Public Meetings - Rio Rancho, New Mexico

The Planning and Zoning Board of Rio Rancho met on October 27, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. Vice Chair Robert Gabaldon presided in the absence of Chair Scottie Richardson. The board voted on six action items, including two variances and a zone map amendment that drew significant public comment. Consent Calendar - The Board unanimously approved the Consent Calendar, which included the October 13, 2026 meeting minutes and the 2027 Regular Meeting Calendar. Public Comments & Testimony - Public comment was heard exclusively on Item 8 (Zone Map Amendment for ABQ Living Inc.). - Tommy Blanton (663 Cottontail Rd) expressed concerns about traffic congestion on Grande Vista Road and NM 528, urging the board to address traffic patterns before approving new development. - Dwayne Fuller (adjacent neighbor) stated he was against uses involving diesel trucks and loud manufacturing but would support quieter commercial businesses. - Cecilia Flores (6062 Cottontail Rd) raised concerns about road widening, lack of turning lanes, noise impacts on Explorer Academy, and the potential use of hazardous chemicals. - Stacy Schaefer (6054 Cottontail Rd) voiced opposition due to the vague definition of manufacturing, preferring existing storage or professional office uses, and cited heavy existing traffic from CNM and area schools. - Eric Fionsi (6110 Jackrabbit Rd) argued he was inadequately notified (living downhill but outside the 100-foot notification radius) and expressed fears about stormwater runoff and chemical contamination. Discussion Items - Item 6 - Variance (Jeffrey and Michelle McQuerry): The applicants requested a variance to allow a 280 sq ft metal gazebo to remain within the 5-foot side setback. Staff recommended denial. The applicant stated the structure was built on pavers and they were unaware of the permit requirement. The Board voted to approve the variance 5-1, with Commissioner Lampson dissenting. - Item 7 - Variance (Claire Ramirez): The applicant requested a variance for a shed encroaching 2.5 feet into the rear setback. Staff recommended approval. The shed was found to be pre-existing (constructed between 2002 and 2004). The Board voted to approve the variance 5-1, with Commissioner Lampson dissenting. - Item 8 - Zone Map Amendment (ABQ Living Inc.): The applicant requested to amend the Special Use (SU) zoning of a 5.82-acre site to add warehousing and light manufacturing uses. Staff recommended approval. The applicant clarified they intend to develop a modern office-warehouse facility. In response to board questions, the applicant and staff distinguished the request from heavy manufacturing, noting that any development would require a future traffic impact analysis and a site plan with strict design requirements. Key Outcomes - Item 4 (Lomas Encantadas Preliminary Plat Extension): Approved unanimously (6-0). - Item 5 (UNM Preliminary/Final Plat): Approved unanimously (6-0). - Item 6 (McQuerry Variance): Approved 5-1 (Commissioner Lampson opposed). - Item 7 (Ramirez Variance): Approved 5-1 (Commissioner Lampson opposed). - Item 8 (ABQ Living Zone Map Amendment): Approved unanimously (6-0). The Board will recommend approval to the Governing Body. The applicant must undergo a site plan review and traffic analysis before development permits are issued.

The City of Rio Rancho Governing Body met on October 22, 2026, in Council Chambers. Present were Mayor Paul Wymer and Councilors Deb Dapson (virtually), Jeremy Lenentine (arrived later), Bob Tyler, David Mann, Karissa Culbreth, and Nicole List. The agenda included public forum, consent calendar, two public hearings, the Mayor's Annual State of the City Report, and a City Manager update. No proclamations or board/commission reports were made. Public Forum - Amanda Lundberg (District 4) spoke about the Rio Rancho Animal Resource Center, urging that the volunteer transfer coordinator position be filled, that big dogs receive more rescue/transfer opportunities, and that the city consider partnering with spay/neuter nonprofits. - Richard Sanchez opposed ALPR cameras, saying road repairs and utilities were more urgent and raising Fourth Amendment and transparency concerns. - Joaquin Montoya, speaking for DFLOC New Mexico, opposed surveillance expansion, citing $164,000 spent on Flock cameras, a $456,000 Axon Fusus real-time crime center contract, and a ClearView AI facial-recognition line item in the FY2024 police budget; he said none of these had been publicly voted on. - Steven Van Horn (District 4) asked for availability of presentations from the water work session and raised regional water planning, the Rio Grande Compact settlement, and the practicality of the city's 34 potential well sites. - Corrine Rios asked the council to investigate why water rate increases took effect August 1 instead of July 1 as set by ordinance, and also raised open-meetings concerns, public hearing access, campaign contributions, and the sale of donated land for $17,500. Consent Calendar - The consent calendar was approved unanimously by roll-call vote. It included the October 8, 2026 minutes; Resolutions R76-R82 (equipment trade-in, property disposal, EMS fund budget adjustment, Parks property disposal, state appropriations adjustment, federal grants adjustment, and 2027 holiday schedule); and the appointment of Nicholas Ansloan to the Keep Rio Rancho Beautiful Committee. Public Hearing - O12: Rezoning from TZ to R-2 - Director Amy Rincone presented the request to rezone described lots in Unit 25, Block A and B, south of Hawk Site, from Transitional Zoning to R-2 Single-Family Residential. She explained the 50-foot-wide, roughly 0.3-acre lots, proposed conditions limiting access off Westphalia and requiring front-yard septic tanks. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended approval. No councilor made a motion, so item O12 died for lack of a motion. Public Hearing - O13: Lomas Encantadas Special Use District - Staff and the applicant presented a request to rezone the Lomas Encantadas Tract 5 corner and part of Tract 17-A to a Special Use district allowing R-6 multifamily and C-1 retail uses. The proposal includes 55 apartment homes (26 one-bedroom and 29 two-bedroom), 1,851 square feet of commercial space, 103 parking spaces, and three-story buildings limited to 36 feet. - Applicant Angela Parowski of Modulus Architects said the owners have 42 years of combined service with the Albuquerque Fire Department, that the project advances the city's adopted 2004/2020/2025 Lomas Encantadas Master Plan, and that the design substantially exceeds city standards: over 400% of the usable open-space requirement, over 250% of the required landscaping, 72% above the tree/shrub requirement, 1,300% above required setbacks in one area, and building heights 28% below the 50-foot allowance. - She cited official 2026 MERGECOG counts of 185 morning and 190 evening peak vehicles, operating at 24.7% and 25.3% of the 750 vehicle-per-hour design capacity; a five-year crash record with one reported crash and no injuries; an HFIN safety score of 3.43 versus the regional average of 24.29; and projected project traffic of 32 morning and 34 evening peak trips (36 and 38 with commercial). She contrasted this with gas station, retail, and gym trip generation under existing C-1 zoning. She also reviewed emergency-only access from Camino Encantadas, the 330-foot access spacing, the parkland boundary distinction, and view/elevation studies. - Public comment was overwhelmingly opposed. Objections included school-route safety, traffic congestion, combined impacts with a nearby 218-unit complex, loss of mountain views, inadequate notification, parking overflow, parkland loss and the land sale appraisal, prior P&Z process concerns, and the design not being 'luxury.' Specific speakers included Margaret McNulty, Mr. Rivera, Laura Rivera, Michelle Pellner, Joe Beam, Michael Hyatt, Aaron Taylor, Rich Kerner, Edwin Isley, Sherry Higgins, Beth Dowler, Sabina Yezel, Heather Starkey, and Jelena Palau; several cited their own traffic counts, prior crashes, HOA membership, or proximity to the site. One speaker asked for a mandatory roundabout/traffic-calming study and pedestrian safety improvements if approval were granted. - Councilor Tyler questioned the applicant on design, parking, fencing, maintenance, grading, security, and possible park contributions. The city manager defended the prior 0.56-acre parkland sale as statutory compliant, noting the city cannot deny access without paying compensation and citing past access-related problems elsewhere in the city. The applicant said stairways were relocated inside in response to community feedback, no covered parking is planned, no security plan had yet been determined, and owners were open to discussing park enhancements. - Councilor Mann noted that if the proposal were not approved, the C-1 site could still be developed by right as a hotel, bar, school, medical complex, gas station, gym, church, bank, or auto repair shop, and that the SU process gives the governing body more control. He also explained that the appraisal was done by a licensed appraiser and included diminution of value due to the parkland zoning. A councilor noted that notification was sent to property owners within 100 feet as required and that the acquired remnant parkland had not been planned for park development. Mayor's Annual State of the City Report - Mayor Wymer delivered the annual State of the City report. He highlighted ongoing road projects (Barbara Loop, Springer Drive, Western Hills Drive, and Esther Bone Library), public safety investments including Fire Station 8 and an additional $1.4 million for police personnel, and community projects such as the multi-generational center, animal shelter kennel expansion, Esther Bone Library renovation, and completed Broadmoor Senior Center. - He reported that Rio Rancho averaged 877 housing starts per year from 2021-2025 versus 586 from 2016-2020 and typically accounts for 35-45% of housing starts in the surrounding five-county area. - He cited social media growth: the mayoral social media accounts launched August 25 had over 1,900 unique viewers, 38,000 content views, and 691 interactions by October 15; the city's Facebook page saw a 280% increase in content views, a 464% increase in unique viewers, and a 791% increase in content interactions. City Manager Update - The city manager said Fallfest is scheduled Saturday, 2:00-8:00 p.m., but will be held inside/outside at the Rio Rancho Event Center because of expected rain. He also announced the DEA drug take-back from 10:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m., the pumpkin patch through October 31, the Dia de los Perros y Gatos pet event on October 31, and an open house for the multi-generational facility on Monday, November 9 at 6:00 p.m. at Loma Colorado Library. Key Outcomes - The consent calendar was approved unanimously. - O12 (TZ to R-2 rezoning) died for lack of a motion. - O13 (Lomas Encantadas Special Use District) was approved 6-1, with Councilor Tyler voting no. - The mayor gave the State of the City report and the city manager gave the fall events update; the meeting then adjourned.

On October 20, 2026, the Rio Rancho Governing Body and Public Infrastructure Advisory Board held a joint work session focused entirely on water resources. City staff provided an overview of current water and sewer operations, followed by a detailed technical presentation from the New Mexico Bureau of Geology on the region's aquifer systems, recent studies, and future mapping initiatives. Discussion Items - Overview of Water and Sewer Operations: City staff, including Director Gregoris and Maria, reported that Rio Rancho currently pumps approximately 12,000 acre-feet of water per year, operating at less than half of its permitted capacity of 26,000 acre-feet per year through its 34 wells. Councilor Karissa Culbreath summarized these figures to highlight the gap between current production and permitted capacity, contextualizing the city's potential for future growth. Staff noted that conservation efforts have successfully lowered the city's Gallons Per Capita per Day (GPCD) from roughly 120 to less than 100. Councilor David Mann stated that the presentation dispelled his concerns and expressed strong confidence in the city's water outlook. - Aquifer Mapping and Management (New Mexico Bureau of Geology): Layla Sturgis and Dan from the New Mexico Bureau of Geology delivered a detailed presentation on the Santa Fe Group aquifer underlying Rio Rancho. They described a 3D subsurface model identifying four distinct aquifer units: the Upper, Middle, and Lower Rio Rancho units, and the deeper Zia unit. The study found the Upper Rio Rancho unit has the highest permeability but is mostly restricted to the east side of the city, while the Middle unit is less permeable but far more extensive. Water table depths vary significantly, from shallow levels near the Rio Grande to over 1,300 feet deep in the northwest. Groundwater quality analysis showed elevated Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) in the Ziana Horst area. Sturgis announced that the Bureau will conduct airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveys around December 2026 as part of the state's 50-year water plan to further map the region's aquifers, offering to target specific areas of interest for the city. - Board/Council Questions and Deliberation: - Well Operations and Capacity: Councilor Culbreath confirmed the production numbers with staff to ensure an accurate understanding of water resources for growth planning. - Risk of Subsidence: In response to a question about land subsidence from pumping, the presenters stated their studies did not address this. Dan noted that satellite-based InSAR data could be used to monitor it, and while subsidence has caused fractures in nearby well fields like Buckman, it has not been a prominent concern raised for Rio Rancho in their scientific work. - Water Migration from Injection Wells: A councilor asked about the path and speed of water from injection wells. Dan explained that water percolates downward at roughly five to seven feet per day through the heterogeneous sand and clay layers, which create a tortuous path that varies by location. - Rio Grande Conditions: Board member Linda Cosand inquired about the recent drying of the Rio Grande. The presenters attributed it to drought and low snowmelt, confirming that multiple agencies continuously monitor the river's condition. Key Outcomes - City staff confirmed a significant gap between current water production (12,000 acre-ft/yr) and permitted capacity (26,000 acre-ft/yr), providing a substantial buffer for future demand. - The governing body and board received an in-depth geological briefing on the aquifer's structure, including the varying permeability of different units and water quality constraints. - The New Mexico Bureau of Geology offered to coordinate with the city to target upcoming AEM survey flights to address specific local data needs. - No formal votes or action items were taken, as the session was a work session focused on information sharing and discussion.

The City of Rio Rancho Governing Body held a joint work session with the Public Infrastructure Advisory Board (PIAB) on October 20, 2026, to receive a comprehensive overview of the city's water and wastewater utility system. The session was structured around three expert presentations covering legal water rights, physical utility infrastructure and operations, and advanced water recycling initiatives. Public comment was not taken as per work session rules. The meeting was extended from its scheduled end to 5:45 PM to accommodate discussion. Discussion Items Water Rights Overview (Maria O'Brien, Water Rights Attorney) - O'Brien explained the legal framework governing the city's water rights, including the 26,439.16 acre-feet per year groundwater diversion permit, offset requirements for Rio Grande depletions, and the 40-year planning horizon. - The city is significantly ahead of its schedule for acquiring surface water rights to offset groundwater pumping, having satisfied requirements through 2041 through scheduled acquisitions and proactive purchasing. - O'Brien detailed the 728 acre-feet per five-year accounting period offset schedule for the 2003 permit and the total ultimate offset requirement of approximately 14,000 acre-feet. - The city holds an inventory of acquired surface water rights (6,400 acre-feet) but cannot directly divert this water; it serves as an accounting offset for groundwater pumping impacts on the Rio Grande. - The aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) program provides operational and aquifer management benefits but does not fully substitute for water rights acquisition, as the technical connection between injection and offset reduction has yet to be fully established with the state engineer. - Councillor Dapson raised concerns about domestic wells depleting the aquifer. O'Brien noted the city can regulate new wells near water mains but reiterated cumulative domestic well impact is a regional issue. - Councillor Culbreath inquired about the cost and availability of water rights. O'Brien stated availability has decreased and competition exists with Santa Fe, projecting incremental price increases over time. - Councilor Mann asked if expanded aquifer injection could eliminate the need to purchase water rights. City Manager Baker and O'Brien clarified that while injection improves drawdown management and may qualify for partial offset credit in the future, it cannot fully replace acquisition under current regulatory frameworks. Utilities Department Infrastructure and Operations (Steve Gallegos, Utilities Director) - Gallegos presented the department's organizational structure, contract operations model (Jacobs/OMI), and enterprise fund status supporting a $78 million annual budget. - The city provides service to 41,481 total customers (39,000+ residential, 2,000 commercial), maintaining 600 miles of water line, 435 miles of sewer line, and 48 million gallons of water storage across 19 tanks. - Production in FY 2026 was 4.1 billion gallons (12,582 acre-feet), well below the permitted 26,000 acre-feet. - The city manages 60 main breaks and 700 service leaks per year on average, with an active program replacing 500 service lines annually. Since 2013, over 7,000 service lines have been replaced, with an estimated 7,000-8,000 remaining. - Gallegos noted that 80% of major road projects since 2016 have included water line replacement, executed in coordination with Public Works to reduce costs (approximately 40% of standalone cost). - A $356 million capital improvement plan for water and wastewater through FY 2031 was presented, with $233 million in identified funding and a gap of $123 million. - Councillor List expressed strong appreciation for the technical expertise and dedication of the utilities team. Aquifer Storage and Recovery and Recycled Water (Jason Herman, Deputy Director of Operations) - Herman presented the city's recycled water strategy, emphasizing that Rio Rancho was the first municipality in New Mexico permitted for aquifer injection of purified wastewater. - Cumulative injection from the Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) from 2017 to 2026 reached 395 million gallons (1,172 acre-feet), avoiding an estimated $2.3 to $3.1 million in water rights purchases. - Injection volumes have increased significantly: 71 million gallons (179 acre-feet) injected in the first nine months of 2026 alone (FY), compared to lower annual totals in previous years. - The ultimate target is the permitted maximum of 1,000 acre-feet per year of injection, requiring continued optimization and a second injection well. - Board member Mitchell questioned the gap between current average injection (18 acre-feet/month) and the 1,000 acre-feet annual goal. Herman confirmed a second well is under design to increase capacity and reliability. Key Outcomes - The board, council, and staff received extensive technical education on the water utility's legal, operational, and regulatory framework. - The city manager indicated that a follow-up discussion on service outside city limits is planned for the February 2027 work session. - No formal motions or votes were made; the meeting was an informational work session. - The meeting was extended to 5:45 PM to allow completion of the presentations and question-and-answer period.

The Parks and Recreation Commission held its regular meeting on October 19, 2026. After opening with the Pledge of Allegiance, the Commission approved the consent calendar and then received a comprehensive presentation on the multi-generational recreation center concept. Commissioners later discussed the annual report to the governing body, directing staff to add specific highlights before final approval. No public comments were received. Consent Calendar - The Commission unanimously approved the minutes from the September 21, 2026, meeting by roll call vote. Commissioners Romero, Herrera, Edwards, French Barger, and Leading voted in favor. Discussion Items - Multi-Generational Center Concept Design – City staff member Connie introduced the presentation, noting the project is still conceptual and requires funding and community feedback. Aaron Zom (Plan Collaborative) and Chris Van Dyck (Greer Stafford Architects) presented the design for a facility at Northern and Rockaway (former Stapleton Elementary site). Phase one (50,000 sq ft) includes a multi-sport court with four basketball courts, lockers, admin, two outdoor basketball courts, parking, etc., estimated at $42 million. Phase two (33,000 sq ft) adds gymnastics, climbing wall, fitness, multi-purpose rooms with stage, snack area; two tennis courts, ten pickleball courts, two play areas, agility course, flexible lawn and picnic pavilion, estimated at $33 million. Both phases include 4% annual inflation. Design emphasizes flexibility, accessibility, night-sky compliant lighting, and hours from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Commissioner Edwards noted that 20% of the city's population is over 65 and asked about therapy pools (none included due to proximity to existing aquatic center). Commissioner Herrera asked about lighting and hours. Commissioner Leading asked about classroom spaces (flexible partitions can be used). Construction and design each estimated at 18 months per phase. Only design funding ($2.5M) secured; future funding sources to be pursued. A public open house is scheduled for November 9, 2026, at 6 p.m. at the Loma Colorado Library. - Annual Presentation to Governing Body – Staff presented a draft annual report for submission to the City Council on December 17, 2026. Commissioner Leading requested adding specific highlights from Keep Rio Rancho Beautiful and Camazone events, including the tree seedling giveaway. Commissioner French Barger supported more detailed listing of KRRB events. Staff will revise the draft and circulate it for commissioner input; final approval will occur at a future meeting. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: September minutes approved unanimously (5-0). - Multi-Generational Center: No formal decisions made. Next step: public open house on November 9, 2026, and continued design development pending funding. - Annual Report: Draft to be revised with additional highlights and approved at a later meeting. - Public Hearings: None.

The Rio Rancho Planning and Zoning Board convened on October 13, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. per the agenda, with Vice Chair Robert Gabaldon presiding because Chair Scottie Richardson was excused. Commissioner R. Wayne Lampson participated online and recused himself from item 3. The board considered 19 public hearing items: one contested zone map amendment, 16 related utility variance requests, and two City of Rio Rancho applications. Consent Calendar - The board approved the August 25, 2026 and September 22, 2026 Planning and Zoning Board meeting minutes unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Numerous Lomas Encantadas residents opposed the PG Properties rezoning (item 3). They described the proposed 55-unit, three-story development as incompatible with a single-family neighborhood, cited traffic and pedestrian safety risks near schools, challenged the sale of 0.5603 acres of Parks & Recreation land for $17,500 as far below market value, and argued the rezoning conflicted with the 2025 Lomas Encantadas Master Plan. - Speakers against item 3 cited 229 pages of opposition letters, more than 300 petition signatures, resident traffic counts of 3,402 vehicles over 465 minutes (about 439 vehicles per hour), and a separate count of 732 vehicles through the nearby T-intersection on October 1 from 4:22 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Others noted 27 dwellings within 100 feet of the site, approximately 1,400 existing single-family homes in Lomas Encantadas with 2,340 anticipated at build-out, nearly 1,500 apartment units in six complexes within two miles, and the proximity of Sandia Vista Elementary and Mountain View schools. - Several residents said they were not notified of or invited to the applicant’s community meetings; others asked the board to deny the request, reacquire the parkland, or place city facilities on the site. - A written public comment from Avelino Marsanicha opposing the Arroyos, LLC variance requests (items 4-19) was entered into the record; no oral public comment was made on those items. Item 3 – Zone Map Amendment: PG Properties, LLC (Lux at Lomas Encantadas) - The applicant, through Modulus Architects & Land Use Planning, requested a zone map amendment from approximately 1.23 acres of C-1 Retail Commercial and 0.5603 acres of Parks & Recreation to SU Special Use for R-6 Multi-Family Residential and C-1 Retail Commercial, covering a combined 1.7895 acres. Staff recommended approval to the Governing Body with findings and conditions. - Tim Dvorak, city planner, presented the staff report, noting the site’s 2004 zoning history, the applicant’s purchase of the adjacent remnant parcel, the combination of parcels as Tract LE-5A, and the proposed 55-unit, three-story development with 1,851 square feet of ground-floor commercial space. - Applicant representatives from Modulus Architects, including Angela Parowski, presented the project in support. They stated the original C-1 zoning already permits commercial uses by right, and that alternatives such as a gas station, drive-thru restaurant, car wash, bar, hotel, or gym could build without a public hearing. They highlighted that the proposal has 103 parking spaces, 22,273 square feet of open space (412% above the minimum), more than 19,000 square feet of landscaping (over 250% of the 7,795 square foot requirement), and a maximum height of 36 feet instead of the 50 feet allowed under C-1. - The applicant’s traffic analysis by Lee Engineering estimated 36 morning and 38 evening peak-hour trips for the proposal, compared with 239 morning and 230 evening trips for a convenience store/gas station, 196 morning and 284 evening trips for a 50,000-square-foot retail strip center, and 96 morning and 204 evening trips for a gym. The applicant said this was about 84% fewer combined peak-hour trips than any other scenario evaluated under existing zoning. - The applicant also said the acquired remnant was never designated for park development in the master plan or city records, that building elevations were compared to neighboring homes, and that two community meetings were held on September 21 and October 8, 2026, followed by design revisions. The city’s planning director added context about access constraints and the decision to pursue a land sale rather than an access easement. - Board members questioned the applicant about the “luxury” label, the leasing office, trip-generation methodology, and whether a smaller two-story option was considered. The applicant said “luxury” distinguished the project from low-income housing, the leasing office would initially use a one-bedroom unit, the trip estimates came from ITE standards, and the 36-foot height was a compromise from the 50-foot allowed height. Items 4-19 – Sixteen Variance Requests: Arroyos, LLC - The applicant requested variances from Rio Rancho Ordinance Chapter 154.60(A)(8), which requires underground utility connections, to allow above-ground electric utility connections on 16 lots in Unit 25, Blocks 155, 156, and 157. Staff recommended denial for all 16. - City planner Michelle Costilla presented the staff findings together: the lots are approximately 0.5 acres each, zoned TZ Transitional, are not irregular in shape or size, and have no physical condition preventing underground installation. Staff argued approval would promote scattered single-family development, discourage lot consolidation, and create an inconsistent standard in the area. - Applicant representative Jared Likar participated online and argued that PNM’s new September 2025 standard requires a separate pole, that the pole could be placed only five feet from the existing overhead line, and that the service would run down the pole and then underground to the meter, making the connection roughly 95% underground. He also noted recent nearby homes with overhead drops and said Amrep’s future master-planned development south of the area would use underground utilities. - The board took a separate vote on each lot; all 16 motions to approve failed on 3-3 votes, meaning each variance request was denied. Items 20 and 21 – City of Rio Rancho Zone Map Amendment and Wall Variance - Item 20 was a City of Rio Rancho request to rezone approximately 5.4722 acres of R-1 Single-Family Residential to SU Special Use for streets, right-of-way, and an operational annex facility, covering properties in Unit 17, Blocks B and AA off Idalia Road. Staff recommended approval to the Governing Body. Michelle Costilla presented the request, noting the rezoning would extend and unify an established special use district, support municipal operations, and include a 50-foot perimeter separation buffer compatible with surrounding residential uses. The accompanying site plan covers approximately 28 acres and is attached as Exhibit A to the ordinance. - Item 21 was a related variance from Chapter 154.61(B)(1) to allow a six-foot partially opaque wall along Idalia Road instead of the otherwise required solid nonresidential buffer wall. Staff recommended approval, citing Idalia Road’s minor arterial classification, a 50-foot gas easement providing additional separation, and the wall’s location approximately 150 feet from adjacent vacant properties. - No public comment was offered on items 20 or 21. The board unanimously recommended approval of the zone map amendment and unanimously approved the variance. Public Forum - Corinne Rios spoke in public forum. She said she was denied the opportunity to speak on the two zoning changes she had registered for, that she lives 0.9 miles from one property and 2.7 miles from the other, and that she did not see a public notice sign posted at the Idalia Road property despite the city code requirement for posting before a zoning hearing. The board took no action on her comments. Key Outcomes - Consent calendar approved unanimously. - Item 3: The board recommended approval of Zone Map Amendment 26-100-5 to the Governing Body by a 4-1 vote, with Vice Chair Gabaldon, Commissioner Kofchur, Commissioner Hankins, and Commissioner Barela voting yes and Commissioner Fischer-Pedraza voting no. Chair Richardson was excused and Commissioner Lampson recused. The item was noted to still require Governing Body consideration. - Items 4-19: All 16 variance motions failed by 3-3 votes, resulting in denial of each above-ground utility variance request. - Item 20: Recommended to the Governing Body by a unanimous 6-0 vote. - Item 21: Approved unanimously by a 6-0 vote. - The meeting moved to adjournment after the public forum; no further board action was taken.

The Rio Rancho Governing Body met on October 8, 2026, at 6:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included public forum comments on a proposed rezoning and the city's Flock camera system, followed by unanimous approval of four construction and professional services contracts. Two external presentations on upcoming ballot measures were also given. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (6-0): Minutes from September 24, 2026 (special work session and regular meeting), and eight resolutions (R69–R75) authorizing budget adjustments to various funds and disposal of property. Also approved was D62, the final decision on a winery application (Vita Brevis LLC). Public Comments & Testimony - Sherri Higgins (District 3 resident, HOA vice president) spoke in opposition to the rezoning of land at Camino Venata and Camino Incantatis, calling for the removal of Planning and Zoning Board Chairman Scotty Richardson for comments implying the outcome was predetermined. She argued residents deserve impartial review and meaningful participation. - Ronald Bjorkland opposed the city's use of Flock cameras, asserting they constitute warrantless mass surveillance in violation of the Fourth Amendment. He cited a recent federal court ruling (U.S. v. Kyle) that suppressed Flock evidence, calling the system's data collection on innocent citizens unacceptable. - Rich Kerner (HOA president, Lomas and Cantatas) presented a traffic count of 732 cars at the intersection in question (October 1, 2026, 4:22–6:00 PM). He noted 575 apartment units have been built in the area since 2019 and suggested the city consider buying the 20-year-old property for green space. - Joaquin Montoya (speaking for DFLOC New Mexico) opposed Flock cameras, arguing they violate the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement. He cited the Carpenter and Chatrie Supreme Court rulings and the recent U.S. v. Kyle decision, calling the system "indiscriminate mass surveillance" and demanding oversight or compliance plan. - Aaron Taylor (20+ year resident, teacher) opposed the rezoning at Camino Encantadas and Camino Venada, citing safety concerns at a blind hill crosswalk where he has nearly been hit with his child. He also called for removal of Scotty Richardson. Discussion Items - D63 – Esther Bone Memorial Library Renovation Contract: Director Jason Shoup presented a $990,430.89 contract with Young Guns Construction for a major renovation/remodel of the 1992-built library. The project includes flooring, lighting, ceiling tiles, paint, bathroom upgrades, expanded programming room, nursing mother's room, children's shelving, and acoustic treatment. Funded by $750,000 from FY27 general fund and Sandoval County Library GO Bond. The library will close from January to May 2027; bookmobile and book locker service will be provided. Approved unanimously. - D64 – Construction Oversight Contract with HDR, Inc.: Director BJ Gottlieb requested approval of a $684,605.36 contract (including gross receipts tax) for HDR to provide construction oversight and office services for the Southern Boulevard reconstruction at Nicholas Channel. The project is 85% federally funded (15% local match, with state grant covering much of the match). Approved unanimously. - D65 – Southern Boulevard Reconstruction Contract with H.O. Construction, Inc.: A $5,642,671.22 contract (including tax) to reconstruct the Nicholas Channel crossing, including retaining walls, box culvert, and erosion control. Same funding split. Approved unanimously. - D66 – Utilities Contract with New Mexico Underground, Inc.: A $1,913,516 contract (including tax) for water and sewer mains at existing platted roads to support the new Streets and Right-of-Way Maintenance Facility and future growth on Idelia Road. Funded by water/wastewater impact fees and utility revenue. Approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - All four discussion items (D63–D66) were approved by unanimous 6-0 votes. - No action was taken on public comments; they were received as input. - The consent calendar was approved without objection. Presentations (City Manager's Report) - Olivia Padilla Jackson (VP for Finance, CNM) presented on the upcoming Higher Education Bond 3 (State GO Bond). If passed, it would provide $15 million to CNM for a Center for Technical Innovation at Sandia Science and Tech Park, with no tax increase. She highlighted CNM's economic impact ($825 million in FY24-25) and its partnership with Rio Rancho Public Schools. - Megan Ellsworth (CEO, UNM Sandoval Regional Medical Center) presented on the mill levy renewal on the November 3, 2026 ballot. She outlined hospital services, trauma care, behavioral health programs, and community outreach. The mill levy supports these services without a tax increase. Adjournment The meeting adjourned after the city manager's updates on upcoming events (pumpkin patch, Fallfest, Goatheads hockey, road project).

The City of Rio Rancho Governing Body met on September 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the Council Chambers. The meeting covered routine consent calendar items, public comments on water infrastructure and surveillance, and public hearings on a master plan amendment, liquor license transfers, and a deeply debated home-based winegrower license application. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (6-0) included the minutes of the September 10, 2026 meeting, two board appointments (Darryl Manning to Keep Rio Rancho Beautiful, Joseph Delmos to Public Infrastructure Advisory Board), and the final decision on the Maverik Gas Station Site Plan. Public Comments & Testimony - Stephan vanHorn: Urged a proactive water leak detection policy, citing a state water task force recommendation to move from reactive to proactive maintenance. - Amanda Lundberg (District 4): Commended the city for bringing adoptable animals to the Pooch Plunge. Requested the creation of a formal volunteer and foster program for the city shelter, offering her services. Noted the Pat Finder page inaccurately listed no animals when 20 dogs and 2 cats were available. - Joaquin Montoya (DFLOC New Mexico): Criticized the city's Flock camera contract, citing Section 5.3 which allows data sharing without a warrant, and the lack of independent oversight for downloaded footage stored indefinitely on city servers. - Casey Robinson (District 2): Praised the governing body for a previous vote against a staff recommendation. Made critical remarks directed at a specific councilor. - Matt Griffin (30-year resident): Expressed strong opposition to the license plate readers, stating being recorded entering or leaving the city "does not feel free." Comments by Councilors - Councilor Tyler: Addressed concerns about the treatment of citizens at a recent PZB meeting, apologizing to the public and stating the body would work to rectify the board members' actions. - Councilor List: Celebrated the opening of the Goatheads merchandise store, noting the excitement around the new professional hockey team. - Mayor Wymer: Echoed the excitement about the Goatheads hockey team, noting the sold-out first game. Public Hearings Item 5: Resolution R68 – Paseo Gateway Master Plan Amendment - Staff Presentation: Amy Rincon, Director of Development Services, explained the amendment expands the plan boundary to the east to include antiquated platted lots and updates land use, park acreage, and zoning to comply with current standards. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval at their August 25, 2026, meeting. - Discussion: Councilors asked clarifying questions regarding commercial and residential boundaries. City Manager Matt Geisel confirmed no commercial expansion was occurring. - Vote: Motion to approve carried 6-0. Items 6 & 7: D59 and D60 – Walgreens Liquor License Transfers - Staff Presentation: City Clerk Noel Davis presented two applications for Walgreens (2101 Northern Blvd and 1941 Southern Blvd) for transfer of dispenser liquor licenses due to a parent company merger. Note: A procedural error occurred where the initial description and vote for D59 were incorrectly applied. The item was re-called and voted on correctly upon a point of order by Councilor Culbreath. - Vote: Both D59 and D60 were approved 6-0. Item 8: D61 – Vita Brevis LLC (Matthew Chaplin) Winegrower License - Background: Matthew Chaplin, a retired deputy police chief and Rio Rancho homeowner, applied for a small-scale artisan winegrower license to operate in his garage. The request followed a staff denial, a city manager upholding, and a Planning and Zoning Board reversal deeming it permissible under home artisan business codes. - Applicant Presentation: Chaplin detailed a limited operation (under 1,000 gallons per year, 210 square feet, no on-site sales or customers). He highlighted extensive state and federal approvals (TTB permit), neighborhood outreach with letters of support, and voluntary safeguards. He showed photos of the secured indoor space via Zoom. - Council Positions: - Councilors Tyler, Mann, Lenentine: Opposed. Primary arguments included the risk of setting a precedent for other commercial home uses ("floodgate"), safety concerns (fermentation byproducts, traffic), and the belief the business belongs in a commercial district. - Councilor List: Supported. Argued the council has the flexibility to judge secondary impacts and that the limited spatial scope of this application was unlike a larger operation, mitigating the floodgate risk. - Councilor Culbreath: Supported. Emphasized the licensing process provides greater city oversight (fire marshal review, home occupation permit) than if the applicant operated purely as a hobbyist under the 200-gallon personal limit. - Vote: Motion to approve D61 failed. 1 Yes (Culbreath), 5 No (Dapson, Lenentine, Tyler, Mann, List). City Manager Comments - Matt Geisel: Announced the Fall Community Cleanup (Saturday), Western Hills road reconstruction project beginning Monday (funded by NMDOT, estimated 6 months), and upcoming community events including the Galloping Goat Pumpkin Patch and the Fall Festival on October 24. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned following the City Manager's report.

The Governing Body of Rio Rancho held a special work session on September 24, 2026, at 3:30 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting focused on three major agenda items: an update on the 2023-2028 Strategic Plan, the 2026-2027 Planning Calendar, and the City Manager's Goals and Priorities. No public comment was taken, and no formal votes were cast, as this was a discussion-only work session. Discussion Items 1. 2023-2028 Strategic Plan Update - Presented by Ryan Armijo (Deputy Director of Parks, Recreation & Community Services; noted as Ryan Chavez in the raw transcript). The plan, adopted in 2023, includes 70 objectives across five key service areas: quality of life, community and economic development, infrastructure, public safety, and organizational excellence. As of year three, 27% (19 objectives) are completed, 65% (45 objectives) are in progress, and 8% (6 objectives) have not yet begun. Armijo highlighted completed items including Campus Park Phase 2, Broadmoor Senior Center Phase 2, library museum-quality exhibits, site readiness funding for College Boulevard ($1.5 million approved), a second aquifer injection well ($2 million in federal funding), the real-time crime center, and ERP implementation. Six objectives remain on deck (e.g., generalized land use map). Deputy City Manager Peter Wells and City Manager Matt Geisel asked the Governing Body whether to continue prioritizing the 45 in-progress objectives or initiate work on the six remaining ones. Councilors expressed general support for continuing to push forward on the in-progress objectives while adding the six items to the next strategic plan cycle, aligning with City Manager Geisel's suggestion. Councilor David Mann asked about the aquifer injection well's impact on water costs; City Manager Geisel estimated the total project cost at $4.5-5 million, with federal funds covering 40%. The well would increase recharge capacity and operational flexibility. No formal decision was made. 2. 2026-2027 Planning Calendar - Presented by Deputy City Manager Peter Wells. The calendar covers the last six months of 2026 and first six months of 2027, divided into three categories: required by charter/ordinance, state/federal law mandates, and good governance/operational items. Key upcoming items include: October joint meeting with Public Infrastructure Advisory Board on water/sewer; November public open house for the multi-generational center concept; December work session on higher education facilities gross receipts tax (expiring June 30, 2028, generating $6 million annually) and financing for a new streets and right-of-way facility; January/February discussion on repurposing the tax; March consideration of a bond ordinance for the streets facility; and potential General Obligation bond questions in April (timing dependent on uncertain municipal election date due to potential state changes). Wells also introduced several new items for possible addition to the strategic plan: creation of a civil monetary penalty system, legislative development options (committee structure), discretionary funds, review of weed maintenance responsibility, vehicle parking regulations, dust control practices, revisiting the Development Process Manual (DPM) and impact fees, and zonal impact fees. Councilors provided individual preferences: Councilor Bob Tyler supported civil monetary penalty, legislative development options, discretionary funds, and vehicle parking regulations; Councilor Karissa Culbreath supported civil monetary penalty, zonal impact fees, weed maintenance, and vehicle parking; Councilor Nicole List emphasized weed maintenance; Councilor David Mann supported civil monetary penalty, vehicle parking, and suggested exploring a city trail system; Councilor Deb Dapson supported civil monetary penalty, discretionary funds, weed/vehicle/dust control. Councilor Tyler also requested moving December work session items to avoid a double-day meeting, but City Manager Geisel cautioned that the streets facility funding discussion was time-sensitive. City Manager Geisel and Wells summarized that civil monetary penalty would be a heavy lift, likely requiring a formal strategic plan amendment, while items like discretionary funds could be presented as informational reports to gauge further interest. They committed to digesting feedback and proposing a timeline for future discussions. 3. 2026-2027 City Manager Goals and Priorities - Presented by City Manager Matt Geisel. The five goals were: 1) Complete another iteration of the five-year staffing plan; 2) Identify, secure, and approve funding for the new streets and right-of-way operations annex; 3) Complete design of the multi-generational center phase one; 4) Complete a new police headquarters assessment; and 5) (implied continuation of existing objectives). Geisel noted these mirror the process used for Fire Station 8, now under construction. Councilors had no additional questions or comments, effectively endorsing the goals. Key Outcomes - Strategic Plan Guidance: Consensus to continue focusing on the 45 in-progress objectives and carry the six unstarted objectives into the next strategic plan cycle. No formal amendment was made. - Planning Calendar Direction: Staff will bring back a formal proposal to add the civil monetary penalty system to the strategic plan, given strong consensus. Other items (discretionary funds, legislative development options, zoning amendments) will be explored as informational reports at future work sessions. The December work session date remains as scheduled, with staff noting the time-sensitive nature of the streets facility funding. - City Manager Goals: Goals were acknowledged and accepted without objection. - Next Steps: Staff will incorporate feedback into the planning calendar and schedule follow-up presentations. The next regular work session is October 20, 2026. Note: The minutes record the presenter as Ryan Armijo, while the raw transcript refers to Ryan Chavez. The discrepancy is not resolved in the source materials.