OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Francisco Planning Commission Meeting - June 26, 2025

Planning CommissionThursday, June 26, 2025
BodySan Francisco, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, June 26, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

Okay, good afternoon and welcome to the San Francisco Planning Commission hearing for Thursday, June 26th, 2025.

0:12

When we reach the item you were interested in speaking to, we ask that you line up on the screen side of the room or to your right.

0:18

Each speaker will be allowed up to three minutes.

0:20

And when you have 30 seconds remaining, you will hear a chime indicating your time is almost up.

0:25

When your allotted time is reached, I will announce that your time is up and take the next person cued to speak.

0:30

There is a very convenient timer on the podium where you can watch how much time you have left and watch your time tick down.

0:36

Please speak clearly and slowly.

0:38

And if you care to state your name for the record.

0:41

I ask that we silence any mobile devices that may sound off during these proceedings.

0:45

And finally, I will remind members of the public that the Commission does not tolerate any disruption or outbursts of any kind.

0:52

At this time, I would like to take roll, Commission President So.

0:55

Present.

0:55

Commission Vice President Moore.

0:57

Commissioner Braun, Commissioner Campbell, Commissioner Imperial.

1:01

Here.

1:03

And Commissioner Williams.

1:04

Here.

1:04

We expect Commissioner McGarry to be absent today.

1:07

First, on your agenda, Commissioners is consideration of items proposed for continuance.

1:11

Item 1, case number 2024, 005943 C UA at 61 through 61A, Colward Street conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance to July 10th, 2025.

1:24

Item 2, case number 2024, hyphen 011548 DRP-02 at 2867 Green Street discretionary review is proposed for continuance to July 31, 2025.

1:37

Item 3, case number 2015, hyphen 012491 ENV for the San Francisco Gateway Project at 749 Tollen Street and 2000 McKinnon Avenue.

1:48

Certification Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and Items 4A through E for the same property address.

1:59

Case numbers 2015, hyphen 0, 12491, ENV, PCA, MAP, DVA, CWP, and C UA for the adoption of findings, code amendments, development agreement, design standards, and conditional use authorization are also proposed for continuance to July 10th, 2025.

2:26

Further Commissioners under your consent calendar.

2:30

Items 9A and B for case numbers 2024, hyphen 004318 SHD and C UA at 350 Amber Drive.

2:38

Shadow findings and conditional use authorization are proposed for continuance to July 24th.

2:45

And items 11A and B for case numbers 2024, hyphen 005966, C UA and VAR at 425 Broadway, the conditional use authorization and variants are proposed for continuance to July 10th, 2025.

2:59

I have no other items proposed for continuance, so we should take public comment.

3:03

Members of the public, this is your opportunity to address the Commissioners on any of these items proposed for continuance, only on the matter of continuance.

3:12

You need to come forward.

3:37

Ask yourself, why is Bayview being made an exception?

3:42

San Francisco spent years fighting terrain in Amazon and other parcel delivery giants because of significant impacts.

3:50

Our city leaders passed laws to slow this down to protect the communities.

3:55

So why now?

3:56

Why here?

3:57

Why are we throwing open the doors to a two million square foot delivery hub right in the middle of a neighborhood that is already overburdened?

4:05

Ma'am, I'm going to interrupt you.

4:07

Excuse me, ma'am.

4:07

I'm going to interrupt you because we are taking public comment on the matter of the community.

4:10

I am talking, I am asking to use this time and continuance to consider some of these questions.

4:15

So this is relevant to your uh your item number.

4:18

Uh the project gateway, the Prologue Gateway project will directly allow the very uses, parcel delivery, warehouse trucking, and massive parking garages that the city just worked so hard to regulate.

4:30

Well, why are we carving out a special zone that lets Prolagus, Amazon, FedEx, and others bypass protections that still apply everywhere else?

4:38

Why is Bayview always asked to bear the burden?

4:40

Let's be clear.

4:41

Prolagis says they don't have Amazon locked in, but Pilag's bill is building this for Amazon.

4:46

Amazon is already on the site.

4:48

So we know how the story goes.

4:50

And I ask you, who benefits from this deal?

4:53

It's not the people breathing emissions.

4:54

It's not the families dealing with asthma.

4:57

It's not our neighbors stuck with more trucks, more noise, more pollution.

5:00

Did you know that tire wear from these delivery vans produce more pollution than tailpipes?

5:05

I'm done.

5:06

The continuance gives you time to reconsider that please use that time wisely.

5:11

Thank you.

5:17

Hello, my name is Judy Kurtz.

5:20

I'm with um Thousand Grandmothers for future generations.

5:24

We also want you to take time to consider why this is being postponed yet again.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use█████████████████████21%
Affordable Housing███████████11%
Procedural██████████10%
Small Business Support██████████10%
Permit Process████████8%
Public Comment██████6%
Public Engagement██████6%
Technology And Infrastructure████4%
Environmental Review███3%
Summary of Proceedings

San Francisco Planning Commission Meeting - June 26, 2025

The San Francisco Planning Commission met on Thursday, June 26, 2025, from approximately 1:15 PM to after 8:00 PM. The meeting covered a wide range of items including continuances, consent calendar approvals, commission matters, department updates, and multiple planning code amendments. Key topics included a controversial warehouse project in Bayview, a package of small business reforms, and an informational presentation on the city's Family Zoning Plan.

Consent Calendar

  • Items 5-8, 10: Approved unanimously (6-0) under the consent calendar: 3319 Sacramento Street, 220 Lombard Street No. 11, 572 Chestnut Street, 214 California Street Suite 2, and 2400 Noriega Street – all conditional use authorizations.
  • Commission Matters: Approved draft minutes from June 5 and June 12, 2025, unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • San Francisco Gateway Project (Items 3-4): Multiple speakers from Bayview-Hunters Point expressed strong opposition to the proposed 2-million-square-foot delivery hub at 749 Toland Street and 2000 McKinnon Avenue. Speakers argued the project would increase pollution, harm public health, and disproportionately burden an already overburdened community. They criticized repeated continuances, stating it suppressed community voices. Speakers included Judy Kurtz (Thousand Grandmothers), Mishua Lee (36-year resident), Ana Priya Gupta (Green Action), and Rochelle Holmes (ATB All Things Bay View).
  • Cell Towers: Several speakers from Diamond Heights requested the commission hold an educational presentation by Dr. Kent Chamberlain of the New Hampshire State Commission on wireless facility safety and siting before any future approvals.
  • General Public Comment: Speakers addressed demolition definitions, priority processing, and other concerns.

Discussion Items

  • Item 17 – Noncomplying and Accessory Structures (Planning Code Amendment): Supervisor Joel Engardio presented the ordinance to simplify repair/replacement of rear-yard structures (sheds, decks, etc.) by allowing larger sizes (up to 120 sq ft, 10 ft tall) and treating pre-2003 unpermitted structures as noncomplying. Staff recommended modifications to clarify no dwelling units, allow relocation for life safety, and remove refund provisions. Approved 5-1 (Commissioner Moore dissenting).
  • Items 18-21 – Package of Small Business Reforms: The commission heard four ordinances aimed at reducing permitting barriers for small businesses: (18) fenestration/transparency/sign requirements and downtown/RC district uses, (19) temporary use authorizations, (20) sign amnesty and security gates, (21A/B) priority processing consolidation. Public comment was generally supportive, with some opposition from Calle 24 Latino Cultural District and North Beach organizations regarding inclusion in the priority processing program. After deliberation, the commission voted separately on each item:
    • Item 18: Approved 6-0 with staff modifications, including a 2030 sunset for ground-floor office uses in C3 districts.
    • Item 19: Approved 6-0.
    • Item 20: Approved 6-0.
    • Items 21A/B: Approved 6-0 with a modification to carve out Calle 24 and North Beach from the priority processing program, after concerns from neighborhood groups.
  • Item 22 – Streamlining Reporting Requirements: The ordinance would reduce 52 reporting requirements in the planning code to 16, replacing paper reports with online dashboards. Staff presented data tools. Commissioner Williams expressed concern about public access and moved to continue with an informational presentation (failed 3-3). The subsequent motion to approve with modifications passed 4-2 (Commissioners Williams and Moore dissenting).
  • Item 23 – Family Zoning Plan (Informational Presentation): Staff presented the mayor's legislation to rezone large portions of the city to allow more housing types, including upzoning along transit corridors. A financial feasibility study showed most prototypes are currently infeasible, but low- and mid-rise projects could become viable under improved conditions. Public comment was divided: some residents opposed height increases and potential demolition of rent-controlled units, while others supported the plan for creating more housing opportunities. Commissioners discussed tenant protections, affordable housing funding, and the need for ongoing community engagement. No vote was taken; the item will return for action in September.

Key Outcomes

  • Continuances Granted: Items 1 (61-61A Coleridge St), 2 (2867 Green St), 9a/b (350 Amber Dr), and 11a/b (425 Broadway) were continued to July 10, 2025 (except 9a/b to July 24). Items 3-4 (San Francisco Gateway Project) were initially continued to July 10, but later re-continued to September 11, 2025, after a request from Supervisor Walton.
  • Item 17: Approved 5-1 with staff modifications.
  • Items 18-21: All approved unanimously (6-0) with modifications as noted, including carving out Calle 24 and North Beach from Item 21.
  • Item 22: Approved 4-2 to streamline reporting requirements.
  • Item 23: Informational only; further hearings scheduled for July 17 and September.
  • Commission Announcements: The commission welcomed Sarah Dennis Phillips as the new planning director (starting Monday) and thanked outgoing Director Rich Hillis for his service.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, good afternoon and welcome to the San Francisco Planning Commission hearing for Thursday, June 26th, 2025. When we reach the item you were interested in speaking to, we ask that you line up on the screen side of the room or to your right. Each speaker will be allowed up to three minutes. And when you have 30 seconds remaining, you will hear a chime indicating your time is almost up. When your allotted time is reached, I will announce that your time is up and take the next person cued to speak. There is a very convenient timer on the podium where you can watch how much time you have left and watch your time tick down. Please speak clearly and slowly. And if you care to state your name for the record. I ask that we silence any mobile devices that may sound off during these proceedings. And finally, I will remind members of the public that the Commission does not tolerate any disruption or outbursts of any kind. At this time, I would like to take roll, Commission President So. Present. Commission Vice President Moore. Commissioner Braun, Commissioner Campbell, Commissioner Imperial. Here. And Commissioner Williams. Here. We expect Commissioner McGarry to be absent today. First, on your agenda, Commissioners is consideration of items proposed for continuance. Item 1, case number 2024, 005943 C UA at 61 through 61A, Colward Street conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance to July 10th, 2025. Item 2, case number 2024, hyphen 011548 DRP-02 at 2867 Green Street discretionary review is proposed for continuance to July 31, 2025. Item 3, case number 2015, hyphen 012491 ENV for the San Francisco Gateway Project at 749 Tollen Street and 2000 McKinnon Avenue. Certification Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and Items 4A through E for the same property address. Case numbers 2015, hyphen 0, 12491, ENV, PCA, MAP, DVA, CWP, and C UA for the adoption of findings, code amendments, development agreement, design standards, and conditional use authorization are also proposed for continuance to July 10th, 2025. Further Commissioners under your consent calendar. Items 9A and B for case numbers 2024, hyphen 004318 SHD and C UA at 350 Amber Drive. Shadow findings and conditional use authorization are proposed for continuance to July 24th. And items 11A and B for case numbers 2024, hyphen 005966, C UA and VAR at 425 Broadway, the conditional use authorization and variants are proposed for continuance to July 10th, 2025. I have no other items proposed for continuance, so we should take public comment. Members of the public, this is your opportunity to address the Commissioners on any of these items proposed for continuance, only on the matter of continuance. You need to come forward. Ask yourself, why is Bayview being made an exception? San Francisco spent years fighting terrain in Amazon and other parcel delivery giants because of significant impacts. Our city leaders passed laws to slow this down to protect the communities. So why now? Why here? Why are we throwing open the doors to a two million square foot delivery hub right in the middle of a neighborhood that is already overburdened? Ma'am, I'm going to interrupt you. Excuse me, ma'am. I'm going to interrupt you because we are taking public comment on the matter of the community. I am talking, I am asking to use this time and continuance to consider some of these questions. So this is relevant to your uh your item number. Uh the project gateway, the Prologue Gateway project will directly allow the very uses, parcel delivery, warehouse trucking, and massive parking garages that the city just worked so hard to regulate. Well, why are we carving out a special zone that lets Prolagus, Amazon, FedEx, and others bypass protections that still apply everywhere else? Why is Bayview always asked to bear the burden? Let's be clear. Prolagis says they don't have Amazon locked in, but Pilag's bill is building this for Amazon. Amazon is already on the site. So we know how the story goes. And I ask you, who benefits from this deal?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com