engagement, inclusive design, and an effective progressive design-build process.
  • A two-day protest period applies before contract negotiations. Staff plan to bring a preliminary contract to the November 17 Committee of the Whole and, if supported, to the December 1 consent agenda.
  • Community engagement to date includes two teen-only visioning sessions with 78 unduplicated teens and a broader community visioning session on October 8. The owner's representative is compiling feedback for the design-build team.
  • Councilmembers requested clearer scoring transparency with the future contract, a timeline of when decisions will be known, and assurances that teen input will be carried through the process. One council member asked about maximizing building activation and utilization throughout the day and week.
  • Outcome: Informational only; no action taken. Staff will return November 17 with a more detailed primer on the progressive design-build process.

Informational Item: Events and Derby Days Recap 2026 (CM 26-650)

  • Special event permitting increased more than 20% year over year: 44 special event permits and 49 miscellaneous park use permits were issued or in process, representing approximately 168,000 attendees. New producers included Fullenco Sports, Seed Kite Foundation, Cascade Stride, Green Stage, and CMP Seattle; Redmond also hosted a large-scale Taiwanese musical festival and four Shakespeare in the Park performances.
  • The Redmond Busker program returned with a QR-code credentialing system; 19 busker permits have been issued. A pilot busker location is planned at Astera Park during Redmond Lights.
  • Derby Days 2026 drew about 35,000 people over two days. Because the carnival could not attend, the city offered Kids Cove inflatables at a flat $5 fee and sold over 2,400 tickets. Additional highlights included 130 staff, 100 volunteers, 72 craft marketers, 14 food vendors, 11 performers, 46 local businesses and community organizations, and more than 600 participants in the kids' bike parade. Environmental measures included reusable cups replacing 2,241 plastic cups and 108 pounds of waste diverted from landfill.
  • In discussion, council members expressed interest in restoring a community bike element rather than the old criterium and asked staff to provide cost options during budget deliberations. Staff said the prior criterium was removed pre-pandemic due to ongoing budget shortfalls and lack of internal capacity, with about $40,000 in event savings and $15,000 in staff savings. Councilmember Kritzer noted that the council had allocated $10,000 through LTAC to the Washington State Bicycle Association, but the race still did not occur.
  • Outcome: Informational only; staff will bring additional bike element options through the budget process.

Informational Item: Redmond Lights 2026 Program Plan (CM 26-647)

  • Staff previewed Redmond Lights 2026: a kickoff event on Saturday, December 5, 2026, at Downtown Park, with light and art activations continuing at Downtown Park and Astera Park through January 4, 2027. Planned features include snowfall, performances, a kids' light fashion show, craft booths, a luminary trail, a Woodblock signature menu, and 10 selected artist installations. Astera Park will add weekly acoustic performances on Saturdays.
  • Council feedback included increasing transparency about artist selection criteria and exploring reuse of art installations across the year. Council President Stuart praised local business participation and asked whether nearby and Astera businesses were invited; staff confirmed they are engaging businesses.
  • Outcome: Informational only; no action taken.

Item from Other Committees: Mayor's Salary Pay Plan Update (CM 26-538)

  • Staff presented the proposed elected official pay plan update for the mayor's salary. Council members raised concerns that the recommended market adjustment would place the mayor's pay at or above several statewide elected officials and would be a large increase while city payroll issues remain unresolved.
  • Several council members stated they would not support an increase above the COLA at this time; Council President Stuart said she supports the COLA alternative. The committee did not consent to placing the item on the November 10 consent agenda. Staff will email the COLA options and ordinance language for council review, with a possible follow-up at the November 2 committee meeting.

Item from Other Committees: 2027 Pay Plan Updates (CM 26-545)

  • Interim HR Director Lisa Meyer presented the 2027 pay plans. All 17 pay plans would receive a 4.1% cost-of-living adjustment based on the first-half 2026 CPI-W for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue area, consistent with approved union contracts, the personnel manual, and the salary commission. The update also includes classification movements for executive analyst, chief operating officer, and city attorney, including a new EX33 band.
  • Council discussion raised concerns about the size of percentage-based increases, top-heavy compensation, transparency in the elected official pay table, and the need for an equity and gender pay review. Several council members said they were not ready to move the item forward until broader budget discussions occur.
  • Outcome: The item was not advanced to the November 10 special meeting consent agenda; staff will receive additional questions and continue budget-related discussions.

Key Outcomes

  • Park impact fee update: advance as part of the November 17 omnibus and consent package, not November 2.
  • Old Fire House Teen Center demolition: committee agreed to forward final contract acceptance for November 2 consent; contractor name discrepancy noted.
  • Teen Center rebuild: Miller Hull and Lise Crutcher Lewis selected as design-build team; contract expected November 17 and December 1 consent.
  • Derby Days bike element: staff to bring options through budget deliberation.
  • Redmond Lights 2026: received as informational.
  • Mayor's salary EO pay plan: not advanced; staff to email COLA options.
  • 2027 pay plan updates: not advanced; further budget discussion and council questions needed.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. I'm calling to order the October 2020 27th, 2026 at 4 30 p.m., Committee of the Whole for Parks and Environment Sustainability. In attendance, we have all the council members here. So we'll not spend time on that. There are seven items on the agenda that has been already shared with all the council members in their agenda packet. There are two consent items to be submitted for November 2 business meeting, three informational and two items from the other committee. Let's go to the first agenda item. The first item is park impact fee schedule update. We have parks director Law Lauren Hamilton, Lindsay Falkenberg box planning manager Cameron Sapeta, our senior box planner. Good afternoon, City Council. We are back to discuss the park impact fees, which we discussed with you at the last committee of the whole. At that point, it was requested to bring a little more detail around where we've been, where we're going, and the changes that we are making, as well as decision points that council has already been engaged in. And so Cameron is here to share that overarching information. Our hope is that this will move towards the consent agenda with other impact fees for the for the omnibus. What's the meeting? November 17th. November 17th consent. Good afternoon. Today we are here returning for our final update to city council on the park impact fee updates. And the purpose of today's update is to refresh the council's memory on the work that Park has under Parks has undertaken over the last seven months, provide materials and answers to questions that were requested by council, and then share out the next steps. The goal of the park impact fee project is to update the outdated park impact fees, which were last updated in 2017. And typically these fees are updated along with the park plan, meaning that they should have been updated in 2023. So before we dig in, um, we want to recognize that there are several terms that do sound pretty familiar, familiar and um can be or similar, sorry, and can be a little confusing. So the full definitions, they are included in your packet under attachment B, and I'll briefly summarize them here. So first we have the impact fee, which is the total amount developers pay during the development of their projects. Taking the CIP and the CIS into account. And the methodology is what we had shared with council in the past study session and updates. And this is uh included in the report, the impact fee report. Uh then we have the impact fee schedule, and this is the official list of the impact fee rates by unit organized by land use and to be updated in the Redmond Municipal Code or RMC. And then we have the impact fee calculation, and this is the calculation used to determine the fees owed by this for the specific project. And this remains unchanged in the RMC. So now that we've clarified some of those terms, I'd like to share an overview of why we're here, uh, where we've been, uh, where we are, and then where we're going. Um, so to provide the project purpose and some context, uh, we undertook this project starting in November of 2025, where we worked with our consultants, FCS, to begin the impact fee update work. This update was comprehensive because instead of just updating the impact fee rate based on our based on our updated CIP and CIS, it introduces a new method. Uh, this is the standards-based 20-year method, and it's used to determine the park impact fee rates. The proposed standards-based 20-year method aligns with our park plan level of service metrics, where it's based on uh acres per resident and walkability. Once adopted, this methodology will remain consistent over time and then will be used during future park plan updates and will adjust the fee rates uh as the CIP and the CIS lists evolved. This ensures that the park system can grow in alignment with our community growth and needs. So now I want to go over the timeline and where we've been. So in October 25th or October of 2025, staff brought forward the contract with FCS, where council approved it on November 3rd of 2025.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com