OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rio Rancho City Council Meeting Summary - October 23, 2025

Meeting PortalThursday, October 23, 2025
BodyRio Rancho, New Mexico
SessionMeeting Portal
DateThursday, October 23, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:51:36

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.

0:05

Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:08

Councilor Colbreth, would you lead us, please?

0:23

Thank you.

0:24

Please remain standing as we take a moment to uh keep our first responders in our thoughts and prayers.

0:30

And we saw another uh tragic loss of an officer in an auto accident, a motorcycle accident up in uh Taos this past week of a uh Questa uh police officer, so we want to keep his family uh in our thoughts and prayers as well.

0:49

So, with that a moment of silence, please.

1:00

Thank you very much.

1:01

You may be seated.

1:05

Okay, please silence as we call this meeting to order.

1:08

Please silence all electronic devices while attending the governing body meeting.

1:12

For the record, I will announce the names of the governing body members when I say your name, please acknowledge your presence by saying presence, counselor Dabson.

1:19

Present.

1:20

Thank you, Councillor Lennon.

1:24

See, is Councillor Lynn Time going to be online this evening?

1:29

Okay, we'll we'll keep an eye out for him.

1:31

Counselor Tyler, who is attending virtually, present.

1:35

Thank you, Councillor Weimer.

1:36

Present.

1:37

Counselor Colbras.

1:38

Present.

1:39

Counselor List.

1:40

Present.

1:40

Thank you.

1:41

All right.

1:42

Moving on to public forum.

1:44

Each comment will be limited to two minutes, and no more than two hours in total will be allotted.

1:49

Uh Mr.

1:50

Van Horn.

2:02

Good evening, Mayor, Counselors.

2:05

Um in August, the 14th of August, I came before you and I gave you a list of questions and asked if you would consider them.

2:28

I'm not going to uh go into detail.

2:32

One of the things he said to me was Steve, you know this stuff because for a while I was on the city's uh utilities commission, and he's right.

2:43

I do know the answers to these questions.

2:46

My asking you was not for my benefit, it was to ask all of you counselors to really consider these things.

2:54

Three things that the mayor said confirm one of the concerns I have.

2:59

He did say that there is issues with the injection system, and the cost to really make the thing work is significant, but they're looking at that.

3:14

He did also admit that the cost of removing PFAs, that's what everyone knows those as forever chemicals is very high, very high, and probably is only gonna get higher.

3:31

And then he also talked about the removal, the cost of removing medications from the wastewater before it's injected, which is so expensive, the EPA won't even set standards for it.

3:48

But what I ask all of you to do is consider what I'm gonna send you all.

3:54

I'm gonna I'm gonna send you the answers that the mayor gave me.

3:58

I'll email it all to you.

4:00

The reason I keep coming before you is not because I want to give you any grief.

4:07

The reason I keep coming before you is because I know that there's substantial issues facing the city with water and wastewater, and it doesn't really matter how many water permits we get.

4:26

Or those that's not the answer because you can have the rights to water, but if there's no water, it doesn't matter.

4:36

Thank you.

4:37

Thank you.

4:39

Um let's see here.

4:42

Tammy Zach.

4:48

Hi, good evening.

4:50

My name is Tammy Zach.

4:52

Uh first I wanted to say thank you for your time and for listening.

4:56

Um I do want to say thank you to Mayor as well as Deb Dobson.

5:01

The issue that I am going to bring up tonight, we have been um talking for quite a few months with the mayor and Deb, so I appreciate you guys for listening and always being there to hear us out.

5:13

I wanted to bring up tonight the um ordinance that we have for our horses out in our E1 zoned properties in Rio Rancho.

5:23

Now I'm not originally from New Mexico.

5:26

I'm originally from New Jersey.

5:28

I came out to New Mexico 32 years ago because I am a horse-driven person and I love the wild wild west, and so I came out here to create a new life out here from being from the inner city of New Jersey.

5:43

I do have two horses right now in an E1 property.

5:47

And I'd like to bring to the table if you guys can actually try to change the ordinance to having two horses per acre instead of one per acre and then one after that.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████████████████████████████38%
Community Engagement█████████████████████21%
Parks and Recreation████████████12%
Procedural███████████11%
Public Engagement████4%
Affordable Housing████4%
Public Safety███3%
Water And Wastewater Management███3%
Election Process██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Rio Rancho City Council Meeting Summary - October 23, 2025

The City of Rio Rancho council convened on October 23, 2025, to address routine administrative matters, bond issuances, voting precinct updates, and a comprehensive update to the Development Process Manual (DPM) and subdivision ordinances. The meeting featured significant public testimony regarding water infrastructure concerns and zoning changes for equestrian properties, followed by extensive debate on balancing residential growth with infrastructure standards. Staff recommended several major updates to ensure long-term neighborhood cohesion, park accessibility, and road quality, which were largely approved by the council.

Consent Calendar

  • Approves routine items and administrative actions unconditionally.
  • The council unanimously approved the consent calendar, which includes standard administrative updates and non-controversial resolutions.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Mr. Van Horn: Expressed deep concern regarding the city's water and wastewater systems. He reported that the Mayor's comments confirmed the significant cost of removing PFAS ("forever chemicals") and medications from wastewater, noting the EPA does not even set standards for the latter. He argued that obtaining water permits does not solve the issue if the source water is contaminated or unavailable, stating there are substantial issues facing the city that require serious consideration.
  • Tammy Zach: Expressed full support for expanding equestrian rights in E1 zoned properties. She requested that the ordinance be changed to allow two horses per acre instead of one per acre, arguing that horses are pack animals that require social companionship and that modern manual feeding methods make the current restrictive ordinance outdated.

Discussion Items

  • R26 (Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds): Financial Services Director Jaramillo presented the ordinance to authorize a $25 million utility revenue bond to fund the Capital Improvement Plan. Staff explained this is part of a long-term debt strategy to finance infrastructure improvements for growth and non-growth needs while maintaining stable rates.
  • R123 (Voting Precincts): Director of Elections presented a revised designation of voting convenience centers. The revision was necessitated by the inability to find commercial locations that met ADA accommodation requirements. The resolution designates new polling locations with provisions to insert additional precincts once approved by the Secretary of State.
  • R122 & O27 (Development Process Manual): Director Rincone presented a 15-year update to the DPM and a first reading of Chapter 155 amendments.
    • Staff Position: Staff recommended requiring master plans for developments of 10 acres (down from 20) with 90% land ownership to prevent "island" developments and ensure cohesive community design. They also proposed requiring parks under three acres to be HOA-owned if no public park is within a half-mile walk, while maintaining road and drainage standards.
    • Matthew Spengler, Brian Aragon, Carrie Plant, and Jared Liker (Developers/Builders): Expressed significant opposition to the 90% ownership threshold and the 10-acre master plan trigger. They argued these are economically unfeasible and contrary to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, they advocated for a 51% ownership threshold and a 50-acre trigger. They also opposed automatic requirements to pave pre-existing adjacent roads and install sidewalks/curbs outside a subdivision boundary, citing potential eminent domain issues and unnecessary costs, proposing instead that these be determined via traffic impact analysis.
    • Councilor Weimer: Expressed support for the 10-acre master plan but opposed the 90% ownership requirement, preferring 85% to balance cohesive design with the logistical difficulty of assembling land. He proposed an amendment to lower the ownership requirement to 85%.
    • Councilor Tyler: Expressed strong support for the staff's 90% recommendation and the 10-acre trigger. He criticized the assertion that staff would retaliate against developers and emphasized the need for the current standards to ensure walkability and quality of life.
    • Councilor Dabson: Expressed support for the master plan and park standards, citing the need to combat "park deserts". She stated she would personally prefer 100% ownership but was willing to compromise as low as 85%, while strongly opposing changes to the road standards.
    • Councilor Colbreth: Expressed full support for the proposed standards, arguing that residents never ask for less infrastructure (roads, sidewalks). She noted that the market is already driving developments that comply with these standards (HOAs and master plans) and that the community is currently suffering from a lack of sidewalks and poor drainage in older areas.
    • Councilor List: Expressed full support for the update, emphasizing that the city's role is to prioritize residents over developer profit. She highlighted the mental health benefits of park access and the necessity of curbing speeding and improving road safety through these new standards.
    • City Manager Geisel: Expressed full support for the staff's work and the proposed standards, refuting claims that the city lacks flexibility by citing over 100 approved zone map amendments and rezoning changes in the last five years. He warned that lowering ownership standards to 51% could allow incompatible land uses (e.g., commercial or mobile homes) to be built next to new residential developments.

Key Outcomes

  • R26: Approved unanimously (7-0) to authorize the issuance of City of Rio Rancho water and wastewater system improvement revenue bonds up to $25 million.
  • R123: Approved unanimously (7-0) to designate voting convenience centers and consolidate precincts as revised.
  • Amendment (Ownership): Councilor Weimer's amendment to reduce the master plan ownership requirement from 90% to 85% failed (4 in favor, 3 against: List, Weimer, Dabson supported; Tyler, Colbreth, Linantine opposed).
  • R122: Approved unanimously (7-0) to adopt the updated Development Process Manual.
  • O27: Approved unanimously (7-0) as the first reading of the Chapter 155 subdivision ordinance amendments. The council agreed to consider potential edits regarding the definition of "public park" versus "park" for the second reading.
  • Departure Acknowledgement: The council expressed gratitude to Director Carol Jaramillo for her retirement and distinguished service, noting she missed the meeting due to her final day being the end of the month.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. Councilor Colbreth, would you lead us, please? Thank you. Please remain standing as we take a moment to uh keep our first responders in our thoughts and prayers. And we saw another uh tragic loss of an officer in an auto accident, a motorcycle accident up in uh Taos this past week of a uh Questa uh police officer, so we want to keep his family uh in our thoughts and prayers as well. So, with that a moment of silence, please. Thank you very much. You may be seated. Okay, please silence as we call this meeting to order. Please silence all electronic devices while attending the governing body meeting. For the record, I will announce the names of the governing body members when I say your name, please acknowledge your presence by saying presence, counselor Dabson. Present. Thank you, Councillor Lennon. See, is Councillor Lynn Time going to be online this evening? Okay, we'll we'll keep an eye out for him. Counselor Tyler, who is attending virtually, present. Thank you, Councillor Weimer. Present. Counselor Colbras. Present. Counselor List. Present. Thank you. All right. Moving on to public forum. Each comment will be limited to two minutes, and no more than two hours in total will be allotted. Uh Mr. Van Horn. Good evening, Mayor, Counselors. Um in August, the 14th of August, I came before you and I gave you a list of questions and asked if you would consider them. I'm not going to uh go into detail. One of the things he said to me was Steve, you know this stuff because for a while I was on the city's uh utilities commission, and he's right. I do know the answers to these questions. My asking you was not for my benefit, it was to ask all of you counselors to really consider these things. Three things that the mayor said confirm one of the concerns I have. He did say that there is issues with the injection system, and the cost to really make the thing work is significant, but they're looking at that. He did also admit that the cost of removing PFAs, that's what everyone knows those as forever chemicals is very high, very high, and probably is only gonna get higher. And then he also talked about the removal, the cost of removing medications from the wastewater before it's injected, which is so expensive, the EPA won't even set standards for it. But what I ask all of you to do is consider what I'm gonna send you all. I'm gonna I'm gonna send you the answers that the mayor gave me. I'll email it all to you. The reason I keep coming before you is not because I want to give you any grief. The reason I keep coming before you is because I know that there's substantial issues facing the city with water and wastewater, and it doesn't really matter how many water permits we get. Or those that's not the answer because you can have the rights to water, but if there's no water, it doesn't matter. Thank you. Thank you. Um let's see here. Tammy Zach. Hi, good evening.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com