Historic Design Review Commission Meeting - March 4, 2026
Historic Design Review Commission Meeting - March 4, 2026
The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) of San Antonio met on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, at 3:00 PM. The meeting included approval of minutes, a consent agenda, and several contested cases involving signage, a gate, and a rear addition in historic districts. Key decisions included approval of a gate at St. John's Lutheran Church with modifications and referral of a rear addition design to the Design Review Committee.
Consent Calendar
- Six consent agenda items were approved with staff stipulations (items 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6) after item 2 was pulled for discussion. Properties approved: 307 Delaware, 9800 Airport, 423 Blue Star, 801 North Olive Street, and 222 Mary Louise.
Discussion Items
- Item 2 – 307 Delaware (St. John's Lutheran Church): Applicant pastor Reverend Burke requested approval for a wrought iron gate at the church porch to address homelessness and security (defecation, urination, damage to doors). Staff found the gate reversible and not overwhelming due to building scale. Concerns were raised about obscuring original Gothic Revival features (leaded glass, eagle of St. John). Two design options were presented: one with grapevines on the arch and one simpler version. The commission approved the simpler design (7-2 vote; Commissioners Savino and Holland dissenting). Vice Chair Fetzer noted the gate would be placed at the front of the step for better anchoring to concrete columns.
- Item 7 – 3428 Roosevelt (Mustang Sally's): Applicant Isaac Ortiz and owner Rudy Lopez sought approval for a 123-square-foot internally illuminated cabinet sign for the bar. Staff recommended denial, proposing a sign no larger than 50 square feet with indirect/halo illumination and metal faces. The applicant argued the sign was needed for safety, citing 10 pages of prior crime (burglaries, shots fired, theft). Owner stated the sign (installed without approval) improved safety, but admitting it was a violation case. Staff noted other signage on the building (window vinyl, north side box) had not been reviewed. The commission voted 7-1 (Commissioner Galloway dissenting) to uphold staff recommendation and deny the current sign, directing the applicant to re-submit within guidelines.
- Item 8 – Garage Construction: Applicant Adrian Zamudio requested approval for a 375-square-foot detached garage with a 288-square-foot covered porch at a rear property. Staff recommended conceptual approval with stipulations requiring detailed drawings, window specifications (2-inch inset, no white, traditional trim), and compliance with setback standards. Chairman Gibbs noted conflicting submittals (vinyl vs. clad wood windows, smooth vs. wood-grain siding). The commission approved conceptual approval with all staff stipulations (unanimous vote) with a reminder to include elevations and site plan.
- Item 9 – Rear Addition: Applicant Chris Coker proposed a 500-square-foot rear addition to a house in the King William area. Staff recommended approval with stipulations to extend the existing gabled roof form, eliminate a proposed dormer, and add a vertical trim piece to demarcate old and new construction. Coker presented two designs: one with a shed roof and dormer, and a revised version extending the gable full-length. The King William Association submitted a letter supporting staff stipulations. Commissioners Savino and Fetzer raised concerns about roof form collisions and legibility of the addition over time. The commission voted unanimously to refer the case to the Design Review Committee (next available meeting) for further discussion on roof forms, with a time certainty for the next HDRC agenda.
Key Outcomes
- Approved consent agenda (items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6).
- Approved simpler gate design at 307 Delaware (7-2).
- Denied internally illuminated sign at 3428 Roosevelt; directed applicant to re-submit within 50 sq. ft., indirect/halo illumination (7-1).
- Granted conceptual approval for garage project (unanimous) with stipulations for detailed drawings.
- Referred rear addition case to DRC for roof form resolution (unanimous).
- Next HDRC meeting scheduled for March 18, 2026.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comments or voicemails were submitted for any agenda items.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon everyone. Um time is on 3 p.m. and like the call to order this historic design review commission meeting for Wednesday, March 4th, 2026. May I have a roll call, please? Ma'aman. Here. Savino. Here. Velazquez Galloway. Present. Mazuka. Commissioner Mazuka, we can't hear you, but we'll come back to you. Commissioner Givada. Okay, not hearing our virtual commissioners. We'll come back to you. Uh Commissioner Groob. Travieso. Holland Fetzer. Here. And Gibbs. I'm here. Here, here, here, here. We have a quorum. Thank you. May I have translation services, please? Good afternoon, everyone. Buenas tardes a todos. Las personas que prefieren escuchar la audiencia in espanhol. Thank you. The historic and design review commission is advisory board appointed by city council. I am J. Maurice Gibbs, Chairman and the Vice Chair is Jeffy Fetzer. It is the function of the commission to advise the city manager and all relevant city departments concerning all applications for permits for properties in historic districts for landmarks on city property and a river improvement overlay and for demolitions. And considering whether to recommend approval or disapproval of an application for a certificate of appropriateness, the commission shall be guided by the city's unified development code and design guidelines and standards that have been adopted by City Council. An appeal of a decision by administrative official can be filed in accordance with the city's unified development code. If anyone present wishes to speak in favor or in opposition to any item on today's agenda, please sign up on the public comment sheet. It is not necessary to sign up if you are the owner of or representative for a project on the agenda. You will be called on as the case is called. Case representatives will be given no more than 15 minutes to present their case with an additional two minutes to respond to public comments. Speakers for or opposed to a case will be limited to two minutes each. Speakers may also sign up to yield their two minutes to another speaker who has signed up. Anyone who is yielding their time must be present at the time the speaker is called upon. Speakers will be called upon in the order in which they are signed up following public testimony. Any commissioner may call upon any speaker to respond to further questions. Approval by the commission does not take the place of any type of permit. Permits must be attained for all work. Certificates of appropriateness but work approved by the commission will be emailed to you within 10 days. No work of any type is to be started with that obtaining the appropriate city permits after certificate of appropriateness has been issued by the Office of Historic Preservation. At this time, please silence your cell phones. Thank you, Mr.
openpublica.com