STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Red Wing City Council convened a workshop on April 27, 2026 at 5:00 PM to discuss City Administrator Chris Heineman's evaluation, a proposed Public Facility Use Policy, and three draft ordinances addressing unauthorized use of public spaces, aggressive panhandling, and unmanned aircraft systems. Council members provided extensive feedback and direction for staff to revise policies before formal adoption.
Council President Janie Farrar read the evaluation summary from a closed session held on April 13, 2026. Administrator Heineman was deemed strong in strategic plan leadership, government and policy knowledge, and fiscal organization. He requires improvement in organizational culture, communication, and trust-building.
Administrator Heineman introduced the draft, which consolidates disparate facility policies into a single master policy with supplemental appendices for each facility.
Police Chief Nick Sather presented the ordinance, noting since 2025 the city has identified 72 unhoused individuals and recorded 865 calls for service. He emphasized the Third Street Walkway as a particular concern, with residents reporting feeling unsafe. Chief Sather stated the primary objective is education, outreach, and connection to supportive resources; enforcement would be a last resort.
Chief Sather introduced the ordinance, which addresses threatening, intimidating, or obstructive behavior, not the act of asking for money or holding signs. The ordinance targets behavior such as blocking pedestrian or vehicle access, approaching individuals at ATMs, running into traffic, or using obscene language. City Attorney Mace noted that aggressive panhandling ordinances are an area of evolving law, and the tailored approach in the draft is preferable to broader versions that face constitutional challenges. Council members did not raise significant objections.
Chief Sather explained that the city has limited authority to regulate drones, as the FAA is the primary regulator. The ordinance provides basic information about where drones may be flown, requires a permit for large public events (e.g., River City Days), and gives officers a local ordinance to cite when responding to complaints. Chief Sather noted that the draft was narrowed after community consultation.
I'll call us to order. It's Monday, April 27th, and we'll start our workshop. Calls to order again. Workshop items. Again, we have about an hour and a half till 6.15, 6:30 or so before we go into our business meeting. But two A is our City Council Minister's evaluation summary. And I'm going to read that. He needs improvement in organizational culture, communication, and building trust. So that will conclude again our city council's administrators evaluation summary for tonight and for this year. So again, moving on to two B is our draft public facility use policy. We'll have a discussion about this. And again, in workshop, we're getting feedback, giving direction to the staff on where to go next. So I think Chris, you're gonna start this though. Sure. So and I don't have a large lengthy um presentation for you. Uh just wanted to uh open this up as uh the the uh there's a memo in your packet that provides the the basic overview. Um it is I think prompted by um certainly uh a need for a clear policy, and uh we've been working from a staff level for actually uh couple months on that that uh initiative looking at um some of the disparate policies that we've had for different facilities and being um while related um somewhat different on their on their core uh contents and certainly part of that is driven by the different needs of each of those facilities on how uh public meeting spaces or or meeting spaces are reserved. Um part of it is has been um how they were initially developed um or or together, and certainly making sure that uh those have the same um same basic principles guiding them uh in in the process. We have um a master policy that is also attached to your your uh agenda item there, and that sort of provides the basic guidelines, and then uh that has been reviewed by each of the departments. There's uh appendix appendices A through D, which have specific language for the um uh differ for the different facilities, including uh the fire station or fire station number two meeting space, the actual uh Sheldon Theater, the library, and the fourth one, which I'm not looking at. The parks, yeah, the park facilities, which actually have a separate reservation process. And so we uh have also had that reviewed by our our city attorney. Um each of the independent um uh language or or draft policies as well as the master policy or the overall policy, and uh just wanted to have a discussion with you this evening and and kind of talk through each of those policies and and how to move forward if there's um significant changes needed or if it's something that you uh you see that is meeting the the expectations of meeting spaces for the city of Redwick going forward. Anyone want to start with beginning comments or questions? I um I appreciate the uh the staff report and um and looking at all the different policies. The only one that I have to um strenuously object to is an appendix A park facilities. Um it's on page one of four, the first bullet there where it says events or activities that are sponsored, coordinated, or paid for by candidate for public office, a political party or and so on. All of that. Um I think because the park facilities have a separate reservation process and they can pay for it. I think that they should be open to the public, and I don't think it should be limited. And I I think that if a candidate wants to pay for the property and reserve a space, they should be able to do that in our park facilities because they're open to the public. I and it doesn't matter what party it is. I think that if a person wants to have a meeting there and they're paying for the space, they should certainly be allowed to do so. I