San Francisco Land Use Committee Regular Meeting – March 17, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San Francisco Land Use and Transportation Committee Regular Meeting – March 17, 2025
The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors held a regular meeting on March 17, 2025, chaired by Supervisor Mirna Melgar, with Vice Chair Cheyenne Chen and Supervisor Bilal Mahmoud. The committee considered four legislative items, all of which were recommended for approval to the full Board. The meeting also included public testimony and a birthday celebration for Chair Melgar.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 1 (Window Replacement Standards): Multiple speakers addressed the committee. Michael Kehen (Foxhill Hill Windows) opposed the legislation, arguing that wood windows are more energy efficient and that the change would benefit large corporations. Sophia O'Neill Roberts (Mission Housing Development Corporation) supported the ordinance, citing cost and time savings for affordable housing providers. Several residents (Garrin, Peter, Julia, Corinne Bruce) expressed support, emphasizing equity, health, noise reduction, and tenant comfort. One speaker raised concerns about wildfire smoke and indoor air quality.
- Item 2 (Interim Housing in Hotels/Motels): Cynthia Gomez of Unite Here Local 2 stated that the union could “live with the amendments” after concerns about unintended consequences were addressed, and thanked the committee.
- Item 3 (Parking Lots Continuation): One speaker made unrelated comments about weather manipulation and road safety, without addressing the specific item.
- Item 4 (447 Bush Street Conversion): One speaker made unrelated comments about immigration and planning code manipulation, without addressing the specific item.
Discussion Items
Item 1: Planning Code – Window Replacement Standards
Supervisor Melgar introduced the ordinance to simplify window replacement regulations, noting that nearly 20,000 window replacement permits had been filed in the past decade. The Planning Commission had recommended approval (6-1) with modifications, including clarifying that the department will not regulate frame and sash materials for replacement windows, adding exceptions for cultural districts, and aligning historic building definitions. The committee adopted those amendments unanimously and sent the amended ordinance to the full Board with a positive recommendation.
Item 2: Planning and Building Codes – Interim Housing in Hotels and Motels
Emily Cohen (Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing) presented clarifying amendments that narrowly limited the ordinance’s scope to the Civic Center Motor Inn (lot 3519-006) and retroactively to three former shelter-in-place hotels (lots 0304-005, 0715-01, 0335-027). After a procedural sequence, the committee: (1) adopted the clarifying amendments unanimously, (2) sent the original amended file to the full Board as a committee report, (3) amended a duplicated file with additional language to allow reestablishment of hotel use for shelter-in-place hotels, and (4) continued the duplicated file to the call of the chair. All motions passed 3-0.
Item 3: Planning Code – Continuation of Nonconforming Public Parking Lots in CMUO and MUR Districts
Madison Tam (Supervisor Dorsey’s office) explained the ordinance would allow existing parking lots in Central SOMA and mixed-use residential districts to continue operating through December 31, 2026, and then apply for a conditional use authorization for up to five more years. The Planning Commission approved the ordinance on March 6, 2025. The committee sent it to the full Board as a committee report unanimously.
Item 4: Planning Code – Conversion of Residential Hotel Rooms to Tourist Hotel Rooms at 447 Bush Street
Deputy City Attorney Brad Rossi and Aaron Starr (Planning Department) presented the ordinance as part of a litigation settlement. The ordinance exempts 447 Bush Street from conditional use requirements for converting 38 residential hotel rooms, while requiring conversion of group housing rooms at other properties in return. The Planning Commission recommended approval unanimously. The committee voted unanimously to send it to the full Board as a committee report.
Key Outcomes
- Item 1: Amended and forwarded to the full Board (March 18, 2025) with a positive recommendation (3-0).
- Item 2: Original file amended and forwarded to the full Board (March 18, 2025) as a committee report (3-0); duplicated file further amended and continued to the call of the chair (3-0).
- Item 3: Forwarded to the full Board (March 18, 2025) as a committee report (3-0).
- Item 4: Forwarded to the full Board (March 18, 2025) as a committee report (3-0).
Meeting Transcript
Okay, good afternoon, everyone. This meeting will come to order. Welcome to the March 17th, 2025 regular meeting of the Land Use and Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. See Happy St. Patrick's Day, everyone. I am Supervisor Mirna Melgar, Chair of the Committee, joined by Vice Chair, Supervisor Cheyenne Chen, and Supervisor Bilal Mahmoud. The committee clerk today is John Carroll, and I would also like to thank Kalina Mendoza from SFGov TV for staffing this meeting and bringing it to our constituents. Mr. Clerk, do you have any announcements? Yes, thank you, Madam Chair. Please ensure that you silenced your cell phones and other electronic devices you've brought with you into the chamber today. If you have any documents to be included as any of today's files, you should submit them to me. Public comment will be taken on each item on today's agenda. When your item of interest comes up and public comment is called, please line up to speak along your right hand side of this room. Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. First, you may send your written public comment to me at J-O-H-N period C A R R O L L at SFGO V dot O R G. Or you may send your written comments via U.S. Postal Service to our office in City Hall. The address is 1, Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, California, 94102. If you submit public comment in writing, I'll forward your comments to the members of this panel and also include your comments as part of the official file on which you are commenting. Items on today's agenda are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors Agenda of March 25th, 2025, unless otherwise stated. Thank you so much. Mr. Clerk, please call item number one. Agenda item number one is an ordinance amending the planning code to limit restrictions on window replacement projects in certain buildings. It affirms the planning department's secret determination and makes appropriate findings throughout the ordinance. And this item is on our agenda as a potential committee report, and it may be sent to the board for consideration tomorrow, March 28th. Sorry, March 18th, 2025. Thank you so much, Mr. Clerk. Uh colleagues, today I am excited to present this legislation to reform how we govern the replacement of windows in homes across our city. Over the past several months, my office has heard from dozens of San Franciscans struggling with unnecessary red tape and excessive costs just to replace their windows. At the same time as we meet our climate action goals and comply with the Bay Area Air Quality Management Agency to electrify our homes and to also make them more efficient. The current planning department standards often force homeowners to pay tens of thousands of dollars for custom wood windows or undergo a burdensome process to prove their home is not a historic resource. When, you know, it's often just single family homes in the middle of the block in uh the sunset or in district seven. Uh it means that tenants are left in drafty rooms, and it means that homeowners are put out tens of thousands of dollars for routine maintenance, not just for the windows, but for the process to uh change them. Over the past uh decade, nearly 20,000 window replacement permits have been filed. With these reforms, we can save San Franciscans millions of dollars while supporting sustainable living. Our city is not a museum, it is a growing, evolving community that should reflect the needs of the people who live there. And I think this is also a legitimate policy discussion over what we'd prioritize uh with our public policy. I want to thank the planning commission for their positive recommendation of this legislation, as well as the very helpful recommendations that they provided, all of which I am adopting and uh have prepared an amendment, which I will introduce. Uh I uh welcome the amendments and have shared the language with you and with the clerk. Um, I also want to thank my colleagues, supervisors in Guardio, Sauter, Cheryl, and Mahmoud for their early co-sponsorship. Um I also want to thank uh Mr. Aaron Starr for uh the collaboration and the helpful guidance uh in this process. Um and now I will turn it over to um Michelle from the planning department who uh will make the presentation. Thank you, Supervisor. Good afternoon, supervisors.
openpublica.com