Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Red Wing City Council met on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers and virtually. The agenda included presentations on a new public art installation and proposed Highway 61 median closures, extensive public comment on several matters, approval of a consent agenda, and discussions on the annual financial report, an aggressive panhandling ordinance, a park stairway replacement contract, a Special Olympics torch run request, and the controversial rezoning of three residential properties. After lengthy deliberation, the council voted to table the rezoning ordinance so that it can be re‑presented as three separate site‑specific items.
Non‑Agenda Items
Agenda Items
Art Installation at Levee Park Circle
MnDOT Highway 61 Median Closures
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
Ordinance No. 235 – Aggressive Panhandling
LaGrange Park Concrete Stairway Replacement
2026 Special Olympics Torch Run
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments (Item 9E)
Thanks, Patrick. I'll call us to order, and thanks for coming tonight. This is a city council regular meeting, and it's Tuesday, May 26th. If you'd please rise and join me for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the fire of the United States of America into the republic for which it's one nation. I'm gonna go to visibility for all. Thanks so much. We'll move on to number three, which is excuse all the members. We do have Mary Yako online remote tonight, and then uh council member Bisey has given me just notice that he is unable to meet with us tonight. He's out of town. So would I have a motion to excuse Kim Bicey? I think that was a motion by Vicky, and was that a second by the second by Ron? Any last discussion? All those in favor of excusable council member Bisey, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? He is excused. Number four is approval of our agenda. Any changes or additions? I'd like to make a change to the agenda, please. I would like to separate out 9E. The um recommendations from the advisory planning commission for the comprehensive plan map and text amendments and zoning map amendments for the three sites. I would like to talk about each of them separately. So I'd like to make a proposal to separate them out all three sites, and rather than grouping them together in one ordinance and one vote, I recommend that we consider each one separately. Okay, this doesn't happen very much. So maybe I would look to Kyle to just ask if that would even or Chris if that's possible or if there's any stipulations for that, or if we need a second for that motion. I think we should have a second probably, but from a from a practical standpoint, I think they will be presented. Um I mean that it's that they need to be presented together as a as a proposal from the planning commission. So um, well, any portion could be voted separately, that's that's totally fine. And and I think we had initially talked about making sure that we distinctly talked about them separately. Um that was your your plan, I believe. Um I don't know about separating them formally if that's up