San Antonio Board of Adjustments Meeting Summary – February 9, 2026
San Antonio Board of Adjustments Meeting Summary – February 9, 2026
The San Antonio Board of Adjustments convened on February 9, 2026, at 1:00 PM with all 11 members present. The meeting included a vote on leadership positions, continuances, several variance and special exception requests, and a discussion on public comment procedures. The board also received a director's report noting that voicemail comments will be discontinued as of April 1, 2026.
Consent Calendar
- Minutes from the previous meeting were approved by voice vote.
Leadership Elections
- Chair: Donald Orion nominated by Commissioner Cruz and seconded by Commissioner Benavides. Approved by voice vote.
- Vice Chair: Andrew Olduna nominated by Commissioner Cruz and seconded by Commissioner Ozuna. Approved by voice vote.
- Pro Tem: Commissioner Bragman nominated by Commissioner Cruz and seconded by Commissioner Benavides. Approved by voice vote.
Discussion Items
-
Item 3 (BOA 25103025) – 154 Babcock: Request for a 15-foot rear setback variance for a barbed wire fence. Staff recommended denial. Bianca Maldonado from the Monticello Park Neighborhood Association spoke, requesting a continuance to March 9, 2026, due to communication issues with the new case manager. She expressed concern that the city plans to stop accepting voicemail comments (effective April 1), which she considers an important engagement tool. The board voted to continue the case to March 9, 2026 (unanimous).
-
Item 4 (BOA 2501030276) – 1038 Sherman Street: Requested a 12-foot variance for a 13-foot corner clear vision and a 9-foot fence entrance. Staff recommended approval for the clear vision and denial for the special exception. A continuance to March 9, 2026, was requested and approved (unanimous).
-
Item 2 (BOA 25103007) – 118 Park View Drive: Variance for development on a 2,680 sq ft lot (required 5,000 sq ft) and 37-foot lot width (required 45 ft). Staff recommended approval, noting 27 notices sent with no responses. The applicant, Analisa Alvarado, described a new construction project. The board granted the requested variances with a unanimous 11–0 vote, citing consistency with neighborhood character.
-
Item 5 (BOA 25-103-00282) – 371 Everest Avenue: Request for a 14-foot rear setback variance (to allow 6 feet) for an addition. Staff recommended approval. The applicant, Artemis Moore, described an addition to the rear of the home. The board granted the variance unanimously (11–0), noting the lot's reverse configuration.
-
Item 6 (BOA 26-10301) – 4028 Colonial Sun Drive: Request for a 4-foot 6-inch side setback variance (to 6 inches) and a 6-foot front setback variance (to 4 feet) for a carport. Staff recommended denial. The applicant, Peter von Perdzek, sought to protect vehicles from hail and sun. Neighbor Debbie Johnson expressed concerns about drainage and visual obstruction. The board amended the request to limit the carport to a maximum 20-foot length (from 23 feet) and to require a continuously sloped roof to the front, and granted the variances (11–0).
-
Items 7 & 8 (BOA 26-10302) – 5703 MacDonald Street: The applicant, Raul Garcia, first requested a waiver of the 12-month time limitation to re-file for a parking variance (from 4 to 2 spaces) for a four-unit duplex development. The board waived the limitation (majority vote). The variance request was debated; the board ultimately denied it (7–3, with 1 abstention), with some members favoring a three-space alternative or suggesting the applicant explore on-street parking. The motion to grant the 50% parking variance failed.
-
Item 9 (BOA 26-103-0004) – 9218 Echo Port Drive: Request for a fence height special exception (to allow 8-foot gates and 6-foot fence) and a 4-foot 8-inch driveway clear vision variance. The applicant cited security concerns with police reports. The board granted the clear vision variance unanimously. For the fence height, an initial motion for 6-foot height passed (10–0, 1 abstention), after an amendment to 7 feet failed (6–5). The applicant was advised that an additional 6 inches might be possible via an administrative variance.
-
Item 10 (BOA 26-103-0005) – 510 Belmont: Request for a 3-foot side setback variance (to 2 feet) for the primary structure and a 4-foot 6-inch side setback variance (to 6 inches) for an existing carport. Staff recommended denial. The applicant explained the house (built 1920) required extensive framing replacement. The board granted the variances (11–0), limiting the structures to their current footprint and placement.
-
Item 11 (BOA 26-10306) – 7830 Louis Pasteur Drive: Request for a 1-foot special exception (to allow 6-foot fence) for a commercial property. Staff recommended denial. The applicant cited security concerns due to homeless activity. The board granted the exception (11–0) for a predominantly open fence.
Key Outcomes
- Leadership: Donald Orion (Chair), Andrew Olduna (Vice Chair), and Commissioner Bragman (Pro Tem) were elected for the coming term.
- Workshop: The board will schedule a workshop to discuss potential UDC amendments; a motion to set a date was approved. Commissioners were asked to submit suggested topics to staff.
- Voicemails: Staff announced that voicemail comments will no longer be accepted or played as of April 1, 2026, per direction from the City Clerk's and City Manager's offices. Several commissioners expressed concern about the impact on public engagement.
- Variances Approved: Items 2, 5, 6, 9 (clear vision and fence height for 6-foot), 10, and 11 were approved.
- Variances Denied: Item 8 (50% parking variance) was denied.
- Cases Continued: Items 3 and 4 were continued to March 9, 2026.
- Time Waived: Item 7 (12-month re-filing limitation) was waived for the parking variance request.
Meeting Transcript
So it looks like we have uh all 11 members and we're recording. All right. It's one o'clock. I hereby call this meeting of the Board of Adjustments into session. If we can have the Spanish interpreter come out, please. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you. If everyone could please uh join me in the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and public for which it stands one nation under God. Honor the Texas flag, I pledge allegiance to the Texas one state under God one and individual. Staff, if you could please call roll. Commissioner Reid. Present. Commissioner Stevens. Present. Commissioner Ibanis. Present. Commissioner Dean. Present. Commissioner Cruz. Present. Commissioner Gomez. Present. Commissioner Mana. Present. Commissioner Bragman. Commissioner Benavides. Present. Commissioner Ozuna? Present. Commissioner Bunnyas? Chair Orion. And I am present. So we have eleven seated today. And before we begin with today's cases, I'd like to offer a few words of explanation. This board follows an agenda which is available online. The cases are listed by number with the name of the applicant and the street address. Following the conclusion of the cases, the board will consider the minutes from the previous meeting, followed by a director's report. Lastly, as chair, I will make announcements such as community calendar events. I ask that the board members submit these announcements to me as a chair, and I will read them at the appropriate time in the meeting. We are private citizens appointed to this board by the city council. The board is supported by members of the city staff competent in the rules and regulations governing the city zoning codes and other codes and aspects pertaining to this area. This is an administrative body and not a court of law. We have the authority to hear and decide appeals from a decision or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of Chapter 32, to hear and decide special exceptions allowed under Chapter 35, and to authorize variances from the zoning regulations required in Chapter 35. We also serve in an advisory and appellate capacity to the Director of Development Services regarding requests for variances from regulations within Chapter 28, Article 1, Section 28-5. In addition, we have powers to hear cases and other matters authorized by City Council under Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code. Every decision or recommendation to the board must be based upon findings of fact, and every finding of fact must be supported in the record of the board's proceedings. The applicant or his representative will present the petition and they will be questioned by the members of the board. Any opposition to the request will be presented in a like manner. After everyone has heard the case, it will be closed and a member of the board will make a motion.
openpublica.com