Good evening.

We will call to order the City of Rockford Special City Council meeting for Monday, August 10th, 2026.

Clerk, could you please call a roll?

Ogman.

Here.

Frost.

Here.

Terina, here.

Frontie.

Here.

Neil.

Here.

Hoffman.

Here.

Granit.

Here.

Beach.

Here.

President.

Meeks here.

Belle.

Present.

Bonnie.

Here.

13 present.

Excellent.

Thank you.

We have a quorum this evening.

Uh Council, we have one item before us.

That's item two.

One.

Uh Roman numeral to item one.

Uh election, election of older person to serve as acting mayor pursuant to 65 ILCS 5-3.1-10-50 F.

Uh at this time is there Alderman Frost.

Thank you.

Can we want to?

Yep.

Before there's I believe there's a motion, but but before we get to the motion, I just want to express kind of the history.

Uh last Monday I sent an email to our legal director concerning, but then you hit it right, Section 50 of the Illinois statutes concerning this matter, concerning whether or not we as a city, due to the uh timing of your announcement to resign, uh would be would be appropriate not under the ordinance.

Um it's important to know that uh we do meet the requirements of section 50 subsection F because it is greater than 28 months.

Uh my position was that Section F 1 does not apply because that allowed for a an election of an acting mayor if there's under 28 months.

Um it's important to know that this this specific statute was amended in 2025, 2021, 2015, 2008, 2005.

And I bring that up because uh I had the privilege and pleasure of talking to uh Carrie Lynn Kraftheifer, who we received her uh a memo from her yesterday.

I uh she called me last week.

I spoke to her about this matter, and again we spoke today for about an hour.

Uh and I do agree with some of the items that she mentions.

Um, but one thing we we we agreed on was that the statute under F is not ambiguous.

Uh there's no ambiguity and no it's not as if there's more than one interpretation of Section F.

Um, she acknowledges that.

She she believed that maybe it was uh left out in error, and my point on that is well, it's been amended six times.

So if the state legislature uh has had a crack to amend or or modify this, you know, six different times over the last you know ten years, and they've chosen not to.

Um another point um on this lack of clarity uh is that nowhere in the memo that she created does it identify something that's very crucial to our city, unfortunately, and that is that we are not a home rule town.

We do not have home rule.

It was taken away uh as an all the I I was here, we tried to get it back, and we failed.

So we talked about cities like Evanston and Harvey, Illinois, that have uh either had by death um someone get a an acting mayor get appointed, and the nuances they have home rule, so they can they can form a rules committee and make their own set of rules on how they're going to elect uh if the and they and they did, but we we don't have that ability.

We heard tonight from Mr.

Gorrow talking about the the TID.

Uh we are limited by statute because there's a statute on it that says what we can and can't do.

And in fact, there's another statute that says that because we don't have home rule, you know, we have to follow the express authority of state law.

We can't just I mean I I I respect her as an attorney, but her her memo just says, well, you know what, since it's not in there, let's just kind of make it up.