Rochester City Council Meeting - March 2, 2026
Rochester City Council Meeting - March 2, 2026
The Rochester City Council met on March 2, 2026, beginning with a public comment period followed by regular agenda items including transit service changes, a downtown corridor redevelopment plan, a downtown mobility network study, council rules updates, and a crisis response grant application. Key votes included approval of the Sixth Avenue corridor plan, adoption of an interim north-south bike route option (First Avenue Option B), and approval of council rules changes excluding certain sections.
Consent Calendar
- Items F1-F3, F5-F7, and F9-F15 were approved en bloc. Items F4 and F8 were pulled for separate discussion.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Barry Skolnick opposed assigning TIF funds to the City Walks apartment project, arguing the affordable housing percentage would decrease and that the properties do not meet the definition of urban blight. He also lamented the loss of the Hefferin House, a historic mayor’s residence.
- Mike Schmidt (Chair, Pedestrian and Bicycle Commission) supported the Sixth Avenue through 4th Street bike route and either First or Second Avenue for north-south connectivity, citing economic benefits of biking and walking.
- John Creasel urged the council not to accept the mayor’s resignation and cautioned about parking downtown, noting that the Mayo Clinic’s construction has reduced available spaces.
- West Lund shared a state fraud report and argued that TIF funds should only be used for public purposes, not luxury developments.
- Jason Bale Backen alleged assault by a sheriff’s deputy and obstruction of justice when attempting to file a fraud report, criticizing taxpayer-funded services not benefiting the community.
- Tim Schmidt criticized community engagement for the downtown mobility network, claiming it only involved bike advisory groups and ignored stakeholders like neighborhoods, RDA, and the Preservation Commission.
- Lucy Creesel supported data collection to evaluate how people move downtown, emphasizing predictability for new cyclists and pedestrians.
- Michael Wojak (Executive Director, Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota) commended the Sixth Avenue design but noted intersections at Civic Center Drive and 2nd Street are not all-ages-and-abilities. He supported either First or Second Avenue for downtown connectivity.
- Aaron Mead (WeBike Rochester) echoed support for Sixth Avenue but stressed the need for an all-ages-and-abilities route through downtown, supporting Second Avenue as a low-cost option.
- Marty Cormac (regular cyclist) supported Sixth Avenue but noted the hill south of 2nd Street is not accessible. He encouraged a north-south connection on First or Second Avenue.
Discussion Items
- H1 - Rochester Public Transit Spring Service Changes: Rachel Fouch, interim transit director, presented proposed changes including route mergers, increased frequency to 20 minutes on key routes, bidirectional service, and a reduction of weekend hours. The changes are revenue-neutral and aim to increase boardings per hour. No vote was taken; the item was informational.
- H2 - Reimagining Sixth Avenue West (Civic Center Drive to 2nd Street SW): The council adopted the corridor concept plan and authorized final design and bid documents. The project includes a two-way cycle track, signalized intersections, and sidewalks. Construction is expected from spring 2027 to end of 2027. The motion passed unanimously.
- H3 - Reconnecting the Downtown Mobility Network: Several options were presented (First Avenue Options A, B, C; Second Avenue; Sixth Avenue extension; Broadway). After extensive debate, Councilmember Keene moved to adopt First Avenue Option B (interim solution with 16 parking spaces lost) as the preferred route. The motion passed 4-3 (Keene, Miller, Doring, Schubring in favor; Wall, Fredericks, Palmer opposed). The council also discussed the need for data collection and future consideration of Second Avenue or Broadway.
- H4 - Updates to Council Rules and Code of Conduct: Council President Schubring proposed changes to clarify council-initiated action procedures. Following discussion and a motion by Councilmember Fredericks, the council approved the rules excluding changes to sections 2.03B and 2.03C, which dealt with anticipating action on CIAs and mayor-initiated actions. The vote was 5-2.
- H5 - Minnesota Office of Justice Programs 2026-2028 Crisis Response Grant: Police Captain Hodgman presented the grant application to fund a homelessness navigator position. The council authorized the application. The motion passed unanimously.
Key Outcomes
- H2: Corridor concept plan for Sixth Avenue West adopted unanimously.
- H3: First Avenue Option B selected as the preferred interim north-south connection (vote 4-3).
- H4: Council rules approved without changes to 2.03B and 2.03C (vote 5-2).
- H5: Authorization to apply for crisis response grant approved (unanimous).
- The council also adopted findings of the Rochester Economic Development Authority (REDA) in the other business portion of the meeting.
Meeting Transcript
Really? Please rise as you're able for the Pledge of Allegiance. Welcome everybody to our March 2nd, 2026 City Council meeting. And we begin our city council meetings with our open common period. This is an opportunity for members of the public to address the council on uh issues that we are not holding a separate public hearing on uh uh later this evening. Each uh person has up to two minutes to speak for a total of 20 minutes. I will keep track of time through two methods. One is the stoplight here and in front of me, and the second is the red digital clock to the left of me. Uh so please know I may need to cut you off because of the limited time, and we want to also make sure that everybody has an opportunity to speak. I'd also ask that speakers be concise to allow more people to speak, and uh encourage you to limit comments generally to topics that are within the scope and jurisdiction of the council's ability to affect policy. Uh council members and staff do not respond directly to your comments, uh, but will instead follow up if you need uh us two separately, and if you have materials to share with the council, please hand them over to our uh city clerk and Caseau, who is uh raising her hand right now. Uh and so you will now be invited up to speak in the order of which you signed up. So we start with Mr. Barry Creesel. I mean Barry Barry Skolnick. I saw Barry and John walking in today together. So Mr. Skolnik, go ahead. Okay, I hope this is on. Anyway, um, yeah, I'm speaking um coming up to speak about the Rochester Economic Development Authority and the request for TIFF being associated, being assigned to the City Walks apartment houses. Um there when you look at the number to total percentage of uh of apartments that are is go is going to people who uh are of lower income or middle income, it's actually going to be less because um the uh the heffron house, which is my uh mayor Martin Hefferin's old house, that one used to be excluded used to have m lower rents and still had lower rents up until when Nozer signed uh the apartments over to he was the former person who ran for mayor, um, sent that over to the developer and he he sold it to them. Um so right now if you look at the total percent of of affordable housing in that unit, it's actually less rather than the more. And some people say there's urban blight, but I've looked in in those buildings. I don't see any blight, I don't see any rodents, I don't see any mice, I don't see any deterioration. So I'm not sure exactly how they're defining urban blight, unless it means they really want to build their project and they want money for it, and so whatever is in their way is blight. But in terms of doing something for the city, getting rid of the Hefferin House, Mayor Hefferin's house, um, is it is a shame. He basically uh would constructed St. Mary's Hospital and the Chateau Theater as well as numerous other houses. And um again, he he was he served as sort of like as one of the only rooming houses where he was the owner and he also had served meals and things in there, and so yeah, it was one of the last ones that was left in Rochester. So while it didn't get on tie, wasn't in a timely way submitted enough where I could get it landmarked. It still was something again. He was a mayor of Rochester, he was president of the board of Alderman. He also served as a uh somebody who was doing anesthesia, a jack of all trades for uh St. Mary's Hospital. And I'm just hoping that not so much for the House itself, which I wish could have been saved, but I know it's not going to be. I'm just concerned about why uh you're actually giving TIFF to it. They already got money from the DMC, I think, through state grants. And I'm just very concerned that it just doesn't deserve to have TIFF, because again, why? Do we give it to all projects? What separates that out? And the two buildings which they say are now on some public role. How do we know that want to stay there? Anyway, so they you so you can't add that to the uh number of affordable housing units. So again, please look at it. I don't think it deserves TIFF. Um, again, why? There's no degradation there whatsoever. Thank you. Okay, thank you. Thank you, Mr.
openpublica.com