San Francisco Board of Supervisors Special Meeting on Police Staffing Charter Amendment – July 23, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San Francisco Board of Supervisors Special Meeting – July 23, 2024
The Board of Supervisors held a special meeting on July 23, 2024, to consider a motion to call from the Rules Committee a proposed charter amendment (File No. 240544) related to police staffing and a voluntary deferred retirement option program, and to modify the submission timeline under Board Rule 2.22.7. The meeting included debate on the committee process, public testimony, and two votes on the motion.
Public Comments & Testimony
- A member of the public spoke in strong opposition to the charter amendment, characterizing it as a "ripoff by the cops" and claiming that officers and sergeants would receive approximately $300,000 per year for five years. The speaker accused the board of prioritizing police interests over public welfare and urged voters to reject the measure if placed on the ballot.
- Leah McGeeber (District 6 resident) criticized the board for focusing on police funding instead of addressing high maternal mortality rates among Black women and the cancellation of a monthly stipend program for homeless transgender individuals. She argued the board was driven by fear of losing power and had failed to defend data-backed social programs against conservative opposition.
Discussion Items
- Motion to Call from Committee: The sole item was a motion to call the charter amendment from the Rules Committee and adjust the submission deadline. Supervisor Ronin, who had resigned as Rules Committee chair, explained her opposition, stating that after in-depth review with the Controller’s Office, Retirement, and Human Resources, she concluded the proposal was a mistaken policy that would be unpopular. She argued the committee structure is vital for thorough review and that the maneuver bypassed proper process. President Peskin countered that there is a long pattern of bringing ballot measures to the full board for deliberation, even after committee amendments. Supervisor Chan supported the motion, citing Board Rule provisions and noting that chairs could have tabled the item to prevent this situation. Supervisor Preston opposed the motion, thanking Supervisor Ronin for her committee work.
- City Attorney Inquiry: Deputy City Attorney Ann Pearson confirmed that a previous tabling of the item might have made it harder to bring back, but she could not be certain. Supervisor Ronin maintained that the rules were being circumvented.
- Rescission and Second Vote: After public comment, Supervisor Mandelman moved to rescind the earlier vote, seconded by Supervisor Stephanie. Without objection, the previous vote was rescinded, and the board proceeded to a second roll-call vote on the same motion.
Key Outcomes
- The motion to call the charter amendment from committee and modify the submission time was approved on two separate votes, each with a tally of 7 ayes and 2 noes. Supervisors Preston and Ronin voted against; Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Engardio, Mandelman, Peskin, Safai, and Stephanie voted in favor. (Supervisors Melgar and Walton were excused.)
- As a result, the charter amendment (File No. 240544) was called from the Rules Committee and considered later that morning during a subsequent special session at 9:05 a.m., where the board would deliberate on the amendment itself.
Meeting Transcript
You please call the role. Thank you, Mr. President. Supervisor Chan. Chan present, Supervisor Dorsey. Dorsey present, Supervisor Ringardio. Engario present, Supervisor Mandelman. Mandelman present, Supervisor Milgar. Melgar not present, Supervisor Peskin. Present. Peskin present, Supervisor Preston. Preston present, Supervisor Ronin. Ronan present, Supervisor Safai. Safaye present, Supervisor Stephanie. Stephanie present and Supervisor Walton. Walton not present. Mr. President, you have a quorum. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors acknowledges we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramatushalone, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. As the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Rama Tushaloni have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. As guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramatushalone community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. Colleagues, please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Madam Clerk, do we have any communications? I have one, Mr. President. Dated July 17th, 2024 from Board President Aaron Peskin, President of the Board of Supervisors, calling for a special Board of Supervisors meeting today, Tuesday, July 23rd at 9 a.m. to call from committee and to modify time for submission of a charter amendment, uh file number 240544 under Rule 2.22 point one point seven. Additionally, a special board meeting at 905 to uh for the same file, file number 240544, charter amendment pertaining to police staffing and voluntary deferred retirement option program for police department. Thank you, madam clerk. Would you please read the first item? Yes. Referred to the Board of Supervisors is item one, a motion to call from the rules committee the proposed charter amendment file number two four zero five four four on police staffing and a voluntary deferred retirement option program and to modify the amount of time required under board rule 2.22.7 between the first appearance of the proposed subject charter amendment on the board's agenda and the board's order submitting to the electorate for the November 5th, 2024 election. Should the motion be approved to call the charter amendment pertaining to the police staffing and voluntary deferred retirement option program from committee pursuant to board rule 3.38, the charter amendment shall be considered at the next meeting of the Board of Supervisors, which is the 905 a.m. The happening this morning during a special session of the Board of Supervisors. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Uh colleagues, uh as the clerk just said, we have this item at this meeting and then another meeting at 9 05 as to the item on this agenda calling from committee uh file number 240544, supervisor ronin. Thank you. Um colleagues, I wanted to just address why I took the extreme measure of resigning as the rules committee chair. Um I believe that our committee structure is really important to this board. And the reason that it's important to this board is because we are faced with analyzing so many pieces of legislation that we can't possibly go deep enough into every single piece to make an informed decision. That's why we divide the work. We divide the work up. And as rules chair, as chair of every committee that I've ever been a chair of, I have done my job to do that. When I first got the draft proposal, uh, like many of you who signed your name on to it, I I wasn't against it. I I know that we have uh a severe staffing crisis at the police department, and I uh thought originally maybe maybe this is a solution. But as I dug deeper and deeper into the proposal, and and the next item I will share what I've learned. I realize that this is a very mistaken policy that will be highly unpopular among the people, and that I think, colleagues, that you affixed your name to this legislation because you weren't aware of the consequences.
openpublica.com