Construction Code Enforcement Meeting - Dec 11, 2025
Construction Code Enforcement Meeting - December 11, 2025
The Construction Code Enforcement Board convened on December 11, 2025, to address four properties identified as public nuisances and hazardous structures. The meeting featured testimony from code enforcement officers, property owners, engineers, and community members regarding structural damage, illegal occupancy, and the feasibility of repairs versus demolition.
Consent Calendar
- Unanimously approved the minutes from the November 13, 2025, meeting as written.
Public Comments & Testimony
Property: 655 Humboldt Street (Appellant: Abel Cantú)
- Position Expressed: The owner expressed strong opposition to the demolition recommendation, asserting he is actively repairing the property and that the city's actions and documentation are false or misleading. He stated he is a "merchant" and "electrician" (though lacking active state licenses) whose progress has been hindered by code enforcement officers seizing materials and equipment. He argued that the city caused the current damage (specifically mentioning a hole in the wall and water lines severed by a tractor) and that the property is not in the condition depicted in the official photos. He requested that his property be returned to him or that he be allowed to continue repairs without interference, claiming he has funds and intends to finish the work.
- Counter-Testimony: Neighbors (Diana Garza) and code enforcement officers (Brian Gilman, Vincent Gonzalez) expressed that the owner has been uncooperative, hostile, and difficult to communicate with. They stated that while the owner claims to have funds, he has not engaged in a verified timeline for completion. They confirmed that the property has been without city water/electricity (utilizing a generator) since 2022 and that previous attempts to offer assistance (social workers, legal aid) were rejected or unfulfilled by the owner due to non-compliance with deadlines. The owner's legal aid contact (Kelly Hope) was noted as having been contacted, but the owner claimed he did not want the help.
Property: 214 Prosperity Drive (Appellant: Sharon Peters)
- Position Expressed: The owner expressed full support for the recommendation to repair rather than demolish. She presented evidence of her financial capability to fund the reconstruction and cited a previous successful property repair completed in under four months. She argued that 60% of the structure is viable and that the damaged portion was already partially demolished by an engineer following an earlier fire. She requested an extension to allow her contractor to submit updated plans and complete the reconstruction, stating she has sufficient funds and a contractor ready to build.
- Rebuttal/Clarification: The owner's engineer (Mónica Lance) confirmed the structure can be saved with reconstruction, estimating the project will take 180 days (six months) to complete, including foundation work. The owner stated the property is currently insured and she has the means to pay for the repair.
Discussion Items
- 655 Humboldt Street: Staff presented findings that the main structure and two accessory buildings (one mobile home, two structures without roofs/foundations) were violating codes regarding dangerous conditions, lack of permits, and public safety hazards. The owner denied negligence, claiming the city interfered with his repairs. Code enforcement emphasized that the property has been uninhabitable for years, utilities have been disconnected, and the owner has failed to meet agreed-upon timelines despite receiving assistance offers.
- 1906 San Fernando Street: Staff reported the property is a single-story structure in ruins, leaning significantly, with a collapsed porch and severe water damage. No owner appeared. Code enforcement noted the property is uninhabitable, has no owner contact, and cannot be feasibly repaired. The owner's absence and lack of financial or repair documentation were highlighted.
- 513 Duval Street: Staff stated the accessory structure is sitting directly on the ground without cimientos, has rotted wood, and is unstable. The owner (JJL Property Group) was contacted but absent. The structure was previously occupied by homeless individuals but has continued to deteriorate. The recommendation was for immediate demolition due to safety hazards.
- 214 Prosperity Drive Re-evaluation: Discussion focused on whether the structure could be saved. The owner and engineer provided financial proof and a timeline (180 days). The Board discussed the feasibility of the repair versus the public nuisance status. The owner agreed to a strict reporting schedule to prove progress.
Key Outcomes
- 655 Humboldt Street: Motion Passed Unanimously (7-0). The property is declared a public nuisance and unrepairable. Directive: Demolition required within 30 days. The property must be cleared of trash/debris, and all services (water/electricity) must be cut. An order of evacuation is issued.
- 214 Prosperity Drive: Motion Passed Unanimously. The property is declared a public nuisance but repairable. Directive: The structure must be reconstructed within 180 days. Amendment: The city is required to receive a work status update every 30 days. The property must be secured.
- 1906 San Fernando Street: Motion Passed Unanimously. The property is declared a public nuisance and unrepairable. Directive: Demolition required within 30 days. The property must be secured and cleared of debris.
- 513 Duval Street: Motion Passed Unanimously. The accessory structure is declared a public nuisance and unrepairable. Directive: Demolition required within 30 days. The property must be secured and cleared of debris.
Board Personnel Updates
- Welcome was extended to incoming board members Juan, Bolvan, and Keila Moranda.
- Announcements were made regarding panel assignments for 2026 (Panels A and B) and the upcoming February board meeting.
- No quorum issues were noted for future meetings as replacements were being sought for absent members.
Meeting Transcript
Muy buenos días, damas y caballeros. Son las nueve de la mañana. El once de diciembre de dos mil veinticinco. En la Junta, la Junta de Normativa de Construcción. Empezamos lista. Por favor. Dwayne Nelson, presente. Joe Solís, presente. George Grams Junior, presente. La doctora Linda López Rodrigues, Kinda Moranda. Yvonne Addison, presente. Fred Andes, presente. Ryan Baldwin, presente. También de la ciudad de San Antonio, Erin Burns, de la oficina de abogados y de desarrollo de servicios. Y el gerente, Melissa Garza, la administradora número dos, señora Ortiz, para el especialista, y yo, Judy Krum, del Departamento de Desarrollo y Supervisora. Se tiene quórum, presidente. La ciudad de San Antonio provee también. Un intérprete en caso de que lo requiera, por favor, pase. Buenos días. Los servicios de traducción al español están disponibles durante esta reunión. La reunión está siendo grabada en español. Los servicios de interpretación están disponibles para aquellos que se inscribieron para hablar. Gracias. Muchísimas gracias. Y hemos recibido las actas de noviembre de dos mil veinticinco. Esperemos que todos hayan tenido la oportunidad de leerlas. Hay algún. Hay una aprobación. Yo soy veranes que se aprueben las minutas de el trece de noviembre del dos mil veinticinco, como se escribieron. Así como se escribieron, tenemos la moción. ¿Quién lo secunda? Joy Solís los recunda. Algún diálogo. No hay diálogo. Todos a favor para que se aprueben las actas de la Junta de Normas de Construcción del 13 de noviembre, digan sí. Aquellos que estén opuestos digan no. La moción pasa unánimamente. Gracias. Y como se había dicho, tenemos quórum. Por favor, silencien sus celulares. Y permítame hacerlo yo también. Y cualquier otro dispositivo que pudiese interrumpir esta audiencia pública. No se debe retrasar ninguna procedimiento o desobedecer la orden del presidente. Si usted requiere hablar, se le permite tres minutos. Sin embargo, el dueño o representante del dueño no tiene tiempo limitado. Por favor, mantenga toda la información relevante a la propiedad en cuestión y la violación al código. También, por favor, para esta audiencia pública, la ciudad va a proveer servicios de interpretación para aquellos que tienen necesidad. Se espera que si usted se requiera cuando esté en la audiencia pública, que el dueño o su representante de la estructura dañada tenga que demostrar los documentos requeridos, de que detalle el alcance del trabajo, el costo y que esté cumpliendo a satisfacción del oficial de código. También que dé la comprobante de la habilidad para pagar el trabajo propuesto y la factibilidad de la reparación dependiendo en los dineros que tenga la mano y que recuerda el tiempo necesario para completar el trabajo. Todas estas. Todo eso se tiene que hacer con la propuesta que se está dando de acuerdo a los códigos y las regulaciones.
openpublica.com