OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Antonio Public Safety Committee Meeting - February 17, 2026

Council CommitteesTuesday, February 17, 2026
BodySan Antonio, Texas
SessionCouncil Committees
DateTuesday, February 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:35:53

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

So we're gonna go ahead and begin.

0:05

The time is now 2 24 p.m.

0:07

and public safety committee is called to order.

0:09

Madam Clerk, could you please call the role?

0:12

Councilmember McKee Rodriguez.

0:17

She might have Councilmember Castillo City, Councilmember Spears.

0:25

Chair Corps?

0:27

Here we have a quorum.

0:29

Okay, awesome.

0:30

All right.

0:31

So the first item on the agenda is um minutes from January 20th, 2026 public safety committee meeting.

0:37

Are there any adjustments that need to be made?

0:39

If not, I'll take a motion.

0:42

You know a second.

0:45

All in favor?

0:46

Aye.

0:47

Aye.

0:48

Any opposed?

0:49

Any abstentions?

0:50

Okay, motion carries three-o.

0:52

All right.

0:53

So we're gonna go ahead and take items five first, which is the inwall care services metrics that we were just looking at.

1:00

The point of this is just to be able to show data on a quarterly basis for all of our public safety organizations that do work in the community.

1:09

So we just thought um we did SCPDs in a memo this form last time.

1:12

We'll do these every month with the different departments, so next month will be fire.

1:17

But for ACS, I'd just like for my colleagues to give any feedback.

1:20

John is here in case we have any um questions for him to uh to answer, but we just wanted feedback on is there a specific item with statistics that you have questions about or that you would want to do a deeper dive in for the next uh public safety meeting.

1:37

Maria, anything you want to add?

1:41

No, councilwoman.

1:42

Okay any feedback from my colleague on it?

1:46

Go ahead, Councilman Castillo.

1:48

Thank you, Chair.

1:48

Uh thank you, John, um, for your work with animal care service as well as Rita and Karen uh for serving on the board.

1:54

I did have a couple of questions in terms of the vacancies.

1:57

Uh for example, um, we see the decrease in the compliance rate due to vacancies, but we've also increased um dangerous dog investigations team from two to four.

2:07

Uh are all four of those roles currently filled, or are there uh any vacancies out of the four?

2:18

Uh no, ma'am.

2:19

The uh there's actually two vacancies of the four right now.

2:23

Um, and um that that's that's the big issue of the problem.

2:27

Not to mention that the number of dangerous cases have doubled.

2:29

So when we when we went from two officers to four officers when we initially that we only were taking were doing about 300 affidavits a year, we went from two to four to so we could cover 300, but now we're getting 600, so it's definitely impacting their ability.

2:44

And in terms of addressing those vacancies, do you all intend to hire from within the animal care service department or are you all uh currently exploring uh candidates for those vacancies?

2:53

Typically they're they're hired from within uh for the because those are lead positions and typically that it's a promotional, although I mean occasionally we do have to go outside if we don't have anyone internally that qualifies.

3:03

Yeah, and to your point, right, in terms of the the actuals from 2025 to this year, um, in terms of seeing the increase of dogs surrendered to animal care service and the increase of animals reported, uh, you all are faring pretty well in terms of increasing the live release rate, uh, ensuring that there's uh more adoptions and then of course transferring to uh rescue partners.

3:22

So just wanted to highlight those key pieces uh in terms of what to see moving forward.

3:26

I think uh in terms of helping us understand uh well one, right?

3:31

I'd like to, I'm sure we all like to see the vacancies um filled um to ensure that we're having the greatest impact.

3:36

Um, but also an understanding of the bike cases, uh how they're separate from the dangerous dog investigations and can you remind me of that split uh of the dangerous dogs investigations uh and then the bite cases as separate?

3:52

Yeah, um dangerous dogs don't necessarily involve a bite, they could just involve an attack, and if even if the person was able to defend themselves well enough where they didn't actually get bid, it could still qualify as dangerous.

4:02

So not every bike ends up at dangerous.

4:05

The other thing is there's there's eight officers that buy officers that will initially work the by call if the bye meets the definition of a dangerous, then that person is offered an affidavit to then to move forward with dangerous at that point.

4:20

So it starts off with our bite officers most of the time, and then get switched to the dangerous team if they file the affidavit.

4:38

I believe it's like a 94%.

4:40

Uh and I can't imagine with those new officers out on the field, right, to see that number continue to increase again, as you mentioned, seeing an increase uh in calls for need of supportive animal care service.

4:49

So just uh thank you and your team for all the work you are doing, and I look forward to receiving these updates.

4:54

Thank you.

4:55

All right, thank you, Chair.

4:56

Thank you, Councilman Castillo.

5:00

And I realized um we had a public comment signed up for this item, so I'm gonna allow her to speak first, and then we can go to Councilmember McKee Riggers if he has anything.

5:05

Vicki Steerman, are you here?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████56%
Senior Services████████████15%
Animal Welfare█████████11%
Community Engagement██████7%
Personnel Matters███4%
Procurement and Contracting███4%
Labor Practices██2%
Code Enforcement1%
Summary of Proceedings

San Antonio Public Safety Committee Meeting - February 17, 2026

The Public Safety Committee met on February 17, 2026, to discuss animal care services metrics, senior protection strategies, alternative response options for quality-of-life calls, and an update on drug and narcotics crime. The meeting was called to order at 2:24 PM and adjourned at 4:00 PM.

Consent Calendar

  • The committee unanimously approved the minutes from the January 20, 2026, Public Safety Committee meeting (motion carried 3-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Vicki Steerman (on ACS item): Shared the case of a dog named Chico that was surrendered to ACS a year ago. She argued that nothing of consequence has been achieved in holding the former owner accountable and that the city is not implementing the 2023 ACS Strategic Plan. She called for timely investigations, review of the process, and acknowledgment of the problem.
  • Joanne Tobias Molina (Joint Commission on Elderly Affairs): Expressed support for the senior protection CCR, noting that elder abuse often goes unreported and that self-neglect is a major issue. Highlighted the needs of "solo agers."
  • Barbara Whitt Howell (AARP): Expressed support for enhanced protections for older adults, especially against abuse and fraud.
  • Fernanda Gardenas (Gonzaba Foundation, Joint Commission on Elderly Affairs): Expressed strong support for the CCR, emphasizing the need for expanded legal assistance, education, and coordination with financial institutions.
  • Darrell Greer (OATS / South Texas APS): Expressed support, noting the underreporting of fraud and abuse, and urged proactive measures like the Do Not Call registry and mobile phone guides.

Discussion Items

  • Animal Care Services (ACS) Metrics (Item 5): Staff presented quarterly data. Councilmember Castillo asked about vacancies in the dangerous dog investigations team (2 of 4 roles filled, but caseload doubled to 600 affidavits). Councilmember Castillo also praised increases in live release rate and adoptions. Chair Cors noted personnel challenges and requested a future deep dive on recruitment and retention strategies. Public comment followed.
  • Enhancing Senior Protection Strategies (Item 4 – CCR by Councilwoman Castillo): Jessica Dovalino (Human Services) presented demographic data (17.5 APS investigations per 1,000 older adults in Bexar County, 92% self-neglect) and outlined existing programs and planned enhancements. The status of older adults report is expected in August 2026; resource guides and public service announcements are in development. Councilmember Castillo highlighted the urgency due to rising fraud cases and requested updates. Chair Cors and Councilmember McKee Rodriguez supported the effort and asked for community feedback opportunities.
  • Enhanced Response to Quality of Life Concerns (Item 2 – CCR by Councilmember Cors): Justina Tate (Interim Assistant City Manager) presented analysis of 177,000 eligible calls annually (minor traffic accidents, lost/stolen property, loud music, parking, found property). Staff identified 69,000 calls potentially eligible for alternate response. Options included retired SAPD officers, contractors, civilians, online reporting, code enforcement, and virtual officers. Councilmember Cors requested an RFI to gauge costs and interest. Councilmembers Castillo and Spears raised concerns about privatization, liability, and the need for police authority to issue citations. The committee decided to discuss the matter with full council before proceeding with an RFI.
  • SAPD Drug and Narcotics Crime Update (Item 3): Assistant Chief Jesse Salome presented an overview, noting San Antonio’s proximity to the border as a hub for trafficking. Drug and narcotic offenses increased 21.9% in 2025 due to proactive enforcement. The covert response units (HIDA, TAG) seized over 1.5 tons of narcotics, with methamphetamine comprising 73%. Fentanyl remains a high-danger substance. The committee was urged to use anonymous tip systems (TIP 411). Councilmember Spears praised the collaborative efforts. Councilmember Cors noted the importance of cross-communication between units and sufficient staffing for patrol to feed specialized units.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent calendar approved.
  • ACS update: Received; future deep dive on personnel challenges scheduled.
  • Senior Protection CCR: Staff to continue developing resource guides (by May 2026) and return with updates. Committee to receive the status of older adults report in August 2026. The no-solicitation ordinance review is expected by September 2026.
  • Quality of Life CCR: Committee will discuss whether to proceed with an RFI with full council before staff takes action. No vote taken.
  • Drug/Narcotics Update: Received; no formal action taken.

Meeting Transcript

So we're gonna go ahead and begin. The time is now 2 24 p.m. and public safety committee is called to order. Madam Clerk, could you please call the role? Councilmember McKee Rodriguez. She might have Councilmember Castillo City, Councilmember Spears. Chair Corps? Here we have a quorum. Okay, awesome. All right. So the first item on the agenda is um minutes from January 20th, 2026 public safety committee meeting. Are there any adjustments that need to be made? If not, I'll take a motion. You know a second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Any abstentions? Okay, motion carries three-o. All right. So we're gonna go ahead and take items five first, which is the inwall care services metrics that we were just looking at. The point of this is just to be able to show data on a quarterly basis for all of our public safety organizations that do work in the community. So we just thought um we did SCPDs in a memo this form last time. We'll do these every month with the different departments, so next month will be fire. But for ACS, I'd just like for my colleagues to give any feedback. John is here in case we have any um questions for him to uh to answer, but we just wanted feedback on is there a specific item with statistics that you have questions about or that you would want to do a deeper dive in for the next uh public safety meeting. Maria, anything you want to add? No, councilwoman. Okay any feedback from my colleague on it? Go ahead, Councilman Castillo. Thank you, Chair. Uh thank you, John, um, for your work with animal care service as well as Rita and Karen uh for serving on the board. I did have a couple of questions in terms of the vacancies. Uh for example, um, we see the decrease in the compliance rate due to vacancies, but we've also increased um dangerous dog investigations team from two to four. Uh are all four of those roles currently filled, or are there uh any vacancies out of the four? Uh no, ma'am. The uh there's actually two vacancies of the four right now. Um, and um that that's that's the big issue of the problem. Not to mention that the number of dangerous cases have doubled. So when we when we went from two officers to four officers when we initially that we only were taking were doing about 300 affidavits a year, we went from two to four to so we could cover 300, but now we're getting 600, so it's definitely impacting their ability. And in terms of addressing those vacancies, do you all intend to hire from within the animal care service department or are you all uh currently exploring uh candidates for those vacancies? Typically they're they're hired from within uh for the because those are lead positions and typically that it's a promotional, although I mean occasionally we do have to go outside if we don't have anyone internally that qualifies. Yeah, and to your point, right, in terms of the the actuals from 2025 to this year, um, in terms of seeing the increase of dogs surrendered to animal care service and the increase of animals reported, uh, you all are faring pretty well in terms of increasing the live release rate, uh, ensuring that there's uh more adoptions and then of course transferring to uh rescue partners. So just wanted to highlight those key pieces uh in terms of what to see moving forward. I think uh in terms of helping us understand uh well one, right? I'd like to, I'm sure we all like to see the vacancies um filled um to ensure that we're having the greatest impact. Um, but also an understanding of the bike cases, uh how they're separate from the dangerous dog investigations and can you remind me of that split uh of the dangerous dogs investigations uh and then the bite cases as separate? Yeah, um dangerous dogs don't necessarily involve a bite, they could just involve an attack, and if even if the person was able to defend themselves well enough where they didn't actually get bid, it could still qualify as dangerous. So not every bike ends up at dangerous.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com