OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Rockford, Illinois/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rockford City Council Strategic Planning Session – August 31, 2026

Meeting Portal — Monday, August 31, 2026
BodyRockford, Illinois
SessionMeeting Portal
DateMonday, August 31, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:29:38

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:24

Good evening.

0:25

Thank you for having us here tonight.

0:28

My name is Andrea Proct.

0:30

I'm with H.R.

0:31

Green.

0:32

I also have a coworker who's been working on this project with the with the staff at and he is not, he is not here tonight.

0:42

His name is Mark Fitz.

0:43

I believe that may be in your board packet presentation.

0:47

My background is water resources, and I have served as in as a municipal engineer in the Chicagoland and Northern Illinois region for the last 20 plus years.

1:03

Mark and I both have had extensive work with various county and municipal ordinances, both writing them and enforcing them during our careers.

1:15

And so that is kind of some of the background on my end, so you know who's in front of you tonight.

1:24

I'm I am Jeremy Carter, I'm the traffic and development engineer.

1:30

So we are going to talk to you tonight about the revisions to our our excuse me, proposed revisions to our stormwater ordinance.

1:38

Our current stormwater ordinance was adopted in 2015 with a minor revision in 2021 that was primarily for floodplain revisions.

1:49

The goals of this revision were to make it to make the ordinance easier to interpret and to uh uh use um from the people who who need to use it.

2:00

We had a goal of making the the ordinance more business aware, and we'll talk about that a little bit um during the presentation, and then also for the uh ordinance to continue to be um consistent with federal and state regulations.

2:20

So the the stormwater ordinance revisions kind of started with our city's master plan.

2:25

Um unlike the the city's stormwater master plan where we went out and did 11 public meetings for this, uh we chose to go with a model of bringing stakeholders in to talk about the ordinance.

2:38

Uh the stakeholder meetings consisted of developers, construction or uh contractors and consultants who are the people who really use the ordinance every day.

2:50

Um the first meeting we had with the to listen to the stakeholders and their concerns was in May of 2023, and then uh in March of this year, we went back uh to the stakeholders with the revisions that we are proposing.

3:07

Andrea.

3:10

All right.

3:11

So I am going to go over some of the significant changes that we've made to the ordinance as part of this project.

3:19

Um I will not go into a lot of detail.

3:23

We're intentionally trying to keep our presentation short.

3:28

And we will have time for questions at the end.

3:31

So I'm going to touch on some of the major changes and then we'll open it up for questions if you have any.

3:38

So with the concept of making the ordinance more user-friendly, we did the first thing that we did was reformatting the ordinance.

3:48

We moved the definitions to the end of the ordinance, which sounds pretty simple, but uh uh the current ordinance has about 15 pages of definitions right up front at the beginning of the ordinance, which can when you pick it up and try to open it up as a user.

4:05

Um you hit all those definitions and it can be like where does it say what I need to do and whether or not I need to follow this ordinance.

4:17

So we move the scope of regulations and exemptions up to the front of the ordinance.

4:23

So that is the section that says do I need it to get a permit underneath this ordinance.

4:28

So that is now front and center.

4:30

When somebody opens the ordinance, they will be able to find that hopefully very quickly.

4:36

Um the la the other big change that we made was we added some graphics to the floodplain portion of the ordinance, the graphics um visually describe where um your property lies within and adjacent to and outside of the floodplain and how the elevation requirements may or may not apply to your development.

5:00

So those graphics are based off of some that DNR has put out, and they're intended to simplify those requirements for visually describe them for users.

5:13

We also, with the goal of user friendliness, added some flow charts to help navigate the requirements of the ordinance.

5:22

They follow there are three of them that we've put in.

5:26

The first one is do I need a permit?

5:31

The second one is what are my stormwater requirements and or some middle requirements.

5:38

And the third one is what are detention requirements if I have contiguous property.

5:45

What I have up in front on the screen right now is a sample of one of those permits.

5:50

Again, I'm not going to go into detail with it here.

5:54

We're available for questions, and I think you had all of them in your packets.

5:59

But the they follow very closely the language of the ordinance, but are intended to put it into a more clear, easy to follow process for a user.

6:10

And they also, in some cases, it's not always a clear yes or no answer.

6:15

And so in some cases, it does direct users to go to city staff and ask for a clear clarify or ask for clarity on the ordinance.

6:28

Okay.

6:29

And then the again looking at helping to make this more business aware with the stormwater ordinance.

6:42

We have clarified the language within the stormwater ordinance of when stormwater detention will be required for a property.

6:51

So we have put very clear cutoffs of points in time in a development of when a project will require stormwater detention.

7:00

So we have set it at 65,000 square feet of new impervious.

7:06

That's an acre and a half of new pavement on a site, kicks in the detention requirements of the ordinance.

7:14

Below that we have this green green space, I guess, area of when we're above 5,000 square feet of disturbance and up to the 65,000 square feet of new impervious.

7:31

In that zone, we have included requirements for green infrastructure practices on sites.

7:38

The city is currently using best management practices, so we have used some new language in there, but we have better defined when they will be required.

7:54

Those green infrastructure practices can be things like filter strips, pervious pay permeable pavement, or even rain gardens.

8:04

And it's their choice.

9:49

So we have clarified that the city will follow Army Corps of Engineers requirements for wetlands impacts and preservation.

10:00

And then we have added some requirements into the ordinance to reflect the solar farms that we're seeing throughout the whole state of Illinois.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Economic Development██████████████████████████26%
Public Works██████████████████18%
Stormwater Management████████████████16%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████16%
Public Engagement████████8%
Tax Increment Financing███3%
Strategic Planning██2%
Budget Equity Analysis██2%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Rockford City Council Strategic Planning Session – August 31, 2026

The Rockford City Council met for a strategic planning session on Monday, August 31, 2026, in Council Chambers at 425 E. State Street. Mayor Neal called the meeting to order at 5:59 p.m.; the meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. Roll call was taken, with Aldermen Gabrielle Torina and Frank Beach absent; Alderman Jonathan Logemann departed at 7:27 p.m. The invocation, Pledge of Allegiance, and public speaker portion occurred during the preceding Special City Council meeting. The agenda listed five public speakers: Kenneth Dickens, John Tac Brantley, Larry Washington, Todd Fagen, and Denzil Wynter.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Although the agenda listed five public speakers, the minutes state that the public speaking portion took place during the preceding Special City Council meeting. No public comments were made during this session.

Storm Water Management Ordinance Revisions

  • Jeremy Carter, City Traffic and Development Engineer, and Andrea Pracht of HR Green presented proposed revisions to the Storm Water Management Ordinance. The current ordinance was adopted in 2015, with a minor floodplain-related revision in 2021. Goals include making the ordinance easier to interpret, more business-aware, and consistent with federal and state regulations.
  • Revisions were developed with stakeholders, including developers, contractors, and consultants, in May 2023 and March 2026.
  • Key changes include moving definitions to the end of the ordinance, putting scope and exemptions up front, adding floodplain graphics and flowcharts, clarifying stormwater detention thresholds, and adding solar farm requirements.
  • Detention is proposed to be required at 65,000 square feet of new impervious surface, about 1.5 acres of new pavement. Properties with between 5,000 square feet of disturbance and 65,000 square feet of new impervious surface would need green infrastructure practices such as filter strips, permeable pavement, or rain gardens.
  • The city will continue to follow U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requirements for wetlands under the Rock Island District. Staff said the city can review wetland delineations and that developers retain ultimate liability for wetland impacts.
  • Council members asked about the standards used, the frequency of updates, and whether the rewrite would streamline approvals. Staff said the flowcharts and clearer language should reduce staff time spent educating users and reduce developer frustration.
  • Next steps include ordinance adoption together with the Storm Water Master Plan and updating the technical guidance manual.

Economic Development Presentation

  • Community and Economic Development Director Sarah Leys and Economic Development Manager Anna Carlson presented an overview of the city's economic development initiatives, including cost reduction tools, business outreach, site readiness, brownfield redevelopment, partner programs, business attraction, and corridor concentration.
  • The city has 31 TIF districts, 2 enterprise zones, and a River Edge Redevelopment Zone. The Springfield Corners TIF is slated for termination after serving 23 years.
  • The department manages a $9.6 million U.S. EPA grant portfolio for brownfield assessments and a revolving loan fund.
  • Rockford was selected for the Illinois EDC R2P2 research pilot program, one of eight Illinois communities, and is one of two larger cities, with Chattanooga, in the Heartland Forward Midwest research effort.
  • The Business Advancement Program closed after providing up to $25,000 in forgivable loans and selected six businesses. Earlier commercial corridor program rounds have completed two projects, with 12 in progress; five neighborhoods have new signs installed and five are in process.
  • The team plans to update corridor addendums for West State, North Main, South Main, Madison, 11th Street, Auburn, and Kishwaukee, plus the downtown revitalization strategy.
  • In discussion, Alderman Durkee asked whether brownfields are hopeless and where companies go when they choose not to locate here. Staff said brownfields are not hopeless, cited the Sports Factory as a brownfield success, and said companies that pass on Rockford often go to Texas, North Carolina, or Tennessee. Alderman Meeks asked about revenue-generating programs and the TIF analysis timeline; staff said the TIF analysis is a joint project with finance and may be available in about a month. Alderman Salgado asked about EPA grant balances and remaining program funding; staff offered to provide balances.

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Mid-Year Update

  • City Engineer Tim Hinkens, Public Works Business Manager Jeremy Finley, and Water Superintendent Jamie Rott presented the 2026-2030 CIP mid-year update.
  • Motor Fuel Tax and Sales Tax revenues are each within about 3 percent of target; water revenue is at 59.1 percent of budget through July, ahead of the 58.3 percent of the year elapsed. Staff described this as the largest sales-tax-funded CIP in city history.
  • Neighborhood ward plan packages are mostly out for construction and are expected to be complete by the end of October.
  • 11th Street Corridor Phase 1, from Harrison Avenue to Broadway, will receive its final asphalt layer during the week of September 14. Phase 2 is under construction, with asphalt planned around October, but the Benson Stone railroad crossing is delayed until next year due to disagreements with Union Pacific Railroad over maintenance terms.
  • Auburn Street Corridor Phase 1, from Central to Main, is about two weeks behind schedule, with an early November completion expected. Madison Street Corridor Phase 2, from Prairie to Whitman, has concrete work scheduled to start October 1 and completion expected in early November.
  • The Harrison Avenue bridge over the Rock River has been moved up to a 2026 bid because of an abutment crack; the city will also paint steel under the bridge. The 15th Avenue bridge over the Rock River will be built with federal and state funding, with zero local transportation funds for a $20 million bridge, and construction will take about two years.
  • Bank stabilization under the Jefferson Street Bridge is addressing erosion that is about 10 feet from the river path.
  • Keith Creek Greenway has secured a $2 million FEMA grant through Senators Durbin and Duckworth's community-directed spending program and is awaiting a $3 million FEMA hazard mitigation grant tied to the 2024 flooding disaster. Design is complete and construction is expected next year.
  • Water projects include Well 45 reservoir reconstruction at 1111 Cedar Street, where the old Stanley Pumping Station has been demolished, and Well 46 near 11th Street and Leonard. The lead service line replacement program has replaced 687 services at a cost of about $5.3 million, has secured $20 million in funding, and anticipates about 3,000 replacements per year for 10 years at a total cost of $400–500 million.
  • Council members asked about the Rolling Green flood plan; staff said it is in the stormwater master plan and that about 8 or 9 of 11 Harmon Park drainage phases have been implemented since 2008. Members also discussed maintenance of new sidewalks and curbs, with staff citing door hangers and property-owner maintenance obligations, and multi-use path signage. Staff said the draft five-year CIP would be provided around mid-October.

City-Wide Fiber Installation Memo

  • Mayor Neal noted that a memorandum on the city-wide fiber installation had been placed on council desks and requested that discussion be deferred to give members time to review it. No one objected; Director Scott Sanders indicated he is available to answer questions or present at a future meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • The four presentations were informational; no votes were taken on the substantive items.
  • Discussion of the city-wide fiber installation memo was deferred to a future City Council meeting.
  • The meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. following a unanimous voice vote on a motion by Alderman Tuneberg, seconded by Alderman Bell, with Aldermen Torina and Beach absent.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. Thank you for having us here tonight. My name is Andrea Proct. I'm with H.R. Green. I also have a coworker who's been working on this project with the with the staff at and he is not, he is not here tonight. His name is Mark Fitz. I believe that may be in your board packet presentation. My background is water resources, and I have served as in as a municipal engineer in the Chicagoland and Northern Illinois region for the last 20 plus years. Mark and I both have had extensive work with various county and municipal ordinances, both writing them and enforcing them during our careers. And so that is kind of some of the background on my end, so you know who's in front of you tonight. I'm I am Jeremy Carter, I'm the traffic and development engineer. So we are going to talk to you tonight about the revisions to our our excuse me, proposed revisions to our stormwater ordinance. Our current stormwater ordinance was adopted in 2015 with a minor revision in 2021 that was primarily for floodplain revisions. The goals of this revision were to make it to make the ordinance easier to interpret and to uh uh use um from the people who who need to use it. We had a goal of making the the ordinance more business aware, and we'll talk about that a little bit um during the presentation, and then also for the uh ordinance to continue to be um consistent with federal and state regulations. So the the stormwater ordinance revisions kind of started with our city's master plan. Um unlike the the city's stormwater master plan where we went out and did 11 public meetings for this, uh we chose to go with a model of bringing stakeholders in to talk about the ordinance. Uh the stakeholder meetings consisted of developers, construction or uh contractors and consultants who are the people who really use the ordinance every day. Um the first meeting we had with the to listen to the stakeholders and their concerns was in May of 2023, and then uh in March of this year, we went back uh to the stakeholders with the revisions that we are proposing. Andrea. All right. So I am going to go over some of the significant changes that we've made to the ordinance as part of this project. Um I will not go into a lot of detail. We're intentionally trying to keep our presentation short. And we will have time for questions at the end. So I'm going to touch on some of the major changes and then we'll open it up for questions if you have any. So with the concept of making the ordinance more user-friendly, we did the first thing that we did was reformatting the ordinance. We moved the definitions to the end of the ordinance, which sounds pretty simple, but uh uh the current ordinance has about 15 pages of definitions right up front at the beginning of the ordinance, which can when you pick it up and try to open it up as a user. Um you hit all those definitions and it can be like where does it say what I need to do and whether or not I need to follow this ordinance. So we move the scope of regulations and exemptions up to the front of the ordinance. So that is the section that says do I need it to get a permit underneath this ordinance. So that is now front and center. When somebody opens the ordinance, they will be able to find that hopefully very quickly. Um the la the other big change that we made was we added some graphics to the floodplain portion of the ordinance, the graphics um visually describe where um your property lies within and adjacent to and outside of the floodplain and how the elevation requirements may or may not apply to your development. So those graphics are based off of some that DNR has put out, and they're intended to simplify those requirements for visually describe them for users. We also, with the goal of user friendliness, added some flow charts to help navigate the requirements of the ordinance. They follow there are three of them that we've put in. The first one is do I need a permit? The second one is what are my stormwater requirements and or some middle requirements. And the third one is what are detention requirements if I have contiguous property. What I have up in front on the screen right now is a sample of one of those permits. Again, I'm not going to go into detail with it here. We're available for questions, and I think you had all of them in your packets. But the they follow very closely the language of the ordinance, but are intended to put it into a more clear, easy to follow process for a user. And they also, in some cases, it's not always a clear yes or no answer. And so in some cases, it does direct users to go to city staff and ask for a clear clarify or ask for clarity on the ordinance. Okay. And then the again looking at helping to make this more business aware with the stormwater ordinance. We have clarified the language within the stormwater ordinance of when stormwater detention will be required for a property.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com