Government Audit and Oversight Committee Regular Meeting - May 16, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Government Audit and Oversight Committee Regular Meeting - May 16, 2024
The Government Audit and Oversight Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on May 16, 2024, at 6:15 PM UTC (1:15 PM local time). The meeting was chaired by Supervisor Dean Preston, with Vice Chair Catherine Stefani and Supervisor Connie Chan present. The committee considered three regular agenda items: annual reports from two Community Benefit Districts, a behested payment waiver to fund a panda exhibit at the San Francisco Zoo, and closed session settlement items. Notable public comment was received regarding zoo worker conditions.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Corey Hallman, Teamsters Local 856 (public comment on item 3): Expressed concerns about unsafe working conditions, deliberate understaffing, and animal husbandry issues at the San Francisco Zoo under current Executive Director Tanya Peterson. Noted that workers have taken a second vote of no confidence in the director and that the Zoological Society board has hired a third party to investigate.
Discussion Items
-
Items 1 & 2: Central Market and Civic Center Community Benefit District Annual Reports (CY2022) – Jackie Hazelwood (OEWD) and Tracy Everwine (Executive Director of both CBDs) presented. Both districts met all four OEWD benchmarks. Key statistics: Civic Center CBD had a $3.2 million budget, with 34,000 needles collected by staff. Mid-Market CBD had a $1.5 million budget. Both reports were late due to increased COVID-19 recovery demands, but the districts are now on track. Supervisor Preston noted the Civic Center CBD's field team's positive impact. Supervisor Stefani asked about needle pickup locations and proactive vs. 311 responses. Supervisor Chan raised concerns about the closure of the Fulton Gift Gallery and the displacement of vendors; the CBD is planning a vintage market starting August 2024. The items were moved to the full board with positive recommendation.
-
Item 3: Hosting Panda Bears at the San Francisco Zoo – Behested Payment Waiver – Sean Elsbernd, Chief of Staff to the Mayor, presented the resolution to authorize the Mayor, Recreation and Park Department, OEWD, Airport, City Administrator, and Chief of Protocol to solicit donations from private entities to support a panda exhibit, targeting $25 million. Supervisor Safai expressed strong concern about prioritizing pandas over $25 million in cuts to children, youth, and family programs, and introduced a separate resolution. He questioned the zoo's readiness and deferred maintenance. Elsbernd offered to amend the resolution to include DCYF fundraising and noted the city's precedent for such waivers. Supervisor Chan asked about the zoo's readiness, referencing a Chronicle report on an internal investigation. Elsbernd detailed the multi-step process: technical agreement negotiations with China, U.S. Fish and Wildlife permit, and AZA accreditation. The committee discussed the need to list known interested parties (e.g., United Airlines) as required by the behested payment ordinance. Supervisor Stefani expressed support for the pandas as a positive for San Francisco. The committee voted 2-1 (Preston and Chan aye, Stefani no) to continue the item to the call of the chair to allow for amendments clarifying donors, narrowing department scope, specifying the beneficiary (San Francisco Zoological Society), and potentially including broader zoo capital needs.
-
Items 4-10: Settlements of Lawsuits and Unlitigated Claims – Seven items authorizing settlements ranging from $28,732.50 to $350,000. After public comment (none), the committee approved forwarding all items to the full board with positive recommendation without a closed session.
Key Outcomes
- Items 1-2: Moved to full board with positive recommendation (unanimous: 3-0).
- Item 3: Continued to call of the chair (2-1: Preston and Chan aye, Stefani no). The committee expects amendments to list known interested parties, narrow the fundraising scope, clarify the beneficiary, and potentially expand to include other zoo capital needs.
- Items 4-10: Moved to full board with positive recommendation (unanimous: 3-0).
Meeting Transcript
Good morning. This meeting will come to order. Welcome to the May 16, 2024 regular meeting of the government audit and oversight committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. I'm Supervisor Dean Preston, Chair of the Committee, joined by Vice Chair Catherine Stephanie and Supervisor Connie Chan. Committee clerk is Monique Creighton, and we want to thank SFGov TV for staffing this meeting. Madam Clerk, do you have any announcements? Yes. Public comment will be taken on each item on this agenda when your item of interest comes up and public comment is called. Please line up to speak on your right. Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. Email them to the government audit and oversight committee clerk at M-O-N-I-Q-U-E. C-R-A-Y-T-O-N at SFGOV.org. If you submit public comment via email, it will be forwarded to the supervisors and also included as part of the official file. You may also send your written comments via U.S. Postal Service to all office in City Hall 1, Dr. Carlton, be good lit place, room 244, San Francisco, California 94102. If you have any documents you would like to include as part of the file, please submit them to me before the end of the meeting. Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices to prevent any interruptions to today's proceedings. Finally, items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors' agenda of June 4th, 2024, unless otherwise stated. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Please call items one and two together. Yes, items one and two are resolutions approving annual reports for the central market and civic center community benefit districts for calendar year 2022 submitted as required by the property and business improvement district of like 1994 in the district's management agreement with the city. Thank you. Um and these items are uh sponsored by Supervisor Dorsey. Um starting us off will be Jackie Hazelwood, uh Community Benefits District Program uh Director at OEWD. Um, and and as I have before, I want to thank you for your engagement uh with our office in advance of this hearing. Uh the floor is yours. Um Supervisor Chan and Supervisor Stephanie, like you said, Jackie Hazelwood, community benefit district program director with OEWD. Um so as today's presentations mark the final CBD presentations for the fiscal year 21-22 um reporting period. I do just want to acknowledge and thank you, Chair Preston and your staff, particularly Melissa Hernandez for her ongoing communication and back and forth with us in preparing these presentations. So thank you to you and your staff. Um so before you here with me today is Tracy Everwine, the executive director of both of the CBDs, the Civic Center CBD and the Mid Market CBD. So before you hear from Ms. Everwine, I'm gonna go ahead and if if it's all right with you, um, walk through the OEWD presentation on behalf of both of these CBDs. So as you know, CBDs are governed by two pieces of legislation. The first being the California Street and Highways Code, Section 36600, known as the 1994 Act, the second being the San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code, Article 15. OEWD is charged with ensuring that all CBDs are meeting their management plans, specifically that they are providing services as outlined in their plans, and that they are spending assessment funds accordingly. Those find those findings are detailed in the memo in your packets and summarized in today's presentations. So this slide here provides an overview of the CBDs we will be reviewing today. Both are property-based districts with over $1 million in revenue and assessment revenue, particular. Civic Center CBD more recently renewed in 2019 and is now set to expire in 2034, whereas the mid-market CBD is more nearly approaching its potential renewal date in 2028. As a part of our memo process, OEWD staff reviewed the following budget-related benchmarks for each CBD. So benchmark one is comparing the current year budget to the management plan budget. Benchmark two confirms that non-assessment revenue obligations were met. Benchmark three compares current year at budget to actuals, and benchmark four indicates whether the CBD identified carry forward and designated projects. So moving forward with the Civic Center CBD. Civic Center CBD met all four benchmarks. So Civic Center CBD, in terms of their service delivery, the CBD has a strong focus on clean, safe, and activation services. In particular, they provided key services to the district, including but not limited to syringe disposal, graffiti abatement, trash and hazardous waste disposal. And notably during this period, they doubled social service support efforts in comparison with their prior reporting period.
openpublica.com