OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Antonio City Council Meeting Summary (December 2, 2025)

Council CommitteesTuesday, December 2, 2025
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionCouncil Committees
DateTuesday, December 2, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:31:29

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Councilman.

0:00

Councilman Corps, can you hear us?

0:02

Yes, I can hear you.

0:03

Yay.

0:05

Round of applause.

0:07

The time is now 2 08 p.m.

0:10

on December 2nd, 2025, and we will call our meeting to order.

0:13

Madam Clerk, can you please read the rule?

0:15

Councilmember Corr.

0:17

Present.

0:18

Councilmember Mungia.

0:21

Councilmember present.

0:23

Present.

0:24

Councilmember Spears.

0:26

Chair McKee Rodriguez.

0:28

Present.

0:28

Chair, we have a quorum.

0:30

Wonderful, wonderful.

0:31

We're gonna start off with uh minutes of our November 4th, 2025 meeting.

0:36

I'll entertain a motion for approval.

0:39

Motion to approve.

0:40

What if we have a motion a second?

0:42

We'll take a voice vote from Councilman Corr.

0:45

Aye.

0:46

Okay, all in favor.

0:48

Aye.

0:49

Passes unanimously and let the record reflect that Councilman Spears is here.

0:53

Next item we have is public comment.

0:55

We have one resident spine signed up to speak.

0:57

Joey Pollock, are you present?

1:03

Okay.

1:04

Not present, so we have no other members of the of the public.

1:07

Uh we'll move on to item two.

1:09

It's going to be uh item two is gonna be a result of two requests, one from Councilwoman Dr.

1:13

Corps, who requested a holistic presentation on the ecosystem micro mobility and vehicles for hire, and the second is my request to begin discussion for what a pilot program could look like uh for e-carriages as we phase out horse-drawn carriages over the next few years.

1:27

And so for this discussion, we're gonna have uh two rounds at five minutes.

1:41

Okay, good afternoon, uh chair and committee members.

1:44

My name is Rick Riley, and I'm the assistant director for the San Antonio Police Department.

1:49

Today I'll be joined by Mr.

1:50

John Jax, uh, who will provide the micromobility uh portion of the brief.

1:55

I'm gonna present a briefing on the electric vehicle for higher service industry, kind of an overview, and Mr.

2:01

Jax, as I said, will take care of a micromobility transportation piece.

2:07

So today's briefing will cover the following uh a short background of chapter 33 as it pertains to electric vehicle uh for higher industry, uh then a micromobility transportation, and then at a conclusion, which we're going to ask uh the committee for some recommendations of how they'd like to move forward on a pilot program uh for additional electric vehicles.

2:30

So uh since November 2022, Chapter 33900 has governed the operation of electric vehicle for higher service industry.

2:40

So the first question is what's an electric vehicle uh service industry and how does that work?

2:45

So, as you see up there, it's a chauffeured vehicle, it's operated for any fare or compensation that includes tips and used to transport uh passengers.

2:54

The vehicle has to be propelled by an electric motor only, so that's non-combustion, that's non-human powered, so it has to be only that electric motor that that propels that vehicle.

3:06

It has a maximum speed of no more than 35 miles an hour, and it must meet all federal state motor vehicle standards for low-speed vehicles.

3:14

That includes a registration as a slow-moving vehicle with the state of Texas.

3:20

As you see there, the SAPD ground transportation unit enforces chapter 33, similar to taxi cabs, horse carriages, petty cabs, etc.

3:30

And as of today, we have not had any citations issued for any of the drivers or operators of the electric vehicle service industry.

3:41

So, as I mentioned, the uh electric vehicles are limited to streets posted uh with speed limits of 35 miles an hour or less.

3:49

That means that they traditionally operate in the downtown, South Town, uh, Pearl, and Blue Star area.

3:57

They currently we have three companies operating here in San Antonio, Ego, San Antonio Go, and Dest.

4:05

Twenty permits are allowed.

4:07

15 of those are standard permits.

4:10

The other five permits are exclusively for the via little runner contract, which provides that last mile of transportation for via as well as transportation for the UTSA students, faculty, and staff that come uh on this side of the freeway.

4:26

There are currently 33 permitted electric vehicle drivers.

4:30

You see some metrics there for 2025.

4:35

Um old slide, I apologize.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety█████████████████████████████████████37%
Vehicle For Hire Regulation███████████████████████████████31%
Procurement and Contracting███████████11%
Traffic Impact Analysis██████6%
Economic Development███3%
Active Transportation██2%
Public Engagement██2%
Labor Practices██2%
Community Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

San Antonio City Council Meeting Summary (December 2, 2025)

The San Antonio City Council met on December 2, 2025, to review ecosystem micro-mobility options, discuss the transition from horse-drawn carriages to electric alternatives, and deliberate on traffic safety initiatives including speed limit reductions and labor contract integrity. The meeting featured presentations from city departments and extensive discussion on stakeholder engagement, pilot programs, and regulatory updates.

Consent Calendar

  • The minutes of the November 4, 2025, meeting were approved unanimously via voice vote. Councilman Spears attendance was noted for the record.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public were present to offer testimony.

Discussion Items

Micro-Mobility and E-Carriage Pilot Program

  • Staff Presentation: Assistant Director Rick Riley (SAPD) and John Jax (CCDO) presented data on the current electric vehicle service industry (20 permits, 33 drivers, ~25,000 trips in 2025), dockless scooters (Bird/VO), and bike share (B-Cycle). They highlighted usage patterns, costs, and the existing regulatory framework under Chapter 33.
  • Councilmember McKee Rodriguez: Expressed support for a holistic stakeholder approach to define the e-carriage transition. She questioned the fairness of the current horse carriage ownership structure, noting an inequity where two owners control most permits, and argued that a simple one-to-one permit transfer without addressing ownership concentration would not ensure equality. She voiced interest in using the Inner City Tourist Board to potentially fund specific routes for pilots.
  • Councilwoman Correa: Supported the formation of focus groups for all mobility sectors (EVs, petty cabs, carriages) to include owners, drivers, and riders. She advocated for increasing permit limits, particularly for petty cabs, to support local entrepreneurship and suggested piloting funded routes in new areas like River North to generate usage data.
  • Councilmen Albert (Villan) and Mungia: Supported the pilot and the creation of a study to assess the impact of permit increases on congestion. Councilman Mungia echoed concerns regarding the inequitable distribution of horse carriage permits and emphasized the need to ensure fair access during the transition. He suggested evaluating if the 20-permit cap for standard electric vehicles was necessary or arbitrary.
  • Councilman Spears: Requested detailed operating and startup cost data (e.g., $20,000 for an e-carriage) to help existing carriage operators transition without bankruptcy. He questioned whether minimum standards, such as battery capacity, should be required beyond current safety equipment (lights, VIN).
  • Councilman Dr. Corr (Correa): Noted that cost and company counts for dockless vehicles are comparable to other major cities. He suggested identifying 10 events over the next year to test strategic pilot routes and funding, and recommended increasing petty cab permits.

Traffic Calming and Speed Limit Reductions (Item 3)

  • Staff Presentation: Interim Public Works Director Juana Yala outlined a CCR request to lower prima fascia speed limits from 30 to 25 mph near schools, parks, and community centers in District 7. She noted state law requires an engineering study for such changes and recommended a pilot program in District 7 to test the feasibility, noting previous studies showed signage alone had limited impact without other physical calming measures.
  • Councilman Aldretico: Expressed strong support for the pilot to address resident concerns regarding speeding and safety. He advocated for analyzing the city's Unified Development Code (UDC) to see if current subdivision designs encourage speeding and suggested future projects should integrate traffic calming proactively.
  • Councilwoman Castillo: Highlighted the frustration with delays in implementing traffic calming infrastructure (e.g., signal installations taking up to three years) and emphasized the need for a holistic, data-driven approach to evaluate requests efficiently.
  • Councilmember Mungia: Suggested piloting a mail-out signature collection method for traffic calming requests to remove barriers for elderly residents or those with fenced properties. He also noted that new subdivisions often require immediate traffic calming (e.g., Vita or Solana Ridge), implying a need for UDC changes to prevent these issues at the design phase.
  • Councilman Spears: Proposed combining the speed limit study with any existing traffic studies (within the past five years) to reduce costs and asked for clarification on how to handle Farm-to-Market roads regulated by the state.

Labor Standards and Integrity in Contracts (Item 5)

  • Staff Presentation: Mike Shannon (Capital Delivery Dept.) reviewed the current wage and labor standards ordinance and the CCR's proposal to strengthen it. Recommendations included establishing a permanent repeat offender list, extending the complaint window from 60 to 180 days, and strengthening anti-retaliation clauses. Staff noted they found 107 minor payroll errors last year but no habitual violations requiring termination.
  • Councilman Dr. Corr: Expressed support for the proposed changes to ensure fair wages and prevent wage theft involving taxpayer funds, emphasizing the need for a diverse stakeholder group to refine the ordinance.
  • Councilman Aldretico: Supported the formation of a stakeholder group to review the proposals, stressing the importance of protecting workers who build the city.
  • Councilmember Mungia: Encouraged the formation of a robust stakeholder group to ensure industry and labor voices shape the final recommendations before returning to the committee.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion Approved: Council approved a pilot program in District 7 to study the lowering of prima fascia speed limits from 30 to 25 mph near community assets (Item 3). The pilot will involve an engineering study and may include additional traffic calming measures.
  • Motion Approved: Council approved a request to form a stakeholder group to review and recommend updates to the city's wage and labor standards ordinance regarding wage theft and repeat offenders (Item 5).
  • Next Steps: Staff are tasked with identifying priority locations within District 7 for the speed limit pilot, determining the cost and scope of a citywide traffic analysis, and convening the stakeholder group for labor standards discussions. Follow-up reports are expected in the early part of 2026.
  • Clarifications: It was confirmed that the online traffic calming application system is being finalized and that renters count toward the 51% signature threshold for traffic calming requests.

Meeting Transcript

Councilman. Councilman Corps, can you hear us? Yes, I can hear you. Yay. Round of applause. The time is now 2 08 p.m. on December 2nd, 2025, and we will call our meeting to order. Madam Clerk, can you please read the rule? Councilmember Corr. Present. Councilmember Mungia. Councilmember present. Present. Councilmember Spears. Chair McKee Rodriguez. Present. Chair, we have a quorum. Wonderful, wonderful. We're gonna start off with uh minutes of our November 4th, 2025 meeting. I'll entertain a motion for approval. Motion to approve. What if we have a motion a second? We'll take a voice vote from Councilman Corr. Aye. Okay, all in favor. Aye. Passes unanimously and let the record reflect that Councilman Spears is here. Next item we have is public comment. We have one resident spine signed up to speak. Joey Pollock, are you present? Okay. Not present, so we have no other members of the of the public. Uh we'll move on to item two. It's going to be uh item two is gonna be a result of two requests, one from Councilwoman Dr. Corps, who requested a holistic presentation on the ecosystem micro mobility and vehicles for hire, and the second is my request to begin discussion for what a pilot program could look like uh for e-carriages as we phase out horse-drawn carriages over the next few years. And so for this discussion, we're gonna have uh two rounds at five minutes. Okay, good afternoon, uh chair and committee members. My name is Rick Riley, and I'm the assistant director for the San Antonio Police Department. Today I'll be joined by Mr. John Jax, uh, who will provide the micromobility uh portion of the brief. I'm gonna present a briefing on the electric vehicle for higher service industry, kind of an overview, and Mr. Jax, as I said, will take care of a micromobility transportation piece. So today's briefing will cover the following uh a short background of chapter 33 as it pertains to electric vehicle uh for higher industry, uh then a micromobility transportation, and then at a conclusion, which we're going to ask uh the committee for some recommendations of how they'd like to move forward on a pilot program uh for additional electric vehicles. So uh since November 2022, Chapter 33900 has governed the operation of electric vehicle for higher service industry. So the first question is what's an electric vehicle uh service industry and how does that work? So, as you see up there, it's a chauffeured vehicle, it's operated for any fare or compensation that includes tips and used to transport uh passengers. The vehicle has to be propelled by an electric motor only, so that's non-combustion, that's non-human powered, so it has to be only that electric motor that that propels that vehicle. It has a maximum speed of no more than 35 miles an hour, and it must meet all federal state motor vehicle standards for low-speed vehicles. That includes a registration as a slow-moving vehicle with the state of Texas. As you see there, the SAPD ground transportation unit enforces chapter 33, similar to taxi cabs, horse carriages, petty cabs, etc.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com