OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sandy Springs, Georgia/Board of Appeals
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Meeting: June 3, 2026

Board of Appeals — Wednesday, June 3, 2026
BodySandy Springs, Georgia
SessionBoard of Appeals
DateWednesday, June 3, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 49:17

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:05

We're calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order on Wednesday, June 3rd, 2026 at 6 o'clock PM.

0:16

Clerk Brown, will you please um do the roll call?

Speaker 2

0:21

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Unassigned speaker

0:23

Good

Speaker 2

0:23

evening, Madam Chair, Vice Chair, and members of the Board of Appeals.

0:27

Today is June the 3rd, 2026.

0:31

Please confirm your attendance as I call your name.

0:34

Madam Chair Sherry Allen.

0:35

Here.

0:36

Vice Chair Justin Sperano.

Speaker 3

0:38

Here.

Speaker 2

0:38

Board Member Jason Bodwell.

Speaker 3

0:40

Here.

Speaker 2

0:40

Board Member Jeff Howe.

Speaker 3

0:42

Here.

Speaker 2

0:42

Board Member Nathan Gontham.

0:44

Absent.

0:45

Board Member Susan Major.

Speaker 4

0:46

Here.

Speaker 2

0:47

Board Member Kim Gay.

0:49

Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes.

0:54

Now I will read the announcements regarding the decorum and procedures of the Board of Appeals meeting.

1:04

The Board of Appeals duty is to review and decide on appeals of the director's administrative decision or interpretation of the development code.

1:14

Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or a final plat without any dedication and variances from the standard of the development code.

1:24

The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda.

1:28

Following are some of the rules and procedures for this part of the meeting.

1:33

The applicant and all those speaking in support of the application will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present their petition.

1:40

The applicant may choose to say some of the time for rebuttal following the present the presentation by the opposition.

1:47

The opposition will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its position.

1:53

Since the burden of proof is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks provided time remained from the original allotted time.

2:02

Staff will keep track of the time for both sides.

2:05

The I'm sorry, those called to speak will be taken in the order that the public comment cards were received by the planet and zoning clerk prior to to the beginning of tonight's meeting.

2:17

All speakers will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable, organization before beginning their presentation.

2:25

Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited.

2:28

So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outboard outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking.

2:36

Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will expect to receive.

2:41

The applicant shall shall not submit materials to the board of appeals during the meeting.

2:47

All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduled meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board.

2:58

Thank you, madam chair.

3:00

Thank you, Clerk Brown.

3:02

Can

Speaker 1

3:02

I get a motion for approval of the meeting agenda?

Speaker 5

3:06

I make a motion to approve the meeting agenda of June 3rd, 2026.

Speaker 1

3:11

And before we approve the minutes of the meeting of April 8th, 2026, um, I have a correction, and if there are any other corrections, um, the plenary and zoning and number six, um manager is spelled incorrectly for the first sentence.

3:28

And just to correct that to say manager instead of major.

Speaker 6

3:35

Any other corrections?

Speaker 1

3:37

It's just a typo

Unassigned speaker

3:38

there.

Speaker 1

3:39

If not, can I get a motion to approve the meeting minutes of April 8th, 2026?

3:46

So move.

3:47

Is there a second?

Speaker 5

3:49

Second.

Speaker 1

3:50

All those in favor say

Unassigned speaker

3:52

I

Speaker 1

3:52

don't think I said all those in favor say aye for approving the meeting agenda.

Speaker 2

3:56

I was just about

Speaker 1

3:56

to let you know.

3:57

Let's go back to that.

3:59

All those in favor say aye for approving the meeting agenda.

4:02

All right.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████59%
Miscellaneous█████████████17%
Procedural███████████14%
Environmental Protection█████6%
Public Safety██2%
Engineering And Infrastructure██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Meeting: June 3, 2026

The Sandy Springs Board of Appeals met on Wednesday, June 3, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the Studio Theatre at City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Chair Sherri Allen. Present were Vice Chair Justin Sparano, Board Members Jason Bodwell, Jeffrey Howe, Kimberly Gay, and Susan Maziar. Board Member Nathan Kongthum was absent and noted as having a conflict of interest on the main variance case. The board addressed a single variance request for a property at 6565 Williamson Drive after a separate item was postponed.

Consent Calendar

  • The Board unanimously approved the June 3, 2026 meeting agenda.
  • The Board unanimously approved the April 8, 2026 meeting minutes, with a correction to the spelling of "manager" in the text.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Applicant's Presentation: Janice McConnell of Georgia ADU presented on behalf of property owners Sonia and Dwayne Tolson. The request sought a variance to build a 490-square-foot, two-story accessory dwelling unit (ADU) to house their daughter, grandson, and eventually an aging parent. Ms. McConnell argued that the property's unique physical characteristics—a stream corridor, 75-foot impervious surface setback, and slopes approaching 39%—created an extreme hardship, making the proposed location the only buildable area on the site. She emphasized that the city's staff recommended approval, finding that "there is effectively no location on the property that is buildable without a variance."
  • Opposition Testimony: Five neighbors spoke in opposition.
    • Neil Cohen (705 Glengate Place) stated absolute opposition, arguing the hardship was based on personal convenience, not legal hardship, and that the 24-foot tall structure would introduce light and noise pollution.
    • Susan Kiyak (6497 Cherry Tree Lane) expressed concern that the staff report lacked evidence such as a study of alternatives, stormwater analysis, or hydrology report. She argued the application misapplied code section 7.8.24, which covers less intensive structures like pool houses, not habitable ADUs.
    • Laura Spence (6497 Cherry Tree Lane) argued the stream is a common feature in the Mount Vernon Woods neighborhood, not a unique hardship. Many homes have coexisted with these natural features for decades.
    • Paul Pleasick (650 Carriage Drive) cited a lack of information on septic system evaluations, environmental impact, and mitigation measures. He asked the board to deny the request due to insufficient proof of environmental protection.
    • Sam Brit (6585 Williamson Drive, appearing virtually), the direct next-door neighbor, raised safety concerns about trees falling near the stream (one caused a power line fire in 2024). He argued that the ADU would face his garage, eliminating privacy and creating a line of sight into his living room and backyard. He reiterated that the existence of a primary dwelling on the property meant no extreme hardship existed.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation: LaQuita Williams, Planner II, presented staff's recommendation for approval with conditions. She detailed the required variances: encroachment into the 20-foot side street setback, 35-foot rear setback, 75-foot impervious surface setback, and exceeding the 15-foot height limit.
  • Board Deliberation: The Board discussed the application, noting neighbor concerns and the lack of certain engineering studies. Chair Allen noted that the Chief Environmental Compliance Officer had not provided a comment on the stream buffer impacts. Board members asked the applicant about alternative locations, height reduction, septic and sewer connectivity challenges. The applicant stated they were amenable to reducing the height from 24 to 20 feet and adding a vegetative buffer to address neighbor privacy concerns.

Key Outcomes

  • Vote on Case V-26-19 (6565 Williamson Drive): A motion was made by Vice Chair Justin Sparano to approve the variance with three conditions:
    1. The structure does not exceed 20 feet in height.
    2. The construction is substantially similar to the provided site plan.
    3. A vegetative buffer is added along the property boundary.
  • The motion was seconded and passed on a voice vote. Chair Sherri Allen voted in opposition. The variance is therefore approved with the specified conditions.
  • Next Meeting: The Board noted there is no meeting in July 2026 due to the Independence Day holiday. The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 2026.

Meeting Transcript

We're calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order on Wednesday, June 3rd, 2026 at 6 o'clock PM. Clerk Brown, will you please um do the roll call? Thank you, Madam Chair. Good evening, Madam Chair, Vice Chair, and members of the Board of Appeals. Today is June the 3rd, 2026. Please confirm your attendance as I call your name. Madam Chair Sherry Allen. Here. Vice Chair Justin Sperano. Here. Board Member Jason Bodwell. Here. Board Member Jeff Howe. Here. Board Member Nathan Gontham. Absent. Board Member Susan Major. Here. Board Member Kim Gay. Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes. Now I will read the announcements regarding the decorum and procedures of the Board of Appeals meeting. The Board of Appeals duty is to review and decide on appeals of the director's administrative decision or interpretation of the development code. Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or a final plat without any dedication and variances from the standard of the development code. The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda. Following are some of the rules and procedures for this part of the meeting. The applicant and all those speaking in support of the application will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present their petition. The applicant may choose to say some of the time for rebuttal following the present the presentation by the opposition. The opposition will be allowed a total of 10 minutes to present its position. Since the burden of proof is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks provided time remained from the original allotted time. Staff will keep track of the time for both sides. The I'm sorry, those called to speak will be taken in the order that the public comment cards were received by the planet and zoning clerk prior to to the beginning of tonight's meeting. All speakers will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable, organization before beginning their presentation. Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited. So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outboard outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking. Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will expect to receive. The applicant shall shall not submit materials to the board of appeals during the meeting. All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduled meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board. Thank you, madam chair. Thank you, Clerk Brown. Can I get a motion for approval of the meeting agenda? I make a motion to approve the meeting agenda of June 3rd, 2026. And before we approve the minutes of the meeting of April 8th, 2026, um, I have a correction, and if there are any other corrections, um, the plenary and zoning and number six, um manager is spelled incorrectly for the first sentence. And just to correct that to say manager instead of major. Any other corrections? It's just a typo there. If not, can I get a motion to approve the meeting minutes of April 8th, 2026? So move.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com