OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sandy Springs, Georgia/Board of Appeals
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Regular Meeting, March 4, 2026

Board of Appeals — Wednesday, March 4, 2026
BodySandy Springs, Georgia
SessionBoard of Appeals
DateWednesday, March 4, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 40:36

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:01

Calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order on March 4th at 6 o'clock PM.

0:11

Can you do the roll call and the general announcements?

0:14

Thank you,

Speaker 2

0:15

Chair.

0:16

Good evening, Madam Chair, Vice Chair, and members of the Board of Appeals.

0:20

Today is March 4th, 2026.

0:22

Please confirm your attendance as I call your name.

0:25

Madam Chair Sherry Allen.

0:27

Present.

0:27

Vice Chair Justin Sperano.

Speaker 3

0:29

Present.

Speaker 2

0:30

Board Member Jason Bodwell.

Unassigned speaker

0:32

Here.

Speaker 2

0:32

Board Member Nathan Guntham.

0:36

Board Member Susan Major.

0:38

Board Member Kim Gay.

0:40

Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes.

0:45

Now I will re read the announcements regarding the decorum and the procedures of the Board of Appeals.

Unassigned speaker

0:52

The

Speaker 2

0:52

Board of Appeals' duty is to review and decide on appeals of the director's administrative decision or interpretation of the development code.

1:00

Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or final plat without any dedication and variances from the standard of the development code.

1:10

The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda.

1:14

Following are some of the rules and procedures of the part of this part of the meeting.

1:18

The applicant and all those speaking in support of the application will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its petition.

1:25

The applicant may choose to say some of the of the rebuttal following the presentation by the opposition.

1:31

The opposition will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its position.

1:37

Since the burden of proof is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks, provided time remains from the original allotted time.

1:47

Staff will keep track of the time for both sides.

1:49

Those called to speak will be taken in the order that the public comment cards were received by the planet and zoning clerk prior to the beginning of tonight's meeting.

1:58

All speakers will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable, organization before beginning their presentation.

2:06

Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited.

2:10

So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking.

2:16

Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will expect to receive.

2:20

The applicant shall not submit materials to the Board of Appeals during the meeting.

2:25

All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduling meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board.

2:36

Thank you, Chair.

Speaker 1

2:37

Thank you.

2:38

Can I get a motion for approval of the meeting agenda?

2:42

So moved.

Speaker 3

2:46

Second.

Speaker 1

2:47

All those in favor say aye.

2:49

Aye.

2:50

Chair votes aye.

2:51

It's unanimous.

2:52

The meeting agenda is approved.

2:53

Can I get a motion for approval of the meeting minutes from February 4th, 2026?

3:01

I'll second.

3:02

All those in favor say aye.

3:04

Aye.

3:05

Chair votes aye.

3:06

It's unanimous.

3:06

The meeting minutes are approved.

3:08

This is a case that we deferred at our February meeting.

3:12

Um so that we could um the we had questions for the applicant questions questions for the department, and so we are re-hearing portions of it.

3:23

Um, I'm going to ask you as the applicant to make your presentation first, then the department can respond, and then you'll have time for rebuttal.

3:32

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

3:33

So

Speaker 1

3:33

if you'd come to the podium, state your name and your address.

Unassigned speaker

3:44

My

Speaker 4

3:44

name is Bruce Bowen.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████61%
Procedural████████████████22%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████13%
Environmental Protection███4%
Summary of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Regular Meeting, March 4, 2026

The Board of Appeals, chaired by Sherri Allen, held its regular meeting on Wednesday, March 4, 2026. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM. The primary agenda item was a continued public hearing for Variance Case V-25-53 regarding a proposed new home at 870 Edgewater Drive. The Board voted 4-1 to deny the variance and received announcements regarding a new member appointment and an upcoming retreat.

Consent Calendar

  • The meeting agenda for March 4, 2026, was approved unanimously.
  • The meeting minutes from February 4, 2026, were approved unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Support: None.
  • Opposition: Deborah Selbert of 990 Mountain Creek Trail submitted an emailed comment card in opposition, which was noted by staff for the record.

Discussion Items

Case V-25-53 – 870 Edgewater Drive: A request for a variance from Section 6.1.2.B to encroach into the 60-foot primary street setback by 20 feet for a new home.

  • Applicant's Position: Applicant Bruce Bowen argued that the lot presents an extraordinary hardship due to severe steepness in the rear of the lot, a culvert easement rendering over 6,800 square feet unbuildable, and the necessity of preserving large specimen trees (a 33-inch and a 20-inch DBH hardwood) from destruction by a required stormwater management tank. He stated the proposed house maintains the character of the neighborhood and cited several nearby homes with comparable encroachments.
  • Staff's Position: Planning & Zoning Manager Michele McIntosh-Ross recommended denial. Staff maintained that the lot's topography, while steep, is not unusually steep for the neighborhood and that the hardship is not extraordinary. Staff argued a conforming, decent-sized home can be built on the site with an alternative design, distinguishing the request as a mere inconvenience rather than a legal hardship. Prior approved variances in the area were characterized by stream buffer protections, a condition not present on this lot.
  • Board Deliberation: Chair Sherri Allen emphasized that the Board's decisions are strictly governed by the Development Code, which requires an extraordinary hardship for a variance, not a mere inconvenience. Board Member Susan Maziar stated her opposition, noting that the Development Code, which she helped update over two years, prohibits new non-conforming structures and that the applicant could reduce the encroachment by 10 feet by eliminating the proposed golf cart parking garage. Board Member Nathan Kongthum inquired about the design implications of eliminating the garage. Vice Chair Justin Sparano asked staff to clarify the differences in topography between the subject property and the river-front parcels which had steeper slopes. Board Member Jason Bodwell sought technical clarification on how the existing culvert functions compared to the proposed stormwater management tank.

Key Outcomes

  • Vote on Variance V-25-53: A motion to deny the variance with staff recommendations was made by Board Member Susan Maziar and seconded by Vice Chair Justin Sparano. The motion passed by a vote of 4-1. Voting in favor of denial: Vice Chair Justin Sparano, Board Member Susan Maziar, Board Member Jason Bodwell, and Board Member Kim Gay. Board Member Nathan Kongthum voted against the motion.
  • Appointment and Retreat: Planning & Zoning Manager McIntosh-Ross announced that Jeff Howe was appointed by the Mayor and City Council on March 3, 2026, to replace outgoing Board Member Fred Jewell. The 2026 Board of Appeals/Planning Commission Retreat was scheduled for Friday, March 20, 2026, from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM at Sandy Springs City Hall.

Notes on Source Materials

The raw meeting transcript contains an apparent discrepancy in the staff presentation, reporting the subject lot's slope as 70% in one portion and as 20% in another. The approved meeting minutes characterize the topography only as 'steep but not unusually steep' and note the parcel is 'relatively less steep than several other parcels in the neighborhood.' This summary relies on the formal minutes for the official narrative of staff findings.

Meeting Transcript

Calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order on March 4th at 6 o'clock PM. Can you do the roll call and the general announcements? Thank you, Chair. Good evening, Madam Chair, Vice Chair, and members of the Board of Appeals. Today is March 4th, 2026. Please confirm your attendance as I call your name. Madam Chair Sherry Allen. Present. Vice Chair Justin Sperano. Present. Board Member Jason Bodwell. Here. Board Member Nathan Guntham. Board Member Susan Major. Board Member Kim Gay. Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes. Now I will re read the announcements regarding the decorum and the procedures of the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals' duty is to review and decide on appeals of the director's administrative decision or interpretation of the development code. Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or final plat without any dedication and variances from the standard of the development code. The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda. Following are some of the rules and procedures of the part of this part of the meeting. The applicant and all those speaking in support of the application will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its petition. The applicant may choose to say some of the of the rebuttal following the presentation by the opposition. The opposition will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its position. Since the burden of proof is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks, provided time remains from the original allotted time. Staff will keep track of the time for both sides. Those called to speak will be taken in the order that the public comment cards were received by the planet and zoning clerk prior to the beginning of tonight's meeting. All speakers will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable, organization before beginning their presentation. Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited. So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking. Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will expect to receive. The applicant shall not submit materials to the Board of Appeals during the meeting. All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduling meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. Can I get a motion for approval of the meeting agenda? So moved. Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Chair votes aye. It's unanimous. The meeting agenda is approved. Can I get a motion for approval of the meeting minutes from February 4th, 2026? I'll second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Chair votes aye.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com