Environment Committee Approves CCA JPA and Consultant Contracts on September 12, 2019
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San Diego Environment Committee Meeting - September 12, 2019
The City of San Diego's Environment Committee met to consider several agenda items, including a landmark Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) joint powers authority agreement, consultant contracts for franchise negotiations, and a stormwater maintenance report. The meeting included public testimony and committee votes.
Consent Calendar
- Approved minutes of July 18, 2019.
- Approved four consent items unanimously (4-0):
- Water supply assessment for Courthouse Commons Project.
- 2019 San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Plan.
- License agreement with San Diego Unified School District for trail access at Taft Middle School.
- Agreement with CDM Smith for 2020 long-range water resources plan and Urban Water Management Plan.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Non-agenda comment: Martha Welch expressed concerns about sewer plant funding and water quality. Becky Rapp urged the city to investigate vaping product contaminants and consider banning vaping products due to rising respiratory illnesses.
- On CCA JPA: Over 30 speakers addressed the committee. Major speakers included:
- Mayor Mary Salais (Chula Vista), Mayor Catherine Blakespear (Encinitas), Deputy Mayor Bill Baber (La Mesa), Councilmembers Paloma Aguirre and Mark West (Imperial Beach) – all urged adoption without amendments. Baber stated, "Don't let perfection be the enemy of good."
- Matthew Vasilakis (Climate Action Campaign), Joyce Lane (San Diego 350), Eddie Price (Grid Alternatives) – spoke for the San Diego Community Choice Alliance, citing 60% public support for CCE and urging no delay.
- Gretchen Newsom (IBEW 569) – opposed the JPA as written, citing weak labor language and inclusion of nuclear/renewable energy credits (RECs). Asked for amendments to exclude these.
- Shannon Bresnahan (Cleantech San Diego) – supported adoption, highlighting economic benefits.
- Vanessa Mapo Garcia (SDG&E) – assured continued cooperation and grid reliability.
- Tyson Siegel (Protect Our Communities Foundation) – supported CCE but stressed need for strong franchise negotiations.
- Kelly Batten (San Diego County Taxpayers Association) – stressed taxpayer protections and avoiding general fund exposure.
- Shandon Harbour (Associated Builders and Contractors) – supported JPA as-is, requesting open competition for projects.
- Patrick McDonough (San Diego Coastkeeper) – supported CCE to combat climate change and ocean acidification.
Discussion Items
- Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA): Staff presented a plan to form a regional CCA with Chula Vista, La Mesa, Encinitas, and Imperial Beach. Key features: 100% renewable energy by 2035 (first JPA in CA with explicit target), local control, opt-out program. Financial projections showed ~5% rate savings. A tight timeline was emphasized: file implementation plan by Jan 1, 2020 to avoid a one-year delay. Councilmembers clarified that while the JPA currently says "avoid nuclear" and allows unbundled RECs, the future board can strengthen language. Chair Campbell assured the public those issues would be addressed. Councilmember Sherman expressed philosophical concerns about opt-out but did not block the motion.
- Franchise Consultant Contracts: Staff requested approval for two contracts: $331,000 to New Gen Strategies for valuation of SDG&E infrastructure, and $593,000 to JVJ Pacific Consulting for strategic advice. The city's 50-year franchise with SDG&E expires Jan 17, 2021. Staff noted the current agreement provides benefits (e.g., utility undergrounding funding, free relocations for city water/sewer) that SDG&E is now challenging. The consultants will help the city negotiate a new franchise. Councilmembers stressed frequent updates to council.
- Stormwater Master Program Report: Informational item. Staff presented channel maintenance plans, permitting challenges, and winter storm preparations. The city faces a $700 million+ stormwater infrastructure shortfall. Councilmember Sherman questioned the cost of wetland mitigation for concrete channels and asked about flood gates in Mission Valley. Councilmember Moreno inquired about delays for Nestor Creek. Chair Campbell noted the low monthly stormwater fee ($0.96/household) compared to Sacramento ($11.35) and expressed support for increased funding.
Key Outcomes
- CCA JPA: Motion to approve staff recommendation passed 3-1 (Campbell, Moreno, Bree in favor; Sherman opposed). The item will proceed to full City Council.
- Franchise Consultant Contracts: Motion to approve both contracts passed 4-0.
- Stormwater Report: Received as information; no vote taken.
- Next meeting scheduled for October 10, 2019.
Meeting Transcript
Um so all of the things that you want, the new residents of this new KB Homes community, they're gonna want that too. You have a unique circum circumstance here to build upon that. So I think it's really key. Um and when I think of a neighborhood park, why can't there be a partnership? Why can't this be a new model looking at KB Homes? Kind of my charge to you, because I will not be on the commission when this comes forward. I term out in January. Um so I'm looking for my colleagues to carry the baton. Um in all seriousness, we have the unified school districts at gates and locks facilities at night and weekend. That should not happen. And that's not just strapped to KB Holmes and the and the applicant team. I am talking to uh the unified school district. Let's let's stop doing that. Those facilities are paid by taxpayers. Let's have those facilities be open. This project has the potential to do that. To have a joint facility, KB Holmes is involved, the Unified School District, the community planning group is involved, the Seoul Sports Center, the bicycle. Your testimony today gave a heart to this project. The project will have a heart because people are coming there to live in the future, but you could do that now with all the facilities that you brought forward to us. And I I felt that it was incredibly compelling and the passion and the good that you're doing for for children and for families. Um the the piece I have following up on Commissioner Osuji's comment is it would be really important to understand what a Lyant University's plans are. Can this gym be relocated to the 21 acres? And if it can, great. If it can't, why? I I think of a detailed study of how this facility can be incorporated. I also think um the photos were incredibly compelling about drop-off and pickup. We all know that within our communities as we have school-aged children, and then as we drive through our own communities, if we don't have children, but we see that. I think this project, I I want to be cautious because we're we're I don't want to say it's your complete responsibility for things, but but there's an adjacency and a and a opportunity so that the pick up drop off is safer, the walking is safer, the bike access is safer, all those things that were brought up today because of this middle school at 95 97% occupancy, and I believe it's the largest middle school in the unified school district, and I'm seeing some nods. It's a it's bigger than many high schools. Um Palmarado Road, uh, I won't repeat what my colleagues said, but I think the issue is larger. I think the project has this potential to work with staff and city officials and leadership to look at it beyond just the boundaries of ingress and egress for this project. It it has to, because it doesn't work now. Um and the last thing, I I really think that when we come forward with projects like this and we have these lists of benefits, it's important that there's a robust outreach. So I'm asking the applicant if you could come forward and tell us how will you continue to keep these people involved, all of the folks that spoke today, plus those that maybe hear about this hearing after, and maybe you can come forward and tell us what will be your your plan to keep um people informed with a website with meetings. Um the community group always has recognized community group meetings, but there's a lot of moving parts with this project. So I'd I'd like to hear more about your your your plan for keeping people involved and including them in your in your studies. Yeah, we're gonna work closely with the planning group and also the neighborhoods. Um it's a very large community, so we will put up a website once we have our plans established. Um we're gonna work with the university, obviously uh Wally and his team, um, and we'll reach out to as many people as possible. Um, but we first have to put some ideas on paper for them to give us feedback on. And it's a process, not an event, as he is now. And so uh we'll we'll go through that and do everything we can. But um I really appreciate you guys' feedback, and I tried to make uh as many notes as I could. So well, we'll also have meeting minutes. There you go. So that'll be a resource. Um, do you have a representative of the unified school district that you're working with or that you've already been starting to work with? We did meet with the school uh um and we did talk to them about their concerns and um um the the good news is a lot of our uh people will be walking the school, so that could actually take some of the stress off of the drop-off points. And hopefully some of those renters come in and we we reduce the cars. Um they told us that they have um a volume of 1600 possible, they're below 1400 now after losing some students, and there are some out of district kids that go to that school that will be trying to figure out where they would go and how we can reduce that.
openpublica.com