The City of San Antonio held a zoning and land use session on September 17, 2026, from 2:13 PM to 2:39 PM. The council considered four items on the agenda, including a lumber yard expansion, a parking and storage lot, and an airport area plan amendment. Public comments were heard on multiple items. The council denied two items, continued two items, and approved the consent agenda unanimously.
All decisions were made without recorded dissent. The meeting adjourned at 2:39 PM.
All right, if we can all come together. The time is now 2 13 PM on Thursday, September 17th, 2026, and the City of San Antonio zoning and land use session is called to order. City Clerk, will you uh call roll? Councilmember Corr. Councilmember McKee Rodriguez. Councilmember Via Gran. Here. Councilmember Mughea. Councilmember Castillo. Councilmember Galvan. Councilmember Alderete Gavito. Here. Councilmember Meso Gonzalez. Councilmember Spears. Councilmember White. Mayor Jones. Mayor Pro Tim, we have Quorum. Thank you. First item is to continue cases to the October 1st, 2026 meeting. The case to continue is item eight. Is there a motion to continue the item? There's a motion to there's a motion to continue the item to October 1st, 2022 with a second. Is there any council discussion? Madam Clerk, is anyone signed to speak on this item? All right, Jack, we're gonna continue this item. Did you want to talk on the continuance or wait until your other times? Thank you, Mr. I would like to speak about that item. Okay. You have three minutes. Thank you, ma'am Madam Mayor Pro Tem. Members of the Council, my name is Jack M. Finger. And uh especially I want to speak about this one. Ms. Castillo, this is uh item that's in your district. It's about uh oh the lumber yard is planning on expanding its uh area over on uh Sarza Morris Street. Um this has been continued uh not once but at least twice now, Ms. Castillo, at least and the question is why are you continuing it? Ms. Castillo Ms. Castillo. The uh the reason uh I a citizen been asking this, Ms. Castillo is because you know as well as I do, and perhaps the rest of you know if you looked at the backup documents that the uh owner, the applicant, apparently it's a pretty bad actor here. Yeah, the uh I'm just looking at what the the documents tell us to the applicant order has not been through the uh done to the required uh building permits. Uh he the site plan has not been approved, nor uh uh the the technical uh reviews either hasn't gone through any of that. He hasn't uh done the adequate stormwater prevention uh plans as well, thereby uh posing a threat to his people in the area as well as the creeks over there on the west side there, yeah. And uh yeah, yeah, that's right, has an unresolved floodplain uh violation violations, Ms. Castile. And that puts the other red flags on this.