OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Rochester, Minnesota/Boards and Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rochester Ethical Practices Board Meeting - October 30, 2026

Boards and Commissions — Friday, October 30, 2026
BodyRochester, Minnesota
SessionBoards and Commissions
DateFriday, October 30, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 56:08

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:03

Yes, we're

Speaker 2

0:04

recording.

Unassigned speaker

0:06

I

Speaker 1

0:06

think everyone for coming.

0:07

So it looks like we have uh two absences.

0:10

We'll have a forum of

Speaker 3

0:12

years ago.

Unassigned speaker

0:16

Um

Speaker 3

0:16

first item on the agenda is to approve the meeting minutes from last meeting.

0:21

Anyone that could make a motion to do

Unassigned speaker

0:23

that.

Unassigned speaker

0:24

Oh

Speaker 3

0:24

my goodness.

0:26

Thank you.

Speaker 1

0:27

Sound good.

0:29

Any discussions?

0:30

All in favor?

0:32

Um closed?

0:36

Honestly.

Speaker 4

0:55

No uh no additional reports, madam chair.

1:00

Um maybe just two things I would mention for your general awareness.

1:06

I think we've talked about this a little bit in the past during election season.

1:12

Um sometimes I will get a few more questions that are closer to the purview of this body, which is just kind of dealing

Unassigned speaker

1:24

with

Speaker 4

1:24

general questions of um or candidates, conflict of interest questions, the ethics disclosure form that candidates submit, and they're all um good questions.

1:40

Um

Unassigned speaker

1:41

they

Speaker 4

1:42

tend to happen most every uh election cycle a little bit more this time, partly because of um some candidates with a little more significant um business um activity within the within the city again.

1:58

That's not unusual and just something for us

Unassigned speaker

2:01

to

Speaker 4

2:02

be aware of and navigate.

2:04

Um and I would rather be getting those questions directly and deal with them proactively than um for them to come through a different avenue.

2:15

So just that general heads

Unassigned speaker

2:17

up

Speaker 4

2:18

to you on election season, but I would also give you the heads up that um the city organization always plans on essentially a new elected orientation that we do.

2:29

Um every time we have an election, and sometimes that involves many new folks.

2:36

At times it's involved three, four or five different new elected officials where we're trying to orient them to um the city organization, the different departments, the things that they need to know as newly elected officials.

2:51

I mention it because part of my role, my time slot includes talking about the ethics ordinance, gifting laws, open meeting uh dynamics, things like that that again touch on the things that are important to this body, and ideally um we're educating folks enough to for them to not end up with matters before all of you.

3:19

So we have that orientation set for second and third week in November.

3:24

Um we'll be digging them to that.

3:27

Just wanted you to be aware.

Speaker 1

3:29

Oh good, thank

Unassigned speaker

3:30

you.

Speaker 1

3:34

Now at the open comment period,

Speaker 3

3:36

there are about 15 minutes allotted.

Unassigned speaker

3:39

So

Speaker 3

3:39

those in attendance wishing to speak, thank you for being 10.

3:42

As with all city boards and commission, we welcome public comment.

3:45

Please be aware that the board is not able to have an ethical complaint through a verbal comment.

3:50

Any complaint against an identified individual must be submitted to the formal complaint process.

3:55

Details can be found on the city's website.

3:57

If you need guidance, please speak to the executive assistant, the chair, or the city agent.

4:02

Would

Speaker 5

4:02

anybody like to make it?

Unassigned speaker

4:09

So

Speaker 5

4:10

we

Speaker 1

4:10

have one item

Speaker 3

4:11

for unfinished business, and we're gonna continue our review of the complaint and we received uh August 17th.

4:18

Um I'd like to ask um Michael to remind us of the data privacy stuff that's relevant to this complaint.

4:27

What can we say?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Ethical Practices Board████████████████████████████████████36%
Ethics And Governance███████████████████████████27%
Public Engagement█████████████13%
Procedural████████████12%
Legal And Contractual Matters████4%
Public Comment███3%
Parks and Recreation███3%
Personnel Matters██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Rochester Ethical Practices Board Meeting - October 30, 2026

The Ethical Practices Board of Rochester, Minnesota, met on October 30, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. in City Hall Room 320. The board addressed routine business, received an update from the City Attorney on election-related inquiries, and conducted a lengthy discussion on a pending complaint before voting unanimously to dismiss it.

Consent Calendar

  • Meeting called to order with roll call; members Faye Harris, Timothy Hornseth, Nick Nedland, Morgan B Muenster, Ndidi V Nwaneri present; Bob Haeussinger and Paul H Grinde absent.
  • Minutes of September 17, 2026, approved unanimously.
  • Reports: City Attorney Michael Spindler-Krage updated the board on election season inquiries, noting an increase in questions about candidate ethics disclosures and conflict of interest, and previewed new elected official orientation in November that will include ethics training.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public spoke during the open comment period.

Discussion Items

  • The board continued its review of a complaint/inquiry dated August 17, 2026. The complaint alleged ethical violations related to a parks department contract, including a $17,000 accounting error (later corrected), a change in contracting process mid-negotiation, and claims of bias by city staff based on personal interactions. Board members debated whether the issues raised constituted an ethics code violation or were matters of professional judgment. City Attorney clarified that staff have discretion in presenting information to boards, that the park board made the final decision to pursue an RFP, and that the ethics code requires impartiality but not that staff ignore legitimate experiences with vendors. The board examined the specific language of the city's ethics ordinance, particularly the duty to discharge duties faithfully and impartially. After discussion, members concluded that the accounting error was unintentional and corrected, and that the decision to change the process was based on actual interactions and not on prohibited bias. No personal financial gain or clear violation was identified.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion by Timothy Hornseth, seconded by Nick Nedland, to dismiss the complaint/inquiry dated August 17, 2026. Approved unanimously (5 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent).
  • The board set its next meeting for November 19, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. in conference room 104.
  • Meeting adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

Yes, we're recording. I think everyone for coming. So it looks like we have uh two absences. We'll have a forum of years ago. Um first item on the agenda is to approve the meeting minutes from last meeting. Anyone that could make a motion to do that. Oh my goodness. Thank you. Sound good. Any discussions? All in favor? Um closed? Honestly. No uh no additional reports, madam chair. Um maybe just two things I would mention for your general awareness. I think we've talked about this a little bit in the past during election season. Um sometimes I will get a few more questions that are closer to the purview of this body, which is just kind of dealing with general questions of um or candidates, conflict of interest questions, the ethics disclosure form that candidates submit, and they're all um good questions. Um they tend to happen most every uh election cycle a little bit more this time, partly because of um some candidates with a little more significant um business um activity within the within the city again. That's not unusual and just something for us to be aware of and navigate. Um and I would rather be getting those questions directly and deal with them proactively than um for them to come through a different avenue. So just that general heads up to you on election season, but I would also give you the heads up that um the city organization always plans on essentially a new elected orientation that we do. Um every time we have an election, and sometimes that involves many new folks. At times it's involved three, four or five different new elected officials where we're trying to orient them to um the city organization, the different departments, the things that they need to know as newly elected officials. I mention it because part of my role, my time slot includes talking about the ethics ordinance, gifting laws, open meeting uh dynamics, things like that that again touch on the things that are important to this body, and ideally um we're educating folks enough to for them to not end up with matters before all of you. So we have that orientation set for second and third week in November. Um we'll be digging them to that. Just wanted you to be aware. Oh good, thank you. Now at the open comment period, there are about 15 minutes allotted. So those in attendance wishing to speak, thank you for being 10. As with all city boards and commission, we welcome public comment. Please be aware that the board is not able to have an ethical complaint through a verbal comment. Any complaint against an identified individual must be submitted to the formal complaint process.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com