Rochester City Council Meeting - May 18, 2026
Rochester City Council Meeting - May 18, 2026
This meeting included public comments on the Silver Lake Dam removal project, traffic safety, and governance transparency, followed by council actions on a budget amendment for the dam modification, a grant application for safe streets, and several routine approvals.
Consent Calendar
- Approved in block items F1–F5, F7–F19, and F21 (Councilmember Wall noted that four contracts (F10, 12, 14, 15) had engineer estimates of $3.553 million but bids came in at $2.786 million, a savings of $766,000 or 21.6% off estimates).
- Items F6 and F20 were pulled by Councilmember Palmer but not discussed further.
Public Comments & Testimony
- First Speaker (Friends of Silver Lake representative): Expressed opposition to the Silver Lake Dam removal project, stating that the dam has been safe for decades and that the $3+ million in RPU electric ratepayer funds is a poor use of public funds. He argued that maintenance costs over 20 years would be similar, and that the project has been based on misleading statements by city staff and the mayor. He urged the council to consider the voices of residents who do not support the project.
- Molly Dennis (resident and mayoral candidate): Called for transparency, accountability, and adherence to the city's weak-mayor charter. She stated she has been asked by residents from both parties to run for mayor, and that she advocates for honest governance, fiscal transparency, affordability, and protecting resident voices.
- Romere's Biddle: Raised three traffic safety concerns: (1) inadequate traffic light visibility on multi-lane roads when one light is out or blocked by large trucks; (2) vehicles parked on railroad crossings while waiting for lights; and (3) poor visibility of street markings at night, especially for older drivers.
Discussion Items
- H1 – RPU Silver Lake Dam Modification Budget Amendment:
- Staff (Mr. McCullough) explained that the revised $3 million budget (up from $2 million previously approved) is based on an updated cost estimate including $1.9 million for near-term gate repairs, $600,000 for 20 years of operation and maintenance, and $700,000 for repair of scour downstream. These costs would be incurred by RPU ratepayers even if the dam is not removed.
- Councilmember Palmer moved to table the item, citing the need for final DNR permit approval to know total project costs. The motion failed 2-5 (Fredericks and Palmer in favor; others opposed).
- A motion to approve the budget amendment ($1,090,000 additional, bringing total to $3,009,700) was made by Councilmember Miller and seconded by Councilmember Keene. A friendly amendment was added to transfer operations, maintenance, and financial responsibility for the dam to the Public Works Department upon commencement of demolition and remain after project completion. The motion passed 5-2 (Palmer and Fredericks dissenting).
- H2 – Safe Streets and Roads for All Planning and Demonstration Grant Application:
- Mr. Dombrowski presented that the grant is 100% federally funded with no local match, building on a prior safety action plan. It would fund demonstration projects on three corridors (Fourth Street SE, Third Avenue SE, 11th Avenue SW/NW) to improve safety for walking, rolling, and biking, and inform future reconstruction.
- Councilmember Palmer opposed, stating that the grant could force the city into unwanted projects and that the identified corridors are already bottlenecks. He voted no.
- The motion to approve the grant application passed 6-1, with Palmer dissenting.
Key Outcomes
- Approved: Consent agenda block (with noted savings).
- Approved: Vacation of drainage and utility easement (CD 2026-004 VAC) for Bella Vita and Forte Rochester LLC (unanimous).
- Approved: Budget amendment for Silver Lake Dam modification ($3,009,700 total RPU contribution) with transfer of O&M responsibility to Public Works (5-2).
- Approved: Submission of Safe Streets and Roads for All grant application (6-1).
- Approved: Ordinance second readings: K1 (unified development code amendment) and K2 (mobile food units regulations) – both unanimous.
- Next Steps: The council will continue discussions on the Rochester Regional Sports and Recreation Complex at the June 1, 2026 meeting. Candidate filing for city elections opens May 19, 2026.
Meeting Transcript
Please rise as you're able for the Pledge of Allegiance. Welcome everybody to the May eighteenth, twenty twenty six Rochester City Council meeting. Uh, we begin every city council meeting with our open comment period. This is an opportunity for for anyone from the public to speak on items that we will that we will not be taking public testimony on during a public hearing later in the agenda. Each person has up to two minutes to speak for a total of twenty minutes. And I will be keeping track of time through two methods. One is the stoplight here, the red, white or the green, yellow, and red, and the also the red digital clock on the wall there. So know that I may need to cut you off. Um I also request that each speaker be concise to allow for more people to speak during the designated time. And participants are also encouraged to limit comments generally to topics that are within the scope and jurisdiction of the council's ability to affect policy. Council members and staff do not respond to your comments during public comment, but will instead follow up on any specific requests separately. I'm a lifelong resident of Rochester, Minnesota. I am here tonight on behalf of the Friends of Silver Lake, a group representing thousands of Rochester residents like myself who do not want to see major changes to Rochester Silver Lake Park that the dam removal is about to bring. As someone who has lived in Rochester my entire life, I've never heard concerns about this dam being unsafe until the removal effort began. For many residents, that raises a legitimate question about whether this project is truly necessary. Part of the dam removal effort has been in the works for the past decade. City council approval to spend more than three million dollars of Rochester public utilities electric ratepayer money for dam removal, despite RPU estimated it would cost similar amounts to maintain the current dam over the next 20 years. We believe this is poor use of public funds and raises serious concerns about how taxpayer and ratepayer dollars are being spent. This project will likely lead to future requests for millions more in public funding for a project many raster Rochester residents do not support. This also follows numerous misleading statements made by city staff and the mayor over the past six years in an effort to convince citizens, council members, and state DNR officials that dam removal will improve Silver Lake Park, despite the fact that many residents believe the park has been a valued and cherished cherished community asset for more than 90 years. We respectfully respectfully ask that you give this request serious consideration before voting on this public expenditure and consider the voices of many Rochester residents who do not support this project. Whatever happens in the in the project, the main consideration should be the beautification of Silver Lake Park and the removal of all unnecessary um debris in the park and make it fishable for people. Um the park will be used much more if you made the boundaries of the park a lot nicer. Thank you, Mr. Gove. Okay. Next up we have Molly Dennis. Thank you. Hi, I'm Molly Dennis. A governing principle of America is the constitutional separation of powers. Dictated by our Rochester weak mayor charter. Rochester's mayor is non-partisan. She's not here today, but she's nonpartisan, and she is also part of the executive branch of government. Residents can easily be confused because both the mayor and the city administrator sit on the high dais of the legislative uh official dais, but both of you are not legislators. As a former teacher living in Rochester, I have for decades paid a close attention to details and patterns. I have consistently advocated for honesty, governmental accountability, and fiscal transparency. As a council member sitting here on the dais, I have proven myself to be nonpartisan, voting for both sustainability and also against a high property taxes because there was not any travel receipts. I have promoted accessibility and public safety while advocating fiercely for affordability for struggling families here in Rochester. I have played these games before, and I do not like this game. Or the unchecked power of the local executive branch. To change corrupt rules starts with transparency from within. As someone who listens, who shows up and who does not rubber stamp. I have been asked by many residents in Rochester from both political parties to run for mayor. I have been asked to stop this propaganda. I have been asked to bring resident voices back into the public agenda, and I have asked to be protect the rights of people here in Rochester. Thank you, Miss Dennis. Transparency of trust. Thank you. Integrity matters. And on August 11th, I hope you vote for Molly for Mayor.
openpublica.com