STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Rochester City Council held its regular session on November 2, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Government Center Council Chamber. All seven council members and Mayor Norton were present. The meeting included open comment on automated license plate readers and Salvation Army housing assistance, four public hearings, a report on private sewer lateral cost assistance, and ordinance readings.
For the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge to the United States of America. And to the republic, which is one nation under the individual with liberty and justice for all. Welcome everybody to our November 2nd, 2026 Rochester City Council meeting. We begin every city council meeting with our open comment period. This is an opportunity for uh anyone from the public to speak on items that we will not be taking public testimony on during a public hearing later in the agenda. Each person has up to two minutes to speak for a total of 20 minutes. I will be keeping track of time through two methods. One is the stoplight here at the dais, and the other is the digital clock that is uh to my left uh on uh on the wall there. Um we I ask each speaker to be concise to allow more people to speak during the period and participants are also uh encouraged to limit comments generally to topics that are within the scope and jurisdiction of the council's ability to affect policy. Council members and staff do not respond directly to your comments during public comment period, but will instead follow up on any specific requests separately. If you have materials to share with the council, you may give them to the city clerk, Miss Ann Caseel over there, uh, and she will distribute them. So you will be invited up in the order which you signed up, and we will start with Mr. Adam uh Schlickla. I hope I'm you guys I messed that up, but you can tell me what it is. That is absolutely fine. Um Good evening, Mayor Norton, counselors. My name is Adam Sechla, and after me will be Sarah Jackham. We were excited to move back to Rochester last month after a few years away. So it was with great disappointment that we learned that on our very street, we have uh two uh axon automatic license plate readers installed in the time we were gone. ALPRs are also known as flock cameras, are raise major practical, moral, and safety concerns. Foremost, because these cameras are part of a national infrastructure, there is no practical way for citizens to hold parties accountable for abuses. And there are countless cases of proven abuses with wrongful arrests, stalking, and even cases of federal agencies using the staff the systems to track uh citizens without warrants. This is all with most evidence pointing towards ALPRs not providing meaningful safety improvements or crime deterrence. We come with two requests to of the council. First, regarding agenda item F6. We want to know that the grant money coming to our city for traffic safety is not being used to fund ALPRs or their use. Instead, that funding should go to proven safety improvements, like those recommended by the Federal Highway Administration or the CDC. Second, we ask that the council act to cancel the current ALPR contracts, remove the existing equipment, and commit to not installing more. I came to Rochester because in Minnesota, we care for our neighbors. We trust each other and we build a healthy communities using ALPRs to track each other's movements and to enable outsiders to track each other's movements, doesn't live up to those ideals. Thank you. Thank you. Next up we have uh Sarah Jackham. Good evening, Mayor Norton and Councillors. Um my name is Sarah Jacum, and it's as Adam just introduced. We are here to speak about the use of ALPRs in Rochester. Last month, the United States in United States versus Kyle, case number 426 CR00189. The court found that the use of ALPRs is an unconstitutional warrantless search, specifically violating expectations of privacy in the whole of a person's movements. Basically, while we do not have a right to privacy in public, we do have a right to not be constantly stalked. Following intense nationwide debate over the last few months, it is clear that these companies have lost the trust of the public. Many communities across Minnesota have paused or suspended ALPR use, including Brooklyn Park, Champlain, Columbia Heights, Crystal, Dayton, Duluth, North Branch, Plymouth, Shorewood, St. Paul, West St. Paul, and Winona, as well as Isantee County, Itasca County, Sherburn County, and St. Louis County. Many of these decisions have occurred in the last few months, citing the poor data sharing protocols and lack of public trust. Therefore, I am reiterating our two requests for the council. First to ensure that the Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2027 traffic enforcement grant is not used to fund additional ALPR contracts or equipment.