Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Rio Rancho Governing Body met on October 8, 2026, at 6:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included public forum comments on a proposed rezoning and the city's Flock camera system, followed by unanimous approval of four construction and professional services contracts. Two external presentations on upcoming ballot measures were also given.
The meeting adjourned after the city manager's updates on upcoming events (pumpkin patch, Fallfest, Goatheads hockey, road project).
The United States of America for which it stands. One nation, under God, indivisible liberty and justice for all. Please remain standing. I want to take a moment to recognize our first responders for their commitment to our safety, as well as those brave men and women who are fighting for our freedoms both here and abroad. And also to acknowledge the dangers that each of them have and enter into every day as they protect us. Present. Councilor Lenantine. Present. Counselor Tyler. Counselor Mann. Present. Councillor Cobra. Present. And Counselor List. Present. Proclamations and awards of merit. We have none. Moving on to public forum. Each comment will be limited to two minutes and no more than two hours in total will be allotted for the public forum comments at any meeting. Each speaker must state their name and address or Rio Rancho District for the record. I see we've got one, two, three, four, five people signed up. We'll start with Sherry Higgins. Good evening, Mayor and members of the governing body. My name is Sherry Higgins. I reside at 7024 Lookout Road in Rio Rancho. I'm in District 3. I'm a homeowner and vice president of the Lomus and Cantatus Master Association. I am speaking for myself and as a member of our board of directors on behalf of residents of Lomus and Cantatas who oppose the rezoning of land at the corner of Camino Venata and Camino Incantatis. I am calling for the removal of Scottie Richardson from the planning and zoning board following his comments at the September 22nd meeting. His remark that residents would not have liked the vote raises serious concerns about whether our voices are heard, valued, or capable of influencing the outcome. His comment gave the impression that the outcome had already been decided. How can homeowners have confidence in public hearing when the board's chairman speaks as though he already knows the result? We are taxpayers and homeowners who have invested in this community. We deserve respectful treatment, meaningful participation, and an impartial review of the evidence. Our concerns about traffic, pedestrian safety, neighborhood character, and consistency with the master plan deserve serious consideration. Public participation must mean that allowing residents to speak for two minutes while leaving them to wonder whether their words matter. I appreciate Councilor Tyler's acknowledgement of the problem and his apology, but restoring public trust requires action and accountability. Thank you. Thank you, Miss Higgins. Next up, Ronald. I'm gonna probably get this name wrong, uh Borkland. Close enough, sir. Thank you. Council, how are you today?