OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Diego City Council Meeting – January 26, 2026: Appointments, Housing, and Parking Contracts

City CouncilMonday, January 26, 2026
BodySan Diego, California
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, January 26, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:56:15

Transcript — Verbatim
2:28

Check, check one, two.

3:34

Good morning.

3:41

Thank you, Council President.

3:42

Councilmember Campbell.

3:44

Councilmember Whitburn.

3:45

Here.

3:46

Councilmember Foster.

3:47

Here.

3:47

Councilmember Von Wolper.

3:50

Council President Pro Tem Lee.

3:52

Councilmember Campillo.

3:54

Councilmember Moreno.

3:56

Present.

3:56

Councilmember Elo Rivera.

3:58

And Council President Lacava.

4:01

Present.

4:02

Also attending the meeting our City Attorney Heather Ferber, independent budget analyst Charles Monica, and myself, your city clerk, the NFWs.

4:09

Thank you, Council President.

4:15

Followed with the land acknowledgement and the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Campbell.

5:01

Today they carry their legacy forward, ensuring that their traditions continue to thrive in gratitude and strength.

5:10

We stand with the Kumeyai Nation connected to our past and committed to a thriving future.

5:16

Please face the flag and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.

5:25

And to the Republic for which it stands.

5:28

One nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

5:38

The clerk will now go over how the public can offer the testimony.

5:42

Please proceed.

5:43

I'd like to highlight the slide on the screen that reviews how the public can offer their public testimony during today's meeting.

5:48

If you are in person, please complete a speaker slip.

5:50

Look at it at the entrance of chambers and bring it to the front of the room.

5:54

No further in-person testimony will be taken once the council begins virtual testimony for better meeting management purposes.

6:00

Each speaker will have one minute per item per person.

6:03

Thank you, Council President.

6:05

All right, thank you for that.

6:06

Please read the closed session items into the record.

6:09

Conference of Legal Council existing litigation pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.91 is CS1, January 22nd, 2024, flooding litigation.

6:21

CS2 is Daniel Patz versus City of San Diego.

6:26

All right, and with that, please proceed with public comment.

6:28

We have no public comment speakers here in Council Chambers, starting with those participating virtually.

6:37

And we have three speakers in the queue.

6:40

The original, if you can please unmute and let me know which item or items you wish to speak to.

6:45

You sound so different, I'm not sure why.

6:47

Um both of them.

6:48

You'll have two minutes, please proceed.

6:50

Thank you.

6:51

Yes.

6:52

The um first one with the flooding, all of these victims, you know, you guys need to do the right thing because you failed to keep up the infrastructure in the city to make sure this kind of stuff wouldn't happen.

7:02

In fact, you're even going as far as counter-suing people saying that they didn't, you know, have their drainage and stuff and their you know property uh well maintained.

7:13

So, you know, you guys are hypocrites.

7:15

You're also um it's unfortunate because that event was a cloud seeding event at the um Santa Anna watershed, um, was uh you know, cloud seeding and making sure that this happens.

7:26

So I mean, when you guys don't even acknowledge things like that, there's gonna be more times like this where the people are going to have to be paying for your negligence because you know, not only do you move money around here or there to, you know, do your little projects, um, and you know, things like this take place, and it's just sad that people would have to come after the city and that it's taken so long.

7:48

Um, but you need to, you know, course correct and make it right for these people.

7:52

And with this class action case alleging that the city violated Prop uh 218 by charging tiered water rates to single family residential log or customers and they want a refund, you know.

8:04

You guys continue to um you know engage in fraud waste and abuse.

8:09

So people do have to come and you know sue you guys to hold you accountable for things that aren't supposed to be happening.

8:16

So it's a little concerning that this kind of stuff is happening when you know now you're putting um trash tax on property tax.

8:24

So, you know, it could lead people to actually lose their homes because of the way that you guys do stuff.

8:30

So again, you need to make it right, even though it sucks it should be coming from your pockets, not from the people who work really hard and you're just trying to make ends meet, um, all while you guys sit here and and you know do negligent things with um the money that you are entrusted to have that you are supposed to be um you know really doing right by the people, so this is your opportunity to do so.

8:52

So time to course correct.

8:54

Thank you.

8:55

Next is Zoom user.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Police Oversight█████████████████17%
Public Comment████████████████16%
Procedural███████████████15%
Parking Management██████████10%
Homelessness████████8%
Public Engagement█████5%
Personnel Matters█████5%
Affordable Housing█████5%
Public Land Management█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

San Diego City Council Meeting – January 26, 2026

The San Diego City Council met on Monday, January 26, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. after a morning closed session and a special Housing Authority meeting. The afternoon session included appointments, amendments to housing and parking contracts, and public testimony on a range of topics. Key actions included the unanimous appointment of Roger Smith as Executive Director of the Commission on Police Practices, approval of a $593,000 fund transfer for the Starling Place affordable housing project, and a one-year extension of the ACE Parking management contract for the Evan V. Jones Parkade.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Closed Session (Morning): Three speakers addressed the closed session items. One speaker criticized the city for flooding victims, accusing the city of negligence and hypocrisy in counter-suing property owners. A second speaker expressed hope for cooperation on immigration policy and concern about the city being sued over water subsidy practices. A third speaker commented on the tiered water rate lawsuit, noting that subsidies can help with bill burdens.

  • Special Housing Authority Closed Session: Two speakers commented on labor negotiations with SEIU Local 221. One speaker opposed raises for housing authority staff until homeless individuals are adequately housed, citing deaths and exploitation. Another speaker expressed support for SEIU and requested a report on how the city will work with the union on housing issues.

  • Item S400 – Appointment of Roger Smith: Multiple speakers commented. One speaker expressed excitement and support for Mr. Smith, emphasizing the need for CPP independence. Another speaker (Andrea Ebbing) was neutral but urged that the role include data management and completion of outstanding investigations. Francine Maxwell welcomed Mr. Smith and cautioned against political exclusion, stressing the need for charter implementation and an independent attorney. Another speaker (the original) questioned the cost and effectiveness of accountability commissions, arguing they lack real authority and that police misconduct continues. Blair Beekman highlighted the importance of tech accountability and learning from other cities. Ernie Casco criticized the city and CPP for failing to address crimes at Torrey Pines Gliderport and demanded police reports.

  • Item 200 – Home Key Plus CDBG Amendment: Public comment included criticism of homelessness programs as a "racket," with speakers alleging fraud, waste, and that the point-in-time count is inaccurate. One speaker (Clinton) called for transparency and questioned oversight, linking housing policies to surveillance. Andrea Ebbing raised concerns about wraparound services as a potential scheme for double-dipping insurance, and urged caution. Blair Beekman expressed hope but called for clear, beneficial outcomes.

  • Item S401 – ACE Parking Contract Extension: Speakers opposed the extension. One speaker argued that parking fees are excessive and that the city should provide free parking. Blair Beekman asked about tram service and parking rates. Andrea Ebbing noted the contract had been voted against previously and questioned Todd Gloria's motives for extending a 70-year relationship. Another speaker (Bob Kazuski) criticized the 70-year length and demanded cash payment options. Kathleen Lippett echoed the need for cash and shorter contract terms.

  • Non-Agenda Public Comment: Topics included allegations about the Family Justice Center as a shell company, concerns about marijuana commercialization and youth mental health, calls for smoke-free affordable housing, criticism of ACE Parking's cashless policy, complaints about Torrey Pines Gliderport management, and pleas for genuine compassion during the point-in-time homeless count. Multiple speakers also addressed national issues such as immigration enforcement and police militarization.

Discussion Items

  • S400 – Appointment of Roger Smith as Executive Director of the Commission on Police Practices: Council President Lacava and Councilmember Foster co-chaired the ad hoc committee that oversaw a nationwide recruitment. Out of 84 applicants, six were interviewed by a community panel, and the ad hoc committee recommended Roger Smith. The proposed annual salary is $216,000 ($8,301.69 biweekly), consistent with the prior executive director. Councilmember Foster highlighted recent police incidents (e.g., the $30 million settlement to Konoa Wilson, officer-involved shootings) underscoring the need for strong oversight. Mr. Smith addressed the council, emphasizing inclusive and fair processes. Councilmembers expressed support and asked about stability; Mr. Smith committed to transparent communication. The appointment was approved 8-0 (Councilmember Campillo absent).

  • Item 200 – Amendment to Home Key Plus CDBG Subrecipient Agreement: The council considered transferring $593,000 in CDBG funds from the Housing Commission's Affordable Housing NOFA to the Home Key Plus program for the Starling Place project. Starling Place, at 7798 Starling Drive in Council District 7, will create 80 affordable homes with supportive services for individuals experiencing homelessness, including veterans. The project received $34.4 million from the state Home Key Plus program, with matching city and county funds. The amendment allows reallocation of unspent NOFA funds to cover acquisition costs and potentially add solar panels. Staff noted the acquisition closing is expected in late February 2026. The council approved the amendment 8-0.

  • Item S401 – First Amendment to Contract with ACE Parking III, LLC: The council considered a one-year extension of the parking management contract for the Evan V. Jones Parkade (1265 First Avenue). The contract was set to expire February 10, 2026; the extension runs to February 10, 2027, at a monthly cost of $21,685 (total $260,220). Staff stated additional time is needed to complete a new procurement process (RFP) expected within 60-90 days. Councilmember Moreno initially voted no in committee due to late timing but supported the extension while demanding better future planning. Several councilmembers thanked the ACE Parking team. The motion passed 8-0.

Key Outcomes

  • Appointment of Roger Smith: Approved unanimously (8-0) as Executive Director of the Commission on Police Practices, with an annual salary of $216,000. Mr. Smith was sworn in immediately.
  • Home Key Plus CDBG Amendment: Approved unanimously (8-0), transferring approximately $593,000 to support Starling Place affordable housing project.
  • ACE Parking Contract Extension: Approved unanimously (8-0) for a one-year extension through February 10, 2027, with a budget of $260,220. Staff committed to issuing an RFP within 90 days.
  • No reportable actions from closed session: City Attorney reported nothing to report from either the city council or housing authority closed sessions.
  • Council adjourned to next regular meeting: Scheduled for Tuesday, January 27, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.

Meeting Transcript

Check, check one, two. Good morning. Thank you, Council President. Councilmember Campbell. Councilmember Whitburn. Here. Councilmember Foster. Here. Councilmember Von Wolper. Council President Pro Tem Lee. Councilmember Campillo. Councilmember Moreno. Present. Councilmember Elo Rivera. And Council President Lacava. Present. Also attending the meeting our City Attorney Heather Ferber, independent budget analyst Charles Monica, and myself, your city clerk, the NFWs. Thank you, Council President. Followed with the land acknowledgement and the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Campbell. Today they carry their legacy forward, ensuring that their traditions continue to thrive in gratitude and strength. We stand with the Kumeyai Nation connected to our past and committed to a thriving future. Please face the flag and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. And to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. The clerk will now go over how the public can offer the testimony. Please proceed. I'd like to highlight the slide on the screen that reviews how the public can offer their public testimony during today's meeting. If you are in person, please complete a speaker slip. Look at it at the entrance of chambers and bring it to the front of the room. No further in-person testimony will be taken once the council begins virtual testimony for better meeting management purposes. Each speaker will have one minute per item per person. Thank you, Council President. All right, thank you for that. Please read the closed session items into the record. Conference of Legal Council existing litigation pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.91 is CS1, January 22nd, 2024, flooding litigation. CS2 is Daniel Patz versus City of San Diego. All right, and with that, please proceed with public comment. We have no public comment speakers here in Council Chambers, starting with those participating virtually. And we have three speakers in the queue. The original, if you can please unmute and let me know which item or items you wish to speak to. You sound so different, I'm not sure why. Um both of them. You'll have two minutes, please proceed. Thank you. Yes. The um first one with the flooding, all of these victims, you know, you guys need to do the right thing because you failed to keep up the infrastructure in the city to make sure this kind of stuff wouldn't happen. In fact, you're even going as far as counter-suing people saying that they didn't, you know, have their drainage and stuff and their you know property uh well maintained. So, you know, you guys are hypocrites. You're also um it's unfortunate because that event was a cloud seeding event at the um Santa Anna watershed, um, was uh you know, cloud seeding and making sure that this happens. So I mean, when you guys don't even acknowledge things like that, there's gonna be more times like this where the people are going to have to be paying for your negligence because you know, not only do you move money around here or there to, you know, do your little projects, um, and you know, things like this take place, and it's just sad that people would have to come after the city and that it's taken so long.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com