OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sandy Springs, Georgia/Board of Appeals
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Regular Meeting - February 4, 2026

Board of Appeals — Wednesday, February 4, 2026
BodySandy Springs, Georgia
SessionBoard of Appeals
DateWednesday, February 4, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:03:20

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:02

Calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order.

0:07

Clerk Brown, would you please give us the roll call and general announcements?

0:12

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Speaker 2

0:14

Excuse me.

0:15

Good evening, Madam Chair, Board Vice Chair and Members of the Board of Appeals.

0:19

Today is February the 4th, 2026.

0:23

Please confirm your attendance as I call your name.

0:26

Madam Chair Sherry Allen.

0:27

Here.

0:28

Vice Chair Justin Sperano.

0:30

Here.

0:30

Board Member Jason Bodwell.

0:32

Board Member Fred Jewell.

Speaker 3

0:34

Here.

Speaker 2

0:35

Board Member Nathan Guntham.

0:37

Board Member Susan Major.

0:39

Here.

0:39

Board Member Kim Gay.

Unassigned speaker

0:41

Here.

Speaker 2

0:41

Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes.

0:46

Now I will read the announcements regarding the decorum and the procedures of the Board of Appeals.

0:53

The Board of Appeals duty is to review and decide on appeals of the of the director's administrative decision or interpretation of the development code.

1:03

Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or final plat without any dedication and variances from the standard of the development code.

1:14

The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda.

1:18

Following are some of the rules and procedures for this part of the meeting.

1:22

The applicant and all those speaking in support of the application will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present the their petition.

1:30

The applicant may choose to save some of the time for rebuttal following the presentation by the opposition.

1:37

The opposition will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its position.

1:42

Some of the burden since the burden of proof of since excuse me, since the burden approved is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks, provided time remained from the original allotted time.

1:55

Staff will keep track of the time for both sides.

1:58

Those called to speak with will be taken in the order that the public comment cards were reviewed or received by the planned and zoning clerk prior to the beginning of tonight's meeting.

2:09

All speakers will be will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable organization before beginning their presentation.

2:18

Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited.

2:21

So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking.

2:28

Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will expect to receive.

2:33

The applicant shall not submit materials to the Board of Appeals during the meeting.

2:38

All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduled meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board.

2:49

Thank you, Chair.

2:51

Thank

Speaker 1

2:52

you.

2:52

Can I get a motion for approval of today's meeting agenda?

Speaker 3

2:56

Motion.

Speaker 1

2:57

Second.

2:59

All those in favor say aye.

3:02

Unanimous approval of the meeting agenda.

3:04

Can I get a motion for approval of the meeting minutes of the January 7th, 2026 Board of Appeals meeting?

Speaker 4

3:12

So moved.

Speaker 1

3:14

Second, anyone?

Speaker 3

3:15

Second.

Speaker 1

3:16

All those in favor say aye.

Unassigned speaker

3:18

Aye.

Speaker 1

3:19

Chair votes aye.

3:20

It's unanimous.

3:21

Um can we call the first case v 2554 701 Bassway.

Speaker 5

3:36

Good evening, Board of Appeals members and members of the public.

3:40

Welcome to the February 4th, 2026 public hearing.

3:44

Today we will we will be discussing variance case B2554 701 Bassway.

3:51

Staff's recommendation is denial.

Unassigned speaker

3:56

The

Speaker 5

3:56

applicants are requesting a variance from Section 6.1 point 2 point B to retain a building E that encroaches into the 30-foot side street setback.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████74%
Procedural████████████19%
Community Engagement██3%
Stormwater Management█2%
Environmental Protection█2%
Summary of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Regular Meeting - February 4, 2026

The Sandy Springs Board of Appeals met on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Studio Theatre at City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Chair Sherri Allen. The board addressed three variance cases, re-elected leadership, and announced a joint retreat with the Planning Commission.

Approvals

  • The Board unanimously approved the meeting agenda for February 4, 2026.
  • The Board unanimously approved the meeting minutes from the January 7, 2026 meeting.

Discussion Items and Case Outcomes

Case A: 2026-0002 V-25-54 – 701 Bass Way (Eave Encroachment)

  • Request: A variance from Section 6.1.2.B to allow a building eave to encroach 5.2 feet into the 30-foot side street setback.
  • Staff Recommendation: Denial. Planner III Helen Owens stated that while the encroachment is fully screened and not detrimental to the public, the violation negates the intent of the development code and the property can be developed without relief.
  • Applicant Position: Homeowner Andrea Darwish of 701 Bass Way explained the encroachment was an unintentional builder error discovered after a 2025 citation. She requested approval and committed to permanently maintaining the existing vegetative screening.
  • Outcome: The Board voted unanimously to approve the variance with the condition that the homeowner permanently maintain the vegetative screening consistent with Exhibit A.

Case B: 2026-0003 V-25-53 – 870 Edgewater Drive (Front Setback)

  • Recusal: Board Member Fred Jewell recused himself from this case.
  • Request: A variance from Section 6.1.2.B to encroach 20 feet into the 60-foot primary street setback for a new home.
  • Staff Recommendation: Denial. Staff argued the property could be developed without a variance and that a code-compliant alternative design exists, making the request a "mere inconvenience" rather than a hardship.
  • Applicant Position: Owners Bruce and Sylvia Bowen of 870 Edgewater Drive stated that a steep slope (20.75%), a culvert easement rendering 6,801 square feet unbuildable, and stormwater management requirements created a unique hardship. They noted similar encroachments exist within the neighborhood and that neighbors supported the project.
  • Board Discussion: The Board raised concerns about the impact on trees and stormwater management, requesting an arborist study.
  • Outcome: The Board voted unanimously to defer the case to the March 4, 2026 meeting to allow the applicant to address arborist and stormwater concerns. Staff was asked to address a letter of opposition regarding setback distinctions.

Case C: 2026-0004 V-25-60 – 4825 Franklin Pond Road (Nonconforming Structures)

  • Request: Variances from Sections 11.7.2.B.3 and 6.1.2.B to expand nonconforming structures in the 35-foot rear and 50-foot front setbacks.
  • Staff Recommendation: Approval. Planner II LaQuita Williams stated that stream buffers rendered approximately 95% of the lot unbuildable, creating an extraordinary hardship for the homeowners.
  • Applicant Position: Representative Den Webb, on behalf of homeowners Robbie and Adisa Duray Raj, requested approval, emphasizing the expansion was minimal (1.5 feet forward, 1.5-3 feet rear), stayed within the existing footprint, and provided a net reduction of impervious surface. Letters of support from neighbors were submitted.
  • Outcome: The Board voted unanimously to approve the variance with the condition that construction be substantially similar to the provided site plan.

Key Outcomes and New Business

  • Elections: Chair Sherri Allen and Vice Chair Justin Sparano were re-elected unanimously for the upcoming term.
  • Retreat: A joint retreat with the Planning Commission is scheduled for March 20, 2026. Board members expressed interest in inviting Mike Alexander from the Atlanta Regional Commission as a speaker.

Meeting Transcript

Calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order. Clerk Brown, would you please give us the roll call and general announcements? Thank you, Madam Chair. Excuse me. Good evening, Madam Chair, Board Vice Chair and Members of the Board of Appeals. Today is February the 4th, 2026. Please confirm your attendance as I call your name. Madam Chair Sherry Allen. Here. Vice Chair Justin Sperano. Here. Board Member Jason Bodwell. Board Member Fred Jewell. Here. Board Member Nathan Guntham. Board Member Susan Major. Here. Board Member Kim Gay. Here. Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes. Now I will read the announcements regarding the decorum and the procedures of the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals duty is to review and decide on appeals of the of the director's administrative decision or interpretation of the development code. Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or final plat without any dedication and variances from the standard of the development code. The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda. Following are some of the rules and procedures for this part of the meeting. The applicant and all those speaking in support of the application will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present the their petition. The applicant may choose to save some of the time for rebuttal following the presentation by the opposition. The opposition will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its position. Some of the burden since the burden of proof of since excuse me, since the burden approved is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks, provided time remained from the original allotted time. Staff will keep track of the time for both sides. Those called to speak with will be taken in the order that the public comment cards were reviewed or received by the planned and zoning clerk prior to the beginning of tonight's meeting. All speakers will be will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable organization before beginning their presentation. Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited. So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking. Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will expect to receive. The applicant shall not submit materials to the Board of Appeals during the meeting. All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduled meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. Can I get a motion for approval of today's meeting agenda? Motion. Second. All those in favor say aye. Unanimous approval of the meeting agenda. Can I get a motion for approval of the meeting minutes of the January 7th, 2026 Board of Appeals meeting? So moved. Second, anyone? Second. All those in favor say aye.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com