OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Rochester, Minnesota/Boards and Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rochester Charter Commission Meeting - September 11, 2026

Boards and Commissions — Friday, September 11, 2026
BodyRochester, Minnesota
SessionBoards and Commissions
DateFriday, September 11, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:52:13

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:06

All right, thank you.

0:07

Once again, I'll call the meeting to order for this uh fine September 8th meeting.

0:12

Um and I'll begin with uh Jody shooting role.

0:16

Thank you.

0:16

Uh Jeffrey Oman.

0:20

Bradley President.

0:25

Michael Goombert.

0:27

Rachel LeForge, present.

0:30

Marsha Markle.

0:35

Malik McNeil.

0:37

Yes.

0:37

Present.

0:38

Only the fell.

0:42

Well Rockwell?

0:43

Here.

0:46

Here.

0:47

Randy State Martin?

0:49

Here.

0:49

Fred Zuller.

0:51

I'm here.

0:52

John Lee.

0:52

Present.

0:53

Nancy Zawarski.

0:55

Here.

0:57

All right.

0:58

And we did have a few absences from uh uh Michael and uh Hassan.

1:02

So they couldn't be with us today.

1:05

We will proceed then.

1:06

We have a uh special recognition event today.

1:10

Nice thing is uh nice way to start off, and I believe the mayor has a couple of comments or we have I got any of that.

1:21

I'm sorry.

1:21

No, there's no motion.

1:24

Okay.

1:28

I will go get it.

1:30

Anyway, some just text your case.

1:35

I'll give us an extreme.

1:36

Except you won't figure it.

1:40

Well, we'll move on with a couple of business items then.

1:43

Um setting the order agenda.

1:45

You have it in front of you.

1:46

If there are no corrections, I would entertain a motion to approve as presented.

1:55

Motion and a second.

1:58

All in favor, say aye.

2:00

Aye.

2:01

Any opposed?

2:02

Motion carries, thank you.

2:05

Um moving on then to the minutes from the prior meeting.

2:09

Were there any edits or again?

2:12

I would entertain a motion to approve our move.

2:17

Second.

2:18

Okay, we have a motion for a second to approval of the minutes.

2:26

You got that right.

2:32

So we are seconded.

2:34

Thank you.

2:35

Okay.

2:37

All right.

2:38

All in favor then say aye.

2:39

Aye.

2:40

Any opposed?

2:42

That motion carries.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Election Procedures█████████████████████████25%
Procedural█████████████████17%
Ethics And Governance████████████████16%
Public Engagement███████████████15%
Legal And Contractual Matters██████████████14%
Ethical Practices Board███████7%
Board and Commission Operations██████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Rochester Charter Commission Meeting - September 11, 2026

The Rochester Charter Commission met on September 11, 2026, to discuss a citizen request regarding ranked choice voting, continue the review of the Home Rule Charter, and address ward boundary provisions. The meeting included a special recognition, a presentation by the mayor on the role of mayor, and multiple votes on subcommittees and charter amendments.

Consent Calendar

  • Set Order of Agenda: Approved unanimously (11 ayes, 0 nays, 4 absent).
  • Approve Meeting Minutes of May 12, 2026: Approved unanimously (12 ayes, 0 nays, 3 absent).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Mayor Norton presented preliminary results from a survey of 119 mayors across the U.S. on the role of mayor. Key findings: 108 can place items on the agenda; 96 chair council meetings; 58 get a vote; 65% have tiebreaker ability; 57 have veto authority; 31 also serve as city manager. Mayor Norton expressed frustration that Rochester’s mayor has limited power compared to other cities and suggested the city consider combining the roles of council president and mayor. She indicated she would return in January 2027 with more detailed findings and recommendations.

Discussion Items

  • Ranked Choice Voting (New Business): The commission discussed a citizen request to review ranked choice voting. Commissioners expressed a range of views. Some noted that 19 states have banned ranked choice voting, others cited concerns about exhausted ballots and partisan funding, while some argued the commission should study the issue thoroughly. After three motions:
    • Motion to create a subcommittee (up to 5 members) to study and bring back a recommendation: Denied (5 ayes, 8 nays, 2 absent).
    • Motion to place discussion on the November 2026 agenda: Denied (6 ayes, 7 nays, 2 absent).
    • Motion to place discussion on the January 2027 agenda: Approved (12 ayes, 1 nay, 2 absent).
  • Home Rule Charter Review (Unfinished Business): The commission continued reviewing Sections 5–15.
    • Section 6.02: Motion to change “by the third day after passage” to “by the third business day”: Approved unanimously (13 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent).
    • Section 6.03: Motion to change “within five days of receipt” to “within five business days”: Approved unanimously (13 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent).
    • Section 6.05: Motion to change “within five business days (Sundays excepted)” to “within five business days”: Approved unanimously (13 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent).
    • Severance Motion: Motion to sever Sections 8.05, 9.00, and 15.00 from the current review, sending all settled items to the city council while those three sections are reconsidered by a subcommittee: Approved (8 ayes, 5 nays, 2 absent).
    • Subcommittee on Mayoral Authority: Motion to establish a subcommittee (up to 4 commissioners plus a city attorney representative) to return with recommendations to address inconsistencies in the authority of the mayor over the city administrator as stated in Sections 8.05, 9.00, and 15.00, by the end of 2027: Approved (10 ayes, 3 nays, 2 absent).
  • Ward Boundaries (Unfinished Business): Commissioner Rothwell proposed a motion to establish a subcommittee in 2027 to examine the charter provision on ward boundaries (Section 1.02) and bring back recommendations. After debate, the motion passed (7 ayes, 6 nays, 2 absent).

Key Outcomes

  • Approved charter amendments to Sections 6.02, 6.03, and 6.05 changing timeframes to business days.
  • Severed Sections 8.05, 9.00, and 15.00 from the current review; settled items will be sent to council.
  • Established a subcommittee to recommend changes to Sections 8.05, 9.00, and 15.00 regarding mayoral authority over the city administrator, with a deadline of end of 2027.
  • Established a subcommittee to examine ward boundary language in Section 1.02, to report in 2027.
  • Scheduled discussion on ranked choice voting for the January 2027 meeting.
  • Directed staff to publish notice for expiring commission terms (6 members) throughout November 2026, with applications due to the chief judge by early December.
  • Adjourned unanimously.

Meeting Transcript

All right, thank you. Once again, I'll call the meeting to order for this uh fine September 8th meeting. Um and I'll begin with uh Jody shooting role. Thank you. Uh Jeffrey Oman. Bradley President. Michael Goombert. Rachel LeForge, present. Marsha Markle. Malik McNeil. Yes. Present. Only the fell. Well Rockwell? Here. Here. Randy State Martin? Here. Fred Zuller. I'm here. John Lee. Present. Nancy Zawarski. Here. All right. And we did have a few absences from uh uh Michael and uh Hassan. So they couldn't be with us today. We will proceed then. We have a uh special recognition event today. Nice thing is uh nice way to start off, and I believe the mayor has a couple of comments or we have I got any of that. I'm sorry. No, there's no motion. Okay. I will go get it. Anyway, some just text your case. I'll give us an extreme. Except you won't figure it. Well, we'll move on with a couple of business items then. Um setting the order agenda. You have it in front of you. If there are no corrections, I would entertain a motion to approve as presented. Motion and a second. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries, thank you. Um moving on then to the minutes from the prior meeting. Were there any edits or again? I would entertain a motion to approve our move. Second.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com