OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Antonio, Texas/Boards & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Antonio Planning Commission Meeting Summary - September 23, 2026

Boards & Commissions — Wednesday, September 23, 2026
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionBoards & Commissions
DateWednesday, September 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 58:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:03

Okay, everybody.

0:04

Is staff ready?

0:06

It is two o'clock, and we're going to call the uh Wednesday, September 23rd, 2026 Planning Commission meeting to order.

0:12

Would staff please do a roll call?

0:15

Commissioner Lopez.

0:17

Commissioner Miller.

0:19

Here.

0:19

Commissioner Orion.

0:21

Here.

0:22

Commissioner Vistamonte.

0:24

Present.

0:24

Commissioner Siegel.

0:26

Here.

0:27

Commissioner Profit.

0:28

Present.

0:29

Chair Peck.

0:30

Here.

0:31

A quorum is present.

0:32

Thank you.

0:33

Can we have the Spanish English interpreter, please?

0:47

Good afternoon, everyone.

0:49

Buenas tardes a those.

0:50

Las personas que prefieran escuchar esta audiencia de Espanyol.

1:01

Muchas gracias.

1:02

Thank you so much.

1:03

Great.

1:03

Thank you.

1:04

All right.

1:04

Today we're going to have two agendas.

1:06

We're going to have the combined hearing agenda, cases on the combined hearing agenda or cases where staff recommends approval.

1:12

The planning commission doesn't require further detailed discussion and no one in the audience has signed up to speak on the item.

1:17

All cases on the combined hearing agenda will be read into the record in one motion before the commission takes any action.

1:24

The second agenda is the individual hearing agenda.

1:27

Cases on individual hearing agenda will be heard separately before the commission takes any action on those items.

1:33

So what I have right now is I have items, everything is on consent except for items 11, 12, 13, 17, 9 has been postponed so it won't be heard, and 12 has been continued to the October 14th planning commission meeting.

1:53

Well, you still have to vote on item number 12 for the continuance.

1:57

Okay.

1:57

All right.

1:58

So we can we leave that on consent?

2:00

Or does it have to be individual?

2:01

It has to be individual.

2:02

Okay, so item 12 is on individual.

2:04

Okay.

2:05

All righty.

2:06

All right.

2:07

Um so at this time we're going to ask Commissioner Bustamante to leave the meeting because he has to recuse from item two.

2:13

It is 2003, and Commissioner Bustamante has left the meeting.

2:17

So at this time we will entertain Oh yeah, one more thing.

2:22

Um we do have someone signed up to speak on item number three.

2:25

So I have a question for staff on that plat.

2:28

Uh does that plat have any variances?

2:30

Does it meet all aspects of the unified development code?

2:32

It does.

2:33

Okay.

2:34

So by state law, that plat has to be approved by this commission.

2:37

But if uh Sonia, is it samples signed up to speak?

2:41

You may address the commission now.

3:03

That's all right, I'll get it.

3:07

Uh my name is Sonia Samples.

3:09

I'm the homeowner that resides at 4106 Diamond Head, San Antonio, Texas, 78218.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████62%
Procedural████████████16%
Flooding█████████12%
Planning████5%
Parking██3%
Transportation Safety█2%
Summary of Proceedings

San Antonio Planning Commission Meeting Summary - September 23, 2026

The San Antonio Planning Commission met on Wednesday, September 23, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. to consider several agenda items, including a consent agenda, a plan amendment for a light industrial use, a plan amendment for a parking garage, and an appeal of a certificate of determination. The meeting adjourned at 3:00 p.m. with decisions on multiple items.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent agenda included items recommended for approval by staff with no public opposition or need for detailed discussion. Items were approved in a single motion with a roll call vote. All commissioners present voted in favor: Commissioner Profit, Miller, Lopez, Orion, Siegel, and Chair Peck. Commissioner Bustamante recused himself from item 2 prior to the vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 3 (Plat approval at 4102 Eisenhower Road): Sonia Samples, a homeowner at 4106 Diamond Head, opposed further commercial development on the property. She cited visual blight (semi-trailers, storage containers), inadequate parking leading to blocked driveways and mailboxes, traffic congestion during events, and safety hazards for emergency vehicle access. She urged the commission to deny the request. Staff noted the plat met all code requirements with no variances and was required by law to be approved. The consent agenda passed.
  • Item 13 (Plan amendment at 717 Pleasanton Road): Jessica Morales, a resident of 144 West Hart, opposed the rezoning and parking garage proposal by Gonzaba Medical Group. She stated that for 40 years the medical group had caused parking and traffic problems in the neighborhood, bought out senior neighbors' properties, and that construction had been ongoing. She requested peace and opposed all further development. The applicant's representative, Patrick Christensen, apologized and noted the parking garage was intended to reduce street parking; he promised to relay concerns to Gonzaba.

Discussion Items

  • Item 11 – Arena District East Side Community Plan Amendment (142 Gembler Road): Staff recommended denial of a request to amend the land use designation from community commercial to light industrial, citing encroachment into a residential area. The applicant (Vanessa Wertzer) presented a revised site plan with a 25-foot landscape buffer and noted discussions with the United Homeowners Improvement Association (UHIA), which supported the change. The commission voted to support the applicant's request. Motion by Commissioner Siegel, second by Commissioner Profit. Roll call: Siegel (yes), Profit (yes), Lopez (yes), Miller (yes), Orion (yes), Bustamante (yes), Chair Peck (yes). Motion passed 7-0.
  • Item 12 – Continuance: The commission voted to continue item 12 to the October 14, 2026 meeting. Motion by Commissioner Miller, second by Commissioner Profit. Roll call: Miller (yes), Profit (yes), Lopez (yes), Orion (yes), Bustamante (aye), Siegel (yes), Chair Peck (yes). Passed.
  • Item 13 – South Central Community Plan Amendment (717 Pleasanton Road): Staff recommended approval of a mixed-use land use designation to allow a parking garage for Gonzaba Medical Group. The applicant noted the property currently had split designations and needed a cohesive plan for the parking structure. After public testimony, the commission voted to approve. Motion by Commissioner Profit, second by Commissioner Lopez. Roll call: Profit (yes), Lopez (yes), Miller (yes), Orion (yes), Bustamante (yes), Siegel (yes), Chair Peck (yes). Passed 7-0.
  • Item 17 – Appeal of Certificate of Determination (3599 West Woodlawn Avenue): The applicant, represented by Edgar Munoz, appealed staff’s denial of a certificate of determination for a new single-family home on an antiquated lot in the 100-year floodplain. The applicant argued that the dwelling unit itself would not be located in the floodplain, citing UDC Section 35-430(C)(6)(G) which states no dwelling unit shall be located in the regulatory floodplain. Staff maintained that habitable uses in the floodplain always require platting, and that the certificate is tied to the lot, not a specific building plan. Stormwater staff noted platting would establish floodplain easements and ensure safe access. After extensive debate, a motion to approve the applicant’s request failed 3-4 (Commissioners Orion, Lopez, Siegel in favor; Miller, Profit, Peck opposed; Bustamante absent? Actually roll call: Lopez yes, Miller no, Siegel yes, Profit no, Peck no. That’s 3 yes, 3 no? The chair clarified five votes required for approval. Motion to deny the appeal also failed 3-4 (Profit yes, Miller yes, Lopez no, Orion no, Bustamante no, Siegel no, Peck yes). A motion to continue to October 14 failed 4-3 (Bustamante aye, Orion yes, Lopez yes, Miller no, Siegel yes, Profit no, Peck no – again needing five votes). As a result, staff’s administrative denial stood.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent calendar approved unanimously.
  • Item 11 approved (7-0) – plan amendment to light industrial with modifications.
  • Item 12 continued to October 14, 2026.
  • Item 13 approved (7-0) – plan amendment to mixed use for parking garage.
  • Item 17 appeal denied – no motion received five votes; staff’s denial of the certificate of determination stands. The applicant may submit a new application.

The meeting adjourned at 3:00 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, everybody. Is staff ready? It is two o'clock, and we're going to call the uh Wednesday, September 23rd, 2026 Planning Commission meeting to order. Would staff please do a roll call? Commissioner Lopez. Commissioner Miller. Here. Commissioner Orion. Here. Commissioner Vistamonte. Present. Commissioner Siegel. Here. Commissioner Profit. Present. Chair Peck. Here. A quorum is present. Thank you. Can we have the Spanish English interpreter, please? Good afternoon, everyone. Buenas tardes a those. Las personas que prefieran escuchar esta audiencia de Espanyol. Muchas gracias. Thank you so much. Great. Thank you. All right. Today we're going to have two agendas. We're going to have the combined hearing agenda, cases on the combined hearing agenda or cases where staff recommends approval. The planning commission doesn't require further detailed discussion and no one in the audience has signed up to speak on the item. All cases on the combined hearing agenda will be read into the record in one motion before the commission takes any action. The second agenda is the individual hearing agenda. Cases on individual hearing agenda will be heard separately before the commission takes any action on those items. So what I have right now is I have items, everything is on consent except for items 11, 12, 13, 17, 9 has been postponed so it won't be heard, and 12 has been continued to the October 14th planning commission meeting. Well, you still have to vote on item number 12 for the continuance. Okay. All right. So we can we leave that on consent? Or does it have to be individual? It has to be individual. Okay, so item 12 is on individual. Okay. All righty. All right. Um so at this time we're going to ask Commissioner Bustamante to leave the meeting because he has to recuse from item two. It is 2003, and Commissioner Bustamante has left the meeting. So at this time we will entertain Oh yeah, one more thing. Um we do have someone signed up to speak on item number three. So I have a question for staff on that plat.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com