OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Antonio, Texas/Boards & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

HDRC Meeting: Brackenridge Park, Airport Commemoration, and More - Jan 21, 2026

Boards & Commissions — Wednesday, January 21, 2026
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionBoards & Commissions
DateWednesday, January 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:49:13

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:15

May I have a roll call, please?

0:16

Ma'amin Savino.

0:19

Here.

0:20

Velasquez.

0:22

Here.

0:23

Galloway?

0:24

Here.

0:25

Mazuka.

0:27

Givata?

0:28

Here.

0:28

Group Cervantes?

0:31

Here.

0:32

Holland Fetzer?

0:34

Here.

0:35

And Gibbs.

0:36

Here.

0:36

We have a quorum.

0:37

Thank you.

0:38

May I have translation services, please?

0:46

Good afternoon, everyone.

0:48

Buenas tardes at all.

0:58

Thank you.

1:03

Okay, well, welcome everyone.

1:05

Before we get into business, we do have our annual election of officers.

1:09

So at this point, I will open up to the floor to nominations for the business position of chair.

1:15

I'd like to nominate Jay Gibbs for chair.

1:19

Second.

1:20

Okay, we have a motion and a second.

1:22

Do we have any other nominations?

1:25

Okay, all in favor of Mr.

1:26

Gibbs as chair for another year.

1:29

Aye.

1:30

Yes, aye.

1:31

Aye.

1:31

Aye.

1:32

All opposed, same sign.

1:33

Motion passes.

1:35

So uh take it away, Mr.

1:36

Chair for uh Vice Chair.

1:38

Thank you.

1:39

Um we like to now let um see any nominations for the vice chair position.

1:45

Um are there any nominations Mr.

1:49

Chair, I'd like to nominate uh Jeffrey Fetzer for Vice Chair.

1:54

Say Jeffrey Fetzer, um, it's been first um motion and property second.

1:58

Are there any other nominations?

2:01

Hearing none, um all those in favor signify by saying aye.

2:05

Aye.

2:06

Opposed.

2:08

Ayes have it so moved.

2:11

Yeah, we can take the chairman's statement at this time.

2:16

The historic and design review commission is an advisory board appointed by the city council.

2:20

I am J.

2:20

Maurice Gibbs, Chairman, and the vice chair is Jeffrey Fetzer.

2:24

It is the function of the commission to advise the city manager and all relevant city departments concerning all applications for permits for properties in historic districts, for landmarks on city property, and the river improvement overlay and for demolitions.

2:38

And considering whether to recommend approval or disapproval of an application for certificate of appropriateness, the commission shall be guided by the city's unified development code and design guidelines and standards that have been adopted by city council.

2:52

An appeal of a decision by administrative official can be filed in accordance with the city's unified development code.

2:58

If anyone present wishes to speak in favor or in opposition to any item on today's agenda, please sign up on the public comment sheet.

3:05

It is not necessary to sign up if you are the owner of or representative for a project on on the agenda.

3:12

You will be called on as the case is called.

3:14

Case representatives will be given no more than 15 minutes to present their case with an additional two minutes to respond to public comments.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Parks and Recreation█████████████████18%
Procedural████████8%
Infrastructure███████7%
Public Engagement███3%
Community Engagement███3%
Engineering And Infrastructure███3%
Airport Infrastructure██2%
Public Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

HDRC Meeting: Brackenridge Park, Airport Commemoration, and More - Jan 21, 2026

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) met in a marathon session on January 21, 2026, spanning from the afternoon into the evening, to consider a packed agenda. Key items included the contentious Brackenridge Park Phase II bond project, an airport terminal connector commemoration, a church security project, and several residential cases.

Consent Calendar

  • The commission approved the December 17, 2025, meeting minutes.
  • The balance of the consent agenda (Items 2, 4, 6-15) was approved with all staff stipulations. Item 16 (Brackenridge Park) was pulled for extensive public comment, and Items 1, 3, and 5 were pulled by commissioners.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Brackenridge Park (Item 16): This item drew the most extensive public input, with over 20 in-person speakers and dozens of recorded voicemails.
    • Support: Chris Maitre (Brackenridge Park Conservancy) urged approval, stating the current area is a sea of broken asphalt suffering from ecological distress, and the project restores critical history and the natural environment.
    • Religious & Indigenous Opposition: John Griel (attorney for Gary Perez and Matilda Torres) argued the removal of two cypress trees adjacent to the pump house violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and that the city has not explored alternatives. A Comanche Nation representative formally opposed any tree removal until consultation is complete. Sabrina Chapa and Norma Santos requested indigenous Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), calling the trees sacred relatives.
    • Cultural & Community Opposition: Many speakers (Aida Ayala, Antonia Castaneda, Susan Strawn of River Road NA, Cecilia Black, Alicia Garlock, and others) opposed the removal of 22 parking spaces, 10% of the park's picnic tables (including WPA replicas), and the historic stone kiosk. They argued the plan would eliminate traditional working-class family uses like Easter camping, lowrider cruising, and Sunday gatherings.
  • Other Items: Ray Herbert spoke in favor of security fencing at St. John's Lutheran Church (Item 3) to protect 94-year-old historic doors. Lulu Francois (Dignity Hill HDRC) provided comments on a new construction project (Item 17). The King William Association provided comments on several consent items and Item 18.

Discussion Items

  • Election of Officers: Jay Gibbs was re-elected as Chair. Jeffrey Fetzer was elected as Vice Chair.
  • Item 1: Airport Terminal Connector / Building 1322 Commemoration: The applicant presented a mitigation plan using a shadow landscape, salvaged Y-column benches, and travertine. Commissioners Fetzer, Mazuka, and Cervantes argued the design lacked visible homage to the historic building. A motion by Commissioner Group to approve the design as submitted carried 8-3, with the majority finding it complied with mitigation stipulations.
  • Item 3: St. John's Lutheran Church (502 East Nueva): The commission discussed proposed security gates and windows. Concern was raised that the ornate front gate design would detract from the historic limestone facade. The item was split; the front gate was referred to a Design Review Committee (DRC), while the remaining scope was approved with staff stipulations.
  • Item 5: 1301 East Commerce (Signage): The applicant presented three sign options. Commissioner Fetzer preferred Option B, the smallest and most architecturally compatible. The commission approved Option B.
  • Item 16: Brackenridge Park Phase II: After over two hours of testimony and deliberation, Commissioner Savino moved to refer the project to a DRC and a site visit to address tree removal, parking, picnic tables, and the historic kiosk. A substitute motion to approve was discussed but did not gain traction. Many commissioners felt the plan radically altered the cultural use of the space and required more public scrutiny. The motion for a DRC and site visit carried.
  • Item 17: 153/155 East Crockett: The applicant stated updated plans met all staff stipulations, though the new documents had not been officially received. The project was approved conditioned on meeting all staff stipulations.
  • Item 18: 525 Mission (King William): The applicant requested approval for metal window screens and a metal carport. Staff recommended denial, advocating for wood materials to match the historic character. The King William Association concurred with staff. The commission voted to deny the request.

Key Outcomes

  • Airport Terminal (Item 1): Approved 8-3.
  • St. John's Church (Item 3): Partial approval; front gate design sent to DRC.
  • Signage (Item 5): Approved (Option B).
  • Brackenridge Park (Item 16): Referred to DRC and site visit.
  • E. Crockett (Item 17): Approved with stipulations.
  • King William Screens/Carport (Item 18): Denied.
  • Consent Agenda: Approved.

Meeting Transcript

May I have a roll call, please? Ma'amin Savino. Here. Velasquez. Here. Galloway? Here. Mazuka. Givata? Here. Group Cervantes? Here. Holland Fetzer? Here. And Gibbs. Here. We have a quorum. Thank you. May I have translation services, please? Good afternoon, everyone. Buenas tardes at all. Thank you. Okay, well, welcome everyone. Before we get into business, we do have our annual election of officers. So at this point, I will open up to the floor to nominations for the business position of chair. I'd like to nominate Jay Gibbs for chair. Second. Okay, we have a motion and a second. Do we have any other nominations? Okay, all in favor of Mr. Gibbs as chair for another year. Aye. Yes, aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed, same sign. Motion passes. So uh take it away, Mr. Chair for uh Vice Chair. Thank you. Um we like to now let um see any nominations for the vice chair position. Um are there any nominations Mr. Chair, I'd like to nominate uh Jeffrey Fetzer for Vice Chair. Say Jeffrey Fetzer, um, it's been first um motion and property second. Are there any other nominations? Hearing none, um all those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed. Ayes have it so moved. Yeah, we can take the chairman's statement at this time.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com