STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Red Wing City Council held a workshop on Monday, October 27, 2025, from 5:00 PM to 5:56 PM, to present the summary of the six-month performance evaluation of City Administrator Chris Heineman and to discuss new full-time employee (FTE) requests and vacant positions for the 2026 levy and budget process. The council heard presentations from department heads and provided directional feedback to staff for the upcoming budget workshop on November 3.
Council President Janie Farrar read the summary of the closed-session performance evaluation held on October 13, 2025. The council commended Administrator Heineman for his professionalism, fiscal management, policy execution, communication, operational efficiencies, budget management, transparency, accountability, innovation, and responsiveness. Areas for improvement included balancing new ideas with the city's culture and strengthening collaboration. The council expressed overall confidence in his leadership.
Administrative Business Director Marshall Hallock noted that staff used conservative cost estimates assuming family health plans. The council discussed the following positions:
Council positions: Mayor Gary Iocco and council members expressed general support for both positions, provided they remain self-sustaining and do not burden the general fund.
Council positions: Mayor Iocco opposed both. Vicki Jo Lambert supported both. Kim Beise opposed both. Beth Snyder supported the Youth Services Assistant but was unsure about the Outreach position. Janie Farrar supported the Youth Services Assistant if it fits within the levy. Donald Kliewer opposed both. Becky Norton supported the Youth Services Assistant and hoped to add the Outreach position later. Ron Goggin opposed both due to budget constraints.
Fire Chief Mike Warner explained the department's staffing model of three shifts of nine firefighter-paramedics, but frequent vacancies due to injuries, mental health leave, FMLA, and other leaves have led to high overtime—approximately $500,000 in 2024 across both funds. He requested three additional FTEs, but the discussion centered on two. Chief Warner noted that hiring FTEs would reduce overtime, alleviate burnout, and help comply with the upcoming Minnesota Family Leave Act. The levy impact per FTE is approximately 0.25% of the total city levy.
Council positions: Janie Farrar initially unsupportive but later supported one FTE. Beth Snyder was on the fence but later supported one. Kim Beise supported two. Vicki Jo Lambert wanted further exploration of creative staffing. Ron Goggin was reluctant unless overtime savings fully offset costs. Becky Norton supported two as the most efficient solution. Donald Kliewer questioned alternative staffing.
Public Works Director Shawn Blaney introduced two positions:
Council positions: Mayor Iocco and Vicki Jo Lambert supported both. Kim Beise supported both but had concerns about electrician pay. Janie Farrar acknowledged the need but questioned levy impact. Donald Kliewer supported the apprentice but not the electrician (open for three years). Becky Norton encouraged outreach to underrepresented populations. Ron Goggin supported the apprentice but not the electrician.
Council positions: Ron Goggin, Janie Farrar, Donald Kliewer opposed both. Becky Norton hesitated pending more information. Beth Snyder supported the field tech. Kim Beise supported two firefighters and the field tech, opposed the CIP Manager Accountant. Vicki Jo Lambert supported the CIP Manager Accountant, opposed the field tech. Mayor Iocco opposed both.
No formal votes were taken; the council gave direction for the November 3 budget workshop. Staff will prepare additional analysis on overtime savings for fire positions, grant recovery for the CIP Manager Accountant, and update the council on levy goals.
Staff will return with detailed financial analysis to help the council finalize positions for the 2026 budget.
So we will begin since we have a lot of things on our agenda tonight, but I'll call our workshop tonight to order. It's Monday, October 27th. First, again for 2A, it's a city council administrators' evaluation summary. Many people probably remember after an evaluation at the next open meeting, we have to provide a summary by state statute, I believe it is. So the city council met in a closed session on Monday, October 13th, 2025, and now concludes the evaluation process by providing the following summary statement. The City Council completed its six-month performance evaluation of city administrator Chris Hein. Council members highlighted strong performance and professionalism, fiscal management, policy execution, and communication with elected officials. Mr. Hinemann was recognized for building relationships with staff and council, initiating operational efficiencies, managing the budget process effectively, and promoting transparency and accountability. Several council members noted his innovation and responsiveness in addressing community needs. Areas for continued improvement include balancing new ideas with the city's unique culture and strengthening collaboration and communication with council and external partners. The city council also expressed a desire for additional city council workshops. Overall, the council expressed confidence in his leadership and appreciation for his dedication to effective city government. Thanks again. So I just kind of wanted to start this with obviously we have a pretty tight schedule with only 50 minutes really allowed to this. So I was hoping when I talked to staff that they were looking for very clear actionable items and feedback for tonight as they prepare for the November 3rd budget workshop. So if we can maybe for each position, kind of go through down the line and maybe give a bit of feedback or kind of you know what we think about about that stuff um request or the big composition. I think we kind of have a department little overview for each position, is that correct, Chris? Yeah, Council President Fair Fair. We do have brief presentations at a PowerPoint to kind of go through to guide that discussion. I also I'm gonna pass this down, maybe I'll leave one for you. And uh this is a for your own note taking if you wish. Um but if if you don't make decisions as you go down, as we go down the agenda, we can come back to them. Um but actually if you see on the left side of this, there's a uh kind of a yes-no column or notes as you wish, but for basically keeping track of where your uh direction might be. Thank you. All right, I think we're ready. Then any first comments on this process, any questions. Then I'll hand it hand it over to whoever's doing the PowerPoint first. I guess I can make a couple statements to get us started here. If you could move forward one slide, please. So these are the position requests enhancement or vacant positions that we'd like to discuss tonight. Uh there'll be a slide on each, so please bear with us. One thing I wanted to point out is the maybe the cost of the presenter because some of these are vague and some of these are new. We took a very conservative approach to the cost. So we're using family health plans. We're trying to tell the city council effectively what could be the maximum cost we could expect if it's family plans for everything. So that's largely what these numbers are based on. We intend to go through these quickly, one at a time, so the council has an opportunity to ask questions. The departments at the position resides and will be making short presentations.