OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sandy Springs, Georgia/Board of Appeals
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Meeting Summary - August 5, 2026

Board of Appeals — Wednesday, August 5, 2026
BodySandy Springs, Georgia
SessionBoard of Appeals
DateWednesday, August 5, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 51:36

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:14

Good evening.

0:14

We're calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order on Wednesday, August 5th, 2026 at 6 o'clock p.m.

Unassigned speaker

0:24

Can

Speaker 1

0:24

you do the roll call, please, Madam

Speaker 2

0:26

Clerk?

0:28

Thank you, Madam Chair.

0:29

Good evening, Madam Chair, Vice Chair, and members of the Board of Appeals.

0:33

Today is August the 5th, 2026.

0:36

Please confirm your attendance as I call your name.

0:39

Madam Chair Sherry Allen.

0:41

Present.

0:41

Vice Chair Justice Sperano.

Speaker 3

0:43

Present.

Speaker 2

0:44

Board Member Jason Bodwell.

Unassigned speaker

0:45

Here.

Speaker 2

0:46

Board Member Jeff Howe.

0:47

Present.

0:48

Board Member Nathan Guntham.

Speaker 4

0:50

Here.

Speaker 2

0:50

Board Member Susan Major.

Speaker 4

0:52

Here.

Speaker 2

0:52

Board Member Kim Gay.

0:54

Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes.

0:59

Now I will read the announcements regarding the decorum and the procedures of the Board of Appeals.

Unassigned speaker

1:06

The

Speaker 2

1:06

Board of Appeals' duty is to review and decide on appeals of the director's administrative decision on interpretation of the development code.

1:15

Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or final plat without any dedication and variances from the stunt the standards of the development code.

1:26

The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda.

1:31

Following are some of the rules and procedures for this part of the meeting.

1:55

Since the burden approved is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks, provided time remain from the original allotted time.

2:05

Staff will keep track of the time for both sides.

2:08

Those called to speak will be taken in the order that the public coming cards were received by the planning and zoning clerk prior to the beginning of tonight's meeting.

2:18

All speakers will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable, organization before beginning their presentation.

2:26

Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited.

2:30

So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking.

2:37

Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will will expect to receive.

2:42

The applicant shall not submit materials to the board of appeals during the meeting.

2:47

All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduled meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board.

2:59

Thank you, Chair.

Speaker 1

3:01

Thank you.

3:02

Before we take a motion for approval of the agenda, I'm um been told that the agenda has been amended with regard to the cases.

3:11

Yes, is that correct?

3:12

Yes, ma'am.

3:13

And what case has been removed?

Unassigned speaker

3:17

Um

Speaker 2

3:17

the case that's gonna be moved to um the September Board of Appeals meeting is V 214 uh-414805 jet road.

3:28

This is a request for a variance from section 7.8.24 to allow residential accessory structure in the 60-foot primary setback.

3:38

This is on administrative hold and move to the September's Board of Appeals meeting.

Speaker 1

3:45

And is the 46 V 269 moving forward as

Unassigned speaker

3:50

well?

Speaker 2

3:52

That's gonna be moved.

3:53

Well, hold on.

3:54

Oh god.

Speaker 5

3:54

Didn't just speak with you?

3:56

No.

Speaker 6

3:56

Is that the Mount Perrin Road?

3:58

Yes.

3:59

So um I just had a conversation with the applicant about an hour ago, and they had additional information that I believe was pertinent to their application.

4:11

Um they wanted to present it at the meeting tonight, which I told them was not appropriate.

4:19

So we agreed that we would put it on administrative hold so that staff can have the time to review the material and perhaps as a result of that review amend their staff report.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████68%
Procedural█████████14%
Water And Wastewater Management████████12%
Parks and Recreation██3%
Miscellaneous██3%
Summary of Proceedings

Sandy Springs Board of Appeals Meeting Summary - August 5, 2026

The Sandy Springs Board of Appeals held a regular meeting on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Studio Theatre at City Hall. The agenda was amended to remove two cases: case A (4630 Mount Paran Parkway, placed on administrative hold) and case C (4805 Jett Road, moved to the September meeting). The board then heard two remaining variance requests: one for a stream buffer variance at 520 Elden Drive (approved unanimously) and one for a sport court variance at 116 Hardeman Road (deferred to allow further neighbor outreach).

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Amended Agenda: Unanimous vote to approve the agenda as amended (removing cases A and C).
  • Approval of June 3, 2026 Minutes: Unanimous approval with a second from Board Member Jason Bodwell.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Case B (520 Elden Drive): Applicant Peter McMaster (Theory Homes) spoke in support, noting the proposed porch and deck would be on stilts, reducing ground disturbance. No opposition was voiced.
  • Case D (116 Hardeman Road):
    • Applicant Alex Brock (land use attorney) argued for approval, citing the homeowner's son's medical need for exercise, the sport court's year-long use without neighbor complaints, and willingness to mitigate stormwater and install screening. He requested a deferral to work with the nearby Cloysters Condominium Association.
    • Opponent Elizabeth Feit (president of the Cloysters Condominium Association) expressed concerns about increased stormwater runoff from additional impervious surface (raising lot coverage from 35% to 44.3%), lack of notice to her HOA, and the precedent of building without permits. She requested denial or, if approved, strict conditions on stormwater management.

Discussion Items

  • Case B (V-26-33, 520 Elden Drive): Staff (LaQuita Williams) recommended approval with a condition that construction be substantially similar to the provided site plan. The applicant confirmed no trees would be removed. Board members asked clarifying questions about tree preservation. The board unanimously approved the variance for a new deck, porch, and home addition to encroach into the 75-foot impervious surface setback and 50-foot undisturbed stream buffer.
  • Case D (V-26-43, 116 Hardeman Road): Staff recommended denial because the unpermitted sport court (built in 2025) encroaches four feet from property lines (required 10-foot setback) and increases lot coverage to 44.3% (max 35%, previously 40% with pool mitigation). The applicant proposed additional conditions: offsetting impervious area with pervious pavers on the front driveway and installing mitigation measures (evergreen screening, netting, swale repair) as negotiated with a neighbor. The board discussed the location of the Cloysters Condominium Association downhill to the north and expressed willingness to defer to allow applicant to address their concerns. The board granted a deferral (unanimous) to a future meeting, allowing the applicant to work with the association and staff on stormwater solutions.

Key Outcomes

  • Case B Approved (unanimous): Variance granted for 520 Elden Drive to allow a new deck, porch, and home addition to encroach into stream buffers, conditioned on construction being substantially similar to the approved site plan.
  • Case D Deferred (unanimous): Variance request for 116 Hardeman Road deferred to a future meeting (likely 60 days, exact date not specified) to allow additional neighbor outreach and stormwater mitigation design. The public hearing will be reopened if needed.
  • Upcoming Engagement: Staff promoted the city's comprehensive plan and recreation and parks master plan ("Plan the Next Chapter") with public meetings on August 17 and 20, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. We're calling the Sandy Springs Board of Appeals meeting to order on Wednesday, August 5th, 2026 at 6 o'clock p.m. Can you do the roll call, please, Madam Clerk? Thank you, Madam Chair. Good evening, Madam Chair, Vice Chair, and members of the Board of Appeals. Today is August the 5th, 2026. Please confirm your attendance as I call your name. Madam Chair Sherry Allen. Present. Vice Chair Justice Sperano. Present. Board Member Jason Bodwell. Here. Board Member Jeff Howe. Present. Board Member Nathan Guntham. Here. Board Member Susan Major. Here. Board Member Kim Gay. Your attendance have been confirmed and will be included in the official meeting minutes. Now I will read the announcements regarding the decorum and the procedures of the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals' duty is to review and decide on appeals of the director's administrative decision on interpretation of the development code. Appeals regarding approval or denial of a preliminary or final plat without any dedication and variances from the stunt the standards of the development code. The petition will be heard in the sequence listed on the posted agenda. Following are some of the rules and procedures for this part of the meeting. Since the burden approved is upon the applicant, the applicant will be allowed to make closing remarks, provided time remain from the original allotted time. Staff will keep track of the time for both sides. Those called to speak will be taken in the order that the public coming cards were received by the planning and zoning clerk prior to the beginning of tonight's meeting. All speakers will identify themselves by name, address, and if applicable, organization before beginning their presentation. Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited. So please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outburst, or dialogue when the person is speaking. Please show the same respect to the person speaking that you will will expect to receive. The applicant shall not submit materials to the board of appeals during the meeting. All materials should be submitted to the community development department at least 21 days prior to the scheduled meeting for inclusion in the normal distribution of packaging to the board. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. Before we take a motion for approval of the agenda, I'm um been told that the agenda has been amended with regard to the cases. Yes, is that correct? Yes, ma'am. And what case has been removed? Um the case that's gonna be moved to um the September Board of Appeals meeting is V 214 uh-414805 jet road. This is a request for a variance from section 7.8.24 to allow residential accessory structure in the 60-foot primary setback. This is on administrative hold and move to the September's Board of Appeals meeting. And is the 46 V 269 moving forward as well?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com