OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Sandy Springs, Georgia/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sandy Springs City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting - September 15, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodySandy Springs, Georgia
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:00:43

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:12

The time for convening has arrived, so we'll start this evening series of meetings.

0:16

We'll start with our work session, and the first item on the work session agenda is an update on the next chapter.

Unassigned speaker

0:23

This

Speaker 1

0:23

Macintosh Ross.

Speaker 2

0:29

Yes, thank you, and good evening, Mayor and City Council.

0:32

I'm here to um introduce our consultant firm who will be giving you an update on our next chapter, our comprehensive plan and recreation and parks master plan.

0:41

So I'd like to introduce Security Gauche with RHI and also Carlos Perez from Perez Planning and Design will also be up here to update you.

0:50

So I'll introduce security.

Speaker 1

0:52

Thank

Speaker 3

0:53

you.

Speaker 1

0:53

Welcome

Unassigned speaker

0:54

back.

Speaker 3

0:56

Thank

Unassigned speaker

0:56

you.

Unassigned speaker

0:58

Good

Speaker 3

0:58

evening, Mayor and Council members.

1:00

Thank you for the opportunity.

1:01

My name is Security Ghosh with RHI.

1:04

We are working with the city on the comprehensive plan and the recreation in the Parks Master Plan.

1:09

Today we are going to give you a brief update on the project progress, starting with the schedule, give you a heads up on what has been going on in the last couple of months with regards to the community engagement, and we'll dive a little bit deep into some of the focused topics that we have been hearing from the community in the last couple of months.

1:29

And then we'll share with you some next steps.

1:31

So where we are right now is smack in the middle of the community engagement process.

1:37

The top bar you see in this slide are all of the leadership meetings.

1:41

We are in the workshop session number three with you all.

1:44

We'll be giving the same kind of presentation to the planning commission members tomorrow night.

1:49

We also have a four-hour workshop session with the advisory committee tomorrow from 12 to 4.

1:55

And then we have the next meeting, the next public meeting is going to be October 29th.

2:01

So we are right in the middle

Unassigned speaker

2:02

of

Speaker 3

2:03

the community engagement process.

2:05

So we just had public meeting number two, and it was divided into two meetings.

2:09

One was for the South Side, and we had that at on August 17th at Church of the Redeemer, and then on August 20th, 2026,

Unassigned speaker

2:20

at

Speaker 3

2:20

the North End at the city's municipal complex.

2:23

Same kind of content, different groups.

2:26

We had a great participation in those, and I'll share with you some numbers pretty soon.

2:30

We also have been meeting with a lot of folks out there with events and pop-ups.

2:37

So we had representation on the national night out, the regular farmers market, the movies by the moonlight, and all of the events that you have in the Sandy Springs community.

2:48

We are representing the next chapter in those.

2:55

One is the conjoint survey for the comprehensive plan, and the other one is the recreation of the parks master plan survey.

3:01

On the conjoint survey, as I mentioned before to you in the last meeting, phenomenal response.

3:06

As you can see the numbers here, on the there's two parts to the conjoint survey.

3:11

One was the closed part, which was the conjoint portion, which is the statistically valid portion of the survey, and then it was open to the community for their feedback.

3:20

And we also had feedback from the community, and that survey closed uh September 9th.

3:26

The one thing that you can see on the top right is the 6.5% response rate.

3:31

That is actually really, really good because for planning purposes in this kind of studies, we generally see four and four to four and a half percent response rate.

3:42

So overall, the community has been very responsive, and we went out to the community with emails, texts, postcards, phones, social media, and the city's communication department did everything in their power to spread the word out, and that was the reason for getting so much good feedback from the community.

4:02

While we are analyzing the conjoint survey, I wanted to share with you a few highlights that we have been hearing from the conjoint, especially the closed version of

Unassigned speaker

4:12

it.

Unassigned speaker

4:13

So

Speaker 3

4:13

the residents are generally happy with the life of Sandy Springs.

4:16

Uh quality of life was one of the top priorities that people mentioned, nine of ten.

4:23

Uh, we are better than other communities.

4:26

Uh folks mentioned nine of ten, headed in the right direction.

4:30

75% of the folks mentioned we are headed in the right direction.

4:34

And it's usually 55 to 65 percent response or that kind of a response in that kind of uh um

Unassigned speaker

4:42

uh

Speaker 3

4:42

question.

4:43

Um so that's really great.

4:45

Uh community safety also came up really highly, and residents shared their they feel very safe in the community, whether it's the daytime or the evening time.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Community Engagement██████████████████████████████30%
Public Engagement████████████████16%
Procedural██████████████14%
Public Safety█████████████13%
Affordable Housing█████████9%
Parks and Recreation███████7%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Transportation Safety███3%
Pending Litigation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Sandy Springs City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting - September 15, 2026

The Sandy Springs City Council convened for a work session at 6:00 PM on September 15, 2026, followed by a regular meeting. The work session featured an update on "The Next Chapter" comprehensive plan and recreation and parks master plan. The regular meeting included public comments, approval of consent agenda, three public hearings (Holy Innocence Episcopal School special event permit appeal, Nubia Cafe business license revocation, CDBG CAPER), and a new business item (landscaping contract extension). The meeting concluded with an executive session for real estate and litigation.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent agenda was approved unanimously by a voice vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Stephen Feldman, President of Grogan's Bluff Home Association, speaking on behalf of 156 homeowners and a coalition of HOAs, opposed the current design of trail segment 2C, citing public safety, security, traffic, and quality of life concerns. He requested the city work with the neighborhood to realign the trail before further funding or construction.
  • Vladimir Spolovsky, a resident, urged the council to improve pedestrian safety along Roswell Road, referencing a recent near-miss crash. He requested additional protective measures such as guardrails and continuous sidewalks, and noted that the T0019 project is set to start accepting bids in mid-October and begin construction in February 2027.

Work Session: Update on The Next Chapter (Comprehensive Plan and Recreation & Parks Master Plan)

Michele McIntosh-Ross, Sukirti Ghosh (RHI), and Carlos Perez (Perez Planning and Design) presented an update on the city's comprehensive plan and recreation and parks master plan, currently in the community engagement phase.

Engagement and Survey Results:

  • The comprehensive plan conjoint survey closed September 9, 2026, with a 6.5% response rate (above the typical 4–4.5%).
  • The recreation and parks statistically valid mailed survey achieved a 95% confidence level with a ±5.5% margin of error.
  • Park visitation: 90% of respondents visit city parks (above national average of 81%).
  • 75% of respondents believe Sandy Springs is headed in the right direction (above typical 55–65%).
  • 93% said recreation and parks enhance quality of life.
  • 62% of respondents indicated willingness to pay $76–$100 annually in increased taxes for a potential parks bond (cumulative, including those willing to pay lower amounts).

Community Priorities:

  • Top development priorities: public safety, tree canopy, homeownership opportunities, walkability to gathering places.
  • Housing: Support for "missing middle" housing (townhomes, duplexes, multiplexes, cottage courts) and preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing; resistance to both very dense multifamily and very large lot single-family.
  • Walkability: Desire for safer connections between City Springs, Perimeter Center, Chattahoochee River, Chastain Park; filling sidewalk gaps, improving Roswell Road.
  • Tree canopy: Strong support for protecting existing canopy and restoring in commercial areas; potential tree ordinance updates.
  • River access: Top three priorities: riverfront trails/boardwalks, walking/biking to river, increased public access to inaccessible riverfront.

Next Steps:

  • Public Meeting No. 3 scheduled for October 29, 2026, 6–8 PM at City Hall.
  • Planning Commission and Advisory Committee working session on September 19, 2026.
  • Policy framework drafting to begin after community input review.
  • Council to receive full survey results, community scenarios, and stakeholder feedback in approximately two months.

Council Discussion:

  • Councilmember Mular asked about the "Sandy Springs Today" assessment and maintaining focus on neighborhood character. Ghosh confirmed it is under development and that neighborhood character remains a priority.
  • Councilmember Kelley requested separate stakeholder meeting summaries and asked about engagement with age-restricted housing developers. Ghosh will follow up.
  • Councilmember Ford asked about Fulton County Schools participation (confirmed), email subscriber numbers (to be provided), and demographic representation of public meetings (primarily homeowners; proactive outreach to renters ongoing).
  • Councilmember Chinsky requested access to full survey data with demographic and geographic breakdowns, and suggested paid canvassers for apartment outreach. He also asked for detailed breakdown of tax increase support levels.
  • Councilmember Paulson asked when policy recommendations would come to council; Ghosh indicated the next meeting.

Public Hearing: Holy Innocence Episcopal School Special Event Permit (Appeal)

The school appealed the city manager's denial of a special event permit for temporary lighting during the homecoming football game on October 2, 2026. The school's conditional use permit (2009) prohibits field lighting.

  • Applicant's Position: Headmaster Paul Barton and supporters (board chair, student, parents) argued that last year's one-time approval was successful, with no traffic or light issues. They acknowledged noise concerns and proposed mitigation measures (redirected speakers, lower volume). They requested approval for a single night.
  • Opposition: Speakers (Kirk Halpern, Steve Leeds, Paul Plestig, Rhonda Smith) raised concerns about precedent, bypassing the conditional use permit process, and the use of special event permits to circumvent zoning conditions. Halpern noted noise was the only issue and expressed willingness to work toward a long-term agreement.
  • Council Discussion: Councilmembers debated the precedent and process. Some noted no opposition from neighbors in District 6. Mayor Paul offered to approve if the school accepted no amplified sound; the school could not commit due to operational needs (announcements, homecoming court).
  • Vote: Motion to approve (by Councilmember Chinsky, seconded by Councilmember Ford) passed. The mayor voted no. (Voice vote: ayes appeared to outnumber nays.)

Public Hearing: Revocation of Business License – Nubia Cafe (Neptune General LLC)

The city sought revocation of the business occupational tax certificate for Nubia Cafe after a shooting in the parking lot at 5:40 AM on August 15, 2026. Police found evidence of alcohol sales without a license, including witness statements, a ledger, and receipts. The business argued no alcohol was found on premises and that the shooting occurred outside their control.

  • Council Action: Motion to approve revocation (by Councilmember Paulson, seconded by Councilmember Roberts) passed unanimously. The license is revoked, and the business cannot reapply for at least one year.

Public Hearing: CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER)

The city presented the required annual report for the 2025 Community Development Block Grant allocation of $485,216. Funds supported sidewalk projects on South Roswell Road, Northwood Drive, Long Island Drive, and Hope Road. A public hearing was held on September 1, 2026, with no comments. The report was approved unanimously.

New Business: Extension of Landscaping Contract with Rupert Landscape LLC

The council approved a 90-day extension (through December 2026) at a cost not to exceed $53,307 to allow time to complete a competitive procurement process for a new landscaping contract. The extension was approved unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • Holy Innocence Special Event Permit: Approved for one night (October 2, 2026) with conditions to mitigate noise.
  • Nubia Cafe Business License: Revoked.
  • CDBG CAPER: Approved.
  • Rupert Landscaping Extension: Approved.
  • Executive Session: Council moved into closed session for real estate and litigation matters.
  • Next Public Meeting (The Next Chapter): October 29, 2026, 6–8 PM at City Hall.
  • Next Council Update on Comprehensive Plan: Approximately two months from September 15, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

The time for convening has arrived, so we'll start this evening series of meetings. We'll start with our work session, and the first item on the work session agenda is an update on the next chapter. This Macintosh Ross. Yes, thank you, and good evening, Mayor and City Council. I'm here to um introduce our consultant firm who will be giving you an update on our next chapter, our comprehensive plan and recreation and parks master plan. So I'd like to introduce Security Gauche with RHI and also Carlos Perez from Perez Planning and Design will also be up here to update you. So I'll introduce security. Thank you. Welcome back. Thank you. Good evening, Mayor and Council members. Thank you for the opportunity. My name is Security Ghosh with RHI. We are working with the city on the comprehensive plan and the recreation in the Parks Master Plan. Today we are going to give you a brief update on the project progress, starting with the schedule, give you a heads up on what has been going on in the last couple of months with regards to the community engagement, and we'll dive a little bit deep into some of the focused topics that we have been hearing from the community in the last couple of months. And then we'll share with you some next steps. So where we are right now is smack in the middle of the community engagement process. The top bar you see in this slide are all of the leadership meetings. We are in the workshop session number three with you all. We'll be giving the same kind of presentation to the planning commission members tomorrow night. We also have a four-hour workshop session with the advisory committee tomorrow from 12 to 4. And then we have the next meeting, the next public meeting is going to be October 29th. So we are right in the middle of the community engagement process. So we just had public meeting number two, and it was divided into two meetings. One was for the South Side, and we had that at on August 17th at Church of the Redeemer, and then on August 20th, 2026, at the North End at the city's municipal complex. Same kind of content, different groups. We had a great participation in those, and I'll share with you some numbers pretty soon. We also have been meeting with a lot of folks out there with events and pop-ups. So we had representation on the national night out, the regular farmers market, the movies by the moonlight, and all of the events that you have in the Sandy Springs community. We are representing the next chapter in those. One is the conjoint survey for the comprehensive plan, and the other one is the recreation of the parks master plan survey. On the conjoint survey, as I mentioned before to you in the last meeting, phenomenal response. As you can see the numbers here, on the there's two parts to the conjoint survey. One was the closed part, which was the conjoint portion, which is the statistically valid portion of the survey, and then it was open to the community for their feedback. And we also had feedback from the community, and that survey closed uh September 9th. The one thing that you can see on the top right is the 6.5% response rate. That is actually really, really good because for planning purposes in this kind of studies, we generally see four and four to four and a half percent response rate. So overall, the community has been very responsive, and we went out to the community with emails, texts, postcards, phones, social media, and the city's communication department did everything in their power to spread the word out, and that was the reason for getting so much good feedback from the community. While we are analyzing the conjoint survey, I wanted to share with you a few highlights that we have been hearing from the conjoint, especially the closed version of it. So

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com