OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Diego, California/Rules Committee
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Diego Rules Committee Meeting Summary — October 14, 2026

Rules Committee — Wednesday, October 14, 2026
BodySan Diego, California
SessionRules Committee
DateWednesday, October 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:58:30

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

2:36

Good morning.

2:37

Welcome to the rules committee meeting, October 14, 2026.

2:40

Joe Locava, Councilmember for District One and Chair of the Committee.

2:44

Our committee's liaison, Sarah Jordan, will go over instructions for today's meeting.

Unassigned speaker

2:49

Thank you,

Speaker 2

2:49

Chair Locava.

2:50

While members of the public are able to attend the meeting in person, the speech meeting is being televised and live streamed on the city's website, and Council Administration will continue to make arrangements for the public to comment using the Zoom webinar platform.

3:00

Members of the public who wish to provide virtual testimony must enter the virtual queue by raising their hand before the virtual queue closes.

3:06

The virtual queue will close when the last virtual speaker finishes speaking or five minutes after in-person testimony ends, whichever occurs first.

3:12

This will allow for better meeting management between the two platforms and ensure the committee is able to manage and conduct city business.

4:26

Members of the public can also join the webinar by computer tablet or smartphone by accessing the link, which is listed online in the preamble language on the agenda of the city's webpage.

4:34

If you need to participate by telephone, you may dial 1669-2545252.

Unassigned speaker

4:55

If you wish to speak to a particular item, please wait for that item to be called and then raise your hand to speak by tapping the raise your hand icon.

Speaker 2

5:00

Or if you're calling participant by pressing star nine on your phone.

5:04

If you raise your hand during a non-comment period, your hand will be lowered.

5:07

Chair.

Speaker 1

5:08

All right.

5:08

Uh I note the council president Pro Tem Lee has now joined the meeting.

5:12

Thank you, Sarah, for reviewing those instructions for the benefit of the public.

5:15

A quorum is not present.

5:17

As a note to the public, we'll be taking our agenda out of order.

5:21

After we take up our consent agenda, we'll take our information item four, followed by discussion items two and three.

5:29

Again, we'll be taking up information item number four, followed by discussion items two and three.

5:35

We will now take up not agenda public comment.

5:37

The council members respect and appreciate the public's input and are fully committed to protecting every participant's free speech rights at council and committee meetings.

5:46

With that, Sarah, please proceed with not agenda public comment.

Unassigned speaker

5:49

Thank

Speaker 2

5:49

you, Chair Lakava Perule 2.7 on agenda public comment as an opportunity for members of the public to comment on items that are not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of this committee.

5:58

Each speaker will have two minutes, and if you need to participate by telephone, you can dial 1669-2545252, inputting webinar D 160-439-9420 pound.

6:07

We will begin with in-person speakers.

6:09

We've received three slips here in the committee room.

6:12

We will begin with Joyce and Yada.

6:14

You will be followed by Max Schmidt, and then allegedly Audra.

Speaker 3

6:25

Good morning.

6:27

Okay.

6:41

So now I'm gonna speak off the cuff.

6:45

So uh yesterday on consent, I spoke with a shaky yes or no on the uh Muni Code amendments for the Cultural Affairs Department, which has uh you know navigated into economic development department.

7:05

And uh I think it's uh uh care, it's more appropriate for me to say this today.

7:13

So when I looked at that item, which perhaps should be very clear, you know, okay, this is you know Municodes, let's let's go for it, let's do it.

7:24

It's simple.

7:25

But it wasn't simple to me.

7:27

And last night I looked at the Muni code adjustment, and I realized how tough it is to have an open government, because it's vast, and with our lack of resources right now, it really, really makes it difficult for us to feel we can trust the process, especially with what the audit committee is continuing to tell us over and over again.

7:54

And to me, their list is growing bigger and bigger as far as what they need to look at.

7:59

So when I looked at that cultural fairs muni code change item, I just thought, wow, what happened between March 25th when it was approved, and now a year and a half later, how did that work out?

8:14

You know, what were the conflicts of interest, if any?

8:18

You know, just let me know as a public.

8:21

That was a big change.

8:23

And to me, all those going into economic development is too much.

8:28

It it's just too vast.

8:30

So anyway, that's part of it today.

8:32

I'll be speaking more love to all.

Speaker 2

8:34

Thank you.

8:35

Our next speaker is Max Schmidt.

Speaker 4

8:43

Um The Founding Fathers wrote the Tenth Amendment, which can easily be interpreted as there should not be there cannot be a federal agent outside of Washington, DC.

8:55

Um, when they wrote the Tenth Amendment, they studied all forms of government and what went wrong with their country, what went wrong.

9:04

And um, in today's modern age, we have liberal fascist um torturing people into committing suicide, entrapping people into uh committing assault and murder and going to prison, and also entrapping people into getting into fights and then getting killed and murdered themselves.

9:25

And um, I call this the entrapment hell genocide because the liberal fascists that are doing this also know that if someone commits suicide, they will very very possibly lose their soul um forever.

9:39

And um what's going on is um in liberal cities, uh fascists who have done a cult practice to read people's mind, follow uh people who are easily easy targets.

9:53

Um, most of them have bad posture.

Unassigned speaker

9:55

Um, many of them are in the lower class, and many of them um are people who are raised Catholic but fell out of their faith.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Comment██████████████████████████████30%
Campaign Finance█████████████████████████████29%
Campaign Finance Reform████████████████16%
Funds Commission████████8%
Cannabis Regulation███3%
Procedural██2%
Homelessness██2%
Public Safety██2%
Public Finance██2%
Summary of Proceedings

San Diego City Council Rules Committee — October 14, 2026

The Rules Committee met on October 14, 2026, with Chair Joe LaCava presiding. Council President Pro Tem Lee, Councilmember Elo Rivera, and Councilmember Campillo participated; Councilmember Moreno was absent. No agenda or minutes were included in the source material, so this summary is based on the raw transcript. The committee took the agenda out of order: after non-agenda public comment and the consent calendar, it heard the Funds Commission information item, then the two campaign-finance discussion items.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 1 — Approval of the committee minutes of September 16, 2026. No member pulled the item. After public comment, Councilmember Elo Rivera moved approval, seconded by Council President Pro Tem Lee. The motion passed unanimously; Councilmember Moreno was absent.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Non-agenda, in person: Joyce Anyatta said rapid, large municipal-code changes and resource constraints made it hard for the public to trust the process. Max Schmidt opposed the city government and called for a government shutdown. Audra urged the city to revoke contracts with Dreams for Change and the Downtown San Diego Partnership over safe-sleeping-site conditions, alleging a federal lawsuit, deaths, and hidden sexual assaults. Anthony Rouse criticized a $3.1 million police-station fence and urged redirecting SDPD funds to faster response times and programs such as No Shots Fired.
  • Non-agenda, virtual: Catherine Rhodes urged the council not to approve Midway Rising on Friday, citing the lack of a final geotechnical investigation and deep foundation recommendations down to 60 feet. Madison encouraged city public-health messaging on high-potency cannabis risks. Becky Rapp asked for a municipal-code ban on marijuana billboards, citing AB 2249. Natalie Ratchke described a desperate housing plea and called for low-cost, outside-the-box supports. Crypto Bradley alleged lease mismanagement and proposed a public, weekly lease-review committee. Judy Strang said she was missed in virtual public comment because of the flow around a no-quorum decision. Blair Beekman discussed SeaWorld, Dreams for Change, Flock ALPR contract questions, and the need for positive community-government communication.
  • Item 1 (minutes): Max Schmidt opposed; Audra said the minutes omitted words that changed meaning; Blair Beekman asked a clarifying question about SB 707 and boards/commissions; Natalie Ratchke praised citizens who participate; Lori Saldania warned about sea-level-rise liability tied to the SeaWorld agreement; Crypto Bradley said he had trouble accessing the minutes.
  • Item 4 (Funds Commission): Audra cautioned against redirecting donor-restricted funds; Max Schmidt opposed; Joyce Anyatta said she generally trusted the funds management and thanked the donors; Catherine Rhodes said the city has $2.3 billion in funds, criticized the presentation for omitting pension funds and fund-balance information; Blair Beekman noted loud library elevators; Crypto Bradley suggested following Nancy Pelosi’s stock picks; Becky Rapp asked the commission to refer a cannabis-tax audit request to the Rules Committee.
  • Item 2 (Fundraising ordinance): Audra questioned enforcement; Max Schmidt opposed; Joyce Anyatta supported; Anthony Ralphs strongly supported. Virtual speakers included support from Blair Beekman and Natalie Ratchke, skepticism from Crypto Bradley, a suggestion from Renault to use a 14-month window, and opposition from Catherine Rhodes, who called the rule unconstitutional and requested a written city attorney opinion.
  • Item 3 (Dark money/shadow campaigns): Audra questioned whether fines would deter violations; Max Schmidt opposed; Joyce Anyatta said she remained on the fence; Anthony Ralphs supported. Virtual comment included support from Blair Beekman, Natalie Ratchke, and Renault; opposition and a request for written constitutional analysis from Catherine Rhodes; and skepticism from Crypto Bradley.

Item 4 — Funds Commission Presentation (Information Item)

  • City Treasurer (the transcript alternates between 'Liz Carey' and 'Liz Gray') and Funds Commission Chair Skylar McCurin presented. The commission supervises seven trust funds under Charter Section 41A: Benjamin Memorial Library, Effie Earle Sargent Memorial, Los Peñasquitos Canyon Preserve, Gladys Edna Peters Memorial, Jane Cameron La Jolla Library, Philip L. Green Memorial, and Mount Hope Cemetery Perpetuity Fund.
  • The non-cemetery funds use a target allocation of 65% stocks and 35% bonds. Mount Hope has a separate charter-based policy designed for income, with 36% allocated to risk assets such as stocks and real estate.
  • Performance: Mount Hope gains were driven by equity exposure, with Northern Trust slightly overweight versus the policy index. The other funds’ net returns were approximately 9–10% over 7 and 10 years, double-digit over 1 and 3 years, and near 9% year-to-date through August 31, 2026.
  • Chair LaCava said this was the first year under the amended Council Policy 000-26 requiring departments to report how restricted fund dollars were spent, in addition to investments and revenue. This was an information item, so no motion was required.
  • Councilmember Elo Rivera asked about reports that Mount Hope Cemetery burials would end. Parks and Recreation Director Andy Field said the city is only beginning discussions and no decision is imminent. Chair LaCava also told public commenters seeking an audit to take the request to the Audit Committee.

Item 2 — Ending Perpetual Fundraising Ordinance

  • Deputy Chief of Staff Rosa Lasquaga, on behalf of Councilmember Elo Rivera, presented a proposed amendment to San Diego Municipal Code Section 27.2938. Because the state moved the presidential primary to March, current rules allowed odd-numbered districts to fundraise for 14 months before the primary and even-numbered districts for 17 months. The proposal would create one consistent start date exactly one year before the election for every candidate.
  • Councilmember Elo Rivera said the City Clerk first identified the inconsistency. The city attorney’s office cautioned that the draft is not final.
  • Councilmember Campillo raised questions about the original ethics commission rationale, self-financing, incumbent-challenger equity, and which committees would be covered; Council President Pro Tem Lee noted a possible roll-over surplus loophole.
  • The committee moved the recommendation unanimously; Councilmember Moreno was absent.

Item 3 — Amendments to Expose Dark Money and Ban Shadow Campaigns

  • Rosa Lasquaga presented a draft framework to: expand the definition of candidate and electioneering communications to capture pre-candidacy spending; require disclosure of the true original source and top five funders on communications; label AI-generated or AI-altered content; and require copies of public communications to be filed with the City Clerk. The proposal draws on Arizona Proposition 211, Rhode Island and Los Angeles disclosure rules, and California AB 2355.
  • The Independent Budget Analyst said the Ethics Commission may need additional enforcement resources; no significant fiscal impact to the Clerk’s office was identified. The city attorney again noted the draft is under legal review.
  • Councilmember Campillo expressed constitutional concerns about compelled speech, independent expenditures, nonprofits being retroactively treated as electioneering, short advertisements, and donor phone numbers; he requested a city attorney legal memo before final council action.
  • The Ethics Commission executive director asked to be included in the drafting process and cited enforcement-resource and law-overlap concerns.
  • Council President Pro Tem Lee raised definitional questions about 'clearly identified,' lookback periods, original-source tracing, disclosure text size, and feasibility.
  • Councilmember Elo Rivera moved approval of the staff recommendation, plus a request for the City Clerk to work with the city attorney on establishing a cost-recoverable campaign filing fee similar to the Secretary of State’s. Chair LaCava seconded. The motion passed unanimously; Councilmember Moreno was absent. Councilmember Elo Rivera said the item should return to committee if significant changes are made during legal review.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the September 16, 2026 committee minutes unanimously (Moreno absent).
  • Took no action on the Funds Commission information item.
  • Approved the ending-perpetual-fundraising ordinance recommendation unanimously (Moreno absent), advancing it to full council.
  • Approved the dark-money/shadow-campaign staff recommendation and the campaign-filing-fee request unanimously (Moreno absent); final legal review and drafting remain, with possible return to committee if the draft changes substantially.
  • The next regularly scheduled Rules Committee meeting is Wednesday, October 28, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. Welcome to the rules committee meeting, October 14, 2026. Joe Locava, Councilmember for District One and Chair of the Committee. Our committee's liaison, Sarah Jordan, will go over instructions for today's meeting. Thank you, Chair Locava. While members of the public are able to attend the meeting in person, the speech meeting is being televised and live streamed on the city's website, and Council Administration will continue to make arrangements for the public to comment using the Zoom webinar platform. Members of the public who wish to provide virtual testimony must enter the virtual queue by raising their hand before the virtual queue closes. The virtual queue will close when the last virtual speaker finishes speaking or five minutes after in-person testimony ends, whichever occurs first. This will allow for better meeting management between the two platforms and ensure the committee is able to manage and conduct city business. Members of the public can also join the webinar by computer tablet or smartphone by accessing the link, which is listed online in the preamble language on the agenda of the city's webpage. If you need to participate by telephone, you may dial 1669-2545252. If you wish to speak to a particular item, please wait for that item to be called and then raise your hand to speak by tapping the raise your hand icon. Or if you're calling participant by pressing star nine on your phone. If you raise your hand during a non-comment period, your hand will be lowered. Chair. All right. Uh I note the council president Pro Tem Lee has now joined the meeting. Thank you, Sarah, for reviewing those instructions for the benefit of the public. A quorum is not present. As a note to the public, we'll be taking our agenda out of order. After we take up our consent agenda, we'll take our information item four, followed by discussion items two and three. Again, we'll be taking up information item number four, followed by discussion items two and three. We will now take up not agenda public comment. The council members respect and appreciate the public's input and are fully committed to protecting every participant's free speech rights at council and committee meetings. With that, Sarah, please proceed with not agenda public comment. Thank you, Chair Lakava Perule 2.7 on agenda public comment as an opportunity for members of the public to comment on items that are not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of this committee. Each speaker will have two minutes, and if you need to participate by telephone, you can dial 1669-2545252, inputting webinar D 160-439-9420 pound. We will begin with in-person speakers. We've received three slips here in the committee room. We will begin with Joyce and Yada. You will be followed by Max Schmidt, and then allegedly Audra. Good morning. Okay. So now I'm gonna speak off the cuff. So uh yesterday on consent, I spoke with a shaky yes or no on the uh Muni Code amendments for the Cultural Affairs Department, which has uh you know navigated into economic development department. And uh I think it's uh uh care, it's more appropriate for me to say this today. So when I looked at that item, which perhaps should be very clear, you know, okay, this is you know Municodes, let's let's go for it, let's do it. It's simple. But it wasn't simple to me. And last night I looked at the Muni code adjustment, and I realized how tough it is to have an open government, because it's vast, and with our lack of resources right now, it really, really makes it difficult for us to feel we can trust the process, especially with what the audit committee is continuing to tell us over and over again. And to me, their list is growing bigger and bigger as far as what they need to look at. So when I looked at that cultural fairs muni code change item, I just thought, wow, what happened between March 25th when it was approved, and now a year and a half later, how did that work out? You know, what were the conflicts of interest, if any? You know, just let me know as a public. That was a big change. And to me, all those going into economic development is too much. It it's just too vast. So anyway, that's part of it today.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com