OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Francisco, California/Land Use and Transportation Committee
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Transportation Committee - September 14, 2026

Land Use and Transportation Committee — Monday, September 14, 2026
BodySan Francisco, California
SessionLand Use and Transportation Committee
DateMonday, September 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 23:54

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:05

Hold on, I'm sorry.

0:06

I'm having technical difficulties with my computer.

0:09

Sorry.

1:22

Okay, let's just get started.

1:29

Okay.

1:31

Welcome everyone to the land use and transportation committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for today, September 14th of 2026.

1:45

And I am joined by my vice chair, Supervisor Cheyenne Chen, and we very much welcome Supervisor Dorsey representing District six.

2:00

Five.

2:01

Six, sorry, uh, here to our commitment to our committee.

2:05

Uh, thank you so much.

2:06

Um we're thrilled to have you and uh look forward to um your contributions to this committee.

2:11

Uh Mr.

2:12

Clerk, do you have any announcements?

2:13

Yes, thank you, Madam Chair.

2:14

Please ensure that you silenced your cell phones and other electronic devices you brought with you into the chamber today.

2:18

If you have any documents that you need to have included as any of today as part of any of today's files, you can submit those documents directly to me.

2:25

Public comment will be taken on each item on today's agenda.

2:27

When your item of interest comes up and public comment is called, please line up to speak along your right-hand side of this room.

2:33

Alternatively, you may submit public comment and writing in either of the following ways.

2:36

First, you may email your comments to me at J-O-H-N, period C-A-R-R-O-L-L at SFGOV.org.

2:43

Or you may send your written comments via U.S.

2:45

Postal Service to our office in City Hall.

2:48

The address is one Dr.

2:50

Carlton B.

2:50

Goodlit Place, room 244, San Francisco, California, 94102.

2:55

If you submit public comment in writing, we will forward your comments to the members of this committee and also include your comments as part of the official file on which you are commenting.

3:03

Items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors Agenda of September 22nd, 2026, unless otherwise stated.

3:13

Okay.

3:13

Uh thank you so much.

3:14

Uh please call item number one.

3:17

Agenda item number one is an ordinance amending the planning code to increase the allowable number and size of signs in mixed-use districts on lots over one half acre and in the mixed-use office district south of Townsend Street, affirming the planning department's determination under sequel making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code section 101.

3:36

And making findings of public necessity convenience and welfare pursuant to planning code section 302.

3:43

Thank you so much.

3:44

Uh Mr.

3:44

Clerk, uh Supervisor Dorsey, thank you for introducing this item and uh the floor is yours.

3:52

Thank you so much, Chair Melgar, and uh I really appreciate the warm welcome to the land use and transportation committee.

3:58

Um after relatively frequent uh guest appearances here at this committee, I look forward to being a full member.

4:04

Um I have always appreciated the attention to detail and professionalism both you and Vice Chair Chen bring to your roles and I hope to follow your example.

4:13

Um I very much appreciate you scheduling three items my office um has been working on for today's meeting.

4:20

Um and everyone has my commitment that uh not all of our meetings will involve me talking as much as I plan to today.

4:26

For item one, Mission Bay.

4:28

Um this is a district six neighborhood that is very much leading San Francisco's economic recovery.

4:34

Uh with many new long-term office tenants, new restaurants, and new amenities.

4:39

Uh my office was approached by a property uh with all th with all three at a large site on Barrie Street for facing Mission Creek.

4:47

Um I actually have a personal history with this building because I actually worked here uh for two years back in 1999 and 2000 during the dot com era when the ballpark was being built.

4:57

This was my stomping ground for a while.

5:00

So today, though, with especially especially with nearby Mission Rock fully opened and thriving, this is exactly the kind of building whose activation and attraction to residents, visitors, and tenants we should be supporting.

5:12

Many of our existing signage controls simply weren't built with larger parcels in mind, and that creates a real mismatch.

5:20

A building occupying a major footprint should have signage that reflects the scale of its presence.

5:26

Mindful of some of the imminent businesses' businesses opening and the unique size and scale of this property, my office decided to pursue a narrow amendment to provide this large multi-tenant site with additional signage options.

5:40

This legislation aligns with the general plan policies, supporting the retention of existing commercial tenants and attractions of new ones.

5:47

It also recognizes that good signage is part of what makes a commercial area work.

5:52

As the staff report notes, this kind of support matters most in mixed-use areas, still working to attract tenants and visitors in our post-pandemic recovery.

6:01

When businesses invest in San Francisco, we should invest in policies that help them and the neighborhoods around them to succeed together.

6:09

I just attended the grand opening of the site's new restaurant, Sergeant Ma last week.

6:14

Their vision for an inclusive and high quality experience for workers and neighborhood residents and visitors is admirable, and I am very much rooting for their success.

6:23

I will say I am grateful to the planning department staff for working through this as quickly as they did to help these businesses and uh at the beginning of their tenures in Mission Bay.

6:33

Uh thanks also to Madison Tam from my office as well as Dan Sider, Veronica Flores, and Lisa Gluckstein from the planning department for their work on this.

6:41

And uh Chair Melgar, I'll send it back to you.

6:45

Thank you so much, Supervisor Dorsey, and thank you for recognizing uh the issue.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Adaptive Reuse Projects███████████████████████████████████████39%
Parks and Recreation███████████████████████████████31%
Procedural█████████████13%
Sign Ordinance████████████12%
Economic Development█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Board of Supervisors Land Use and Transportation Committee Regular Meeting - September 14, 2026

The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on Monday, September 14, 2026, beginning at 9:45 AM, with Chair Melgar presiding. The clerk announced that public comment would be taken on each agenda item and that written comments could be submitted to the clerk's office. The committee considered three items: signage allowances in mixed-use districts, commercial-to-residential adaptive reuse code amendments, and the Transbay Under Ramp Park project involving the Oscar Alley street vacation and conveyance. Items acted upon during the meeting are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors Agenda of September 22, 2026, unless otherwise stated.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public offered comment on Item 1 (Signs in Mixed Use Districts) or Item 3 (Transbay Under Ramp Park).
  • Mark Babson, representing Emerald Fund, San Francisco Housing Developers, expressed support for the adaptive reuse legislation (Item 2). He stated that Emerald Fund converted 100 Van Ness Avenue into 418 apartments in 2015 and has worked with the planning department and other city departments to create incentives to bring projects into financial feasibility. He noted the planning department had been forward-looking but additional adjustments were needed, and he supported the modifications to the legislation.

Discussion Items

Item 1 (File 260679): Planning Code - Signs in Mixed Use Districts

Supervisor Dorsey (District 6) presented the ordinance amending the Planning Code to increase the allowable number and size of signs in mixed-use districts on lots over one half acre and in the mixed-use office district south of Townsend Street, affirming the Planning Department's CEQA determination and making required findings. Dorsey expressed support for the legislation, stating that Mission Bay is leading San Francisco's economic recovery and that good signage is part of what makes a commercial area work, particularly in mixed-use areas still working to attract tenants and visitors in the post-pandemic recovery. He acknowledged the committee was taking a narrow approach and noted the city will adapt the code's existing assumptions around signage as new residential districts are created. Planning staff presented the item. The Planning Commission heard the item on July 30, 2026 and unanimously adopted a recommendation of approval. The committee voted by roll call to send the item to the full Board of Supervisors with a positive recommendation.

Item 2 (File 260771): Planning Code - Commercial to Residential Adaptive Reuse

Supervisor Dorsey presented the ordinance, which builds on prior board actions to facilitate converting underutilized office and commercial space into housing. Dorsey stated that existing code obligations may be incompatible with the physical layout of buildings being converted, and satisfying them can be the difference between a project penciling out and a project never happening. He noted that several new adaptive reuse applications have been submitted and that his office supported the staff recommendations, which were incorporated into version two of the legislation before the committee. The recommended modifications included: waiving the bike parking requirement only where a project does not provide accessory off-street automobile parking; waiving the street frontage requirement for any project providing ground floor accessory off-street parking; and providing that off-street parking and loading requirements in Section 155S shall not apply to any existing off-street parking and loading retained to serve the new residential uses as long as the parking is located within or... (the remainder of the sentence and one additional modification were not captured in the transcript). Staff referenced included Jake Jacob Bentleff of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development and Lily Langwa of the Planning Department. The committee voted to send the item to the full Board of Supervisors with a positive recommendation.

Item 3 (File 260873): Transbay Under Ramp Park Project - Oscar Alley Street Vacation and Conveyance

Supervisor Dorsey presented the ordinance on behalf of Public Works, the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (OCII), and the Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) to facilitate construction of the Under Ramp Park (East Cut Sports and Dog Park), an approximately two-and-a-half-acre public open space planned beneath and around the elevated bus ramp connecting the Salesforce Transit Center to I-80, spanning the blocks between the Transit Center and Folsom Street. The park is a long-planned public amenity identified in multiple city-approved frameworks and essential to the neighborhood's open space network. Planned amenities include multi-sport courts for pickleball, basketball, and soccer; a roughly 20,000-square-foot dog park; a pavilion and amphitheater with retail space; a lawn; and an outdoor fitness area. The ordinance requests: vacation and conveyance of Oscar Alley, a small paper street above the Transbay bus off-ramp, to the TJPA for a nominal fee, with the area found not necessary for city use, containing no utilities, and exempt surplus property under the California Surplus Lands Act; waiver of the Administrative Code Chapter 23 appraisal requirement; sidewalk width changes on Folsom Street between Essex and Second Streets and on Clementina Street between First and Second Streets, including narrowing the sidewalk to create an ADA-accessible passenger loading zone with curb ramps and cutting back the Folsom Street sidewalk to create a 'jog handle' so eastbound bicyclists can turn north into the park when the traffic signal changes; acceptance of a public sidewalk easement from the TJPA; and acceptance of traffic signal infrastructure. Dorsey noted that the board previously vacated the airspace rights over Oscar Alley for the ramp's construction several years ago, and that continued discussions and negotiations with the TJPA since introduction prompted additional amendments circulated in revised legislation, but the overall concept remained unchanged. A motion was made to amend the legislation as described in the revised legislation and continue the item to the September 21, 2026 committee meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 1 (Signs in Mixed Use Districts): Forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors with a positive recommendation following a roll call vote.
  • Item 2 (Commercial to Residential Adaptive Reuse): Forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors with a positive recommendation.
  • Item 3 (Transbay Under Ramp Park): Amended as described in the revised legislation and continued to the September 21, 2026 Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting.
  • Items acted upon are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors Agenda of September 22, 2026, unless otherwise stated.

Note: The agenda also listed numerous items under 'Legislation Under the 30-Day Rule,' including landmark designation ordinances for properties such as the Transamerica Pyramid, Presidio Theatre, Vesuvio Cafe, Finocchio's, and the First AME Zion Church, as well as an item on noncomplying unpermitted residential yard structures. These items were not addressed in the portion of the meeting captured by the available transcript.

Meeting Transcript

Hold on, I'm sorry. I'm having technical difficulties with my computer. Sorry. Okay, let's just get started. Okay. Welcome everyone to the land use and transportation committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for today, September 14th of 2026. And I am joined by my vice chair, Supervisor Cheyenne Chen, and we very much welcome Supervisor Dorsey representing District six. Five. Six, sorry, uh, here to our commitment to our committee. Uh, thank you so much. Um we're thrilled to have you and uh look forward to um your contributions to this committee. Uh Mr. Clerk, do you have any announcements? Yes, thank you, Madam Chair. Please ensure that you silenced your cell phones and other electronic devices you brought with you into the chamber today. If you have any documents that you need to have included as any of today as part of any of today's files, you can submit those documents directly to me. Public comment will be taken on each item on today's agenda. When your item of interest comes up and public comment is called, please line up to speak along your right-hand side of this room. Alternatively, you may submit public comment and writing in either of the following ways. First, you may email your comments to me at J-O-H-N, period C-A-R-R-O-L-L at SFGOV.org. Or you may send your written comments via U.S. Postal Service to our office in City Hall. The address is one Dr. Carlton B. Goodlit Place, room 244, San Francisco, California, 94102. If you submit public comment in writing, we will forward your comments to the members of this committee and also include your comments as part of the official file on which you are commenting. Items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors Agenda of September 22nd, 2026, unless otherwise stated. Okay. Uh thank you so much. Uh please call item number one. Agenda item number one is an ordinance amending the planning code to increase the allowable number and size of signs in mixed-use districts on lots over one half acre and in the mixed-use office district south of Townsend Street, affirming the planning department's determination under sequel making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code section 101. And making findings of public necessity convenience and welfare pursuant to planning code section 302. Thank you so much. Uh Mr. Clerk, uh Supervisor Dorsey, thank you for introducing this item and uh the floor is yours. Thank you so much, Chair Melgar, and uh I really appreciate the warm welcome to the land use and transportation committee. Um after relatively frequent uh guest appearances here at this committee, I look forward to being a full member. Um I have always appreciated the attention to detail and professionalism both you and Vice Chair Chen bring to your roles and I hope to follow your example. Um I very much appreciate you scheduling three items my office um has been working on for today's meeting. Um and everyone has my commitment that uh not all of our meetings will involve me talking as much as I plan to today. For item one, Mission Bay. Um this is a district six neighborhood that is very much leading San Francisco's economic recovery. Uh with many new long-term office tenants, new restaurants, and new amenities. Uh my office was approached by a property uh with all th with all three at a large site on Barrie Street for facing Mission Creek. Um I actually have a personal history with this building because I actually worked here uh for two years back in 1999 and 2000 during the dot com era when the ballpark was being built. This was my stomping ground for a while. So today, though, with especially especially with nearby Mission Rock fully opened and thriving, this is exactly the kind of building whose activation and attraction to residents, visitors, and tenants we should be supporting. Many of our existing signage controls simply weren't built with larger parcels in mind, and that creates a real mismatch. A building occupying a major footprint should have signage that reflects the scale of its presence. Mindful of some of the imminent businesses' businesses opening and the unique size and scale of this property, my office decided to pursue a narrow amendment to provide this large multi-tenant site with additional signage options.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com